search
Back to results

Individualized Anterior Cruciate Ligament Versus Conventional Reconstruction (IACLR)

Primary Purpose

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Greece
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Individualised ACL reconstruction
Conventional ACL reconstruction
Sponsored by
Larissa University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries focused on measuring ACL, Anterior, Cruciate, Ligament, Reconstruction, Individualised, Anatomical, Navigation

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 45 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ACL rupture undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery with closed epiphyses, younger than 45 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No previous surgery in the knee (except partial meniscectomy), no major systematic pathology

Sites / Locations

  • Michael HantesRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Convetional reconstruction group

Individualised reconstruction group

Arm Description

Patients will undergo ACL reconstruction based on conventional ACL surgery

Patients will undergo ACL reconstruction based on their special anatomical and functional characteristics and with the use of a navigation system

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of the change of stability of the operated knee between the two groups from Baseline until 1 year post-operation
Participants in two groups will be assessed with KT2000 arthrometer before and after ACL reconstruction regarding knee stability. Additionally knee kinematics and gait analysis before and after the ACL reconstruction will be compared between the two groups in a gait analysis lab.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Compare the change from Baseline between the patients of the two groups in KOOS (Knee Injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome) from the baseline until 1 year post operation
Originally published in 1998 in The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) assesses patient pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in daily living (17 items), function in sport and recreation (5 items), and knee related quality of life (4 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 indicating no knee symptoms. The KOOS is a patient reported joint-specific score, which may be useful for assessing changes in knee pathology over time, with or without treatment.
Compare the change from Baseline between the patients of the two groups in IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form) from the baseline until 1 year post operation.
the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) was designed to assess patients with a variety of knee disorders including ligamentous and meniscal injuries as well as patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis. The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Compare the change from Baseline between the patients of the two groups in Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale from the baseline until 1 year post operation.
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was designed to be used for evaluating outcomes of knee ligament surgery, particularly for symptoms related to instability. The Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability).
Compare the post operation MRI of the 2 groups
Evaluate tunnel positioning in femur and tibia and the graft integration and compare them between the 2 groups.

Full Information

First Posted
June 10, 2019
Last Updated
November 16, 2021
Sponsor
Larissa University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Thessaly
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04366362
Brief Title
Individualized Anterior Cruciate Ligament Versus Conventional Reconstruction
Acronym
IACLR
Official Title
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgical Reconstruction Based on Individualized Musculoskeletal Models: a Randomized Control Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 2, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Larissa University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Thessaly

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A randomised prospective control trial comparing the efficiency of a more individualized approach in ACL reconstruction with the help of neuromuscular computer models with traditional ACL reconstruction practices.
Detailed Description
Until now the ACL reconstruction was based on the surgeon's experience. An individualised ACL reconstruction is customized based on each patient's special characteristics. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the native ACL (both anteromedial and posterolateral bundles), knee anatomy and function, level of activity and generalised ligamentous laxity are assessed. Femoral and tibial tunnels should be placed in their anatomical location accounting for both the native ACL insertion site and bony landmarks. Two groups will be created, one with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction based on a surgeon's experience and one based on a more individualised approach according to the particular characteristics of each patient separately. In addition, patients in the second group will undergo ACL reconstruction with the use of Computer Assisted System (Navigation). Preoperatively and postoperatively, the patients will be assessed with the KT2000 system, the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome), the Tegner- Lysholm Knee scoring system and the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee). Additionally, all patient will be examined for their knee function with the use of a 3D gait analysis system. The follow-up examination will take place 6 and 12 months after the surgery.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Keywords
ACL, Anterior, Cruciate, Ligament, Reconstruction, Individualised, Anatomical, Navigation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Two groups of patients, randomly assigned
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants will not be aware of the group that they will be part of. Assessors before and after surgery will not be aware of patients groups
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Convetional reconstruction group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will undergo ACL reconstruction based on conventional ACL surgery
Arm Title
Individualised reconstruction group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will undergo ACL reconstruction based on their special anatomical and functional characteristics and with the use of a navigation system
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Individualised ACL reconstruction
Intervention Description
ACL reconstruction based on anatomical and functional distinctiveness of each patient separately
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional ACL reconstruction
Intervention Description
ACL reconstruction based on surgeons experience without taking into account any other patients characteristics
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of the change of stability of the operated knee between the two groups from Baseline until 1 year post-operation
Description
Participants in two groups will be assessed with KT2000 arthrometer before and after ACL reconstruction regarding knee stability. Additionally knee kinematics and gait analysis before and after the ACL reconstruction will be compared between the two groups in a gait analysis lab.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 year post operation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare the change from Baseline between the patients of the two groups in KOOS (Knee Injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome) from the baseline until 1 year post operation
Description
Originally published in 1998 in The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) assesses patient pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in daily living (17 items), function in sport and recreation (5 items), and knee related quality of life (4 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 indicating no knee symptoms. The KOOS is a patient reported joint-specific score, which may be useful for assessing changes in knee pathology over time, with or without treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 year post operation
Title
Compare the change from Baseline between the patients of the two groups in IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form) from the baseline until 1 year post operation.
Description
the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) was designed to assess patients with a variety of knee disorders including ligamentous and meniscal injuries as well as patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis. The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 year post operation
Title
Compare the change from Baseline between the patients of the two groups in Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale from the baseline until 1 year post operation.
Description
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was designed to be used for evaluating outcomes of knee ligament surgery, particularly for symptoms related to instability. The Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability).
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 year post operation
Title
Compare the post operation MRI of the 2 groups
Description
Evaluate tunnel positioning in femur and tibia and the graft integration and compare them between the 2 groups.
Time Frame
1 year post operation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with ACL rupture undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery with closed epiphyses, younger than 45 years old Exclusion Criteria: No previous surgery in the knee (except partial meniscectomy), no major systematic pathology
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Georgios Chalatsis, MD
Phone
00306977992086
Email
ghalatsis@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
michael hantes, MD
Email
hantesmi@otenet.gr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Hantes, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University General Hospital of Larissa
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Michael Hantes
City
Larissa
Country
Greece
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gorgios Paraskevas Chalatsis, MD
Phone
0030 6977992086
Email
ghalatsis@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Hantes, MD
Email
hantesmi@otenet.gr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Individualized Anterior Cruciate Ligament Versus Conventional Reconstruction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs