search
Back to results

Importance of Restoring Biomechanical Correct Hip Anatomy During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GF hip guide
Stryker Navigation System
ABG II modular femoral component
Sponsored by
Region Skane
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA), Total hip arthroplasty (THA), Hip anatomy, Hip biomechanics

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip necessitating primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)
  • Male and non-pregnant female patients
  • Hip bone quality and morphology suitable for uncemented THA
  • Age up to 75 years old at the inclusion time of the study
  • Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed follow-up.
  • Patients who are capable of, and have given informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Malignant disease
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Patients with active infection
  • Patients with malignancy
  • Prior major surgery in the hip to be operated on
  • Peroperative fracture
  • Hip prosthesis or grossly distorted hip anatomy in the contralateral hip.
  • Ongoing corticosteroid (oral) or immunosuppressive medication
  • Personal disorders (dementia, alcohol or drug abuse etc) suspected of making completion of the trial uncertain.
  • Patients with concurrent illnesses which are likely to affect their outcome.

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

instrumented hip guide technique

conventional measuring technique

computer assisted navigation

Arm Description

A mechanical device used to measure and decide how the hip prosthesis (ABG II modular) should be implanted

Standard way of implanting the prosthesis (ABG II standard) without special measuring device or computer navigation technique

A method to use computer navigation when positioning and sizing the hip prosthesis (ABG II modular).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA)
This will measure the change in migration (translation and rotation around the x-, y- and z-axis of the hip) over time from baseline which is the direct postoperative examination and up to 2 years postoperatively. The migration pattern over a 2-year period can predict the long-term fate of the prosthesis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Gait analysis
This will measure how the patients gait pattern has changed from preoperatively when the patient had symptoms from osteoarthritis and 1 year postoperatively when everything has healed and the new hip prosthesis should have full effect on function and pain relive.
Computer Tomography (CT)
This will measure how much the anatomy has changed from preoperatively to after the new hip prosthesis has been put in. Are the goals of hip anatomy restoration achieved? The main measurements will be leg length, global offset and rotation of femoral neck.
General and hip specific health questionnaires
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) - this is a hip specific questionnaire that will measure how the operation has affected the patients function and pain situation over time. EuroQol (EQ-5D) - a standardized instrument for use as measure of general health outcome over time

Full Information

First Posted
January 6, 2012
Last Updated
September 26, 2017
Sponsor
Region Skane
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01512550
Brief Title
Importance of Restoring Biomechanical Correct Hip Anatomy During Total Hip Arthroplasty
Official Title
Evaluation of the Importance in Restoring Biomechanical Correct Hip Anatomy During THA. A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study Evaluated by RSA, CT and Gait Analysis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Region Skane

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the importance of restoring the exact individual hip biomechanics during total hip arthroplasty.
Detailed Description
This prospective, controlled and randomized study aims at evaluating the correlation between postoperative hip prosthesis migration and the achieved exactness of biomechanical restoration of hip mechanics during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The main objective is to find out how close the result from the surgery can come to a preferred prosthesis position and whether this makes any difference in terms of loosening, functionality and quality of life for the patient. The prosthesis positioning is performed with either (1) computer assisted navigation, (2) instrumented hip guide measuring devise alignment technique or (3) conventional non-instrumented measuring technique. The ABG II stem system (Stryker) will be used in the modular version for group 1 and 2 and the non-modular version in group 3. Before each operation the investigators will perform exact measurements of anatomical variables using preoperative radiographs (maximum 8 weeks old) and computed tomography images (CT)(taken 3-4 weeks preoperatively). While applying these measurements the investigators will try to preserve the patient´s individual biomechanical situation, most often as compared to the healthy contralateral hip. The variables to be analysed are anteversion of the femoral neck, offset and leg length. This preoperative hip analysis combined with the use of a templating system will give the data needed for component choice and exact positioning of the ABG II hip prosthesis. 75 patients will be randomized into the three groups (25+25+25). The patients will be followed with RadioStereometric Analysis (RSA) for two years (directly postoperatively, 14 days, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years). There will be a second CT scan 1 year postoperatively to measure the actual achieved position. In completion hip specific and general health questionnaires will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction and outcome. All patients will be subject to 3-Dimensional (3-D) gait analysis 3-4 weeks prior to surgery and after one year. The results of the gait analysis will be correlated to the achieved restoration of the hip anatomy and biomechanics. The investigators aim is to improve the fundamental understanding of the hip biomechanics in patients undergoing THA. Will physical performance improve when the individual hip biomechanics is better restored, and in which way and to what extent?

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA), Total hip arthroplasty (THA), Hip anatomy, Hip biomechanics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
75 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
instrumented hip guide technique
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
A mechanical device used to measure and decide how the hip prosthesis (ABG II modular) should be implanted
Arm Title
conventional measuring technique
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard way of implanting the prosthesis (ABG II standard) without special measuring device or computer navigation technique
Arm Title
computer assisted navigation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
A method to use computer navigation when positioning and sizing the hip prosthesis (ABG II modular).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
GF hip guide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Instrument designed by the investigators
Intervention Description
Using GF hip guide to measure and control the peroperative positioning of the hip stem
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Stryker Navigation System
Other Intervention Name(s)
Stryker Orthomap Hip Navigation System
Intervention Description
Using Orthomap Modular Hip Software to navigate the operation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ABG II modular femoral component
Other Intervention Name(s)
ABG™II modular Cementless Hip System
Intervention Description
A hip prosthesis made by Stryker. It has the same basic shape as the ABG II femoral component but has a modular neck system allowing it to better follow the patient specific hip anatomy regarding offset, varus-valgus angle and rotation in the anteroposterior plane.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA)
Description
This will measure the change in migration (translation and rotation around the x-, y- and z-axis of the hip) over time from baseline which is the direct postoperative examination and up to 2 years postoperatively. The migration pattern over a 2-year period can predict the long-term fate of the prosthesis
Time Frame
First postoperative day(reference examination), 14 days, 3 months, 1 and 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gait analysis
Description
This will measure how the patients gait pattern has changed from preoperatively when the patient had symptoms from osteoarthritis and 1 year postoperatively when everything has healed and the new hip prosthesis should have full effect on function and pain relive.
Time Frame
Preoperatively (3-4 weeks) and 1 year postoperatively
Title
Computer Tomography (CT)
Description
This will measure how much the anatomy has changed from preoperatively to after the new hip prosthesis has been put in. Are the goals of hip anatomy restoration achieved? The main measurements will be leg length, global offset and rotation of femoral neck.
Time Frame
Preoperatively (3-4 weeks) and 1 year postoperatively
Title
General and hip specific health questionnaires
Description
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) - this is a hip specific questionnaire that will measure how the operation has affected the patients function and pain situation over time. EuroQol (EQ-5D) - a standardized instrument for use as measure of general health outcome over time
Time Frame
preoperatively (3-4 weeks), 1 and 2 years postoperatively

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip necessitating primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) Male and non-pregnant female patients Hip bone quality and morphology suitable for uncemented THA Age up to 75 years old at the inclusion time of the study Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed follow-up. Patients who are capable of, and have given informed consent for participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Rheumatoid arthritis Malignant disease Severe osteoporosis Patients with active infection Patients with malignancy Prior major surgery in the hip to be operated on Peroperative fracture Hip prosthesis or grossly distorted hip anatomy in the contralateral hip. Ongoing corticosteroid (oral) or immunosuppressive medication Personal disorders (dementia, alcohol or drug abuse etc) suspected of making completion of the trial uncertain. Patients with concurrent illnesses which are likely to affect their outcome.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gunnar Flivik, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Dept of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
22185
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33879123
Citation
Esbjornsson AC, Kiernan S, Mattsson L, Flivik G. Geometrical restoration during total hip arthroplasty is related to change in gait pattern - a study based on computed tomography and three-dimensional gait analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04226-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33297800
Citation
Kiernan S, Kaptein B, Flivik C, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Unexpected varus deformity and concomitant metal ion release and MRI findings of modular-neck hip stems: descriptive RSA study in 75 hips with 8 years' follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):67-73. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1853387. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32552711
Citation
Kiernan S, Geijer M, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Effect of symmetrical restoration for the migration of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized RSA study with 75 patients and 5-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jun 17;15(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01736-0.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Importance of Restoring Biomechanical Correct Hip Anatomy During Total Hip Arthroplasty

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs