search
Back to results

ICE Based Atrial Flutter Ablation Vs Conventional Fluoroscopy/Anatomical Mapping Based Ablation - ICE Flutter Study

Primary Purpose

Atrial Flutter

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
3D electroanatomical mapping alone guided CTI ablation
ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation
Sponsored by
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atrial Flutter focused on measuring Atrial Flutter, Ablation, Intra-cardiac echocardiogram (ICE)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients undergoing typical CTI dependent AFL who give informed consent for participation in the study will be included.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients in whom placement of an ICE catheter in the right atrium for adequate atrial visualization is technically not feasible.
  • Patients who cannot give an informed consent will be excluded.
  • Patients in who vascular access for the 11F sheath is not feasible will be excluded. Those with left iliac vein stenosis or left groin arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or prior left groin access complications will be excluded.
  • Patients who on the EP (Electrophysiology) study are found to have a left sided arrhythmia needing transseptal access will be excluded.
  • Patients who during EP study are found to have atypical flutter pathways including Left Atrial (LA)/Left sided flutter as above, atypical pathways outside of the CTI, and scar based- reentry pathways.

Sites / Locations

  • Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
  • Midwest Heart and Vascular Specialists
  • Overland Park Regional Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

3D electroanatomical mapping alone

ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping

Arm Description

Patients who are diagnosed with typical right sided flutter who are scheduled for an ablation procedure will be enrolled. Informed consent will be obtained from each of them prior to the procedure. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either 3D electroanatomical mapping alone vs ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation. Operators will plan to alternate each case with the use of ICE + 3D mapping and 3D mapping alone with one method followed by the other for randomization. All patients will have the standard access sheaths placed in the right femoral vein.

Patients who are diagnosed with typical right sided flutter who are scheduled for an ablation procedure will be enrolled. Informed consent will be obtained from each of them prior to the procedure. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either 3D electroanatomical mapping alone vs ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation. Operators will plan to alternate each case with the use of ICE + 3D mapping and 3D mapping alone with one method followed by the other for randomization. All patients will have the standard access sheaths placed in the right femoral vein. The group randomized to ICE catheter placement will have a left femoral 11F sheath placed in addition.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF time assessment
To assess the procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF time of patients undergoing CTI dependent flutter ablation using ICE catheter along with 3D anatomical plus fluoroscopy imaging guidance compared to the same parameters in patients undergoing CTI dependent flutter ablation using only 3D anatomical plus fluoroscopy imaging guidance alone.
Post procedural complications
To assess the incidence of post procedural complications such as incidence of perforation, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and pericarditis.
Procedural success - Number of patients with bidirectional block (entrance block and exit block) at the end of the procedure.
To assess the procedural success of ablation procedures in terms of achieving bidirectional block.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 28, 2021
Last Updated
February 3, 2022
Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05229848
Brief Title
ICE Based Atrial Flutter Ablation Vs Conventional Fluoroscopy/Anatomical Mapping Based Ablation - ICE Flutter Study
Official Title
Prospective Comparison of ICE Based Atrial Flutter Ablation Vs Conventional Fluoroscopy/Anatomical Mapping Based Ablation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
February 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
April 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), has been an essential component of Radiofrequency (RF) ablations for AF given its association with decreased fluoroscopy time and complication rates, and therefore it is logical that this can be applied to CTI ablations for AFL as well. There are however no studies to date that directly focused on the benefits of adding ICE during CTI dependent AFL ablation. Currently it is not required that operators use ICE in every case of AFL ablation. Investigators intended to study the routine use of ICE in such cases and to see if there is a significant benefit in routine use of ICE.
Detailed Description
Atrial flutter (AFL) is a re-entrant tachyarrhythmia that involves the atria that leads to both rapid ventricular rates as well as a loss of effective contractility of the atrial making them vulnerable to formation of thrombi similar to atrial fibrillation (AF). Incidence rates ranges between 5/100,000 in those <50 years old to 587/100,000 in subjects older than 80. AFL often coexists or precedes AF. In a longitudinal study, 56% of patients with lone AFL eventually developed AF. A variety of atrial flutters have been described apart from the classic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent flutters. These include left atrial flutters and scar based reentry flutters. Atrial flutter is often a persistent rhythm that requires electrical cardioversion or radiofrequency catheter ablation for termination. While AFL may recur after cardioversion with or without antiarrhythmic therapy, ablation offers a more curative approach for this rather intolerant arrhythmia. 3D electroanatomical mapping in combination with fluoroscopy has been traditionally used in conventional CTI ablation for AFL. However, there are instances when ablation of the CTI is challenging as a result of various factors including a thick Eustachian ridge, presence of a sub-Eustachian pouch, or prominent pectinate muscles. Isthmus anatomy has been shown to affect the parameters of ablation procedure. 3D mapping to overcome difficult anatomy may not be the answer for difficult situations as shown by some operators . These anatomical challenges can not only lengthen procedural times but also lead to increased risk of complications such as perforation, effusion, or cardiac tamponade. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), has been an essential component of Radiofrequency (RF) ablations for AF given its association with decreased fluoroscopy time and complication rates, and therefore it is logical that this can be applied to CTI ablations for AFL as well. There are however no studies to date that directly focused on the benefits of adding ICE during CTI dependent AFL ablation. Currently it is not required that operators use ICE in every case of AFL ablation. Investigators intend to study the routine use of ICE in such cases and to see if there is a significant benefit in routine use of ICE.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Flutter
Keywords
Atrial Flutter, Ablation, Intra-cardiac echocardiogram (ICE)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Total 60 patients will be studied. St.Jude View Flex ICE catheter and Siemens AcuNav ICE catheter are used routinely for all left sided ablation procedures which require transeptal puncture. ICE imaging catheter is typically introduced through an 11-F hemostatic sheath and positioned under fluoroscopic guidance in right atrium. After catheter coupling to the imaging platform, imaging frequency is optimized using adjunctive gain, depth, and focal length controls to define anatomic structures and minimize noise.Imaging is performed at different levels in right atrium, if needed. Imaging targets included right atrium, coronary sinus orifice, fossa ovalis, interatrial septum(IAS), tricuspid valve,left atrium, left atrial appendage, orifice of all pulmonary veins,mitral valve, papillary muscles, aortic and pulmonary valve leaflets, right ventricle, right ventricular outflow tract(RVOT),pericardial space,esophagus,aorta and adjoining left ventricular and right ventricular myocardium.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
3D electroanatomical mapping alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients who are diagnosed with typical right sided flutter who are scheduled for an ablation procedure will be enrolled. Informed consent will be obtained from each of them prior to the procedure. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either 3D electroanatomical mapping alone vs ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation. Operators will plan to alternate each case with the use of ICE + 3D mapping and 3D mapping alone with one method followed by the other for randomization. All patients will have the standard access sheaths placed in the right femoral vein.
Arm Title
ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who are diagnosed with typical right sided flutter who are scheduled for an ablation procedure will be enrolled. Informed consent will be obtained from each of them prior to the procedure. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either 3D electroanatomical mapping alone vs ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation. Operators will plan to alternate each case with the use of ICE + 3D mapping and 3D mapping alone with one method followed by the other for randomization. All patients will have the standard access sheaths placed in the right femoral vein. The group randomized to ICE catheter placement will have a left femoral 11F sheath placed in addition.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
3D electroanatomical mapping alone guided CTI ablation
Intervention Description
3D electroanatomical mapping in combination with fluoroscopy has been traditionally used in conventional CTI ablation for AFL.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation
Intervention Description
ICE imaging catheter is typically introduced through an 11-F hemostatic sheath and positioned under fluoroscopic guidance in the right atrium. After catheter coupling to the imaging platform, imaging frequency is optimized by the operator using adjunctive gain, depth, and focal length controls to define anatomic structures and minimize noise. Imaging is performed at different levels in the right atrium, if needed. Imaging targets included the right atrium, coronary sinus orifice, fossa ovalis, interatrial septum (IAS), tricuspid valve, left atrium, left atrial appendage, orifice of all pulmonary veins, mitral valve, papillary muscles, aortic and pulmonary valve leaflets, right ventricle, RVOT, pericardial space, esophagus, aorta and adjoining left ventricular and right ventricular myocardium.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF time assessment
Description
To assess the procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF time of patients undergoing CTI dependent flutter ablation using ICE catheter along with 3D anatomical plus fluoroscopy imaging guidance compared to the same parameters in patients undergoing CTI dependent flutter ablation using only 3D anatomical plus fluoroscopy imaging guidance alone.
Time Frame
These are all intraprocedural characteristics
Title
Post procedural complications
Description
To assess the incidence of post procedural complications such as incidence of perforation, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and pericarditis.
Time Frame
Post-operative Day#0-7
Title
Procedural success - Number of patients with bidirectional block (entrance block and exit block) at the end of the procedure.
Description
To assess the procedural success of ablation procedures in terms of achieving bidirectional block.
Time Frame
End of procedure marker of success

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All patients undergoing typical CTI dependent AFL who give informed consent for participation in the study will be included. Exclusion criteria: Patients in whom placement of an ICE catheter in the right atrium for adequate atrial visualization is technically not feasible. Patients who cannot give an informed consent will be excluded. Patients in who vascular access for the 11F sheath is not feasible will be excluded. Those with left iliac vein stenosis or left groin arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or prior left groin access complications will be excluded. Patients who on the EP (Electrophysiology) study are found to have a left sided arrhythmia needing transseptal access will be excluded. Patients who during EP study are found to have atypical flutter pathways including Left Atrial (LA)/Left sided flutter as above, atypical pathways outside of the CTI, and scar based- reentry pathways.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Donita Atkins
Phone
8166511969
Email
datkins@kchrf.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66211
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donita Atkins
Phone
816-651-1969
Email
Donita.Atkins@kchrf.com
Facility Name
Midwest Heart and Vascular Specialists
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66211
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donita Atkins
Phone
816-651-1969
Email
datkins@kchrf.com
Facility Name
Overland Park Regional Medical Center
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66215
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donita Atkins
Phone
816-651-1969
Email
datkins@kchrf.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11127467
Citation
Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, Maassen K, Vierkant R, Smith PN, Hayes J, Eaker E, Vidaillet H. Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Dec;36(7):2242-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00982-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14970149
Citation
Halligan SC, Gersh BJ, Brown RD Jr, Rosales AG, Munger TM, Shen WK, Hammill SC, Friedman PA. The natural history of lone atrial flutter. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 17;140(4):265-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-4-200402170-00008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25838435
Citation
Bun SS, Latcu DG, Marchlinski F, Saoudi N. Atrial flutter: more than just one of a kind. Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 14;36(35):2356-63. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv118. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24685669
Citation
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2305-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20811537
Citation
Sehar N, Mears J, Bisco S, Patel S, Lachman N, Asirvatham SJ. Anatomic guidance for ablation: atrial flutter, fibrillation, and outflow tract ventricular tachycardia. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Aug 10;10(8):339-56.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15326078
Citation
Da Costa A, Faure E, Thevenin J, Messier M, Bernard S, Abdel K, Robin C, Romeyer C, Isaaz K. Effect of isthmus anatomy and ablation catheter on radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1030-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000139845.40818.75. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26305365
Citation
Schernthaner C, Haidinger B, Brandt MC, Kraus J, Danmayr F, Hoppe UC, Strohmer B. The influence of cavotricuspid isthmus length on total radiofrequency energy to cure right atrial flutter. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(3):237-43. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0159. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10745552
Citation
Cohen TJ, Ibrahim B, Lazar J, Rosen J, Klein J. Utility of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in electrophysiology: ICEing the CAKE (catheter ablation knowledge enhancement). J Invasive Cardiol. 1999 Jun;11(6):364-8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

ICE Based Atrial Flutter Ablation Vs Conventional Fluoroscopy/Anatomical Mapping Based Ablation - ICE Flutter Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs