search
Back to results

Integrated Dual Exercise and Lexiscan Positron Emission Tomography: IDEALPET (IDEALPET)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise)
Regadenoson (Lexiscan)
Sponsored by
Brigham and Women's Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring coronary artery disease, exercise, regadenoson, positron emission tomography

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Clinically indicated N-13 ammonia PET study or ten healthy volunteers
  • Known coronary artery disease (prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass surgery or Q wave MI on ECG) or intermediate to high pretest likelihood of CAD
  • Able to exercise on a treadmill
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to exercise stress testing such as, unstable angina, known severe left main coronary artery stenosis, severe heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias, symptomatic hypotension or severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure < 90 or > 200 mmHg, respectively), or > 1st degree atrioventricular block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker.
  • Subject requires emergent cardiac medical intervention or catheterization after the clinical study.
  • Documented myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days prior to enrollment.
  • History of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≤ 4weeks prior to enrollment.
  • History of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ≤ 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • History of heart transplantation.
  • Allergy or intolerance to aminophylline or regadenoson
  • Known severe or oxygen dependent bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease [e.g., asthma, wheezing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), etc.].
  • Severe LV dysfunction, with ejection fraction of < 30%
  • Serious non-cardiac medical illness (e.g., disseminated malignancy, severe neurological dysfunction at time of baseline PET study) or a social situation which will preclude research study participation
  • History of Seizures.

Sites / Locations

  • Brigham and Womens' Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Regadenoson (Lexiscan)

Exercise + Regadenoson (Lexercise)

Arm Description

Regadenoson Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography

Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise) Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety and Tolerability of Combined Exercise and Regadenoson Stress
Count of subjects with ischemic ECG changes is reported Count of subjects with systolic blood pressure decrease > 20 mm Hg is reported Count of subjects with abnormal serum troponin T levels is reported Radiation dose to the staff will be measured using personal dosimeters after the Lexiscan as well as the Lexercise PET study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Image Quality: Heart to Liver Ratio of Counts
Sub-diaphragmatic activity: Heart to Liver Ratio was measured on the rubidium-82 and N-13 ammonia scans. Since this measure is a ratio it has no units. Mean and Standard Deviation of Ratio is reported for each group. This was measured on the clinical scan and on the research scan which were performed about 2 weeks apart in most subjects.
Changes in Left Ventricular Function With Dual Exercise and Regadenoson PET
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at stress was measured at Stress scan 1 (regadenoson) and Stress scan 2 (regadenoson or exercise + regadenoson). This was measured on the clinical scan and on the research scan which were performed about 2 weeks apart in most subjects.
Peak Stress Myocardial Blood Flow
Myocardial Blood Flow Measured at Peak Hyperemia With Regadenoson or Immediately After Exercise + Regadenoson This was measured on the clinical scan and on the research scan which were performed about 2 weeks apart in most subjects.

Full Information

First Posted
April 16, 2010
Last Updated
September 27, 2018
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01109992
Brief Title
Integrated Dual Exercise and Lexiscan Positron Emission Tomography: IDEALPET
Acronym
IDEALPET
Official Title
Integrated Dual Exercise and Lexiscan PET: IDEAL PET
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 6, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 6, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a single-center study of subjects undergoing clinically indicated heart scans for evaluation of known or suspected heart disease. We will also include 10 healthy subjects without known heart disease. We would like to study stress testing of the heart using exercise and a medication called regadenoson. Imaging of the heart will be performed.
Detailed Description
Regadenoson is stress agent approved by the FDA for use with myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients that are unable to exercise adequately. We would like to study Regadenoson in conjunction with Exercise Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (PET MPI). Regadenoson is not approved by FDA for use with Rubidium-82 PET MPI. Also, we would like to study a novel stress protocol of Regadenoson combined with symptom limited exercise stress (not FDA approved). The objectives of this study are to assess the tolerability and safety of combined symptom limited exercise stress test with Lexiscan (Lexercise PET) compared to Lexiscan alone (Lexiscan PET), to assess image quality of Lexercise compared to Lexiscan PET and to compare relative and absolute myocardial perfusion imaging with Lexercise compared to Lexiscan PET to identify CAD.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
coronary artery disease, exercise, regadenoson, positron emission tomography

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
43 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Regadenoson (Lexiscan)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Regadenoson Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Arm Title
Exercise + Regadenoson (Lexercise)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise) Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Exercise plus Lexiscan
Intervention Description
Standard Bruce exercise stress test with regadenoson injection at maximal stress with Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Regadenoson (Lexiscan)
Intervention Description
Regadenoson Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety and Tolerability of Combined Exercise and Regadenoson Stress
Description
Count of subjects with ischemic ECG changes is reported Count of subjects with systolic blood pressure decrease > 20 mm Hg is reported Count of subjects with abnormal serum troponin T levels is reported Radiation dose to the staff will be measured using personal dosimeters after the Lexiscan as well as the Lexercise PET study.
Time Frame
Day of the research scan during the stress test
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Image Quality: Heart to Liver Ratio of Counts
Description
Sub-diaphragmatic activity: Heart to Liver Ratio was measured on the rubidium-82 and N-13 ammonia scans. Since this measure is a ratio it has no units. Mean and Standard Deviation of Ratio is reported for each group. This was measured on the clinical scan and on the research scan which were performed about 2 weeks apart in most subjects.
Time Frame
Week 1 (day of the clinical scan), and Week 2 (day of the research scan)
Title
Changes in Left Ventricular Function With Dual Exercise and Regadenoson PET
Description
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at stress was measured at Stress scan 1 (regadenoson) and Stress scan 2 (regadenoson or exercise + regadenoson). This was measured on the clinical scan and on the research scan which were performed about 2 weeks apart in most subjects.
Time Frame
Week 1 (day of the clinical scan), and Week 2 (day of the research scan)
Title
Peak Stress Myocardial Blood Flow
Description
Myocardial Blood Flow Measured at Peak Hyperemia With Regadenoson or Immediately After Exercise + Regadenoson This was measured on the clinical scan and on the research scan which were performed about 2 weeks apart in most subjects.
Time Frame
Week 1 (day of the clinical scan), and Week 2 (day of the research scan)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age > 18 years Clinically indicated N-13 ammonia PET study or ten healthy volunteers Known coronary artery disease (prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass surgery or Q wave MI on ECG) or intermediate to high pretest likelihood of CAD Able to exercise on a treadmill Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications to exercise stress testing such as, unstable angina, known severe left main coronary artery stenosis, severe heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias, symptomatic hypotension or severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure < 90 or > 200 mmHg, respectively), or > 1st degree atrioventricular block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker. Subject requires emergent cardiac medical intervention or catheterization after the clinical study. Documented myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days prior to enrollment. History of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≤ 4weeks prior to enrollment. History of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ≤ 8 weeks prior to enrollment. History of heart transplantation. Allergy or intolerance to aminophylline or regadenoson Known severe or oxygen dependent bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease [e.g., asthma, wheezing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), etc.]. Severe LV dysfunction, with ejection fraction of < 30% Serious non-cardiac medical illness (e.g., disseminated malignancy, severe neurological dysfunction at time of baseline PET study) or a social situation which will preclude research study participation History of Seizures.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sharmila Dorbala, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Brigham and Womens' Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02421
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15837254
Citation
Chow BJ, Ananthasubramaniam K, dekemp RA, Dalipaj MM, Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 19;45(8):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17372188
Citation
Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1464-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.629808. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12975245
Citation
Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, O'Gara PT, Carabello BA, Russell RO Jr, Cerqueira MD, St John Sutton MG, DeMaria AN, Udelson JE, Kennedy JW, Verani MS, Williams KA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Alpert JS, Gregoratos G, Anderson JL, Hiratzka LF, Faxon DP, Hunt SA, Fuster V, Jacobs AK, Gibbons RJ, Russell RO; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation. 2003 Sep 16;108(11):1404-18. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080946.42225.4D. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16412870
Citation
Chow BJ, Beanlands RS, Lee A, DaSilva JN, deKemp RA, Alkahtani A, Ruddy TD. Treadmill exercise produces larger perfusion defects than dipyridamole stress N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 17;47(2):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.027.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17314342
Citation
Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 22;356(8):830-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra061889. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16085581
Citation
El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Guerin B, Kijewski MF, Di Carli MF, Moore SC. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. J Nucl Med. 2005 Aug;46(8):1264-71.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Integrated Dual Exercise and Lexiscan Positron Emission Tomography: IDEALPET

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs