search
Back to results

Impact of Virtual Reality in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology

Primary Purpose

Virtual Reality, Pediatrics, Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Virtual Reality
Usual Practices
Sponsored by
Poitiers University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Virtual Reality focused on measuring Virtual Reality, Pediatrics, Cancerology, Pain, Invasive Acts

Eligibility Criteria

7 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 7 to strictly under 18
  • Follow-ups for hematological or oncological pathology
  • With a lumbar puncture
  • Patient understanding French
  • Consent of parents or guardians with parental authority.
  • Child informed and having given his assent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with cognitive impairment
  • Children in absolute emergency situations
  • Children with a contraindication to a virtual reality headset (psychiatric pathology, vestibular and proprioceptive disorders, unbalanced epilepsy, impaired vision, hearing aids, claustrophobia, recent lesions of the eyes, face or scalp)
  • Children who have already participated in the clinical investigation
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Patients not benefiting from a social security system or not benefiting from it by the intermediary of a third person

Sites / Locations

  • CHU poitiersRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Virtual Reality headset Group

Control group with usual practices

Arm Description

30 patients will be included in the virtual reality arm

30 patients will be included the usual practices

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To assess the effectiveness of virtual reality compared to usual analgesic practices in pain management during the first lumbar puncture or connection to an implantable chamber of the study.
At the inclusion, the primary endpoint will be to assess pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after the first invasive act of lumbar puncture or connection to an implantable chamber. The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The EVA (Analogue Visual Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7. It reliably allows self-assessment of pain. The scale will be explained to the child before the act and it will be presented to him after the invasive act for the assessment: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to the implantable chamber
Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to the implantable chamber: The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The VAS (Visual Analogue Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7. It reliably allows self-assessment of pain. The scale will be explained to the child before the act and it will be presented to him after the invasive act for the assessment: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Child's anxiety using the Frankl scale
The Frankl scale, is a scale of hetero-evaluation of anxiety. It will be performed by the caregiver before the invasive procedure (lumbar puncture and connection to an implantable chamber). It is suitable for children from 7 to under 18 years old and is easy to score: 0: Definitely negative behavior; refuses treatment, shouts forcefully, opposes/cares, 1: Negative behavior: unwilling to accept care; unwilling to accept care. Some signs of opposition exist but not necessarily declared (sullen air, scowling), 2: Positive behaviour; accepts treatment with reservation. He is cautious but follows the instructions of the practitioner/caregiver 3: Definitely positive behavior; good relations/practitioner/caregiver, interested in treatment. He laughs often and seems to enjoy the visit/care.
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality:The type and amount of analgesics consumed during the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
The type of associated analgesics, the dosage will be collected through the patient's medical record
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Heart rate
Heart rate (min <40 B/min - max >200 B/min), from a scope connected to the patient before and throughout the duration of the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality:oxygen saturation
oxygen saturation (min <90% - max >100%) from a scope connected to the patient before and throughout the duration of the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Respiratory rate
Respiratory rate (min <10 - max > 50) from a scope connected to the patient before and throughout the duration of the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Tolerance
Tolerance, in number of episodes of confusion, agitation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, headache, hallucinations and temporary amnesia during the performance of the invasive act and within 2 hours of post-act monitoring for a lumbar puncture and 30 minutes for a connection to an implantable chamber
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Pain after each act from the VAS
A patient may have several consecutive invasive acts. The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The VAS (Visual Analogue Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to an implantable chamber
Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to an implantable chamber the : The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The VAS (Visual Analogue Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7. It reliably allows self-assessment of pain. The scale will be explained to the child before the act and it will be presented to him after the invasive act for the assessment: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain

Full Information

First Posted
February 10, 2022
Last Updated
February 13, 2023
Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05275881
Brief Title
Impact of Virtual Reality in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology
Official Title
Impact of Virtual Reality in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology for the Management of Pain During Invasive Procedures in Children 7 to Under 18 Years in a Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 13, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 13, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 13, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This pilot study will be testing the feasibility of medical hypnosis through virtual reality during invasive médical procédures in children with cancer. Patients age from 7 to under 18 years whose treatement protocols required a lumbure puncture and a chemotherapy by implantable venous access will be randomly assigned to virtual reality or treatement as usual (nitrous oxide, anxiolytics, opioid analgesics, psychotropic and benzodiazepine). We expect the same benefit by using VR as usual intervention.
Detailed Description
Nationally, around 2,150 new cases of cancer are diagnosed per year in children aged 0 to 18. The main locations are leukemia, central system tumors and lymphomas. The onco-pediatrics unit of the Poitiers University Hospital is recruiting around 70 patients per year from 0 to under 18 years old. 1482 invasive procedures have been done in 2019. The diagnostic and therapeutic methods for these children remain aggressive and involve patients in chronic care. They repeatedly undergo painful and anxiety-inducing care. In pediatrics, nitrous oxide is chosen as the first-line choice in these various procedures, but its effectiveness is not always conclusive, due to habituation, and can induce side effects. For some children, it becomes difficult to obtain their consent to care, despite the range of different analgesics offered, and forces prescribers to increase the drugs. Virtual reality (VR) has already been shown to be effective on pain and anxiety in children and adolescents. This devices uses distraction and hypnosis techniques by establishing a state of hypnosedation and mediation through the work of breathing and sophrology. With this study, we expect the same benefit by using VR as usual pratices. After explaining the treatment protocol, the potentially eligible patient will be informed by the investigator of the possibility of participating in this clinical trial. After checking the eligibility criteria and including the patient, the investigator can randomize the patient in the control group or the experimental group. As part of this study, patients will be followed for 1 month and for each act of lumbar puncture and connection to an implantable chamber.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Virtual Reality, Pediatrics, Cancer, Pain, Procedural Pain
Keywords
Virtual Reality, Pediatrics, Cancerology, Pain, Invasive Acts

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is an exploratory interventional, comparative, single-center, randomized research into 2 parallel groups. The study will compare the use of virtual reality versus usual practices for two iterative and painful acts: lumbar puncture and connection to an implantable chamber.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Virtual Reality headset Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
30 patients will be included in the virtual reality arm
Arm Title
Control group with usual practices
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
30 patients will be included the usual practices
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Virtual Reality
Intervention Description
In each arm, patients will benefit from an EMLA-type local anesthetic cream, pain and anxiety assessment. During the act, the physiological constants will be recorded (Fr, O2 and pulse). In the the RV group, The session will be started before the gesture and the patient will wear the helmet throughout the act. In case of pain and / or restlessness, the child will receive analgesics.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Practices
Intervention Description
In each arm, patients will benefit from an EMLA-type local anesthetic cream, pain and anxiety assessment. During the act, the physiological constants will be recorded (Fr, O2 and pulse). In the control group, the child will receive the usual care: nitrous oxide, anxiolytics, opioid analgesics, psychotropic and benzodiazepine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To assess the effectiveness of virtual reality compared to usual analgesic practices in pain management during the first lumbar puncture or connection to an implantable chamber of the study.
Description
At the inclusion, the primary endpoint will be to assess pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after the first invasive act of lumbar puncture or connection to an implantable chamber. The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The EVA (Analogue Visual Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7. It reliably allows self-assessment of pain. The scale will be explained to the child before the act and it will be presented to him after the invasive act for the assessment: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain
Time Frame
up to one day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to the implantable chamber
Description
Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to the implantable chamber: The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The VAS (Visual Analogue Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7. It reliably allows self-assessment of pain. The scale will be explained to the child before the act and it will be presented to him after the invasive act for the assessment: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Child's anxiety using the Frankl scale
Description
The Frankl scale, is a scale of hetero-evaluation of anxiety. It will be performed by the caregiver before the invasive procedure (lumbar puncture and connection to an implantable chamber). It is suitable for children from 7 to under 18 years old and is easy to score: 0: Definitely negative behavior; refuses treatment, shouts forcefully, opposes/cares, 1: Negative behavior: unwilling to accept care; unwilling to accept care. Some signs of opposition exist but not necessarily declared (sullen air, scowling), 2: Positive behaviour; accepts treatment with reservation. He is cautious but follows the instructions of the practitioner/caregiver 3: Definitely positive behavior; good relations/practitioner/caregiver, interested in treatment. He laughs often and seems to enjoy the visit/care.
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality:The type and amount of analgesics consumed during the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Description
The type of associated analgesics, the dosage will be collected through the patient's medical record
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Heart rate
Description
Heart rate (min <40 B/min - max >200 B/min), from a scope connected to the patient before and throughout the duration of the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality:oxygen saturation
Description
oxygen saturation (min <90% - max >100%) from a scope connected to the patient before and throughout the duration of the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Respiratory rate
Description
Respiratory rate (min <10 - max > 50) from a scope connected to the patient before and throughout the duration of the invasive act (lumbar puncture and / or connection to an implantable chamber)
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Tolerance
Description
Tolerance, in number of episodes of confusion, agitation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, headache, hallucinations and temporary amnesia during the performance of the invasive act and within 2 hours of post-act monitoring for a lumbar puncture and 30 minutes for a connection to an implantable chamber
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Pain after each act from the VAS
Description
A patient may have several consecutive invasive acts. The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The VAS (Visual Analogue Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain
Time Frame
up to one month
Title
Comparison, between the control group and the group supported with virtual reality: Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to an implantable chamber
Description
Pain from the VAS after the 1st connection to an implantable chamber the : The pain assessment will be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale provided as part of the clinical investigation.The VAS (Visual Analogue Assessment) from 0 to 10, is a scale that can be used from the age of 7. It reliably allows self-assessment of pain. The scale will be explained to the child before the act and it will be presented to him after the invasive act for the assessment: 0: no pain Between 1 and 3: mild pain Between 3 and 5: moderate-intensity pain Between 5 and 7: severe pain Greater than 7: very intense pain
Time Frame
up to one month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
7 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients aged 7 to strictly under 18 Follow-ups for hematological or oncological pathology With a lumbar puncture or to connection to an implantable chamber Patient understanding French Consent of parents or guardians with parental authority. Child informed and having given his assent Exclusion Criteria: Children with cognitive impairment Children in absolute emergency situations Children with a contraindication to a virtual reality headset (psychiatric pathology, vestibular and proprioceptive disorders, unbalanced epilepsy, impaired vision, hearing aids, claustrophobia, recent lesions of the eyes, face or scalp) Children who have already participated in the clinical investigation Refusal to participate in the study Patients not benefiting from a social security system or not benefiting from it by the intermediary of a third person
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Amandine AF FERNANDES
Phone
+33549444578
Email
amandine.fernandes@chu-poitiers.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Karine KG ESTEVE-GARNIER
Phone
+33549443567
Email
karine.garnier@chu-poitiers.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amandine AF FERNANDES
Organizational Affiliation
Poitiers University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU poitiers
City
Poitiers
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amandine FERNANDES

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Impact of Virtual Reality in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs