In Vivo nCLE Study in the Pancreas With Endosonography of Cystic Tumors (INSPECT)
Primary Purpose
Pancreatic Cysts
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cellvizio needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) system
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Pancreatic Cysts focused on measuring Pancreatic cysts
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for an EUSFNA procedure of a pancreatic cyst,
- Patients aged 18 years or older,
- Patients is under surgical consideration for management of the cyst
- Patients have provided written informed consent for the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to fluorescein
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Sites / Locations
- University of Chicago
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Cellvizio system
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Sensitivity
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
Specificity
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
PPV (Positive Predictive Value)
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
NPV (Negative Predictive Value)
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall Complication Rate
Assess the safety of nCLE, by recording any possible adverse event or complications occurring during or shortly after the EUSFNA and nCLE procedure
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01236300
First Posted
November 5, 2010
Last Updated
May 6, 2016
Sponsor
University of Chicago
Collaborators
Mauna Kea Technologies, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Technical University of Munich, Yale University, University of California, Irvine, Mayo Clinic, University of Washington, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01236300
Brief Title
In Vivo nCLE Study in the Pancreas With Endosonography of Cystic Tumors
Acronym
INSPECT
Official Title
In Vivo nCLE Study in the Pancreas With Endosonography of Cystic Tumors
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Chicago
Collaborators
Mauna Kea Technologies, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Technical University of Munich, Yale University, University of California, Irvine, Mayo Clinic, University of Washington, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Assess the safety and efficacy of the Cellvizio needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) system in differentiating benign from malignant and premalignant cysts (e.g. mucinous from non-mucinous cysts)
Detailed Description
The primary aim of the study is to define interpretation criteria to differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous cysts and classify more precisely the cysts. Once these criteria have been defined, the diagnostic parameters of nCLE in differentiating the different types of cysts and the reproducibility of these criteria will be assessed.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Cysts
Keywords
Pancreatic cysts
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
66 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cellvizio system
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cellvizio needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) system
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensitivity
Description
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
Time Frame
October 2011
Title
Specificity
Description
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
Time Frame
October 2011
Title
PPV (Positive Predictive Value)
Description
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
Time Frame
October 2011
Title
NPV (Negative Predictive Value)
Description
Using the descriptive criteria of the nCLE images of mucinous vs. non mucinous cysts determined in stage 1, we assessed diagnostic parameters of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of for the detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasia in stage 2.
For patients who underwent surgery, a gold standard diagnosis was obtained by histopathological diagnosis of the surgical specimen. The local pathologist reviewed the histology slides and selected key areas for high-resolution digital photography. Digital images for all surgical cases were sent to the central pathologist (J.H.) for review.
In patients who did not undergo surgery, the final diagnosis was established by clinical diagnosis after a review by five investigators. These investigators independently reviewed the patients' clinical factors, cross-sectional image findings, EUS findings and images, and cyst fluid results, and follow-up imaging studies ranging from 10 to 22 months, if available.
Time Frame
October 2011
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Complication Rate
Description
Assess the safety of nCLE, by recording any possible adverse event or complications occurring during or shortly after the EUSFNA and nCLE procedure
Time Frame
August 2011
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients scheduled for an EUSFNA procedure of a pancreatic cyst,
Patients aged 18 years or older,
Patients is under surgical consideration for management of the cyst
Patients have provided written informed consent for the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Allergy to fluorescein
Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Irving Waxman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Chicago
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
IL 60637
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
In Vivo nCLE Study in the Pancreas With Endosonography of Cystic Tumors
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs