search
Back to results

Intensive Bimanual Intervention in Cerebral Palsy Children

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Palsy

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intensive bimanual therapy
Sponsored by
Laval University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Palsy focused on measuring Intensive bimanual therapy, Upper limb motor function, Rehabilitation, Motor learning, Accelerometry

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosis of cerebral palsy or spastic hemiparesis encephalopathy
  • Having sensorimotor deficits of one or both upper limb (spastic hemiparesis with a dominance on one side of the body; Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level

    1, 2 or 3);

  • Having cognitive capacities to understand and perform task of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting other significant health problem which may interfere with the requested task or with the clinical intervention;
  • Having Botox injection in one or both upper limbs with the 4 months prior to the intervention;
  • Presenting significant uncorrected visual deficits.

N.B. Having a ferromagnetic implant is not an exclusion criterion, such participant will be eligible but will not perform the MRI.

Sites / Locations

  • Université LavalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

MANUS

Arm Description

Children and youth living with cerebral palsy will take part in a 60-hour intensive bimanual therapy at Peps at Université Laval, during which they will play games and exercise to promote spontaneous use of the most affected hand. Participants will take part to pre-evaluation and 1-week and 6-month post-intervention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Neurophysiological evaluation
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold.
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function. 6 tasks. Sub-task score is the time to complete the task (a maximum of 120s is allowed per task) and the total score is the total time to perform the six tasks (maximum of 720s). Higher time means worse outcome.
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function. 6 tasks. Sub-task score is the time to complete the task (a maximum of 120s is allowed per task) and the total score is the total time to perform the six tasks (maximum of 720s). Higher time means worse outcome.
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention. Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention.Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention. Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
May 25, 2022
Last Updated
June 13, 2022
Sponsor
Laval University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05423171
Brief Title
Intensive Bimanual Intervention in Cerebral Palsy Children
Official Title
Predictors of Response to an Intensive Bimanual Intervention in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 30, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 30, 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 30, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Laval University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Motor disorders related to cerebral palsy are often accompanied by sensory, cognitive, perceptive, communication and behavioural impairments. It has already been shown that intensive bimanual intervention can improve arm movement, but its impact on the spontaneous use of the most affected arm in everyday life remains to be established. This project aims to understand the impacts of an intensive bimanual therapy on uni- and bi-manual motor functions as well as the spontaneous use of the most affected arm. Predictive value of neuroimaging variables will also be assessed.
Detailed Description
Most activities of everyday life require the use of both hands in a coordinated manner. Motor disorders related to cerebral palsy lead to activity limitations due to motor function disturbances. It has already been shown that intensive bimanual intervention can improve arm movement, but its impact on the spontaneous use of the most affected arm in everyday life remains to be established. This project aims to understand the impacts of intensive bimanual therapy on the motor functions of both arms (working together or in isolation) as well as on the spontaneous use of the most affected limb. Predictive value of neuroimaging variables will also be assessed. Thirty children living with cerebral palsy will be recruited over a 5-year period. The intervention consists of a day camp, where a small group of participants will be stimulated (one worker per child) to do activities using both hands 6 hours/day for 10 days. There will be three periods of evaluation (pre-intervention, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up). These evaluation periods consist of neuroimaging assessment, clinical evaluation, robotic evaluation and movement evaluation using inertial control units. The use of more accurate measurements of sensorimotor arm functions using robotic systems will clarify the relationship between measurements of brain function and clinical improvements, to better understand the significant variability observed in response to interventions.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Palsy
Keywords
Intensive bimanual therapy, Upper limb motor function, Rehabilitation, Motor learning, Accelerometry

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MANUS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Children and youth living with cerebral palsy will take part in a 60-hour intensive bimanual therapy at Peps at Université Laval, during which they will play games and exercise to promote spontaneous use of the most affected hand. Participants will take part to pre-evaluation and 1-week and 6-month post-intervention.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Intensive bimanual therapy
Intervention Description
60-hour intensive therapy promoting the use of both hands (ex: bimanual activities, games,...)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Description
Neurophysiological evaluation
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
Description
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
Description
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
Description
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
Description
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
Description
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
Description
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Description
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Description
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Description
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
Description
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
Description
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
Description
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Spontaneous use of both arms
Description
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Time Frame
Measured during two-days prior to the intervention.
Title
Spontaneous use of both arms
Description
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Time Frame
Measured two days during the intervention.
Title
Spontaneous use of both arms
Description
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Time Frame
Measured during two-days one week post-intervention.
Title
Spontaneous use of both arms
Description
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Time Frame
Measured during two-days 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Description
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Description
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Description
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold.
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Description
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function. 6 tasks. Sub-task score is the time to complete the task (a maximum of 120s is allowed per task) and the total score is the total time to perform the six tasks (maximum of 720s). Higher time means worse outcome.
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Description
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function. 6 tasks. Sub-task score is the time to complete the task (a maximum of 120s is allowed per task) and the total score is the total time to perform the six tasks (maximum of 720s). Higher time means worse outcome.
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Description
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Description
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Description
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Description
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Description
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Description
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Description
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Description
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Description
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Description
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Description
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Description
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Description
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
Description
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
Description
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
Description
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.
Title
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Description
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention. Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Time Frame
Measured prior to the intervention.
Title
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Description
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention.Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Time Frame
Measured one week post-intervention.
Title
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Description
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention. Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Time Frame
Measured 6-month post-intervention.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Having a diagnosis of cerebral palsy or spastic hemiparesis encephalopathy Having sensorimotor deficits of one or both upper limb (spastic hemiparesis with a dominance on one side of the body; Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level 1, 2 or 3); Having cognitive capacities to understand and perform task of the study. Exclusion Criteria: Presenting other significant health problem which may interfere with the requested task or with the clinical intervention; Having Botox injection in one or both upper limbs with the 4 months prior to the intervention; Presenting significant uncorrected visual deficits. N.B. Having a ferromagnetic implant is not an exclusion criterion, such participant will be eligible but will not perform the MRI.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Catherine Mercier, PhD;OT
Phone
141852991416701
Email
catherine.mercier@rea.ulaval.ca
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Université Laval
City
Québec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1V 0A6
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mercier Catherine, Ph.D.;O.T.
Phone
141852991416701
Email
catherine.mercier@rea.ulaval.ca

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Intensive Bimanual Intervention in Cerebral Palsy Children

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs