Intensiva 2.0: Improve the Communication Towards Families of Critically Ill Patients (Intensiva2)
Primary Purpose
Critical Illness, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Enhanced communication by brochure, website and posters
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Critical Illness focused on measuring Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Web-site, Communication, Intensive Care Unit, Comprehension
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥ 18 years
- family member of ICU patient
- patient with mechanical ventilation length expected at admission > 48 hours;
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal to participate;
- inability to understand Italian language;
- any previously diagnosed and not compensated psychiatric condition;
- absence of visiting relatives in the first 4 ICU days.
Sites / Locations
- AO San Paolo - Polo UniversitarioRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Experimental
Arm Label
Control
Intervention
Arm Description
Families of Critically Ill will be informed about patients'clinical status only by oral communication during daily family meeting
Families of critically ill patients will receive during the first ICU day of their loved one a brochure presenting the ICU and inviting them to visit a website specifically created for this project: www.intensiva.it Moreover, in the waiting room of the ICU will be placed 8 posters to improve comprehension and to legitimize emotions.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Correctness of comprehension
Improvement in correctness of comprehension during the family meetings about medical information (main outcome: prognosis quo ad vitam), and about medical treatment and not diagnosis regarding organ dysfunction (comprehension assessment interview, CAI, minimum = 0, maximum = 16)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Anxiety
Evaluation of anxiety on families after an ICU admission of a loved one (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS, for anxiety: minimum = 0, maximum = 21)
Depression
Evaluation of depression on families after an ICU admission of a loved one (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS, for depression: minimum = 0, maximum = 21)
Acute traumatic stress
Evaluation of traumatic experience (ICU admission of a loved one) influence on families in the early term of the first ICU week (short screening scale for symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, minimum = 0, maximum = 7)
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Evaluation of traumatic experience (ICU admission of a loved one) influence on families in the long term of 6 months after ICU discharge (PTSD check list for DSM V - civilian version, PCL-5, minimum = 0, maximum = 80)
Empathy
Evaluation of project effects on ICU staff involvement (Jefferson Scale for Physician Empathy, JSPE, minimum = 20, maximum = 140).
Burnout
Evaluation of project effects on work satisfaction in ICU staff members (Maslach burnout inventory, MBI, minimum = 0, maximum = 132).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03438175
First Posted
February 2, 2018
Last Updated
May 21, 2018
Sponsor
University of Milan
Collaborators
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva, Società Italiana di Anestesia, Rianimazione, Emergenza e Dolore (SIARED), Ass. Anestesisti Rianimatori Ospedalieri Italiani - Em. Area Crit. (AAROI-EMAC), Associazione Nazionale Infermieri di Area Critica (ANIARTI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03438175
Brief Title
Intensiva 2.0: Improve the Communication Towards Families of Critically Ill Patients
Acronym
Intensiva2
Official Title
Randomized, Multicenter, Before-after Study for a Large-scale Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Multitasking Intervention to Improve the Communication Towards Families of Critically Ill Patients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Milan
Collaborators
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva, Società Italiana di Anestesia, Rianimazione, Emergenza e Dolore (SIARED), Ass. Anestesisti Rianimatori Ospedalieri Italiani - Em. Area Crit. (AAROI-EMAC), Associazione Nazionale Infermieri di Area Critica (ANIARTI)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The admission of a loved one in an ICU is a hard experience for family members. They frequently feel fear and grief, develop anxiety and depression symptoms, or even show some behaviors as this event was a real traumatic one, like hyper-arousal, avoidance and intrusion in the daily life.To improve the communication between them and the ICU staff members, and to meet their needs in terms of medical comprehension and emotional legitimization, a specific website was built, and a brochure was printed to make them welcomed in the ICU; moreover, a series of poster was prepared for the family waiting room outside the ICU. These instruments appeared able to improve the correctness of prognosis comprehension and to decrease the post-traumatic stress symptoms in a multicenter study involving Italian ICUs. The proposal of the present study is to verify on a larger scale if these instruments can really ameliorate the empathic communication among staff members, without increase in workload, and to make less traumatic, for the family members, their experience during and after the ICU stay.
Detailed Description
Many recent studies described the comprehension, the satisfaction, and the psychological consequences due to the experience of an ICU admission of a loved one. Even if satisfaction about meetings and clinical information is about 90%, from 50 to 70% of family members reported an incomplete medical comprehension, and 70% showed symptoms of anxiety and depression. Many interventions may considerably improve their ICU experience, regarding both the comprehension and the emotions. For example, the family members of ICU patients that receive clear and reassuring information can deal better with the stress associated with their loved one illness, or may participate in the clinical decisional processes with awareness and lighter emotional distress.
Literature shows that relationship with families of ICU patients presents these problems:
comprehension of care essentials (diagnosis, prognosis about illness severity, interventions undertaken);
trust on ICU staff members;
management of their emotions (anxiety, fear, depression);
post-traumatic stress symptoms due to the concerns about life-threatening diseases of their loved one.
To ameliorate the relationship and the communication in the harsh ICU environment, and to meet the problems aforementioned, in 2012 some instruments for families were created (website, brochure, posters). They present in non-technical language the activities and the environment of ICU, with the aim to increase their comprehension and - at the same time - to make them feel not alone and powerless.
To evaluate the effectiveness of these information instruments, a before-and-after study was done in 2012 in 12 Italian ICUs. These instruments were demonstrated able to improve the correctness of communication about outcome and treatment (not about the illness and the organ dysfunctions, that is responsibility of local staff), and to decrease the post-traumatic symptoms. Anxiety and depression symptoms were showed non-significantly decreased. The physicians also reported an improvement in the quality of communication with families. (Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):69-79). The main study limitations were: low prevalence of internet browsing among families; few participating centers; lacking of complete diagnosis of PTSD, made after 6 months from traumatic event; lacking of characteristics of staff members who participated on the family meetings. The present larger, randomized and controlled trial was then designed, to replicate and verify the preliminary results, overcoming the limits and finding new strategies of communication.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Illness, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Keywords
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Web-site, Communication, Intensive Care Unit, Comprehension
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Families of Critically Ill will be informed about patients'clinical status only by oral communication during daily family meeting
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Families of critically ill patients will receive during the first ICU day of their loved one a brochure presenting the ICU and inviting them to visit a website specifically created for this project: www.intensiva.it Moreover, in the waiting room of the ICU will be placed 8 posters to improve comprehension and to legitimize emotions.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Enhanced communication by brochure, website and posters
Intervention Description
Several instruments to improve communication toward ICU patients' families were prepared for this study: a brochure of 12 pages, a website with 80 webpages, 8 posters for the waiting room, 1 sign for the ICU door. All these instruments are made to have more correct comprehension and to legitimize emotions of ICU patients' families.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Correctness of comprehension
Description
Improvement in correctness of comprehension during the family meetings about medical information (main outcome: prognosis quo ad vitam), and about medical treatment and not diagnosis regarding organ dysfunction (comprehension assessment interview, CAI, minimum = 0, maximum = 16)
Time Frame
7 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Anxiety
Description
Evaluation of anxiety on families after an ICU admission of a loved one (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS, for anxiety: minimum = 0, maximum = 21)
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Depression
Description
Evaluation of depression on families after an ICU admission of a loved one (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS, for depression: minimum = 0, maximum = 21)
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Acute traumatic stress
Description
Evaluation of traumatic experience (ICU admission of a loved one) influence on families in the early term of the first ICU week (short screening scale for symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, minimum = 0, maximum = 7)
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Description
Evaluation of traumatic experience (ICU admission of a loved one) influence on families in the long term of 6 months after ICU discharge (PTSD check list for DSM V - civilian version, PCL-5, minimum = 0, maximum = 80)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Empathy
Description
Evaluation of project effects on ICU staff involvement (Jefferson Scale for Physician Empathy, JSPE, minimum = 20, maximum = 140).
Time Frame
2 months
Title
Burnout
Description
Evaluation of project effects on work satisfaction in ICU staff members (Maslach burnout inventory, MBI, minimum = 0, maximum = 132).
Time Frame
2 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
age ≥ 18 years
family member of ICU patient
patient with mechanical ventilation length expected at admission > 48 hours;
Exclusion Criteria:
refusal to participate;
inability to understand Italian language;
any previously diagnosed and not compensated psychiatric condition;
absence of visiting relatives in the first 4 ICU days.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Giovanni Mistraletti
Phone
+39.339.8245014
Email
giovanni.mistraletti@unimi.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Maria Grazia Bocci
Phone
+39.340.9759951
Email
mariagrazia.bocci@unicatt.it
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AO San Paolo - Polo Universitario
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20142
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giovanni Mistraletti, MD
Phone
+39.339.8245014
Email
giovanni.mistraletti@unimi.it
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10966293
Citation
Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, Canoui P, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3044-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11588447
Citation
Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Hubert P, Canoui P, Grassin M, Zittoun R, le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B; French FAMIREA Group. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1893-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00007.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17267907
Citation
Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, Barnoud D, Bleichner G, Bruel C, Choukroun G, Curtis JR, Fieux F, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Georges H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Loubert G, Reignier J, Saidi F, Souweine B, Vincent F, Barnes NK, Pochard F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 12;357(2):203.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23417207
Citation
Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, Westermann I, Riedemann NC, Pfeifer R, Gunther A, Witte OW, Reinhart K, Hartog CS. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jun;39(6):1071-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27830281
Citation
Mistraletti G, Umbrello M, Mantovani ES, Moroni B, Formenti P, Spanu P, Anania S, Andrighi E, Di Carlo A, Martinetti F, Vecchi I, Palo A, Pinna C, Russo R, Francesconi S, Valdambrini F, Ferretti E, Radeschi G, Bosco E, Malacarne P, Iapichino G; http://www.intensiva.it Investigators. A family information brochure and dedicated website to improve the ICU experience for patients' relatives: an Italian multicenter before-and-after study. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4592-0. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31525488
Citation
Mistraletti G, Mezzetti A, Anania S, Ionescu Maddalena A, Del Negro S, Giusti GD, Gili A, Iacobone E, Pulitano SM, Conti G, Bocci MG. Improving communication toward ICU families to facilitate understanding and reduce stress. Protocol for a multicenter randomized and controlled Italian study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Nov;86:105847. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105847. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Intensiva 2.0: Improve the Communication Towards Families of Critically Ill Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs