search
Back to results

Impact of Real-time Angiographic Co-registered OCT on PCI Results - the OPTICO-integration II Study (Integration-II)

Primary Purpose

Ischaemic Heart Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Angio-PCI
OCT-PCI
ACR-PCI
Sponsored by
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ischaemic Heart Disease focused on measuring OCT, Co-Registration, Stent, PCI, Geographical mismatch, Edge Dissection

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with indication for coronary angiography for angina (stable or unstable), silent ischemia (a visually estimated target lesion diameter stenosis of ≥70%, a positive invasive or non-invasive test must be present), or NSTE-ACS
  • male or non pregnant female patient
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known neoplasia on treatment / without a curative therapeutic approach
  • Presence of one or more co-morbidities which reduces life expectancy to less than 24 months
  • Estimated creatinine clearance <40 ml/min
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Hemodynamic instability because of arrhythmia
  • Known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%.
  • Therapy requiring psychiatric disorder
  • Patient is participating in any other investigational drug or device clinical trial that has not reached its primary endpoint.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Refusal of study participation

Sites / Locations

  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Blinded-group

OCT-group

ACR-group

Arm Description

Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators only based on angiographic lesion evaluation (standard care)

Patients underwent OCT-imaging before PCI. Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators based on OCT findings

Patients underwent ACR-imaging before PCI. Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators based on ACR-findings

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of a combined endpoint based on "major edge dissections" (I) AND/OR "geographical mismatch" (II) [%]
Analysis of primary endpoint will be assessed by evaluation of proximal and/or distal stent end. I) Major edge dissection (MED): Major: ≥60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel at site of dissection and/or ≥3 mm in length II) Geographical mismatch (GM): Untreated plaque with a minimal lumen area <4,5mm2 within 5mm of the reference segment. In the postPCI-OCT analysis it is considered as no geographical mismatch, if: the segment of the lesion is fully covered AND the stent protrudes maximal 5mm beyond the predetermined landing zone. If one of these criteria is not fulfilled, it is considered as geographical mismatch

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of "major edge dissections" [%]
All secondary endpoints of OCT will be assessed by evaluation of proximal and/or distal stent end/segment.
Incidence of "all edge dissections" (major (I) and minor (II)) [%]
(I) ≥60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel at site of dissection and/or ≥3 mm in length (II) Any visible edge dissection <60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel and < 3 mm in length
Incidence of "geographical mismatch" [%]
see primary endpoint
Stent expansion [%]
Defined by the MSA achieved relative to the proximal or distal reference segments. The stent length is divided into 2 equal segments (proximal and distal), and the MSA is determined in each segment. Optimal stent expansion: The MSA of the segment is ≥95% of the related reference lumen area Acceptable stent expansion: The MSA of the segment is ≥90% and <95% of the related reference lumen area Unacceptable stent expansion: The MSA of the segment is <90% of the related lumen area
Inacceptable stent expansion [%]
see outcome 5
Incidence of "malapposition" [%]
Incompletely apposed stent struts in at least 5 consecutive OCT-frames (defined as stent struts clearly separated from the vessel wall (lumen border/plaque border) without any tissue behind the struts with a distance from the adjacent intima of ≥0.2 mm and not associated with any side branch). Malapposition will be further classified as: A) Major: If associated with stent underexpansion (unacceptable stent expansion as defined above) B) Minor: If not associated with significant underexpansion (optimal or acceptable stent expansion as defined above) C) Major and minor
Distance between target and actual lesion coverage [mm]
Defined as the distance between target landing zone and actual landing zone of stent location (proximal and distal end). Therefore, the lesion is divided in two equal halves, so that every segment (proximal and distal) can be analyzed for itself.
Minimal Stent Area (MSA) of target lesion [%]
Minimal lumen area covered by stent.
Acute Luminal Gain of target lesion [mm]
Gain of Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD) between prePCI- and postPCI-OCT
Procedure time [min]
Time from reaching the ostium with the guide catheter until pullback of the last one.
Total fluoroscopy time [min]
Total time required for diagnostic angiography and PCI.
Total contrast volume [ml]
Total amount of contrast used for entire intervention (including OCT-pullbacks)
Total stent length [mm]
Addition of each stent length which were used for target lesion
Total number of stents
Number of stents which were used for target lesion
Maximal stent diameter [mm]
Maximal stent diameter used for target lesion
Complications associated with OCT-examination [%]
Complications between advancing and pullback of OCT catheter
Complications during hospitalization [%]
Defined as: new ACS; stent thrombosis of study culprit lesion; new unplaned coronary angiography; new revascularization (PCI/CABG); apoplex/TIA; pacemaker implantation; anaphylactic shock; contrast-induced nephropathy; bleeding; death
DOCE within target lesion [%]
Device-oriented composite endpoint within the target lesion. Defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction OR target-lesion revascularization. This composite endpoint will be checked during a follow up after 1 and 3 months.

Full Information

First Posted
August 5, 2018
Last Updated
April 19, 2019
Sponsor
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03646097
Brief Title
Impact of Real-time Angiographic Co-registered OCT on PCI Results - the OPTICO-integration II Study
Acronym
Integration-II
Official Title
Impact of Real-time Angiographic Co-registered OCT on PCI Results - the Randomized OPTICO-integration II Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 29, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 15, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Charite University, Berlin, Germany

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging allows for high-resolution characterization of coronary lesions. Difficulties in matching cross-sectional OCT-images with angiographic lesion localization, however, may limit its clinical utilization. The investigators sought to prospectively assess the impact of a novel system of real-time OCT-coregistration with angiography (ACR) compared to OCT alone and to the clinical standard proceeding (angiographic guided-PCI) all used for coronary lesion evaluation before percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The investigators hypothesize that the use of ACR will lead to less incidence of insufficient covered coronary lesions (geographical mismatch) and/or a less rate of edge dissections after PCI (combined primary study endpoint)
Detailed Description
In this randomized blinded pilot-study the effect of pre-PCI planning by angiographic-co-registered OCT (ACR) compared to OCT or angiographic evaluation alone with respect to the entire result after PCI will be investigated. A special focus (primary endpoint) will be on the incidence of geographical mismatch (GM) and/or major edge dissections. Eligible patients will be randomized in three groups. Group 1 Pre-PCI-OCT: Patients underwent OCT-imaging before PCI. Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators based on OCT findings. Group 2: Pre-PCI-ACR: Patients underwent ACR-imaging before PCI. Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators based on ACR-findings. Group 3:OCT-Blinded/Angiographic guided PCI: Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators only based on angiographic lesion evaluation (standard care). For outcome analysis all study groups underwent post-PCI-OCT imaging as soon as investigators assume angiographic justiciable PCI-results (TIMI III, no residual stenosis > 50%; no angiographic definable or suspicious edge dissections, angiographic acceptable stent expansion without evidence for malapposition). OCT imaging analysis will be performed within a OCT core-lab by two investigators blinded for the randomization group.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ischaemic Heart Disease
Keywords
OCT, Co-Registration, Stent, PCI, Geographical mismatch, Edge Dissection

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
84 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Blinded-group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators only based on angiographic lesion evaluation (standard care)
Arm Title
OCT-group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients underwent OCT-imaging before PCI. Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators based on OCT findings
Arm Title
ACR-group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients underwent ACR-imaging before PCI. Lesion assessment, selection of PCI landing zone as well as stent selection will be performed by investigators based on ACR-findings
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Angio-PCI
Intervention Description
PCI only with angiography and without OCT findings
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
OCT-PCI
Intervention Description
PCI with OCT-measurements but no transfer of landingzone-markers to angiography
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
ACR-PCI
Intervention Description
PCI with OCT-measurements and transfer of landingzone-markers to angiography
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of a combined endpoint based on "major edge dissections" (I) AND/OR "geographical mismatch" (II) [%]
Description
Analysis of primary endpoint will be assessed by evaluation of proximal and/or distal stent end. I) Major edge dissection (MED): Major: ≥60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel at site of dissection and/or ≥3 mm in length II) Geographical mismatch (GM): Untreated plaque with a minimal lumen area <4,5mm2 within 5mm of the reference segment. In the postPCI-OCT analysis it is considered as no geographical mismatch, if: the segment of the lesion is fully covered AND the stent protrudes maximal 5mm beyond the predetermined landing zone. If one of these criteria is not fulfilled, it is considered as geographical mismatch
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of "major edge dissections" [%]
Description
All secondary endpoints of OCT will be assessed by evaluation of proximal and/or distal stent end/segment.
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Incidence of "all edge dissections" (major (I) and minor (II)) [%]
Description
(I) ≥60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel at site of dissection and/or ≥3 mm in length (II) Any visible edge dissection <60 degrees of the circumference of the vessel and < 3 mm in length
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Incidence of "geographical mismatch" [%]
Description
see primary endpoint
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Stent expansion [%]
Description
Defined by the MSA achieved relative to the proximal or distal reference segments. The stent length is divided into 2 equal segments (proximal and distal), and the MSA is determined in each segment. Optimal stent expansion: The MSA of the segment is ≥95% of the related reference lumen area Acceptable stent expansion: The MSA of the segment is ≥90% and <95% of the related reference lumen area Unacceptable stent expansion: The MSA of the segment is <90% of the related lumen area
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Inacceptable stent expansion [%]
Description
see outcome 5
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Incidence of "malapposition" [%]
Description
Incompletely apposed stent struts in at least 5 consecutive OCT-frames (defined as stent struts clearly separated from the vessel wall (lumen border/plaque border) without any tissue behind the struts with a distance from the adjacent intima of ≥0.2 mm and not associated with any side branch). Malapposition will be further classified as: A) Major: If associated with stent underexpansion (unacceptable stent expansion as defined above) B) Minor: If not associated with significant underexpansion (optimal or acceptable stent expansion as defined above) C) Major and minor
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Distance between target and actual lesion coverage [mm]
Description
Defined as the distance between target landing zone and actual landing zone of stent location (proximal and distal end). Therefore, the lesion is divided in two equal halves, so that every segment (proximal and distal) can be analyzed for itself.
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Minimal Stent Area (MSA) of target lesion [%]
Description
Minimal lumen area covered by stent.
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Acute Luminal Gain of target lesion [mm]
Description
Gain of Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD) between prePCI- and postPCI-OCT
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Procedure time [min]
Description
Time from reaching the ostium with the guide catheter until pullback of the last one.
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Total fluoroscopy time [min]
Description
Total time required for diagnostic angiography and PCI.
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Total contrast volume [ml]
Description
Total amount of contrast used for entire intervention (including OCT-pullbacks)
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Total stent length [mm]
Description
Addition of each stent length which were used for target lesion
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Total number of stents
Description
Number of stents which were used for target lesion
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Maximal stent diameter [mm]
Description
Maximal stent diameter used for target lesion
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Complications associated with OCT-examination [%]
Description
Complications between advancing and pullback of OCT catheter
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
Complications during hospitalization [%]
Description
Defined as: new ACS; stent thrombosis of study culprit lesion; new unplaned coronary angiography; new revascularization (PCI/CABG); apoplex/TIA; pacemaker implantation; anaphylactic shock; contrast-induced nephropathy; bleeding; death
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours
Title
DOCE within target lesion [%]
Description
Device-oriented composite endpoint within the target lesion. Defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction OR target-lesion revascularization. This composite endpoint will be checked during a follow up after 1 and 3 months.
Time Frame
Time of PCI Procedure - participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 24 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with indication for coronary angiography for angina (stable or unstable), silent ischemia (a visually estimated target lesion diameter stenosis of ≥70%, a positive invasive or non-invasive test must be present), or NSTE-ACS male or non pregnant female patient Signed written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Known neoplasia on treatment / without a curative therapeutic approach Presence of one or more co-morbidities which reduces life expectancy to less than 24 months Estimated creatinine clearance <40 ml/min Cardiogenic shock Hemodynamic instability because of arrhythmia Known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. Therapy requiring psychiatric disorder Patient is participating in any other investigational drug or device clinical trial that has not reached its primary endpoint. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding Refusal of study participation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David M Leistner, PD Dr. med.
Organizational Affiliation
Managing Senior Physician
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12203
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Impact of Real-time Angiographic Co-registered OCT on PCI Results - the OPTICO-integration II Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs