search
Back to results

Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Stroke Through Technological Innovation

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Aging Problems, Innovative Rehabilitation Treatment Based on Robotics

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Technological intervention arm
Control arm
Sponsored by
Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, robotic rehabilitation, frail elderly, gait performance, balance, risk of falling, quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Capacity to consent
  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months to the recruitment, proven by computerized axial tomography or nuclear magnetic resonance
  • Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≤ 2
  • Ranking scale score ≤ 3
  • Complete communication and comprehension skills, assessed during the objective examination
  • Ability to stand upright, supported or unsupported, for 1 minute

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant participation in other studies
  • Severe hypertonus of the hip, knee, ankle of the paretic leg with a modified Ashworth scale score ≥3
  • Severe hip, knee or ankle contracture or orthopedic problem affecting ambulation that would preclude passive range of motion of the paretic leg
  • Deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs
  • Other cognitive, motor and sensory deficits that negatively condition robotic training
  • Treatment of spasticity of the lower limb within 3 months to the start of the study or during the study
  • Lack of written informed consent
  • Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥ 3
  • Severe systemic diseases with life expectancy < 1 year

Sites / Locations

  • IRCCS INRCA HospitalRecruiting
  • IRCCS INRCA Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

technological intervention arm

Control arm

Arm Description

Twenty technological treatment sessions divided into 3 training sessions per week for 7 weeks.

Twenty traditional treatment sessions divided into 3 training sessions per week for 7 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

difference in falling risk between experimental arm and control arm
falling risk will be evaluated by the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). Balance section of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment has two subscales, Balance and Gait section.) Balance section has 9 items. Each item can be scored in a 3 point ordinal scale (0-2). "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "2" the highest level of function. Total Score = 16. Total score is obtained by adding the individual scores.

Secondary Outcome Measures

difference in gait performance between experimental arm and control arm
gait performance will be evaluated by the walking speed evaluated by instrumental gait analysis
difference in fear of falling between experimental arm and control arm
fear of falling will be evaluated by the Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I). Higher scores represent greater the fear of falling (ranging from 16 to 64)
difference in quality of life between experimental arm and control arm: SF-12 health survey
Quality of life will be measured using the Hausa SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12-H). The questionnaire consists of 12 items questioned weighted and summed to provide physical and mental health scores (PCS and MCS). The two composite scores are computed using the scores on twelve questions that range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better health

Full Information

First Posted
September 10, 2019
Last Updated
October 20, 2023
Sponsor
Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04087083
Brief Title
Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Stroke Through Technological Innovation
Official Title
Assistive Robotic in the Elderly: Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Stroke Through Technological Innovation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 15, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The final goal of the present study is to propose a new approach and an innovative therapeutic plan in the post-stroke rehabilitation of elderly patients, focused on the use of robotic device, in order to obtain the beneficial effects of this treatment.
Detailed Description
Stroke is a leading cause of disability, injury, and death in elderly people and represents a major public health problem with substantial medical and economic consequences. The incidence of stroke rapidly increases with age, doubling for each decade after age 55 years. Gait impairment is one of the most important problems after stroke and improve walking function is often a key component of any rehabilitation program. To achieve this goal, robotic gait trainer seems to be promising. In fact, some studies underline the efficacy of robotic gait training based on end-effector technology, for different diseases, in particular in stroke patients. In this randomized controlled trial, we verify the efficacy of the robotic treatment in terms of improving the gait and reducing the risk of falling and its long-term effects. In this single blind randomized controlled trial the investigators will include 150 elderly subacute stroke patients divided in two groups to receive a traditional rehabilitation program or a robotic rehabilitation using G-EO system, an end-effector device for the gait rehabilitation, in addition to the traditional therapy. A 20 treatment sessions will be conducted, divided into 3 training sessions per week, for 7 weeks. The control group will perform traditional therapy sessions lasting 50 minutes. The technological intervention group, using G-EO system, will carry out 30 minutes of traditional therapy and 20 minutes of treatment with a robotic system. The primary outcome of the study is the evaluation of the falling risk. Secondary outcomes are the assessment of the gait improvements and the fear of falling. Further evaluations, such as length and asymmetry of the step, walking and functional status, acceptance of the technology, will be carried.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Aging Problems, Innovative Rehabilitation Treatment Based on Robotics
Keywords
stroke, robotic rehabilitation, frail elderly, gait performance, balance, risk of falling, quality of life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
technological intervention arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Twenty technological treatment sessions divided into 3 training sessions per week for 7 weeks.
Arm Title
Control arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Twenty traditional treatment sessions divided into 3 training sessions per week for 7 weeks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Technological intervention arm
Intervention Description
Each session will include 30 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy followed by 20 minutes of robotic training (G-EO system, Reha Technology, Switzerland), an end-effector technology that simulates floor walking and stairs climbing (up and down)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Control arm
Intervention Description
Each session will include 50 minutes of traditional physical rehabilitation therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
difference in falling risk between experimental arm and control arm
Description
falling risk will be evaluated by the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). Balance section of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment has two subscales, Balance and Gait section.) Balance section has 9 items. Each item can be scored in a 3 point ordinal scale (0-2). "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "2" the highest level of function. Total Score = 16. Total score is obtained by adding the individual scores.
Time Frame
before treatment, at the end of rehabilitation sessions and 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
difference in gait performance between experimental arm and control arm
Description
gait performance will be evaluated by the walking speed evaluated by instrumental gait analysis
Time Frame
before treatment, at the end of rehabilitation sessions and 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention
Title
difference in fear of falling between experimental arm and control arm
Description
fear of falling will be evaluated by the Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I). Higher scores represent greater the fear of falling (ranging from 16 to 64)
Time Frame
before treatment, at the end of rehabilitation sessions and 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention
Title
difference in quality of life between experimental arm and control arm: SF-12 health survey
Description
Quality of life will be measured using the Hausa SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12-H). The questionnaire consists of 12 items questioned weighted and summed to provide physical and mental health scores (PCS and MCS). The two composite scores are computed using the scores on twelve questions that range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better health
Time Frame
before treatment, at the end of rehabilitation sessions and 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Capacity to consent Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months to the recruitment, proven by computerized axial tomography or nuclear magnetic resonance Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≤ 2 Ranking scale score ≤ 3 Complete communication and comprehension skills, assessed during the objective examination Ability to stand upright, supported or unsupported, for 1 minute Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant participation in other studies Severe hypertonus of the hip, knee, ankle of the paretic leg with a modified Ashworth scale score ≥3 Severe hip, knee or ankle contracture or orthopedic problem affecting ambulation that would preclude passive range of motion of the paretic leg Deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs Other cognitive, motor and sensory deficits that negatively condition robotic training Treatment of spasticity of the lower limb within 3 months to the start of the study or during the study Lack of written informed consent Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥ 3 Severe systemic diseases with life expectancy < 1 year
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Roberta Bevilacqua
Phone
00390718004767
Email
r.bevilacqua@inrca.it
Facility Information:
Facility Name
IRCCS INRCA Hospital
City
Ancona
ZIP/Postal Code
60131
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elvira Maranesi
Email
e.maranesi@inrca.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giovanni R Riccardi, MD
Facility Name
IRCCS INRCA Hospital
City
Fermo
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Valentina Di Donna
Email
v.didonna@inrca.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pietro Scendoni, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34127032
Citation
Maranesi E, Bevilacqua R, Di Rosa M, Pelliccioni G, Di Donna V, Luzi R, Morettini M, Sbrollini A, Casoni E, Rinaldi N, Baldoni R, Lattanzio F, Burattini L, Riccardi GR. An innovative training based on robotics for older people with subacute stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Jun 14;22(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05357-8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Innovative Models in the Rehabilitation of the Elderly With Stroke Through Technological Innovation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs