Influence of Patient-Informed Choice in a Novel Treatment Model for LBP
Primary Purpose
Mechanical Low Back Pain
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Patient Decision Making tool
Standard of care
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Mechanical Low Back Pain focused on measuring Low back pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older with mechanically producible LBP
Exclusion Criteria:
- the presence of any red flags (i.e., tumor, metabolic diseases, RA, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.), or signs consistent with nerve root compression (reproduction of low back or leg pain with straight leg raise at less than 45°, muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the lower extremity, diminished lower extremity muscle stretch reflex, or diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any lower extremity dermatome). Other exclusion criteria include prior surgery to the lumbar spine and current pregnancy.
Sites / Locations
- Proaxis Physical Therapy
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Patient Decision Making Tool
Standard of care
Arm Description
Patients will be given an opportunity to use a decision making tool to assist in decision making of their care
Control group consisting of normal care
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Care Seeking Behavior (recurrence of back pain) at 1 year
Care seeking behavior is defined as a recurrence of symptoms, no resolution of symptoms at 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measures
Oswestry Disability Index
At discharge (after care) the Oswestry will be measured and compared
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01744015
First Posted
December 2, 2012
Last Updated
July 9, 2013
Sponsor
Walsh University
Collaborators
Proaxis Therapy
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01744015
Brief Title
Influence of Patient-Informed Choice in a Novel Treatment Model for LBP
Official Title
Influence of Patient-Informed Choice in a Novel Treatment Model for LBP: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
We did not receive funding
Study Start Date
April 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2016 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Walsh University
Collaborators
Proaxis Therapy
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
(Primary) To compare the effectiveness of a patient guided choice of care using a patient decision support tool to clinical guided care within a novel care process for non-specific low back pain.
(We hypothesize that the patient guided choice model will demonstrate significant improvements when compared to the clinician guided care approach)
(Secondary) To qualitatively investigate which components of the patient choice educational methods were most effective for informed decision making among patients who participate in the patient guided choice of care approach (We hypothesize that dialogue method of patient guided choice will be identified as most useful)
Detailed Description
The purpose of this research study proposal is to evaluate patient choice within this physical therapist-led model for non-specific low back pain. Evidence exists that patients are eager to play an active role in decisions concerning their health. Recent evidence from research supports the benefit of decision aides for consumers, especially those that were accurate and refined to the specific problems of each patient. In our proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT), one group of patients in the study will have the opportunity to drive choices within their healthcare model; but only after receiving useful information on what the consequences of their selections will be. Patients will receive decision making information to assist in making an informed choice. The structured information will organize known results from the research literature to assist patients in understanding the likely outcome of their condition and what they need to adequately manage their own care. The control group of patients will receive the Physical therapist-directed care model that is presently used and has shown success. Patient outcomes will involve patient self report of improvement and whether or not the patient pursued care for the same condition over a 1 year period of time.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mechanical Low Back Pain
Keywords
Low back pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Care Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Patient Decision Making Tool
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be given an opportunity to use a decision making tool to assist in decision making of their care
Arm Title
Standard of care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Control group consisting of normal care
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Patient Decision Making tool
Intervention Description
The experimental group will consist of typical care from the physical therapist (as with the control group) with the addition of the patient decision support tool and information dissemination. The process of information dissemination for informed decision making. Based on the literature, we have deemed three points of informational contact as necessary to improve informed decision making. We plan to inform patients through the use of a) pre-material, b) dialogue, and c) reinforcement means.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of care
Intervention Description
A control group will receive typical care from the physical therapist. Typical care includes physical therapist directed care of patients with low back pain, using standardized treatment algorithms (guideline oriented) for referral to physicians during cases of concern. In this model, a physician is consulted when the physical therapists feel it is necessary; or when directly requested by a patient. Physician consult is not normally provided as an option for the control group, unless evidence exists within the examination to suggest the need from a mutually agreed upon examination scheme including identification of red flags between the PT and physician. In the current model, because most of patients seen are diagnosed with non-specific LBP and do not require imaging or prescriptive medications, a majority are treated actively by the physical therapists-only during the initial visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Care Seeking Behavior (recurrence of back pain) at 1 year
Description
Care seeking behavior is defined as a recurrence of symptoms, no resolution of symptoms at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year status post discharge from formal physical therapy care
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Oswestry Disability Index
Description
At discharge (after care) the Oswestry will be measured and compared
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment which is on average 4 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
At D/C, we will compare pain change scores
Time Frame
participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment which is on average 4 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years of age or older with mechanically producible LBP
Exclusion Criteria:
the presence of any red flags (i.e., tumor, metabolic diseases, RA, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.), or signs consistent with nerve root compression (reproduction of low back or leg pain with straight leg raise at less than 45°, muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the lower extremity, diminished lower extremity muscle stretch reflex, or diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any lower extremity dermatome). Other exclusion criteria include prior surgery to the lumbar spine and current pregnancy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chad E Cook, phd
Organizational Affiliation
Walsh U
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Proaxis Physical Therapy
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29602
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Influence of Patient-Informed Choice in a Novel Treatment Model for LBP
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs