search
Back to results

Injecting Botulinum Toxin A Underneath the Skin to Treat Spinal Cord Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Primary Purpose

Neuropathic Back Pain, Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botulinum Toxin A
Placebo
Sponsored by
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuropathic Back Pain focused on measuring Botulinum Toxin A, Neuropathic pain, Spinal cord injury, Pain management, Rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 18 and 80 years old
  • Diagnosed with traumatic spinal cord injury
  • Target pain is considered by the physician as at-level SCI in nature to a high degree of certainty (4 or 5 using a Likert confidence scale ranging from 0-5 where 0 is "purely a guess" and 5 is "absolutely certain")
  • Able to give written informed consent
  • Target pain that has been continuously present for at least one month
  • Target pain is of at least moderate average intensity over the past week, e.g., greater than or equal to 4/10 on a numeric rating scale, the cutoff point for moderate pain in an SCI population.
  • Target pain is localized within the dermatome which identifies the NLI or within 3 levels below the NLI
  • Subject has been on a stable dose of analgesic mediation (or not on analgesic medication) for at least 3 weeks and is agreeable to remaining on current regimen for the duration of the study (previous prescribed breakthrough analgesics will be allowed)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of intolerance, hypersensitivity or known allergy to botulinum toxin or its preservatives
  • History of intolerance, hypersensitivity or known allergy to EMLA cream (lignocaine/prilocaine eutectic mixture) which is used as an analgesic during BoNT injection
  • Recent history of administration of botulinum toxin (within previous 6 months)
  • Contraindications to botulinum toxin (myasthenia gravis or other disease of the neuromuscular junction)
  • Coagulation disorder
  • Current infection
  • Insufficient command of English to complete self-report instruments.

Sites / Locations

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Botulinum Toxin A

Placebo

Arm Description

Each vial of botulin toxin (100U, BOTOX, Allergan) will be reconstituted with 4ml non-preserved saline solution (0.9%) as recommended by the manufacturer (concentration of 5 units Botulinum Toxin A/0.2ml). Each injection will be 0.2mL (BOTOX, 5 units), administered through a 25 gauge needle. The marked area will have subcutaneous injections, each separated by a radius of 1 cm, from the other injections into the marked area,(maximum of 80 injections, 400 Units).

Placebo consists of 0.9% normal saline. Each injection will be 0.2mL, administered with a 25 gauge needle subcutaneously into the affected area. The marked area will have subcutaneous injections (maximum of 80) each separated from the surrounding ones by a radius of 1 cm.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Participant rated pain intensity from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

7-Point Guy/Farrar Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Mean change from baseline. Participants are asked "Taking into account your pain level and how it affects your life, are you feeling better, the same or worse than when you started treatment?" and then to quantify the magnitude of the change. with the 7-Point guy Farrar which measures the global treatment effect from with scale from 0 to 6, higher score indicates worse outcomes.
International Basic Pain Dataset - Pain Affecting Day-to-day Activities
The International Basic Pain Dataset is an assessment tool which includes several components including: location of pain, temporal qualities of the pain, type of pain, pain interference measures of activity, sleep, and mood. It has been shown to be valid in an interview/self -report format. The pain affecting day-to-day activities subset of the dataset is scored is from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating less favorable outcomes.
International Basic Pain Dataset - Pain Affecting Mood
The International Basic Pain Dataset is an assessment tool which includes several components including: location of pain, temporal qualities of the pain, type of pain, pain interference measures of activity, sleep, and mood. It has been shown to be valid in an interview/self -report format. The pain affecting mood subset of the dataset is scored is from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating less favorable outcomes.
International Basic Pain Dataset - Pain Affecting Sleep
The International Basic Pain Dataset is an assessment tool which includes several components including: location of pain, temporal qualities of the pain, type of pain, pain interference measures of activity, sleep, and mood. It has been shown to be valid in an interview/self -report format. The pain affecting sleep subset of the dataset is scored is from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating less favorable outcomes.
Static Mechanical Allodynia Testing
Mechanical allodynia is a characteristic of evoked pain in subjects with neuropathic pain. Static allodynia to mechanical stimuli will be defined as a sensation of pain evoked by the pressure of the end of a wooden stick. The end of a wooden stick will touch the affected region with enough pressure to indent the skin, for 10 seconds. Afterwards, the subject will be asked to rate the perceived pain on an 11-point NRS.
Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia Testing
Dynamic allodynia will be tested by stroking the affected region gently with a cotton swab, 4 times at a rate of 3-5cm per second over an area of 5cm. If there is an evoked clear sensation of pain, the subject is asked to rate the intensity of dynamic allodynia using the 11-point NRS. The region of static and dynamic allodynia, if present, will be marked and recorded
Patient-generated Index (PGI)
PGI measures activity affected by pain. Full score is 0 to 10000, with higher score indicating better function

Full Information

First Posted
April 8, 2016
Last Updated
April 5, 2019
Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02736890
Brief Title
Injecting Botulinum Toxin A Underneath the Skin to Treat Spinal Cord Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Official Title
Subcutaneous Injection of Botulinum Toxin A for At--Level Back Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
funding not available to continue
Study Start Date
March 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 17, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 17, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Back pain is a common secondary condition of both acute and chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Current existing treatment including both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic are limited by marginal efficacy or intolerable side effects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of subcutaneous injections of botulinum toxin A to provide pain relief in spinal cord injury patients with back pain near the level of injury in the spine. Botulinum toxin A has been shown in both pre-clinical and clinical studies to help with nerve pain. The researchers propose a double blinded placebo controlled crossover study to study the effects of subcutaneous botulinum injections to at--level SCI back pain in patients with spinal cord injury.
Detailed Description
In this study, there will be 2 procedure performed. The first procedure will be named P1 and consists of subcutaneous injection of either placebo or Botulinum Toxin A. The second procedure will be the cross-over procedure named P2. For the cross-over procedure, the subjects who had initially received Botulinum Toxin A will receive placebo and the subjects who had initially received placebo will receive Botulinum Toxin A. This is a Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo Controlled Trial. Recruited subjects will be consented, enrolled and evaluated immediately prior to P1 (or during a visit prior to the visit for P1). After the initial pre-treatment evaluation, subjects will randomly receive either placebo or Botulinum Toxin A subcutaneously (P1). A telephone follow-up (or e-mail follow up) will be performed at 2 weeks and 8 weeks post- P1. An onsite follow up will be performed 4 weeks post P1 and 12 weeks post P1. Cross-over Study: After the 3rd month on-site evaluation (12 weeks post P1), during the same visit, the subject will proceed to the cross-over study. At this time, the patient will have the option to receive a repeat subcutaneous injection of the cross-over agent. If they desire one, a subcutaneous injection of the cross-over agent will be performed at that same visit. If they wish to defer the repeat injection, they will be contacted and asked every 4 weeks - between 12 weeks and 24 weeks post P1 (no subject will receive P2 after week 24) if they would like to have the subcutaneous injection of the cross-over agent. If they desire one, a repeat injection will be scheduled for the following week. The rationale for a variable length of time after the initial Botulinum Toxin A/Placebo injection (P1) is to document the variability of individuals' pain response after Botulinum Toxin A. It has been reported in literature, of the subjects that respond to subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin A injections for pain, most will return to their base-line pain score in 12--24 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuropathic Back Pain, Spinal Cord Injury
Keywords
Botulinum Toxin A, Neuropathic pain, Spinal cord injury, Pain management, Rehabilitation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
8 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Botulinum Toxin A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each vial of botulin toxin (100U, BOTOX, Allergan) will be reconstituted with 4ml non-preserved saline solution (0.9%) as recommended by the manufacturer (concentration of 5 units Botulinum Toxin A/0.2ml). Each injection will be 0.2mL (BOTOX, 5 units), administered through a 25 gauge needle. The marked area will have subcutaneous injections, each separated by a radius of 1 cm, from the other injections into the marked area,(maximum of 80 injections, 400 Units).
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo consists of 0.9% normal saline. Each injection will be 0.2mL, administered with a 25 gauge needle subcutaneously into the affected area. The marked area will have subcutaneous injections (maximum of 80) each separated from the surrounding ones by a radius of 1 cm.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Botulinum Toxin A
Other Intervention Name(s)
Botox
Intervention Description
Subjects will receive subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin A injections into the marked painful region. The syringes will be prepared by a third party prior to the injection and the administrator of the procedure will be blinded to syringe content. This physician will be performing the injections under sterile conditions. Local anesthesia, EMLA (lignocaine/prilocaine eutectic mixture) cream, up to 4 grams, will be applied topically for local anesthesia. After 50 minutes, the cream will be cleaned off. Overlying skin will be sterilized with either betadine or alcohol solution.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Subjects will receive subcutaneous placebo injections into the marked painful region. The syringes will be prepared by a third party prior to the injection and the administrator of the procedure will be blinded to syringe content. This physician will be performing the injections under sterile conditions. Local anesthesia, EMLA (lignocaine/prilocaine eutectic mixture) cream, up to 4 grams, will be applied topically for local anesthesia. After 50 minutes, the cream will be cleaned off. Overlying skin will be sterilized with either betadine or alcohol solution.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Description
Participant rated pain intensity from 0-10, with higher score indicating more pain
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
7-Point Guy/Farrar Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Description
Mean change from baseline. Participants are asked "Taking into account your pain level and how it affects your life, are you feeling better, the same or worse than when you started treatment?" and then to quantify the magnitude of the change. with the 7-Point guy Farrar which measures the global treatment effect from with scale from 0 to 6, higher score indicates worse outcomes.
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Title
International Basic Pain Dataset - Pain Affecting Day-to-day Activities
Description
The International Basic Pain Dataset is an assessment tool which includes several components including: location of pain, temporal qualities of the pain, type of pain, pain interference measures of activity, sleep, and mood. It has been shown to be valid in an interview/self -report format. The pain affecting day-to-day activities subset of the dataset is scored is from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating less favorable outcomes.
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Title
International Basic Pain Dataset - Pain Affecting Mood
Description
The International Basic Pain Dataset is an assessment tool which includes several components including: location of pain, temporal qualities of the pain, type of pain, pain interference measures of activity, sleep, and mood. It has been shown to be valid in an interview/self -report format. The pain affecting mood subset of the dataset is scored is from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating less favorable outcomes.
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Title
International Basic Pain Dataset - Pain Affecting Sleep
Description
The International Basic Pain Dataset is an assessment tool which includes several components including: location of pain, temporal qualities of the pain, type of pain, pain interference measures of activity, sleep, and mood. It has been shown to be valid in an interview/self -report format. The pain affecting sleep subset of the dataset is scored is from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating less favorable outcomes.
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Title
Static Mechanical Allodynia Testing
Description
Mechanical allodynia is a characteristic of evoked pain in subjects with neuropathic pain. Static allodynia to mechanical stimuli will be defined as a sensation of pain evoked by the pressure of the end of a wooden stick. The end of a wooden stick will touch the affected region with enough pressure to indent the skin, for 10 seconds. Afterwards, the subject will be asked to rate the perceived pain on an 11-point NRS.
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Title
Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia Testing
Description
Dynamic allodynia will be tested by stroking the affected region gently with a cotton swab, 4 times at a rate of 3-5cm per second over an area of 5cm. If there is an evoked clear sensation of pain, the subject is asked to rate the intensity of dynamic allodynia using the 11-point NRS. The region of static and dynamic allodynia, if present, will be marked and recorded
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline
Title
Patient-generated Index (PGI)
Description
PGI measures activity affected by pain. Full score is 0 to 10000, with higher score indicating better function
Time Frame
up to 12 weeks post-injection, for a total of 24 weeks from baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Between the ages of 18 and 80 years old Diagnosed with traumatic spinal cord injury Target pain is considered by the physician as at-level SCI in nature to a high degree of certainty (4 or 5 using a Likert confidence scale ranging from 0-5 where 0 is "purely a guess" and 5 is "absolutely certain") Able to give written informed consent Target pain that has been continuously present for at least one month Target pain is of at least moderate average intensity over the past week, e.g., greater than or equal to 4/10 on a numeric rating scale, the cutoff point for moderate pain in an SCI population. Target pain is localized within the dermatome which identifies the NLI or within 3 levels below the NLI Subject has been on a stable dose of analgesic mediation (or not on analgesic medication) for at least 3 weeks and is agreeable to remaining on current regimen for the duration of the study (previous prescribed breakthrough analgesics will be allowed) Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy History of intolerance, hypersensitivity or known allergy to botulinum toxin or its preservatives History of intolerance, hypersensitivity or known allergy to EMLA cream (lignocaine/prilocaine eutectic mixture) which is used as an analgesic during BoNT injection Recent history of administration of botulinum toxin (within previous 6 months) Contraindications to botulinum toxin (myasthenia gravis or other disease of the neuromuscular junction) Coagulation disorder Current infection Insufficient command of English to complete self-report instruments.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Bryce, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The following will be shared: demographic information, pain response to interventions, adverse events and functional outcomes. The above information will be obtain in the forms of questionnaires and surveys. The data will be available when the study concludes.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12791431
Citation
Siddall PJ, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003 Jun;103(3):249-257. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00452-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15520972
Citation
Cardenas DD, Bryce TN, Shem K, Richards JS, Elhefni H. Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.027.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9630137
Citation
Rintala DH, Loubser PG, Castro J, Hart KA, Fuhrer MJ. Chronic pain in a community-based sample of men with spinal cord injury: prevalence, severity, and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap, and subjective well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jun;79(6):604-14. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90032-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15968299
Citation
Jensen MP, Hoffman AJ, Cardenas DD. Chronic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury: a survey and longitudinal study. Spinal Cord. 2005 Dec;43(12):704-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101777.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12137215
Citation
Vogel LC, Krajci KA, Anderson CJ. Adults with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury: part 2: musculoskeletal and neurological complications. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002 Summer;25(2):117-23. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2002.11753611.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15031818
Citation
McColl MA, Charlifue S, Glass C, Lawson N, Savic G. Aging, gender, and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8446450
Citation
Knutsdottir S. Spinal cord injuries in Iceland 1973-1989. A follow up study. Paraplegia. 1993 Jan;31(1):68-72. doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.10.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Samuelsson KK. Back pain and spinal Deformity-Common among wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy. 1996 -01;3(1):28-32.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6514167
Citation
Waisbrod H, Hansen D, Gerbershagen HU. Chronic pain in paraplegics. Neurosurgery. 1984 Dec;15(6):933-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3665258
Citation
Hardcastle P, Bedbrook G, Curtis K. Long-term results of conservative and operative management in complete paraplegics with spinal cord injuries between T10 and L2 with respect to function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Nov;(224):88-96.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11926327
Citation
Walter JS, Sacks J, Othman R, Rankin AZ, Nemchausky B, Chintam R, Wheeler JS. A database of self-reported secondary medical problems among VA spinal cord injury patients: its role in clinical care and management. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;39(1):53-61. Erratum In: J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Sep-Oct;39(5):623.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15273900
Citation
Rintala DH, Hart KA, Priebe MM. Predicting consistency of pain over a 10-year period in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;41(1):75-88. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.01.0075.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16739554
Citation
Cardenas DD, Jensen MP. Treatments for chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury: A survey study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(2):109-17. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753864.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11973011
Citation
Cardenas DD, Warms CA, Turner JA, Marshall H, Brooke MM, Loeser JD. Efficacy of amitriptyline for relief of pain in spinal cord injury: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2002 Apr;96(3):365-373. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00483-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15087796
Citation
Levendoglu F, Ogun CO, Ozerbil O, Ogun TC, Ugurlu H. Gabapentin is a first line drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):743-51. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000112068.16108.3a.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19333166
Citation
Norrbrink C, Lundeberg T. Tramadol in neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2009 Mar-Apr;25(3):177-84. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31818a744d.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19224614
Citation
Elia AE, Filippini G, Calandrella D, Albanese A. Botulinum neurotoxins for post-stroke spasticity in adults: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2009 Apr 30;24(6):801-12. doi: 10.1002/mds.22452.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20633181
Citation
Novak I, Campbell L, Boyce M, Fung VS; Cerebral Palsy Institute. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and aftercare for cervical dystonia and other causes of hypertonia of the neck: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17 Suppl 2:94-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03130.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20633180
Citation
Sheean G, Lannin NA, Turner-Stokes L, Rawicki B, Snow BJ; Cerebral Palsy Institute. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and after-care for upper limb hypertonicity in adults: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17 Suppl 2:74-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03129.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20633179
Citation
Olver J, Esquenazi A, Fung VS, Singer BJ, Ward AB; Cerebral Palsy Institute. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and aftercare for lower limb disorders of movement and muscle tone in adults: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17 Suppl 2:57-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03128.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16247065
Citation
Piovesan EJ, Teive HG, Kowacs PA, Della Coletta MV, Werneck LC, Silberstein SD. An open study of botulinum-A toxin treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2005 Oct 25;65(8):1306-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000180940.98815.74.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21134121
Citation
Xiao L, Mackey S, Hui H, Xong D, Zhang Q, Zhang D. Subcutaneous injection of botulinum toxin a is beneficial in postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Med. 2010 Dec;11(12):1827-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01003.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22492424
Citation
Wu CJ, Lian YJ, Zheng YK, Zhang HF, Chen Y, Xie NC, Wang LJ. Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cephalalgia. 2012 Apr;32(6):443-50. doi: 10.1177/0333102412441721. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19246421
Citation
Yuan RY, Sheu JJ, Yu JM, Chen WT, Tseng IJ, Chang HH, Hu CJ. Botulinum toxin for diabetic neuropathic pain: a randomized double-blind crossover trial. Neurology. 2009 Apr 28;72(17):1473-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000345968.05959.cf. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12873271
Citation
Jabbari B, Maher N, Difazio MP. Botulinum toxin a improved burning pain and allodynia in two patients with spinal cord pathology. Pain Med. 2003 Jun;4(2):206-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03013.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18092558
Citation
Bryce TN, Budh CN, Cardenas DD, Dijkers M, Felix ER, Finnerup NB, Kennedy P, Lundeberg T, Richards JS, Rintala DH, Siddall P, Widerstrom-Noga E. Pain after spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research. Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures meeting. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(5):421-40. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753405.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22310319
Citation
Bryce TN, Biering-Sorensen F, Finnerup NB, Cardenas DD, Defrin R, Ivan E, Lundeberg T, Norrbrink C, Richards JS, Siddall P, Stripling T, Treede RD, Waxman SG, Widerstrom-Noga E, Yezierski RP, Dijkers M. International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) Classification: Part 2. Initial validation using vignettes. Spinal Cord. 2012 Jun;50(6):404-12. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.2. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10680163
Citation
Bryce TN, Ragnarsson KT. Pain after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2000 Feb;11(1):157-68.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21078545
Citation
Vranken JH, Hollmann MW, van der Vegt MH, Kruis MR, Heesen M, Vos K, Pijl AJ, Dijkgraaf MGW. Duloxetine in patients with central neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord injury or stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16736200
Citation
Lis AM, Black KM, Korn H, Nordin M. Association between sitting and occupational LBP. Eur Spine J. 2007 Feb;16(2):283-98. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0143-7. Epub 2006 May 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15385649
Citation
Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Fatkhutdinova L, Verbeke G, Pirenne D, Johannik K, Somville PR, Mairiaux P, Moens GF, Masschelein R. Risk factors for first-ever low back pain among workers in their first employment. Occup Med (Lond). 2004 Dec;54(8):513-9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh091. Epub 2004 Sep 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23916072
Citation
Adams MA, McNally DS, Chinn H, Dolan P. The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1994 Jan;9(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3722226
Citation
Panjabi MM, Andersson GB, Jorneus L, Hult E, Mattsson L. In vivo measurements of spinal column vibrations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):695-702.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14519062
Citation
Scannell JP, McGill SM. Lumbar posture--should it, and can it, be modified? A study of passive tissue stiffness and lumbar position during activities of daily living. Phys Ther. 2003 Oct;83(10):907-17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18793867
Citation
Claus AP, Hides JA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. Is 'ideal' sitting posture real? Measurement of spinal curves in four sitting postures. Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):404-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19138810
Citation
Dunk NM, Kedgley AE, Jenkyn TR, Callaghan JP. Evidence of a pelvis-driven flexion pattern: are the joints of the lower lumbar spine fully flexed in seated postures? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Feb;24(2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20114100
Citation
De Carvalho DE, Soave D, Ross K, Callaghan JP. Lumbar spine and pelvic posture between standing and sitting: a radiologic investigation including reliability and repeatability of the lumbar lordosis measure. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Jan;33(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3406840
Citation
Dolan P, Adams MA, Hutton WC. Commonly adopted postures and their effect on the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Feb;13(2):197-201. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198802000-00012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9383867
Citation
Lord MJ, Small JM, Dinsay JM, Watkins RG. Lumbar lordosis. Effects of sitting and standing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2571-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199711010-00020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11219760
Citation
Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting. Ergonomics. 2001 Feb 20;44(3):280-94. doi: 10.1080/00140130118276.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10626703
Citation
Harrison DD, Harrison SO, Croft AC, Harrison DE, Troyanovich SJ. Sitting biomechanics part I: review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Nov-Dec;22(9):594-609. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70020-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9106313
Citation
Hedman TP, Fernie GR. Mechanical response of the lumbar spine to seated postural loads. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Apr 1;22(7):734-43. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199704010-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19443261
Citation
Reeve A, Dilley A. Effects of posture on the thickness of transversus abdominis in pain-free subjects. Man Ther. 2009 Dec;14(6):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19282726
Citation
Claus AP, Hides JA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. Different ways to balance the spine: subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E208-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181908ead.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16946644
Citation
O'Sullivan PB, Dankaerts W, Burnett AF, Farrell GT, Jefford E, Naylor CS, O'Sullivan KJ. Effect of different upright sitting postures on spinal-pelvic curvature and trunk muscle activation in a pain-free population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19):E707-12. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000234735.98075.50.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22660369
Citation
Francisco GE, Tan H, Green M. Do botulinum toxins have a role in the management of neuropathic pain?: a focused review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;91(10):899-909. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825a134b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19286054
Citation
Lu DW, Lippitz J. Complications of botulinum neurotoxin. Dis Mon. 2009 Apr;55(4):198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2009.01.001. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12569966
Citation
Argoff CE. A focused review on the use of botulinum toxins for neuropathic pain. Clin J Pain. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6 Suppl):S177-81. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200211001-00010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21539899
Citation
Matak I, Bach-Rojecky L, Filipovic B, Lackovic Z. Behavioral and immunohistochemical evidence for central antinociceptive activity of botulinum toxin A. Neuroscience. 2011 Jul 14;186:201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11376175
Citation
Foster L, Clapp L, Erickson M, Jabbari B. Botulinum toxin A and chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind study. Neurology. 2001 May 22;56(10):1290-3. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.10.1290.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23370074
Citation
Apalla Z, Sotiriou E, Lallas A, Lazaridou E, Ioannides D. Botulinum toxin A in postherpetic neuralgia: a parallel, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013 Oct;29(10):857-64. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827a72d2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18546285
Citation
Ranoux D, Attal N, Morain F, Bouhassira D. Botulinum toxin type A induces direct analgesic effects in chronic neuropathic pain. Ann Neurol. 2008 Sep;64(3):274-83. doi: 10.1002/ana.21427. Erratum In: Ann Neurol. 2009 Mar;65(3):359.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20123097
Citation
Bach-Rojecky L, Salkovic-Petrisic M, Lackovic Z. Botulinum toxin type A reduces pain supersensitivity in experimental diabetic neuropathy: bilateral effect after unilateral injection. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010 May 10;633(1-3):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19732788
Citation
Bach-Rojecky L, Lackovic Z. Central origin of the antinociceptive action of botulinum toxin type A. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Dec;94(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21927045
Citation
Kharkar S, Ambady P, Venkatesh Y, Schwartzman RJ. Intramuscular botulinum toxin in complex regional pain syndrome: case series and literature review. Pain Physician. 2011 Sep-Oct;14(5):419-24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22732156
Citation
Birthi P, Sloan P, Salles S. Subcutaneous botulinum toxin A for the treatment of refractory complex regional pain syndrome. PM R. 2012 Jun;4(6):446-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.12.010. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22716282
Citation
Fabregat G, Asensio-Samper JM, Palmisani S, Villanueva-Perez VL, De Andres J. Subcutaneous botulinum toxin for chronic post-thoracotomy pain. Pain Pract. 2013 Mar;13(3):231-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00569.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21076878
Citation
Zhang T, Adatia A, Zarin W, Moitri M, Vijenthira A, Chu R, Thabane L, Kean W. The efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in managing chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta analysis. Inflammopharmacology. 2011 Feb;19(1):21-34. doi: 10.1007/s10787-010-0069-x. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21134116
Citation
Argoff C. The emerging use of botulinum toxins for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain Med. 2010 Dec;11(12):1750-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00997.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18164334
Citation
Lew HL, Lee EH, Castaneda A, Klima R, Date E. Therapeutic use of botulinum toxin type A in treating neck and upper-back pain of myofascial origin: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.133.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21958302
Citation
Jabbari B, Machado D. Treatment of refractory pain with botulinum toxins--an evidence-based review. Pain Med. 2011 Nov;12(11):1594-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01245.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16712627
Citation
Jabbari B, Ney J, Sichani A, Monacci W, Foster L, Difazio M. Treatment of refractory, chronic low back pain with botulinum neurotoxin A: an open-label, pilot study. Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;7(3):260-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00147.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1356988
Citation
McMahon HT, Foran P, Dolly JO, Verhage M, Wiegant VM, Nicholls DG. Tetanus toxin and botulinum toxins type A and B inhibit glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, aspartate, and met-enkephalin release from synaptosomes. Clues to the locus of action. J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 25;267(30):21338-43.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10665805
Citation
Welch MJ, Purkiss JR, Foster KA. Sensitivity of embryonic rat dorsal root ganglia neurons to Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins. Toxicon. 2000 Feb;38(2):245-58. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00153-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14979881
Citation
Durham PL, Cady R, Cady R. Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion from trigeminal nerve cells by botulinum toxin type A: implications for migraine therapy. Headache. 2004 Jan;44(1):35-42; discussion 42-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04007.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17666428
Citation
Meng J, Wang J, Lawrence G, Dolly JO. Synaptobrevin I mediates exocytosis of CGRP from sensory neurons and inhibition by botulinum toxins reflects their anti-nociceptive potential. J Cell Sci. 2007 Aug 15;120(Pt 16):2864-74. doi: 10.1242/jcs.012211. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15909179
Citation
Planells-Cases R, Garcia-Sanz N, Morenilla-Palao C, Ferrer-Montiel A. Functional aspects and mechanisms of TRPV1 involvement in neurogenic inflammation that leads to thermal hyperalgesia. Pflugers Arch. 2005 Oct;451(1):151-9. doi: 10.1007/s00424-005-1423-5. Epub 2005 May 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15066994
Citation
Morenilla-Palao C, Planells-Cases R, Garcia-Sanz N, Ferrer-Montiel A. Regulated exocytosis contributes to protein kinase C potentiation of vanilloid receptor activity. J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 11;279(24):25665-72. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311515200. Epub 2004 Apr 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18385327
Citation
Antonucci F, Rossi C, Gianfranceschi L, Rossetto O, Caleo M. Long-distance retrograde effects of botulinum neurotoxin A. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 2;28(14):3689-96. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0375-08.2008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22049408
Citation
Restani L, Antonucci F, Gianfranceschi L, Rossi C, Rossetto O, Caleo M. Evidence for anterograde transport and transcytosis of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A). J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 2;31(44):15650-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2618-11.2011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15265242
Citation
Naumann M, Jankovic J. Safety of botulinum toxin type A: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jul;20(7):981-90. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003962.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17112348
Citation
Naumann M, Albanese A, Heinen F, Molenaers G, Relja M. Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A following long-term use. Eur J Neurol. 2006 Dec;13 Suppl 4:35-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01652.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15831014
Citation
Li M, Goldberger BA, Hopkins C. Fatal case of BOTOX-related anaphylaxis? J Forensic Sci. 2005 Jan;50(1):169-72.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21353824
Citation
Forchheimer MB, Richards JS, Chiodo AE, Bryce TN, Dyson-Hudson TA. Cut point determination in the measurement of pain and its relationship to psychosocial and functional measures after traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective model spinal cord injury system analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.029.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16340590
Citation
Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Robinson LR, Cardenas DD, Turner JA, Smith DG. Clinically significant change in pain intensity ratings in persons with spinal cord injury or amputation. Clin J Pain. 2006 Jan;22(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000148628.69627.82.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
13271123
Citation
BEECHER HK. The powerful placebo. J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Dec 24;159(17):1602-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18521092
Citation
Widerstrom-Noga E, Biering-Sorensen F, Bryce T, Cardenas DD, Finnerup NB, Jensen MP, Richards JS, Siddall PJ. The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2008 Dec;46(12):818-23. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.64. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19786975
Citation
Jensen MP, Widerstrom-Noga E, Richards JS, Finnerup NB, Biering-Sorensen F, Cardenas DD. Reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Pain Data Set items as self-report measures. Spinal Cord. 2010 Mar;48(3):230-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.112. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7967852
Citation
Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Med Care. 1994 Nov;32(11):1109-26. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199411000-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10557665
Citation
Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Russell IT. Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):22-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3305931
Citation
Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Grace E, Hanna B. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire--an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1987 Jun;14(3):446-51.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9234873
Citation
Wright JG, Young NL. The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):974-83. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199707000-00003.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Injecting Botulinum Toxin A Underneath the Skin to Treat Spinal Cord Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs