search
Back to results

INSIGHTFUL-FFR Clinical Trial

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS MC
Pressure Wire guided strategy - PIOS - PW
Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - Standard of care
Pressure Wire guided strategy - Standard of care
Sponsored by
CoreAalst BV
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Percutaneous Coronary intervention (PCI)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject must be at least 18 years of age and younger than 85 years old.
  2. Eligible for elective PCI.
  3. Stable angina or ACS (non-culprit vessels only and outside of primary intervention during acute STEMI)
  4. Subject willing to participate and able to understand, read and sign the Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. STEMI as clinical presentation.
  2. Chronic total occlusion as a target vessel.
  3. Significant contraindication to adenosine administration (e.g. heart block, severe asthma)
  4. Uncontrolled or recurrent ventricular tachycardia.
  5. Hemodynamic instability.
  6. Severe valvular disease.
  7. Severe renal dysfunction defined as an eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
  8. Comorbidity with life expectancy ≤ 2 years.
  9. Inability to take DAPT (both aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor) for at least 12 months in the patient presenting with an ACS, or at least six months in the patient presenting with stable CAD, unless the patient is also taking chronic oral anticoagulation in which case a shorter duration of DAPT may be prescribed per local standard of care.
  10. Planned major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery within 24 months after the index procedure. Note: major surgery is any invasive procedure in which an extensive resection is performed, e.g., a body cavity is entered, organs are removed, or normal anatomy is altered. Note: minor surgery is an operation on the superficial structures of the body or a manipulative procedure that does not involve a serious risk. Planned minor surgery is not excluded.
  11. Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the study drugs (including all P2Y12 inhibitors, one or more components of the study devices, including everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus, sirolimus, cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic, and fluoropolymers, or radiocontrast dye that cannot be adequately pre- medicated.
  12. The subject has received a functioning solid organ transplant or is active on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants with expected transplantation within 24 months.
  13. The subject receives immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy.
  14. The subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy) or the chest/mediastinum.
  15. Subject has a platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3.
  16. The subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder defined as cirrhosis or Child-Pugh ≥ Class B.
  17. The subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months. The subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months, any prior intracranial bleed, any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g., aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc. The subject has a life expectancy of <2 years for any non-cardiac cause.
  18. The subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device clinical study.
  19. Pregnancy or nursing.
  20. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results.

Sites / Locations

  • OLV AalstRecruiting
  • Universitair ziekenhuis BrusselRecruiting
  • Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Klinikum FürthRecruiting
  • Catholic Medical Center Koblenz-MontabaurRecruiting
  • Herzzentrum LahrRecruiting
  • UniversitätsklinikRecruiting
  • National Cardiac InstituteRecruiting
  • Hospital Clínic BarcelonaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS-MC

Pressure Wire guided strategy - PIOS-PW

Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - Standard of care

Pressure Wire guided strategy - Standard of care

Arm Description

Patients will be treated with the Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS).

Patients will be treated with the Pressure Wire during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS).

Patients will be treated with the Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will receive the standard of care treatment.

Patients will be treated with the Pressure Wire during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will receive the standard of care treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Compare the rate of MACE between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies.
Compare the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the combined rate of all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies at 12-months follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) between PIOS and SOC.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC.
Compare in-hospital resource utilization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies.
Compare in-hospital resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros) between microcatheter and pressure wire strategies i.e.number of pressure catheters/wires and procedural time needed to complete the procedure.
Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes.
Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes. This is the time from first to the last angiography in minutes.
Compare in-hospital resource utilisation between PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros, e.g. number of catheters/wires) between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies.
Compare the post-PCI FFR between the pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the post-PCI FFR between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the post-PCI FFR between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW
Compare the rate of symptoms-free status between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies.
Compare the rate of symptoms-free status assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up.
Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC.
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up
Compare the rate of PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) (type 4a) between pressure PIOS and SOC.
Compare the rate of angiographic complications between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Compare the rate of angiographic complications related to vessel wiring (i.e., Angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B, perforations (Ellis classification), intra-procedural thrombotic events (including slow-flow, no-reflow, side branch closure, distal embolization, and intra-procedural stent thrombosis, as per the standard angiographic core laboratory definitions) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for post-PCI FFR.
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the actual measure post-PCI FFR value.
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target vessel failure (TVF).
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target vessel failure (TVF).
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target myocardial infarction.
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR).
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR).
Compare the predictive capacity of the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Compare the predictive capacity of the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target vessel revascularization.
Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel revascularization.
Compare the rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarction stratified by PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire.
Compare the rate of peri-procedural myocardial injury stratified by PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire.

Full Information

First Posted
June 2, 2022
Last Updated
August 9, 2023
Sponsor
CoreAalst BV
Collaborators
Insight Lifetech Co., Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05437900
Brief Title
INSIGHTFUL-FFR Clinical Trial
Official Title
Pressure Microcatheter vs Pressure Wire for Clinical Decision Making and PCI Optimization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 22, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2029 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
CoreAalst BV
Collaborators
Insight Lifetech Co., Ltd.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Recently, a new device for measuring physiological lesion severity, the pressure microcatheter, was introduced. The pressure microcatheter provides similar information to the conventional measurement technique but differs as it is easily advanced on a customary coronary wire and simplifies pullback maneuvers. The pressure microcatheter has been shown to provide comparable FFR results to pressure wires. Insightful-FFR is an investigator-driven, multicenter, randomized, open-label and prospective trial of patients with stable coronary artery disease or stabilised non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with epicardial stenosis considered for PCI aiming at comparing clinical outcomes between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire-guided strategies. The study hypothesis states that the use of a Pressure Microcatheter for clinical decision making would be non-inferior to pressure wire-based strategy After determining the presence of a coronary artery disease/ stabilized acute coronary syndrome, patients will be randomized to use a pressure microcatheter (investigational device) or a pressure wire (comparator) to guide and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be followed up in hospital at 12 months and yearly until five years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Keywords
Percutaneous Coronary intervention (PCI)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients with one or more coronary stenoses will be randomized to either pressure microcatheter or pressure wire-based strategies for clinical decision making. Clinical decision making for PCI could be based either on FFR or NHPR. FFR or NHPR will support clinical decisions to defer or treat at the operator discretion. In cases with a positive FFR (≤ 0.80) or NHPR (≤0.89), patients will undergo a hyperemic FFR pullback to guide the PCI procedure further. PCI will be performed using last-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) at operator's discretion. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS) or standard of care (SOC). The one-step randomization process in four groups permits an uninterrupted invasive procedure avoiding the logistic issues related to a second randomization during the invasive procedure while preserving the statistical power and balance between groups.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2500 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS-MC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be treated with the Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS).
Arm Title
Pressure Wire guided strategy - PIOS-PW
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will be treated with the Pressure Wire during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS).
Arm Title
Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - Standard of care
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be treated with the Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will receive the standard of care treatment.
Arm Title
Pressure Wire guided strategy - Standard of care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will be treated with the Pressure Wire during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will receive the standard of care treatment.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS MC
Intervention Description
Use of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) .
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pressure Wire guided strategy - PIOS - PW
Intervention Description
Use of Pressure Wire during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) .
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - Standard of care
Intervention Description
Use of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive standard of care treatment.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pressure Wire guided strategy - Standard of care
Intervention Description
Use of Pressure Wire during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive standard of care treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare the rate of MACE between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies.
Description
Compare the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the combined rate of all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies at 12-months follow-up.
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) between PIOS and SOC.
Description
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC.
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare in-hospital resource utilization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies.
Description
Compare in-hospital resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros) between microcatheter and pressure wire strategies i.e.number of pressure catheters/wires and procedural time needed to complete the procedure.
Time Frame
During the hospitalisation (from admission to the hospital until discharge after the procedure)
Title
Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes.
Description
Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes. This is the time from first to the last angiography in minutes.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare in-hospital resource utilisation between PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW.
Description
In patients undergoing PCI, compare resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros, e.g. number of catheters/wires) between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time Frame
During the hospitalisation (from admission to the hospital until discharge after the procedure)
Title
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies.
Description
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the post-PCI FFR between the pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the post-PCI FFR between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the post-PCI FFR between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Description
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Description
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI
Description
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Description
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the rate of symptoms-free status between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies.
Description
Compare the rate of symptoms-free status assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up.
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Description
Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Description
Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Description
Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC.
Description
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC.
Description
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up.
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC.
Description
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the rate of PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) (type 4a) between pressure PIOS and SOC.
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Compare the rate of angiographic complications between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Description
Compare the rate of angiographic complications related to vessel wiring (i.e., Angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B, perforations (Ellis classification), intra-procedural thrombotic events (including slow-flow, no-reflow, side branch closure, distal embolization, and intra-procedural stent thrombosis, as per the standard angiographic core laboratory definitions) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for post-PCI FFR.
Description
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the actual measure post-PCI FFR value.
Time Frame
Periprocedural time frame
Title
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target vessel failure (TVF).
Description
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target vessel failure (TVF).
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Description
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target myocardial infarction.
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR).
Description
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the predictive capacity of the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Description
Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the predictive capacity of the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target vessel revascularization.
Description
Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel revascularization.
Time Frame
12 Months follow-up
Title
Compare the rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarction stratified by PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire.
Time Frame
Periprocedural timeframe
Title
Compare the rate of peri-procedural myocardial injury stratified by PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire.
Time Frame
Periprocedural timeframe

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The subject must be at least 18 years of age and younger than 85 years old. Eligible for elective PCI. Stable angina or ACS (non-culprit vessels only and outside of primary intervention during acute STEMI) Subject willing to participate and able to understand, read and sign the Informed Consent. Exclusion Criteria: STEMI as clinical presentation. Chronic total occlusion as a target vessel. Significant contraindication to adenosine administration (e.g. heart block, severe asthma) Uncontrolled or recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Hemodynamic instability. Severe valvular disease. Severe renal dysfunction defined as an eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Comorbidity with life expectancy ≤ 2 years. Inability to take DAPT (both aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor) for at least 12 months in the patient presenting with an ACS, or at least six months in the patient presenting with stable CAD, unless the patient is also taking chronic oral anticoagulation in which case a shorter duration of DAPT may be prescribed per local standard of care. Planned major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery within 24 months after the index procedure. Note: major surgery is any invasive procedure in which an extensive resection is performed, e.g., a body cavity is entered, organs are removed, or normal anatomy is altered. Note: minor surgery is an operation on the superficial structures of the body or a manipulative procedure that does not involve a serious risk. Planned minor surgery is not excluded. Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the study drugs (including all P2Y12 inhibitors, one or more components of the study devices, including everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus, sirolimus, cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic, and fluoropolymers, or radiocontrast dye that cannot be adequately pre- medicated. The subject has received a functioning solid organ transplant or is active on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants with expected transplantation within 24 months. The subject receives immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy. The subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy) or the chest/mediastinum. Subject has a platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3. The subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder defined as cirrhosis or Child-Pugh ≥ Class B. The subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months. The subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months, any prior intracranial bleed, any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g., aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc. The subject has a life expectancy of <2 years for any non-cardiac cause. The subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device clinical study. Pregnancy or nursing. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anne-Sophie Rowies, MSc
Phone
0032 53 72 42 30
Email
annesophierowies@coreaalst.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sofie Pardaens, MSc, PhD
Email
sofiepardaens@coreaalst.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
CoreAalst BV
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos Collet, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
CoreAalst BV
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Junbo Ge, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salvatore Brugaletta, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
OLV Aalst
City
Aalst
State/Province
Oost-Vlaanderen
ZIP/Postal Code
9300
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hilde Delacroix
Email
hilde.delacroix@olvz-aalst.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos Collet, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Universitair ziekenhuis Brussel
City
Brussel
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bert Vandeloo, Md, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bert Vandeloo, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Xuhui District
ZIP/Postal Code
200031
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Junbo Ge, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Junbo Ge, MD
Facility Name
Klinikum Fürth
City
Fürth
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stylianos Pyxaras, MD,PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stylianos Pyxaras, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Catholic Medical Center Koblenz-Montabaur
City
Koblenz
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiangtao Yu, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiangtao Yu, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Herzzentrum Lahr
City
Lahr
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kambis Mashayekhi, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kambis Mashayekhi, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Universitätsklinik
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tommaso Gori, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tommaso Gori, MD, PhD
Facility Name
National Cardiac Institute
City
Warsaw
Country
Poland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adam Witkowski, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adam Witkowski, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Hospital Clínic Barcelona
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salvatore Brugaletta, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salvatore Brugaletta, MD, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

INSIGHTFUL-FFR Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs