Intervention in Frailty Versus Usual Care in Frail Patients After an Acute Myocardial Infarction (FRAMIP)
Primary Purpose
Fragility
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intervention on frailty
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Fragility focused on measuring Frailty, Acute myocardial infarction
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Admission for acute myocardial infarction and survivors in the hospitalization phase
- Age =>70 years
- Prefrail or frail status (Fried scale =>1 points)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test)
- Severe concomitant disease that could hamper the participation in the study
- Patient refusal to participate
Sites / Locations
- Juan Sanchis
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Intervention on frailty
Control
Arm Description
Intervention on frailty in addition to the usual care by the cardiologist. A multidisciplinary team (physicians, nurses and physiotherapists and nutritionists) will carry out the intervention on frailty
Conventional strategy consisting only of the usual care by the cardiologist
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change on frailty status according to the Fried scale
Points in the Fried scale
Secondary Outcome Measures
Total cardiac (cardiac death, reinfarction, postdischarge revascularization, readmission for acute heart failure, readmission for other cardiac cause) and non-cardiac (all-cause mortality or readmission for non-cardiac cause) clinical events
Number of participants with the events
All-cause mortality
Number of participants dead
Ischemic events (reinfarction or postdischarge revascularization)
Number of participants with reinfarction (readmission for chest pain with troponin elevation) or postdischarge revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary surgery)
Readmission for acute heart failure
Number of participants with readmission for acute heart failure
Readmission for non-cardiac causes
Number of participants with readmission for non-cardiac cause
Change of Quality of life (EUROQOL)
EUROQOL test
Change of Functional capacity (walk distance test)
Distance walked during 6 minutes
Change of Nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment)
Mini Nutritional Assessment Test
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02715453
Brief Title
Intervention in Frailty Versus Usual Care in Frail Patients After an Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acronym
FRAMIP
Official Title
Randomized Comparison Between a Strategy of Intervention in Frailty Versus the Usual Care in Frail Patients After an Acute Myocardial Infarction
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Valencia
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Frailty has been associated to a worse outcome in acute coronary syndromes, but the best management of frail patients after an acute coronary syndrome remains unknown. The aim was to investigate the benefit of an intervention on frailty in frail patients after an acute myocardial infarction.
Patients survivors after an acute myocardial infarction (with and without ST-segment elevation), older than 70 years and with pre-frailty (1-2 points) or frailty (≥3 points) according to the Fried's scale measured 24 hours before hospital discharge, will be included. The participants will be randomized to 2 strategies: a) intervention on frailty in addition to the usual care by the cardiologist, and b) conventional strategy consisting only of the usual care by the cardiologist. A multidisciplinary team (physicians, nurses and physiotherapists and nutritionists) will carry out the intervention on frailty The study contemplates a 2-year inclusion period and a 3rd year for the follow-up of the last included patient. The main outcome will be the frailty status (Fried's scale) at 3 months and 1 year. The secondary endpoint will be the clinical events, both cardiovascular and not cardiovascular events, including recurrent events (cumulative events analysis), for the total follow up (3 years in the case of the first included patient). The hypothesis is that an intervention on frailty will improve frailty status and the clinical outcomes in frail patients after an acute myocardial infarction.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fragility
Keywords
Frailty, Acute myocardial infarction
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention on frailty
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention on frailty in addition to the usual care by the cardiologist. A multidisciplinary team (physicians, nurses and physiotherapists and nutritionists) will carry out the intervention on frailty
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Conventional strategy consisting only of the usual care by the cardiologist
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Intervention on frailty
Intervention Description
Multidisciplinary team (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, and nutritionists):
Nutritional evaluation and intervention after randomization and regularly during follow-up
Physiotherapy sessions for 3 months after randomization and home exercise program for 1 year
Psychiatrist or psychologist assistance for 1 year after discharge
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change on frailty status according to the Fried scale
Description
Points in the Fried scale
Time Frame
3 months and 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total cardiac (cardiac death, reinfarction, postdischarge revascularization, readmission for acute heart failure, readmission for other cardiac cause) and non-cardiac (all-cause mortality or readmission for non-cardiac cause) clinical events
Description
Number of participants with the events
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
All-cause mortality
Description
Number of participants dead
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Ischemic events (reinfarction or postdischarge revascularization)
Description
Number of participants with reinfarction (readmission for chest pain with troponin elevation) or postdischarge revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary surgery)
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Readmission for acute heart failure
Description
Number of participants with readmission for acute heart failure
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Readmission for non-cardiac causes
Description
Number of participants with readmission for non-cardiac cause
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Change of Quality of life (EUROQOL)
Description
EUROQOL test
Time Frame
3 months and 1 year
Title
Change of Functional capacity (walk distance test)
Description
Distance walked during 6 minutes
Time Frame
3 months and 1 year
Title
Change of Nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment)
Description
Mini Nutritional Assessment Test
Time Frame
3 months and 1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Admission for acute myocardial infarction and survivors in the hospitalization phase
Age =>70 years
Prefrail or frail status (Fried scale =>1 points)
Exclusion Criteria:
Cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test)
Severe concomitant disease that could hamper the participation in the study
Patient refusal to participate
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Juan Sanchis
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46010
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26514748
Citation
Sanchis J, Nunez E, Ruiz V, Bonanad C, Fernandez J, Cauli O, Garcia-Blas S, Mainar L, Valero E, Rodriguez-Borja E, Chorro FJ, Hermenegildo C, Nunez J. Usefulness of Clinical Data and Biomarkers for the Identification of Frailty After Acute Coronary Syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2015 Dec;31(12):1462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.737. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25440808
Citation
Sanchis J, Bonanad C, Ruiz V, Fernandez J, Garcia-Blas S, Mainar L, Ventura S, Rodriguez-Borja E, Chorro FJ, Hermenegildo C, Bertomeu-Gonzalez V, Nunez E, Nunez J. Frailty and other geriatric conditions for risk stratification of older patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2014 Nov;168(5):784-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.022. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33228950
Citation
Sanchis J, Sastre C, Ruescas A, Ruiz V, Valero E, Bonanad C, Garcia-Blas S, Fernandez-Cisnal A, Gonzalez J, Minana G, Nunez J. Randomized Comparison of Exercise Intervention Versus Usual Care in Older Adult Patients with Frailty After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Am J Med. 2021 Mar;134(3):383-390.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Intervention in Frailty Versus Usual Care in Frail Patients After an Acute Myocardial Infarction
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs