Improving Vision in Adults With Macular Degeneration
Primary Purpose
Macular Degeneration
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
anodal tDCS Active Stimulation
anodal tDCS Sham/Placebo Stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Macular Degeneration focused on measuring Macular Degeneration, Brain Stimulation, Psychophysics, Reading, tDCS, RSVP, Visual Acuity, Uncrowded Visual Acuity, Crowded Visual Acuity
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of AMD (age 60+) or JMD (current age 18+).
- Central vision loss and use of a peripheral preferred retinal locus (PRL) to fixate on visual objects, as confirmed by a microperimeter.
- Visual acuity (VA); between 0.5 and 1.0 logMAR inclusive (6/18-6/60) in the better eye.
- Best-corrected near visual acuity of 4.0M at 40 cm or better in the better eye
- Stable vision for the previous 3 months (by patient report).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed dementia.
- Not fluent in reading English (Waterloo) or Chinese characters (Hong Kong).
- Any ocular surgery (including anti-vegF injections) within the duration of the study.
- Ocular pathology other than JMD or AMD that can reduce central vision.
- Severe hearing impairment.
- Contraindications for brain stimulation
Sites / Locations
- University of Waterloo
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Active then Sham
Sham then Active
Arm Description
Participants in this arm will be exposed to active stimulation during session 1 and sham/placebo stimulation during session 2
Participants in this arm will be exposed to sham/placebo stimulation during session 1 and active stimulation during session 2
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Pre-Test
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected.
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Post-Test 1 (during stimulation)
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected without accounting for any effects of stimulation.
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Post-Test 2 (5 min after stimulation)
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected without accounting for any effects of stimulation.
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Post-Test 3 (30 min after stimulation)
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected without accounting for any effects of stimulation.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Pre-Test
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 1 (during stimulation)
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 2 (5 min after Stimulation)
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 3 (30 min after Stimulation)
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Crowded Visual Acuity Pre-Test
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Crowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 1 (during stimulation)
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Crowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 2 (5 min after stimulation)
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Crowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 3 (30 min after stimulation)
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04111068
First Posted
September 23, 2019
Last Updated
April 27, 2022
Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Collaborators
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04111068
Brief Title
Improving Vision in Adults With Macular Degeneration
Official Title
Improving Vision in Adults With Macular Degeneration, Study 1: the Effect of Brain Stimulation
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Collaborators
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether a kind of brain stimulation called anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) can improve the ability of people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or juvenile macular degeneration (JMD) to read words presented to them on a computer screen. In addition, secondary measures of visual acuity will also be examined to determine whether brain stimulation can allow patients to resolve finer details of an image. The proposed treatment is the application of a-tDCS onto the participant's head, with brain stimulation aimed at Primary Visual Cortex toward the occipital pole. The investigators will test the ability of participants to read words before and after the application of stimulation. The difference between the pre and post tests when receiving active stimulation will be compared to the difference when receiving sham stimulation, because sham stimulation is not expected to improve reading beyond a placebo. The aim of the study is to examine the potential of brain stimulation as an effective treatment for macular degeneration that may be used in conjunction with more traditional eye-based interventions. The investigators hypothesize that the brain stimulation will enable higher performance in the reading task and secondary measures due to an increase in the cortical excitability of the stimulated brain cells.
Detailed Description
This study will be carried out in Ontario, Canada (University of Waterloo) and Hong Kong (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University). There are two conditions: Active brain stimulation and sham/placebo brain stimulation. This study uses a within-subjects design, such that all participants will take part in both conditions on separate sessions.
Participants will be recruited from university-affiliated clinics and local clinical practices. Following full informed consent, participants will complete baseline testing and clinical testing to confirm that they meet eligibility criteria including: a diagnosis of macular degeneration without any additional eye disease, impaired vision but with enough visual acuity that the computer monitor can still present readable word, and no contraindications for brain stimulation interventions. Eligible participants will then be randomized to either receiving the active stimulation first or the placebo stimulation first.
The primary outcome measure is verbal reading accuracy for sentences presented on a computer screen following a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) task in which a single word is presented on the screen at a time. Participants will freely observe the words and will indicate the words on the screen verbally. The secondary outcome measures are crowded and uncrowded visual acuity as measured by Freiburg Visual Acuity & Contrast Test (FrACT) using the Landolt C stimulus. The "C"'s gap will be oriented randomly, and the participant will indicate the orientation of the stimulus. Crowded visual acuity will be assessed with Landolt C surrounded by a solid ring, while uncrowded visual acuity will be assessed with the Landolt C alone.
The study consists of 3 sessions:
Session 1: The first session will include the clinical evaluation. In addition, the first session will also collect the participant's individual RSVP performance threshold by presenting a variety of reading speeds and print sizes. The selected threshold will be the combination of print size and presentation speed required for a given participant to achieve roughly 55% performance accuracy.
Session 2 and 3: Brain stimulation sessions. At the start of each session, participants will perform baseline pre tests for the uncrowded and crowded visual acuity tasks as well as the RSVP task using their selected threshold from Session 1. They will then undergo a-tDCS to their primary visual cortex - this stimulation may be either active or placebo on any given day, but all participants will have been exposed to both sham and placebo by the end of Session 3. During the brain stimulation, participants will perform post tests for the primary outcome measure (RSVP) and the two secondary outcome measures (crowded and uncrowded visual acuity). Five minutes after the completion of the brain stimulation, participants will again perform all three post tests. A third set of post tests will be completed 30 minutes after the completion of the brain stimulation.
All outcome measures will be analyzed by comparing the baseline (pre test) scores to the post test scores, examining whether the active brain stimulation condition resulted in greater post test improvement relative to the placebo brain stimulation condition. The time course of the effect of brain stimulation will also be examined by comparing the effect of brain stimulation at each of the 3 post tests to one another.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Macular Degeneration
Keywords
Macular Degeneration, Brain Stimulation, Psychophysics, Reading, tDCS, RSVP, Visual Acuity, Uncrowded Visual Acuity, Crowded Visual Acuity
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
1 session of active brain stimulation and 1 session of placebo sham stimulation. Each participant will perform both sessions in a randomly-assigned order.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
The participant and the researcher will be blind to the order of the sessions for each participant.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
21 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Active then Sham
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this arm will be exposed to active stimulation during session 1 and sham/placebo stimulation during session 2
Arm Title
Sham then Active
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this arm will be exposed to sham/placebo stimulation during session 1 and active stimulation during session 2
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
anodal tDCS Active Stimulation
Intervention Description
a weak electric current is applied to the head through electrodes to affect the cortical excitability of the targeted cells in the brain.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
anodal tDCS Sham/Placebo Stimulation
Intervention Description
The tDCS machine will be used as in active stimulation, except the electrical current will not be applied.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Pre-Test
Description
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected.
Time Frame
This test is roughly 6 minutes in length, occurring before brain stimulation.
Title
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Post-Test 1 (during stimulation)
Description
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected without accounting for any effects of stimulation.
Time Frame
This test is roughly 6 minutes in length, occurring during the 20 minute brain stimulation period.
Title
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Post-Test 2 (5 min after stimulation)
Description
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected without accounting for any effects of stimulation.
Time Frame
This test is roughly 6 minutes in length, occurring 5 minutes after the completion of stimulation.
Title
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) Reading Post-Test 3 (30 min after stimulation)
Description
Behavioral Measure - Participants will verbally read words presented on a computer. The speed of the presentation and the size of the words will be personalized to the participant so that roughly 50% accuracy can be expected without accounting for any effects of stimulation.
Time Frame
This test is roughly 6 minutes in length, occurring 30 minutes after the completion of stimulation.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Pre-Test
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Pre-Test" before brain stimulation.
Title
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 1 (during stimulation)
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Post-Test 1" while brain stimulation is ongoing.
Title
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 2 (5 min after Stimulation)
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Post-Test 2" 5 minutes after brain stimulation completion.
Title
Uncrowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 3 (30 min after Stimulation)
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Post-Test 3" 30 minutes after brain stimulation completion.
Title
Crowded Visual Acuity Pre-Test
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Pre-Test" before brain stimulation.
Title
Crowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 1 (during stimulation)
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Post-Test 1" while brain stimulation is ongoing.
Title
Crowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 2 (5 min after stimulation)
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Post-Test 2" 5 minutes after brain stimulation completion.
Title
Crowded Visual Acuity Post-Test 3 (30 min after stimulation)
Description
Visual acuity as measured by participants indicating the orientation of the gap present in a Crowded Landolt C stimulus using the freely available FrACT software https://michaelbach.de/fract/index.html. The Crowded Landolt C stimulus adds a solid black ring round the standard Landolt C stimulus and generally results in poorer performance.
Time Frame
Roughly 2 minutes in length, administered after the primary outcome measure "RSVP Reading Post-Test 3" 30 minutes after brain stimulation completion.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of AMD (age 60+) or JMD (current age 18+).
Central vision loss and use of a peripheral preferred retinal locus (PRL) to fixate on visual objects, as confirmed by a microperimeter.
Visual acuity (VA); between 0.5 and 1.0 logMAR inclusive (6/18-6/60) in the better eye.
Best-corrected near visual acuity of 4.0M at 40 cm or better in the better eye
Stable vision for the previous 3 months (by patient report).
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnosed dementia.
Not fluent in reading English (Waterloo) or Chinese characters (Hong Kong).
Any ocular surgery (including anti-vegF injections) within the duration of the study.
Ocular pathology other than JMD or AMD that can reduce central vision.
Severe hearing impairment.
Contraindications for brain stimulation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ben Thompson, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Waterloo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Waterloo
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2L 3G1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
City
Hung Hom
State/Province
Kowloon
Country
Hong Kong
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IDP that underlie results in a publication will be available upon reasonable request to the research team.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IDP will be available upon a publication, and no more than 9 months after the publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IDP will be shared to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
Learn more about this trial
Improving Vision in Adults With Macular Degeneration
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs