Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer (HRBC)
Primary Purpose
Breast Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hypofractionated Radiation therapy
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast cancer, hypofractionated radiotherapy, Hypofractionated radiation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Invasive carcinoma of the breast
- Breast conservation surgery or mastectomy
- Axillary staging &/or dissection
- Complete microscopic excision of primary tumour
- pT1-3 pN0-2 M0 disease
- Written informed consent
- Able to comply with follow up
Exclusion Criteria:
- Past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer and CIN cervix uteri or (ii) non-breast malignancy allowed if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease free
- Contralateral breast cancer, including DCIS, irrespective of date of diagnosis
- Breast reconstruction using implants
- Concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy (sequential neoadjuvant or adjuvant cytotoxic therapy allowed)
Sites / Locations
- Dr Budhi Singh Yadav
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Study
Control
Arm Description
Patients with breast cancer post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery to be treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy dose of 34Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks.
Patients with breast cancer post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery to be treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy dose of 35Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Local Recurrence
Any recurrence with in the irradiated area from completion of radiation
Secondary Outcome Measures
Acute skin toxicity
Acute toxicity will be assessed using a RTOG grading system. Assessment will be carried out weekly during radiotherapy and for 4 weeks after treatment.
Cosmetic assessment
done using Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Bowel and Breast Project(NSABP)/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group(RTOG) breast cosmesis grading scale. Grading will be done as Excellent- no or minimal difference between two breasts,Good- slight difference between two breasts,Good- slight and Fair minimal difference between two breasts, Fair- obvious difference between two breasts Poor- marked difference between two breasts. Excellent/good and fair/poor will be considered better and worse outcomes, respectively.
Quality of life
EORTC QLQ -30 The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, as well as five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items.The scores must be averaged and linearly transformed to obtain a range of scores from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a greater response level. Thus, a high score for a functional scale represents a healthy level of functioning and a high score for the global health status represents a high QoL, but a high score for the symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
Quality of life
EORTC QLQ-BR 23 It contains 23 items rated on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The items assess the side effects of therapy, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, body image, and sexual function. Additionally, there are single items assessing sexual enjoyment, anxiety caused by hair loss, and future outlook. The scores range between 0-100 points. For scales evaluating function, a higher score represents a higher level of functioning. For scales evaluating symptoms, a higher score indicates more severe symptoms.
Disease free survival
Time interval free from locoregional recurrence and metastasis
Overall survival
From the date of diagnosis to death
Arm edema
Will be graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus. Treated side will be compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. It will be classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm.
Late effects- pain, shoulder stiffness
A four point scale(none, a little, quite a bit, very much ) will be used to asess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale(Cox et al, 1995).
Late effects- Brachial plexopathy
If the patient had symptoms of pain in the arm, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, or other sensory symptoms then injury to the brachial plexus will be suspected and reported as brachial plexopathy.
Late effects- Lung, cardiac
Late lung and cardiac toxicity asess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale (Cox et al, 1995).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04075058
First Posted
October 26, 2015
Last Updated
June 22, 2021
Sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04075058
Brief Title
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
Acronym
HRBC
Official Title
A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Two Adjuvant Hypofractionated Radiation Schedules in Patients With Breast Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators at PGIMER have been practicing hypofractionation radiotherapy with a dose of 35Gy/15#/3wks to the chest wall in post mastectomy and 40Gy/16#/3wks in breast conservation in breast cancer patients for the last 4 decades. It is also a routine practice in UK and few centers in Canada. Hypofractionation reduces treatment time to half while maintaining cosmesis and gives control rates equal to conventional fractionation. As breast cancer is a leading cancer in females and radiation therapy is an important part of its local management, hypofractionation help the radiation centers worldwide to meet the growing need for radiation in breast cancer, particularly in developing countries where resources are limited. It also reduces the financial burden on the patient and family. In this study the investigators want to reduce the treatment duration from 3 weeks to 2 weeks. The study will include 1000 patients, 500 in each arm, with breast cancer post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery to be treated with a radiotherapy dose of 34Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks in the study arm and 35Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks in the control arm. The primary endpoint of the study will be ipsilateral local tumour control. Secondary endpoints will be early and late adverse effects in normal tissues, quality of life, contralateral primary tumours, regional and distant metastases and survival.
Detailed Description
Patients to be included in this study will be pre-operatively staged according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, International Union against cancer ( which uses TNM staging ) as stage I-III of breast carcinoma. Total 500 patients of histologically proven post lumpectomy/mastectomy cases of carcinoma breast suitable for radiotherapy will be enrolled in this study. Patients would be evaluated at the Department of Radiotherapy PGIMER, Chandigarh by doing a thorough clinical examination followed by routine investigations which will include hemogram, liver function tests, kidney function tests, chest X-ray. Patients will be treated by standard rectangular tangential fields.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast cancer, hypofractionated radiotherapy, Hypofractionated radiation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1070 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Study
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with breast cancer post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery to be treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy dose of 34Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with breast cancer post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery to be treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy dose of 35Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Hypofractionated Radiation therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Local Recurrence
Description
Any recurrence with in the irradiated area from completion of radiation
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acute skin toxicity
Description
Acute toxicity will be assessed using a RTOG grading system. Assessment will be carried out weekly during radiotherapy and for 4 weeks after treatment.
Time Frame
After 1 month of completion of radiation
Title
Cosmetic assessment
Description
done using Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Bowel and Breast Project(NSABP)/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group(RTOG) breast cosmesis grading scale. Grading will be done as Excellent- no or minimal difference between two breasts,Good- slight difference between two breasts,Good- slight and Fair minimal difference between two breasts, Fair- obvious difference between two breasts Poor- marked difference between two breasts. Excellent/good and fair/poor will be considered better and worse outcomes, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Title
Quality of life
Description
EORTC QLQ -30 The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, as well as five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items.The scores must be averaged and linearly transformed to obtain a range of scores from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a greater response level. Thus, a high score for a functional scale represents a healthy level of functioning and a high score for the global health status represents a high QoL, but a high score for the symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
Time Frame
3 year, 5 year
Title
Quality of life
Description
EORTC QLQ-BR 23 It contains 23 items rated on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The items assess the side effects of therapy, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, body image, and sexual function. Additionally, there are single items assessing sexual enjoyment, anxiety caused by hair loss, and future outlook. The scores range between 0-100 points. For scales evaluating function, a higher score represents a higher level of functioning. For scales evaluating symptoms, a higher score indicates more severe symptoms.
Time Frame
3 year, 5 year
Title
Disease free survival
Description
Time interval free from locoregional recurrence and metastasis
Time Frame
5 years, 10 years
Title
Overall survival
Description
From the date of diagnosis to death
Time Frame
5 years, 10 years
Title
Arm edema
Description
Will be graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus. Treated side will be compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. It will be classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm.
Time Frame
3 years, 5 years, 10 years
Title
Late effects- pain, shoulder stiffness
Description
A four point scale(none, a little, quite a bit, very much ) will be used to asess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale(Cox et al, 1995).
Time Frame
3 years, 5 years, 10 years
Title
Late effects- Brachial plexopathy
Description
If the patient had symptoms of pain in the arm, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, or other sensory symptoms then injury to the brachial plexus will be suspected and reported as brachial plexopathy.
Time Frame
3 years, 5 years, 10 years
Title
Late effects- Lung, cardiac
Description
Late lung and cardiac toxicity asess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale (Cox et al, 1995).
Time Frame
5 years, 10 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Invasive carcinoma of the breast
Breast conservation surgery or mastectomy
Axillary staging &/or dissection
Complete microscopic excision of primary tumour
pT1-3 pN0-2 M0 disease
Written informed consent
Able to comply with follow up
Exclusion Criteria:
Past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer and CIN cervix uteri or (ii) non-breast malignancy allowed if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease free
Contralateral breast cancer, including DCIS, irrespective of date of diagnosis
Breast reconstruction using implants
Concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy (sequential neoadjuvant or adjuvant cytotoxic therapy allowed)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Budhi S Yadav, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dr Budhi Singh Yadav
City
Chandigarh
State/Province
N/A = Not Applicable
ZIP/Postal Code
91 160012
Country
India
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17963907
Citation
Yadav BS. Accelerated partial breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jan;90(1):161. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Oct 25. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17961777
Citation
Yadav BS, Sharma SC, Patel FD, Ghoshal S, Kapoor RK. Second primary in the contralateral breast after treatment of breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2008 Feb;86(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25022378
Citation
Yadav BS, Sharma SC, George P, Bansal A. Post-mastectomy radiation beyond chest wall in patients with N1 breast cancer: is there a benefit? J Cancer Res Ther. 2014 Apr-Jun;10(2):279-83. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.136560.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18804919
Citation
Yadav BS, Sharma SC, Patel FD, Ghoshal S, Kapoor R, Kumar R. Nonbreast second malignancies after treatment of primary breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):1489-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs