search
Back to results

Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CNI, MMF, Steroids, Aza etc. (mTOR inhibitor free)
Sirolimus
Sponsored by
University of Regensburg
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring Sirolimus, mTOR, HCC-recurrence free survival, Liver transplant recipients, HCC recurrence free survival

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years and older Histologically proven HCC before randomisation Signed, written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Multiple-organ recipients. Known hypersensitivity to sirolimus or its derivatives. Hyperlipidemia refractory to optimal medical management. (cholesterol >300 mg/dL; triglycerides >350 mg/dL).* Evidence of significant local or systemic infection. Known HIV-positive patients.* Platelets <75,000/cubic mm.* Women of child-bearing potential not willing to take contraception. Patients with non-HCC malignancies within the past 5 years,excluding successfully treated squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Extrahepatic HCC tumor manifestation Patients with a psychologic, familial, sociologic or geographic condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule. Patients under guardianship (e.g. individuals who are not able to freely give their informed consent).

Sites / Locations

  • Regensburg University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Center specific immunosuppressive regimen (mTOR inhibitor free)

Sirolimus containing regimen

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recurrence free survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
July 24, 2006
Last Updated
July 29, 2014
Sponsor
University of Regensburg
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00355862
Brief Title
Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
A Prospective Randomised, Open-labeled, Trial Comparing Sirolimus-Containing Versus mTOR-Inhibitor-Free Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University of Regensburg

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy in patients following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with regard to HCC recurrence-free patient survival.
Detailed Description
There are two major issues to face in patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). First, the patient requires adequate immunosuppressive medication to avoid rejection of its allograft. Second, the risk for HCC recurrence has to be reduced to a minimum. To date, it is a wide spread argument that immunosuppressive agents for the reduction of allograft rejection are generally tumorogenic, or at least are permissive of cancer development although little is known about their tumorogenic effect. In clinical studies substantiated by experimental data, cyclosporin (CsA) enhances cancer cell growth characteristics and angiogenesis in tumors and inhibits DNA repair mechanisms, promoting their growth. In an experimental rat-model CsA promoted liver tumor recurrence and growth. In other experimental studies a higher proliferation rate of human hepatoma cells in the presence of tacrolimus was demonstrated. Nevertheless not all immunosuppressive agents do necessarily promote tumor growth, and in fact, can have antineoplastic activities. Sirolimus, in immunosuppressive doses, has potent antiangiogenic properties that inhibit tumor growth. The antiangiogenetic mechanism is due to inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production and signaling to endothelial cells. Besides that, sirolimus directly blocks critical intracellular pathways (mTOR) and inhibits cell-cycle. Through increased E-cadherin expression on tumor cells, tumor metastasis can be reduced by increased tumor cell binding. In this context it has to be mentioned that in mouse models where a transplant recipient also has a tumor, the pro-tumor effects of CsA are completely negated by sirolimus. Especially HCC seems to be particularly sensitive to VEGF/angiogenesis, indicating a potential susceptibility to the action of sirolimus which could be shown by the group of E.K. Geissler and colleagues in Regensburg. From a clinical perspective there is a recent pilot study from Kneteman et al. indicating that early conversion of immunosuppression from CNI to mTOR-inhibitors after OLT in HCC patients (n=21) with a "high risk" for tumor recurrence results in a tumor recurrence rate of only 19% and a 4-year over all survival of 83% in this group. Moreover, in the "low-risk" group (n=19) the 4-year tumor recurrence rate was only 1/19. Post-HCC recurrence survival was 15.5 months, which is marked improvement compared to currently published data. Although this study only reports on a small number of patients and is not controlled, it suggests the potential role for sirolimus to ameliorate tumor recurrence, leading to a more benign course of renewed tumor disease. Among the most serious complications of immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplantation is the high risk of previous neoplasia recurrence, or the development of de novo cancer. HCC comprises 80-90 % of malignancies indicating OLT. Before the introduction of strict criteria for the enrollment of primary liver tumors, tumor recurrence led to poor mid- and long-term results. HCC thus has an unacceptable recurrence rate following OLT when the tumor exceeds 5 cm in size. ELTR data from 2003 showed a 5 year patient overall survival for hepatic malignancy (including more than 80% HCC in this group since 1997) of merely 53%, comparing poorly with data from non-cholestatic liver cirrhosis of 74% and even acute liver failure of 62%. Based on previous work, and a landmark publication in 1996 by Mazzaferro et al. many centers have restricted their indication for liver transplantation due to clinical criteria based on tumor size and number to the so-called ´Milan Criteria´. Implementing these criteria, recent single center data show an improvement in both disease-free and overall survival following OLT for HCC. Nevertheless approximately 30% of patients in these studies who were thought to be within Milan Criteria before transplantation, proved by histopathological examination to have extended disease. This led to a dramatic decline in overall and disease-free survival, from 71-85% to 40-50%, and from 65-78% to 27-30%, respectively. In total all preclinical and clinical observations have led us to the purpose that the use of sirolimus in HCC patients could improve survival after liver transplantation by decreasing tumor recurrence rate. Thus patients should experience less posttransplant problems with HCC recurrence, and therefore could expect a longer, and better quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
Sirolimus, mTOR, HCC-recurrence free survival, Liver transplant recipients, HCC recurrence free survival

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
525 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Center specific immunosuppressive regimen (mTOR inhibitor free)
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Sirolimus containing regimen
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CNI, MMF, Steroids, Aza etc. (mTOR inhibitor free)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Azathioprine, MMF, Prednisolone, etc
Intervention Description
center specific therapeutic regimen without mTOR inhibition
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sirolimus
Other Intervention Name(s)
Rapamune
Intervention Description
Sirolimus based immunosuppression
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence free survival
Time Frame
5 year follow up after last patient in

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years and older Histologically proven HCC before randomisation Signed, written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Multiple-organ recipients. Known hypersensitivity to sirolimus or its derivatives. Hyperlipidemia refractory to optimal medical management. (cholesterol >300 mg/dL; triglycerides >350 mg/dL).* Evidence of significant local or systemic infection. Known HIV-positive patients.* Platelets <75,000/cubic mm.* Women of child-bearing potential not willing to take contraception. Patients with non-HCC malignancies within the past 5 years,excluding successfully treated squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Extrahepatic HCC tumor manifestation Patients with a psychologic, familial, sociologic or geographic condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule. Patients under guardianship (e.g. individuals who are not able to freely give their informed consent).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edward K Geissler, Prof. PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Regensburg University Medical Center, Head of Experimental Surgery
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hans J Schlitt, Prof. MD. FACS FRACS FRCS MHM
Organizational Affiliation
Regensburg University Medical Center, Director of Surgical Department
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andreas A Schnitzbauer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Regensburg University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Regensburg University
City
Regensburg
State/Province
Bavaria
ZIP/Postal Code
93053
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32889867
Citation
Schnitzbauer AA, Filmann N, Adam R, Bachellier P, Bechstein WO, Becker T, Bhoori S, Bilbao I, Brockmann J, Burra P, Chazoullieres O, Cillo U, Colledan M, Duvoux C, Ganten TM, Gugenheim J, Heise M, van Hoek B, Jamieson N, de Jong KP, Klein CG, Klempnauer J, Kneteman N, Lerut J, Makisalo H, Mazzaferro V, Mirza DF, Nadalin S, Neuhaus P, Pageaux GP, Pinna AD, Pirenne J, Pratschke J, Powel J, Rentsch M, Rizell M, Rossi G, Rostaing L, Roy A, Scholz T, Settmacher U, Soliman T, Strasser S, Soderdahl G, Troisi RI, Turrion VS, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK. mTOR Inhibition Is Most Beneficial After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Active Tumors. Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):855-862. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004280.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26555945
Citation
Geissler EK, Schnitzbauer AA, Zulke C, Lamby PE, Proneth A, Duvoux C, Burra P, Jauch KW, Rentsch M, Ganten TM, Schmidt J, Settmacher U, Heise M, Rossi G, Cillo U, Kneteman N, Adam R, van Hoek B, Bachellier P, Wolf P, Rostaing L, Bechstein WO, Rizell M, Powell J, Hidalgo E, Gugenheim J, Wolters H, Brockmann J, Roy A, Mutzbauer I, Schlitt A, Beckebaum S, Graeb C, Nadalin S, Valente U, Turrion VS, Jamieson N, Scholz T, Colledan M, Fandrich F, Becker T, Soderdahl G, Chazouilleres O, Makisalo H, Pageaux GP, Steininger R, Soliman T, de Jong KP, Pirenne J, Margreiter R, Pratschke J, Pinna AD, Hauss J, Schreiber S, Strasser S, Klempnauer J, Troisi RI, Bhoori S, Lerut J, Bilbao I, Klein CG, Konigsrainer A, Mirza DF, Otto G, Mazzaferro V, Neuhaus P, Schlitt HJ. Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial. Transplantation. 2016 Jan;100(1):116-25. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000965.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
20459775
Citation
Schnitzbauer AA, Zuelke C, Graeb C, Rochon J, Bilbao I, Burra P, de Jong KP, Duvoux C, Kneteman NM, Adam R, Bechstein WO, Becker T, Beckebaum S, Chazouilleres O, Cillo U, Colledan M, Fandrich F, Gugenheim J, Hauss JP, Heise M, Hidalgo E, Jamieson N, Konigsrainer A, Lamby PE, Lerut JP, Makisalo H, Margreiter R, Mazzaferro V, Mutzbauer I, Otto G, Pageaux GP, Pinna AD, Pirenne J, Rizell M, Rossi G, Rostaing L, Roy A, Turrion VS, Schmidt J, Troisi RI, van Hoek B, Valente U, Wolf P, Wolters H, Mirza DF, Scholz T, Steininger R, Soderdahl G, Strasser SI, Jauch KW, Neuhaus P, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK. A prospective randomised, open-labeled, trial comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2010 May 11;10:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-190.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
19773418
Citation
Geissler EK. Rapamycin enhances lifespan: at last, an advantage for transplant recipients? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Dec;24(12):3623-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp496. Epub 2009 Sep 22. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
19192962
Citation
Treiber G. mTOR inhibitors for hepatocellular cancer: a forward-moving target. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Feb;9(2):247-61. doi: 10.1586/14737140.9.2.247.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.silver-study.org
Description
Related Info
URL
http://www.klinikum-regensburg.de
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs