Number of participants recruited to I-ER GD.
Measures will include recruitment rate during study inclusion period (0-30 participants).
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Attkisson & Zwick, 1982) in I-ER GD
Measures treatment satisfaction after treatment. Range 8-32, higher values equals higher satisfaction with treatment.
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (Devilly & Borkovec, 2000) in I-ER GD.
Measures treatment credibility and expectancy for positive change. Range 0-5, higher values equals higher treatment credibility and expectancy.
The Negative effects Questionnaire (NEQ; Rozental et al. 2016) in I-ER GD.
Measures negative effects of psychological treatment after an intervention. Range 0-20, higher values equals worse outcomes, and more negative effects of treatment.
The internet intervention Patient Adherence Scale (iiPAS; Lenhard et al. 2019) in I-ER GD
Measures adherence to treatment at two timepoints of the treatment. Range 0-20. Higher scores indicate better adherence.
The internet intervention Patient Adherence Scale (iiPAS; Lenhard et al. 2019) in I-ER GD
Measures adherence to treatment at two timepoints of the treatment. Range 0-20. Higher scores indicate better adherence.
Number of participants recruited to I-ER SUPPORT.
Measures will include recruitment rate during study inclusion period (0-15 participants).
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Attkisson & Zwick, 1982) in I-ER SUPPORT
Measures treatment satisfaction. Range 8-32, higher values equals higher satisfaction with treatment.
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (Devilly & Borkovec, 2000) in I-ER SUPPORT
Measures treatment credibility and expectancy for positive change. Range 0-5, higher values equals higher treatment credibility and expectancy.
The Negative effects Questionnaire (NEQ; Rozental et al. 2016) in I-ER SUPPORT.
Measures negative effects of psychological treatment. Range 0-20, higher values equals worse outcomes, and more negative effects of treatment.
Changes in Gender minority stress and resilience (GMSR, Testa et al 2014) for I-ER GD.
Changes in the Gender minority stress and resilience scale. Range 0-17 for sub scales Gender related discrimination, rejection, victimization. Higher values represents higher levels of discrimination, rejection, victimization etc. Range 0-164 for sub scales Non-affirmation of gender identity, Internalized transphobia, Pride, Negative expectations for the future, Nondisclosure and Community connectedness. Higher values represents higher levels of whatever the sub scale covers (e.g. pride, internalized transphobia, community connectedness etc).
Changes in The Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, (DERS-16; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) for I-ER GD.
Changes in the Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, DERS-16. Range 16-80. Lower values equals better outcomes.
Changes in The Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, (DERS-16; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) for I-ER GD.
Changes in the Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, DERS-16. Range 16-80. Lower values equals better outcomes.
Changes in The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, (ERQ; Gross & John, 2003) for I-ER GD.
Changes in the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, ERQ. Subscales Cognitive reappraisal (Range 6-42). and Suppression (Range 4-28). Higher values equals better outcomes in reappraisal, and worse outcomes in Suppression.
Changes inThe Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; Berman, Wennberg & Källmén, 2012) for I-ER GD.
Changes in alcohol consumption. Range 0-40 where higher values equal higher substance use, worse outcomes.
Changes inThe Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT; Berman, Wennberg & Källmén, 2012) for I-ER GD.
Changes in drug consumption. Range 0-44 where higher values equal higher substance use, worse outcomes.
Changes in Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction Scale (GCLS; Dhejne et al. 2019) for I-ER GD
Change and measure improvements in gender (in)congruence, related mental well-being, and life satisfaction throughout the process of undergoing gender affirming medical interventions. Range: 38-190 where higher values indicate greater gender congruence, greater gender-related well-being, and greater life satisfaction.
Changes in Work and social adjustment scale (WSAS; Marks 1986) for I-ER GD
Changes in functioning. Ranges from 0-40 where higher scores indicate a more impaired functioning.
Changes in Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke 1998) for I-ER GD
Changes in anxiety over 20 different situations. Ranges from 0-80 where higher scores indicate a higher social anxiety.
Changes in Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke 1998) for I-ER GD
Changes in anxiety over 20 different situations. Ranges from 0-80 where higher scores indicate a higher social anxiety.
Changes in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S; Montgomery & Åsberg 1979) for I-ER GD
Changes in depressive symptoms. Ranges from 0-54 where higher scores indicate higher depressive severity.
Changes in Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI-9; Lundh, Karim & Quillisch 2007) for I-ER GD
Changes in instances and forms of self-harming behavior. Higher number of instances indicates worse outcomes.
Changes in Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI-9; Lundh, Karim & Quillisch 2007) for I-ER GD
Changes in instances and forms of self-harming behavior. Higher number of instances indicates worse outcomes.
Changes in Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Inventory (BBQ; Lindner et al, 2016) for I-ER GD
Changes in perceived quality of life. Range: 0-96. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived quality of life.
Changes in Satisfaction With Life, Swedish (SWLS; Diener 1985) for I-ER GD
Changes in global cognitive judgements of one's life. Range: 0-35. Higher score indicates higher satisfaction with one's life.
Changes in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14; Cohen, Kamarck & Mermelstein 1983) for I-ER GD
Changes in perceived stress. Range: 0-56. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Changes in Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS; Zimet et al, 1988) for I-ER GD
Changes in perceived support from family, friends and significant other(s). Range: 12-84. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Changes in Rosenberg's scale of self-esteem (Rosenberg; Schmitt & Allik 2005) for I-ER GD
Changes in self-esteem. Range: 0-40. Higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.
Changes in Rumination Response Scale (RRS-10; Nolen-Hoeksema, Morrow 1991) for I-ER GD
Changes in ruminative tendencies. Range: 10-40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of ruminative response styles.
Changes in Affect Labeling Questionnaire (ALQ; Sahi et al, in prep.) for I-ER GD
Changes in one's ability to recognize emotions. Range 12-60. Higher scores indicates higher ability to recognize and label emotions.
Changes in The Gender/Sex diversity belief scale (GSDB; Schudson & van Anders, 2022) for I-ER SUPPORT
Changes in the Gender/Sex diversity belief scale. Range 23-161. Higher values equals more positive attitudes toward transgender individuals.
Changes in Affect Labeling Questionnaire (ALQ; Sahi et al, in prep.) for I-ER SUPPORT
Changes in one's ability to recognize emotions. Range 12-60. Higher scores indicates higher ability to recognize and label emotions.
Changes in The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, (ERQ; Gross & John, 2003) for I-ER SUPPORT.
Changes in the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, ERQ. Subscales Cognitive reappraisal (Range 6-42). and Suppression (Range 4-28). Higher values equals better outcomes in reappraisal, and worse outcomes in Suppression.
Changes in The Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, (DERS-16; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) for I-ER SUPPORT
Changes in the Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, DERS-16. Range 16-80. Lower values equals better outcomes.
Changes in The Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, (DERS-16; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) for I-ER SUPPORT
Changes in the Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, DERS-16. Range 16-80. Lower values equals better outcomes.