search
Back to results

In-office Evaluation of Two Toric Soft Contact Lenses and a Spherical Soft Contact Lens

Primary Purpose

Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
senofilcon A toric contact lens
alphafilcon A toric
etafilcon A sphere
Sponsored by
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Astigmatism focused on measuring astigmatism, visual acuity, fit, comfort, satisfaction, contact lens

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 39 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. be at least 18 and less than or equal to 39 years of age and have a need for vision correction in BOTH eyes (monovision or uniocular fitting is NOT allowed).
  2. be of Asian descent (Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Polynesian or other Asian ancestry) and have Asian Eye anatomy
  3. have successfully worn toric or spherical soft (hydrogel or silicone hydrogel) contact lenses for at least 4-weeks prior to enrollment in the study.
  4. be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the protocol.
  5. agree to wear their contact lenses in both eyes on a daily wear schedule for at least 8 hours per day every day during the study.
  6. have a distance spherical component between -1.00 D and -5.50 D with cylinder in the range of 0.75 D to 2.25 D and cylinder axis within 10 ° of the vertical and within 20 ° of the horizontal in both eyes
  7. have a best corrected manifest refraction visual acuity of at least 20/25 or better in each eye.
  8. be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge.
  9. read, be given an explanation of, indicate understanding of, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is a rigid gas permeable (RGP) or daily disposable soft lens wearer.
  2. The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
  3. The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would cause the lenses to be removed more than twice a day. (i.e., Sjögren's syndrome, type II diabetes, etc).
  4. Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:

    • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
    • Pterygium or corneal scars within the visual axis
    • Neovascularization >1mm in from the limbus
    • History of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) worse than Grade 2
    • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
    • Seborrhoeic eczema, seborrhoeic conjunctivitis
  5. A history of recurrent erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcer or fungal infections.
  6. A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity.)
  7. Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
  8. Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge).
  9. Active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm 4

    Arm 5

    Arm 6

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    senofilcon A/alphafilcon A/etafilcon A

    alphafilcon A/etafilcon A/senofilcon A

    etafilcon A/senofilcon A/alphafilcon A

    senofilcon A/etafilcon A/alphafilcon A

    alphafilcon A/senofilcon A/etafilcon A

    etafilcon A/alphafilcon A/senofilcon A

    Arm Description

    First intervention:senofilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses

    First intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Third intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses

    First intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Second intervention:senofilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses

    First intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Third intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses

    First intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses

    First intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Second intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Visual Acuity
    Number of eyes with Distance Visual Acuity 20/20 or better
    Patient Reported Vision
    A weighted combined score calculated from individual confort-vision related questions asked on a 1-5 scale, 1=most negative resonse to 5=most positive response, was used to derive vision scores. The analysis shows the difference in outcome between test and control. >0=greater vision, <0=lesser vision.
    Lens Orientation Within 5 Degrees
    Meaures in what position does the lens sit on the eye at insertion and is measured in degrees of rotation.
    Lens Stability Within 5 Degrees
    Measures if the lens changes position on the eye as it is worn and is measured in degrees of rotation.
    Patient Reported Comfort.
    A weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale, 1=most negative response to 5=most positive response, was used to derive comfort outcomes. The analysis shows the difference in outcome between the test and control. >0=comfortable, <0=uncomfortable
    Patient Preference
    This outcome measures which lens the subjects preferred to wear.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 20, 2007
    Last Updated
    May 5, 2015
    Sponsor
    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
    Collaborators
    Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00584727
    Brief Title
    In-office Evaluation of Two Toric Soft Contact Lenses and a Spherical Soft Contact Lens
    Official Title
    Evaluation of Fit and Visual Acuity of the Cypress Toric Lens in Two Phases: Part A: A Non-Dispensing Comparison to SofLens66® Toric and Acuvue® 2
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2015
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    September 2007 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2007 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 2007 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
    Collaborators
    Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc.

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to determine the relative performance of a new toric soft contact lens against a toric and a spherical contact lens currently available in market, specifically with regards to the fit and visual acuity as well as the comfort, vision and satisfaction while in the practitioner's office. Approximately 2 hours duration.
    Detailed Description
    Non-dispensing, single-masked (subject-masked), randomised, controlled study.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Astigmatism
    Keywords
    astigmatism, visual acuity, fit, comfort, satisfaction, contact lens

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    96 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    senofilcon A/alphafilcon A/etafilcon A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    First intervention:senofilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses
    Arm Title
    alphafilcon A/etafilcon A/senofilcon A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    First intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Third intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses
    Arm Title
    etafilcon A/senofilcon A/alphafilcon A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    First intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Second intervention:senofilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses
    Arm Title
    senofilcon A/etafilcon A/alphafilcon A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    First intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Third intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses
    Arm Title
    alphafilcon A/senofilcon A/etafilcon A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    First intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Second intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses
    Arm Title
    etafilcon A/alphafilcon A/senofilcon A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    First intervention: etafilcon A sphere contact lenses Second intervention: alphafilcon A toric contact lenses Third intervention: senofilcon A toric contact lenses
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    senofilcon A toric contact lens
    Intervention Description
    contact lens
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    alphafilcon A toric
    Intervention Description
    contact lens
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    etafilcon A sphere
    Intervention Description
    contact lens
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Visual Acuity
    Description
    Number of eyes with Distance Visual Acuity 20/20 or better
    Time Frame
    15-20 minutes
    Title
    Patient Reported Vision
    Description
    A weighted combined score calculated from individual confort-vision related questions asked on a 1-5 scale, 1=most negative resonse to 5=most positive response, was used to derive vision scores. The analysis shows the difference in outcome between test and control. >0=greater vision, <0=lesser vision.
    Time Frame
    15-20 minutes
    Title
    Lens Orientation Within 5 Degrees
    Description
    Meaures in what position does the lens sit on the eye at insertion and is measured in degrees of rotation.
    Time Frame
    1 minute
    Title
    Lens Stability Within 5 Degrees
    Description
    Measures if the lens changes position on the eye as it is worn and is measured in degrees of rotation.
    Time Frame
    1 minute
    Title
    Patient Reported Comfort.
    Description
    A weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale, 1=most negative response to 5=most positive response, was used to derive comfort outcomes. The analysis shows the difference in outcome between the test and control. >0=comfortable, <0=uncomfortable
    Time Frame
    15-20 minutes
    Title
    Patient Preference
    Description
    This outcome measures which lens the subjects preferred to wear.
    Time Frame
    end of study

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    39 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: be at least 18 and less than or equal to 39 years of age and have a need for vision correction in BOTH eyes (monovision or uniocular fitting is NOT allowed). be of Asian descent (Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Polynesian or other Asian ancestry) and have Asian Eye anatomy have successfully worn toric or spherical soft (hydrogel or silicone hydrogel) contact lenses for at least 4-weeks prior to enrollment in the study. be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the protocol. agree to wear their contact lenses in both eyes on a daily wear schedule for at least 8 hours per day every day during the study. have a distance spherical component between -1.00 D and -5.50 D with cylinder in the range of 0.75 D to 2.25 D and cylinder axis within 10 ° of the vertical and within 20 ° of the horizontal in both eyes have a best corrected manifest refraction visual acuity of at least 20/25 or better in each eye. be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge. read, be given an explanation of, indicate understanding of, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT. Exclusion Criteria: The subject is a rigid gas permeable (RGP) or daily disposable soft lens wearer. The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures. The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would cause the lenses to be removed more than twice a day. (i.e., Sjögren's syndrome, type II diabetes, etc). Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as: Pathological dry eye or associated findings Pterygium or corneal scars within the visual axis Neovascularization >1mm in from the limbus History of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) worse than Grade 2 Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present) Seborrhoeic eczema, seborrhoeic conjunctivitis A history of recurrent erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcer or fungal infections. A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity.) Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea. Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge). Active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jason Chin, O.D.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    James Fujimoto, O.D.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Weslie Hamada, OlD.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Arthur T. Kobayashi, O.D., Inc.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Dennis Kuwuabara, O.D.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Eye Care Associates of Hawaii
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Mark Nakano, O.D.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Mark E. Nakano Optometric Corp.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Ikuko Sugimoto, O.D.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Kevin Rosin, O.D.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Drs. Farkas, Kassalow, Resnick & Associates
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jennifer Kao, O.D.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    In-office Evaluation of Two Toric Soft Contact Lenses and a Spherical Soft Contact Lens

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs