search
Back to results

Intranasal Versus Intravenous Drug in Painful Procedure for Outpatient Oncologic Participants (NAIVe)

Primary Purpose

Pediatric Cancer, Analgesia, Procedural Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
intranasal dexmedetomidine
intranasal fentanyl
intravenous ketamine (ketalar®)
intravenous midazolam
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pediatric Cancer focused on measuring fentanyl, dexmedetomidine

Eligibility Criteria

2 Years - 8 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with oncohematological diseases that requires cerebrospinal fluid, myelogram or both for staging and monitoring their treatment ( leukemia, lymphoma, solid tumors and bone marrow aplasia)
  • Patients who is undergoing to collect cerebrospinal fluid, myelogram or both;
  • aged between two and eight years;
  • absence of tumor recurrence.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous neurologic disease;
  • Using of opioid previously;
  • Neurological developmental delay

Sites / Locations

  • ITACI - Instituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil/ ICR HCFMUSP

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

intranasal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl

intravenous ketamine and midazolam

Arm Description

Dexmedetomidine (precedex®) and fentanyl will be administered by intranasal routes, seeing if both sedative (dexmedetomidine) and analgesic (fentanyl) can give enough sedation for procedure

ketamine (ketalar®) and midazolam intravenous will be using to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain control
Evaluate if intranasal drugs is effective for pain relief in painful procedures for paediatric oncologic and hematologic patients. To measure it will use Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC). This is a scale for pain in children, and for each sign gives 0-2 point, and 0 is no pain and 7-10 intense pain
Sedation
Evaluate if intranasal drugs is effective for sedation in painful procedures for paediatric oncologic and hematologic patients. For access this, will be use Ramsay scale, this scale range between 1 to 6. 1 is a anxious patient and 6 sleeping patient without answer
Change in heart rate
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for ages. To evaluate this, heart rate values will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
Change in respiratory rate
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for different ages. To evaluate this, respiratory rate values will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
Change in blood pressure
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for ages. To evaluate this, blood pressure value will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison if intranasal drugs has the same pain relief as intravenous drugs
Using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) to compare both arms. The FLACC is a scale for pain in children, and for each sign gives 0-2 point, and 0 is no pain and 7-10 intense pain
Comparison if intranasal drugs has the same sedation effects like intravenous drug
Using Ramsay scale to compare both arms, intranasal and intravenous drugs. The Ramsay scale range between 1 to 6. 1 is a anxious patient and 6 sleeping patient without answer effect in sedation.

Full Information

First Posted
September 29, 2020
Last Updated
March 30, 2021
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04621110
Brief Title
Intranasal Versus Intravenous Drug in Painful Procedure for Outpatient Oncologic Participants
Acronym
NAIVe
Official Title
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Midazolam and Ketamine in Sedation for Painful Outpatient Procedures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Pain is a vital sign that depends on personal experience involving different factors such as previous sensory and emotional experience, age, spiritual and cultural aspects, that makes it harder to evaluate, especially in young children. Pain control is important to diminish the anxiety of the child and family, also this is more important in patients who require procedure and treatment that are more painful, like oncological and hematological patients. The study aims to measure if the intranasal drugs (dexmedetomidine and fentanyl) has the same outcomes when compared with intravenous drug (ketamine and midazolam), but with less side effects. The participants are patients from an oncologic outpatient, that will be submitted to cerebrospinal fluid puncture, myelogram or both will be randomized assigned to both groups. The study will compare physiological variables ( heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure) and sedation and pain scales to see if its work properly. The study purpose is to evaluate if intranasal drug works in the same way with less side effects comparing with the usual treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pediatric Cancer, Analgesia, Procedural Pain
Keywords
fentanyl, dexmedetomidine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
intranasal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dexmedetomidine (precedex®) and fentanyl will be administered by intranasal routes, seeing if both sedative (dexmedetomidine) and analgesic (fentanyl) can give enough sedation for procedure
Arm Title
intravenous ketamine and midazolam
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ketamine (ketalar®) and midazolam intravenous will be using to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
intranasal dexmedetomidine
Intervention Description
Dexmedetomidine (precedex®) will be administered by intranasal route in 1ug/kg each dose, repeating at most 3 times to see if it can give enough sedation to painful procedure. To assess the level of sedation the study will use Ramsay sedation scale.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
intranasal fentanyl
Intervention Description
Fentanyl will be administered by intranasal route in 1,5ug/kg each dose, repeating at most 3 times to see if it can give enough pain relief for painful procedure. To assess pain control the study will use Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale ( FLACC)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
intravenous ketamine (ketalar®)
Intervention Description
Ketamine (ketalar®) will be administrated by intravenous route in 1mg/kg dose and the study will use this drug to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
intravenous midazolam
Intervention Description
Midazolam will be administrated by intravenous route in 0,1mg/kg dose and the study will use this drug to compare the efficiency of intranasal drugs.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain control
Description
Evaluate if intranasal drugs is effective for pain relief in painful procedures for paediatric oncologic and hematologic patients. To measure it will use Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC). This is a scale for pain in children, and for each sign gives 0-2 point, and 0 is no pain and 7-10 intense pain
Time Frame
The FLACC scale will be measure each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes.
Title
Sedation
Description
Evaluate if intranasal drugs is effective for sedation in painful procedures for paediatric oncologic and hematologic patients. For access this, will be use Ramsay scale, this scale range between 1 to 6. 1 is a anxious patient and 6 sleeping patient without answer
Time Frame
The Ramsay scale will be measure each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes.
Title
Change in heart rate
Description
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for ages. To evaluate this, heart rate values will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
Time Frame
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Title
Change in respiratory rate
Description
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for different ages. To evaluate this, respiratory rate values will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
Time Frame
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Title
Change in blood pressure
Description
evaluate side effects using PALS ( paediatric advanced life support) values for ages. To evaluate this, blood pressure value will be noted before the procedure, during and after that and will be evaluated if there was an increase or decrease in it, respecting a significance level of 5%.
Time Frame
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison if intranasal drugs has the same pain relief as intravenous drugs
Description
Using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) to compare both arms. The FLACC is a scale for pain in children, and for each sign gives 0-2 point, and 0 is no pain and 7-10 intense pain
Time Frame
each 2 minutes up to 30 minutes
Title
Comparison if intranasal drugs has the same sedation effects like intravenous drug
Description
Using Ramsay scale to compare both arms, intranasal and intravenous drugs. The Ramsay scale range between 1 to 6. 1 is a anxious patient and 6 sleeping patient without answer effect in sedation.
Time Frame
each 2 minutes after medication up to 30 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with oncohematological diseases that requires cerebrospinal fluid, myelogram or both for staging and monitoring their treatment ( leukemia, lymphoma, solid tumors and bone marrow aplasia) Patients who is undergoing to collect cerebrospinal fluid, myelogram or both; aged between two and eight years; absence of tumor recurrence. Exclusion Criteria: Previous neurologic disease; Using of opioid previously; Neurological developmental delay
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Clarissa A Archanjo, M.D.
Phone
+5511964593842
Email
clarissa.archanjo@yahoo.com.br
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ITACI - Instituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil/ ICR HCFMUSP
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05410-030
Country
Brazil
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clarissa A Archanjo, M.D.
Phone
+5511964593842
Email
clarissa.archanjo@yahoo.com.br

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27989326
Citation
Manworren RC, Stinson J. Pediatric Pain Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2016 Aug;23(3):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29364490
Citation
Fantacci C, Fabrizio GC, Ferrara P, Franceschi F, Chiaretti A. Intranasal drug administration for procedural sedation in children admitted to pediatric Emergency Room. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):217-222. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201801_14120.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26936022
Citation
Li BL, Zhang N, Huang JX, Qiu QQ, Tian H, Ni J, Song XR, Yuen VM, Irwin MG. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children administered either by atomiser or by drops. Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):522-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.13407. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26323489
Citation
Tug A, Hanci A, Turk HS, Aybey F, Isil CT, Sayin P, Oba S. Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Dec;17(6):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0145-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28639236
Citation
Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Sep;64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28781452
Citation
Gupta A, Dalvi NP, Tendolkar BA. Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam as premedication for brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized double blind trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):236-240. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30283188
Citation
Chatrath V, Kumar R, Sachdeva U, Thakur M. Intranasal Fentanyl, Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as Premedication in Pediatric Patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):748-753. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_97_18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20956230
Citation
Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Samson RA, Hazinski MF, Atkins DL, Berg MD, de Caen AR, Fink EL, Freid EB, Hickey RW, Marino BS, Nadkarni VM, Proctor LT, Qureshi FA, Sartorelli K, Topjian A, van der Jagt EW, Zaritsky AL. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S876-908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971101. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Intranasal Versus Intravenous Drug in Painful Procedure for Outpatient Oncologic Participants

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs