Intermittent vs Continuous Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis
Primary Purpose
Multiple Sclerosis
Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Walking
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring Walking, Gait, Fatigue
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-identified difficulty walking
- Definitive diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from a neurologist
- Signed an approved consent form
- Ability to ambulate for unaided for 6-minutes continuously with or without an assistive device (e.g. a cane or brace)
- Has not had a multiple sclerosis relapse in the past 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwilling or unable to complete assessments
- Unwilling or able to complete assessments and or intervention without the use of portable functional electrical stimulation devices
- Medical history of concomitant condition unrelated to multiple sclerosis which may impact results including: other neurological conditions including stroke, Parkinson's disease, or orthopedic, or cardiopulmonary conditions that affect walking
- Had a major change in exercise habits in the past three months
- Individuals reporting change in any disease modifying treatment or steroid use during the past 6 weeks
- Unable to walk for 6 minutes continuously without physical assistance
- Medical history of unstable angina, uncontrolled cardiac dysrhythmias causing symptoms, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, uncontrolled symptomatic heart failure, acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction, history of deep vein thrombosis, acute myocarditis or pericarditis, acute systemic infection, uncontrolled hypertension, and uncontrolled diabetes
- Has an abnormal response to exercise
- Cannot adhere to protocol
- Determined to be unsafe at the discretion of the research team including individuals unwilling to wear safety "gait belt" during testing or not willing to wear proper footwear.
Sites / Locations
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis - Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Continuous Walking
Interval Walking
Arm Description
Participants in the Continuous Walking (CONT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the CONT group will be to complete a 6-minute long walk without rest breaks
Participants in the Interval Walking (INT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the (INT) group will be to complete three 2-minute-long walks with 2-minute seated rest breaks between each walk
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in 6-minute Walk Test distance
Is a measurement of the distance (in meters) walked at best pace in six minutes.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale score
A survey that measures a participant's perception of how his/her walking ability is affected by multiple sclerosis. The scale ranges from 0-100 with lower scores representing a lesser impact of multiple sclerosis on the participant's walking ability. There are no subscales.
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale score
A survey that measures a participant's perception of the impact of the symptom of fatigue on a person's ability to participate in life roles. The scale ranges from from 9-63, with lower scores representing a lower impact of fatigue on the ability to perform the activities listed in the scale.There are no subscales.
Change in Step Length
The distance (in centimeters) traversed in one step from initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot.
Change in Step Time
The time (in seconds) taken to complete one step from initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot.
Change in Stride Velocity
The speed with which it takes a person to complete one stride from initial contact of one foot to the next initial contact of the same foot
Change in Cadence
The number of steps (the initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot taken per minute
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03963492
First Posted
May 16, 2019
Last Updated
May 11, 2022
Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Collaborators
Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, City University of New York, School of Public Health
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03963492
Brief Title
Intermittent vs Continuous Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis
Official Title
Intermittent vs. Continuous Walking Training in People With Multiple Sclerosis: a Comparison of Effectiveness
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
COVID-19 Pandemic
Study Start Date
July 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Collaborators
Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, City University of New York, School of Public Health
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effectiveness of a traditional, continuous walking rehabilitation program for people with MS to the novel intervention of an intermittent or interval walking rehabilitation program. Half of the participants will receive the continuous walking program while the other half will receive the novel intermittent walking program.
Detailed Description
The typical rehabilitation of walking difficulties for people with MS has included practice walking. In general, this includes training to build walking endurance by having the person with MS walk until he/she becomes tired and needs to stop. Although this model has been used successfully to treat people with other diagnoses, it has limited effectiveness in improving walking ability and endurance in people with MS because of fatigue. Recently, a different model has been considered: intermittent or interval walking training. Interval walking training is organized such that seated rest breaks are intentionally interspersed between walking training bouts that end before the person with MS becomes too tired to continue. Exploratory research has shown that people with MS can walk faster and farther when using interval walking training, and may have more improvements in walking ability and endurance after using interval walking training. This study will compare the effectiveness of the traditional model of continuous walking training to the promising new model of interval walking training. This will help to determine whether interval or continuous walking training is superior in improving walking ability and endurance in people with MS.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords
Walking, Gait, Fatigue
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled pre-post study
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Assessors blinded to experimental condition
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Continuous Walking
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in the Continuous Walking (CONT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the CONT group will be to complete a 6-minute long walk without rest breaks
Arm Title
Interval Walking
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the Interval Walking (INT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the (INT) group will be to complete three 2-minute-long walks with 2-minute seated rest breaks between each walk
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Walking
Intervention Description
Participants will undergo training in either the CONT or INT walking interventions 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in 6-minute Walk Test distance
Description
Is a measurement of the distance (in meters) walked at best pace in six minutes.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale score
Description
A survey that measures a participant's perception of how his/her walking ability is affected by multiple sclerosis. The scale ranges from 0-100 with lower scores representing a lesser impact of multiple sclerosis on the participant's walking ability. There are no subscales.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Title
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale score
Description
A survey that measures a participant's perception of the impact of the symptom of fatigue on a person's ability to participate in life roles. The scale ranges from from 9-63, with lower scores representing a lower impact of fatigue on the ability to perform the activities listed in the scale.There are no subscales.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Title
Change in Step Length
Description
The distance (in centimeters) traversed in one step from initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Title
Change in Step Time
Description
The time (in seconds) taken to complete one step from initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Title
Change in Stride Velocity
Description
The speed with which it takes a person to complete one stride from initial contact of one foot to the next initial contact of the same foot
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Title
Change in Cadence
Description
The number of steps (the initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot taken per minute
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Self-identified difficulty walking
Definitive diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from a neurologist
Signed an approved consent form
Ability to ambulate for unaided for 6-minutes continuously with or without an assistive device (e.g. a cane or brace)
Has not had a multiple sclerosis relapse in the past 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
Unwilling or unable to complete assessments
Unwilling or able to complete assessments and or intervention without the use of portable functional electrical stimulation devices
Medical history of concomitant condition unrelated to multiple sclerosis which may impact results including: other neurological conditions including stroke, Parkinson's disease, or orthopedic, or cardiopulmonary conditions that affect walking
Had a major change in exercise habits in the past three months
Individuals reporting change in any disease modifying treatment or steroid use during the past 6 weeks
Unable to walk for 6 minutes continuously without physical assistance
Medical history of unstable angina, uncontrolled cardiac dysrhythmias causing symptoms, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, uncontrolled symptomatic heart failure, acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction, history of deep vein thrombosis, acute myocarditis or pericarditis, acute systemic infection, uncontrolled hypertension, and uncontrolled diabetes
Has an abnormal response to exercise
Cannot adhere to protocol
Determined to be unsafe at the discretion of the research team including individuals unwilling to wear safety "gait belt" during testing or not willing to wear proper footwear.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Evan T Cohen, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis - Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06112
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Intermittent vs Continuous Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs