Increasing Decision Quality for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Primary Purpose
Patient Engagement, Patient Preference
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Physicians trained in shared decision making
Physicians were not trained in shared decision making
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Patient Engagement
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- men aged 50 years old and older attending the polyclinic for routine follow up of a chronic disease (non-communicable disease)
- have moderate-to-severe LUTS and/or poor quality of life (QOL) as assessed by the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of eight or more and/or its individual QOL score of three or more
- men of any local Asian ethnicity and were willing to provide written consent
- can communicate with their allocated PCP in either of the three main local languages; English, Mandarin or Malay.
Exclusion Criteria:
- have indwelling catheters
- urinary incontinence requiring diapers
- anuria due to any renal pathology
- gross hematuria
- acute urinary retention
- symptoms consistent with an acute urinary tract infection
- existing treatment of LUTS or other prostate pathology
- visual or hearing impairment which render men incapable of understanding the study procedure and providing informed consent
- men unwilling to discuss their LUTS treatment options with their PCP
Sites / Locations
- Haidee Ngu
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms
No shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms
Arm Description
Participants used the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score so report their symptoms and were attended by Primary Care Physicians trained in shared decision making
Participants did not use the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score to report their symptoms and received usual care by Primary Care Physicians not trained in shared decision making
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the patients' perspective
The Shared Decision Making-9 (SDMQ9) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the patient. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the physicians' perspective
The Shared Decision Making-Doctor (SDMQDoc) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the physician. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04851275
First Posted
March 26, 2021
Last Updated
April 16, 2021
Sponsor
SingHealth Polyclinics
Collaborators
Singapore General Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04851275
Brief Title
Increasing Decision Quality for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Official Title
Increasing Decision Quality in Older Men in Selecting Treatment Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
SingHealth Polyclinics
Collaborators
Singapore General Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators show that by upskilling of primary care physicians (PCPs) in SDM and leveraging on a novel pictorial Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score (VAUS), they can enhance older men's recognition of LUTS and stimulated discussion with their PCPs.
Detailed Description
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), often related to prostatomegaly, is common but seldom sought medical attention amongst older men. Visual-aid and shared decision-making (SDM) are potential solutions to address LUTS. The study aimed to determine the effect of a novel pictorial Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score (VAUS) and primary care physicians (PCP) SDM training on the decisional quality amongst men selecting their treatment options for LUTS.
This study recruited 60 multi-ethnic Asian men aged ≥50 years with moderate-to-severe LUTS (International Prostate Symptoms Score≥8 and/or QOL≥3) in a Singapore public primary care clinic. Men used the VAUS to report their symptoms. 60 men were randomly assigned to PCPs trained in SDM in the intervention group (n=30) and the other 30 to the control group (PCPs without SDM-training). Patient-physician dyad decision quality was measured using the validated SDMQ-9 (patient) and SDMQ-Doc (physician) questionnaires.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patient Engagement, Patient Preference
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants used the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score so report their symptoms and were attended by Primary Care Physicians trained in shared decision making
Arm Title
No shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants did not use the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score to report their symptoms and received usual care by Primary Care Physicians not trained in shared decision making
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Physicians trained in shared decision making
Intervention Description
Physicians in this group were trained in shared decision making
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Physicians were not trained in shared decision making
Intervention Description
Physicians did not receive training in shared decision making
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the patients' perspective
Description
The Shared Decision Making-9 (SDMQ9) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the patient. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Title
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the physicians' perspective
Description
The Shared Decision Making-Doctor (SDMQDoc) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the physician. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
men aged 50 years old and older attending the polyclinic for routine follow up of a chronic disease (non-communicable disease)
have moderate-to-severe LUTS and/or poor quality of life (QOL) as assessed by the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of eight or more and/or its individual QOL score of three or more
men of any local Asian ethnicity and were willing to provide written consent
can communicate with their allocated PCP in either of the three main local languages; English, Mandarin or Malay.
Exclusion Criteria:
have indwelling catheters
urinary incontinence requiring diapers
anuria due to any renal pathology
gross hematuria
acute urinary retention
symptoms consistent with an acute urinary tract infection
existing treatment of LUTS or other prostate pathology
visual or hearing impairment which render men incapable of understanding the study procedure and providing informed consent
men unwilling to discuss their LUTS treatment options with their PCP
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tan Ngiap Chuan, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Singhealth polyclinic
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Haidee Ngu
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
150167
Country
Singapore
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31451932
Citation
Tiwari R, Ng MY, Neo SH, Mangat R, Ho H. Prospective validation of a novel visual analogue uroflowmetry score (VAUS) in 1000 men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1267-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02909-1. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Increasing Decision Quality for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs