search
Back to results

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Primary Purpose

Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
Sponsored by
ProPep Surgical, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Urinary Incontinence

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male subjects 40-70 years of age diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate;
  • Subjects scheduled for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for removal of localized prostate cancer;
  • Subjects, who, in the opinion of the clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, cooperate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with pre-operative urinary incontinence defined as use of pads or adult diapers;
  • Subjects with previous pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy;
  • Subjects with current or previous malignancy other than prostate or non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • Subjects who have previously had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryotherapy;
  • Subjects with a prostate volume of >80mL
  • Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 34;
  • Subjects with current or suspected urinary tract or bladder infection(s);
  • Subjects with reported unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g., unstable angina, myocardial infarction within past 6 months, cardiac failure or life-threatening arrhythmia, congestive heart failure) or symptomatic postural hypotension within 6 months before screening;
  • Subjects with a history of diabetes;
  • Subjects with drug, alcohol, or substance abuse reported within the last three years (subject reported);
  • Subjects with a life expectancy less than study duration;
  • Subjects with systemic autoimmune disorder;
  • Subjects with any significant psychological disturbance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could impair the consent process or ability to complete self-assessment questionnaires.
  • Subjects with known sensitivity to any device or products required for the RALP surgery; and
  • Subjects with any other condition that would contraindicate participation, as determined by the Investigator.

Sites / Locations

  • Indiana University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Intraoperative nerve monitoring

Arm Description

Patients for which intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
The proportion of subjects who have urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at 6 months postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
The proportion of subjects who return to pre-operative baseline (RTB) category (i.e. normal, mild, moderate, or severe erectile dysfunction) of erectile function following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves. The change in SHIM score over time from baseline to 12 months.
Time to urinary continence
Assess time to continence defined as using 0 pads per day following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves for 12 month post-operatively.

Full Information

First Posted
May 11, 2015
Last Updated
April 9, 2018
Sponsor
ProPep Surgical, LLC
Collaborators
Indiana University School of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02446808
Brief Title
Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
Official Title
Clinical Assessment of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2018 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
ProPep Surgical, LLC
Collaborators
Indiana University School of Medicine

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery improves post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function.
Detailed Description
Study Design: This is a single surgeon, single institution prospective post-market study of patients undergoing a robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with intraoperative nerve monitoring of pelvic nerves using the ProPep Nerve Monitoring System. The treatment group will consist of 80 subjects (with 69 anticipated to be evaluable) undergoing RALP with intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). This will be compared to a consecutive group of contemporary control cohort patients who have underwent RALP without nerve monitoring by the same single surgeon. Baseline Evaluations and Data Collection: Pre-operative baseline evaluations and data collection will be used to determine eligibility for enrollment and to document subject clinical status prior to surgical procedure. This information is recorded on the Screening case report forms (CRF). The following data will be collected at screening/baseline: Medical History including Gleason score at biopsy, and clinical stage (cT, TNM 2002); Physical examination; Demographic information; Current symptoms; Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) Questionnaire; SHIM Questionnaire; Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction ; Confirmation of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Surgical Procedure The surgical procedure should be completed according to site-specific standards. The following is a general overview of the surgical procedure for this study. The daVinci Surgical System must be used. Additional instrumentation necessary to perform the procedure is determined by the surgeon. The Pep Electrode Introducer facilitates the introduction of the needle electrodes into the pelvis. The electrodes are initially placed in the levator muscle near the apex of the prostate in the area of the nerve bundles prior to the pedicle dissection to identify the perineal branches of the pudendal nerve. Prior to posterior dissection of the apex of the prostate, the needle electrodes are removed from the levator muscle and moved to the external urethral sphincter to identify the deep (muscular) branch of the perineal nerves. Action potentials are measured by the Pep Monitor. Signals are induced in the nerve(s) of interest by stimulating the tissue surrounding the nerve(s) along the presumed nerve pathway with a low level electrical current. The low level current is delivered through the conventional bipolar instrument used during robotic surgery and when delivered close to a nerve it triggers and action potential in the nerve that is displayed on the Pep Monitor. The Pep Control Switch is used to switch the bipolar instrument between cautery mode and stimulation mode. The closer the bipolar instrument is to the nerve being located, the larger the amplitude of the action potential displayed by the Pep Monitor. Nerves will be identified with the device prior to pedicle and apical dissection to establish nerve location. Nerve monitoring may be used through the course of dissections to confirm nerve location. Post-dissection readings will be collected after specimen removal to confirm the integrity of the preserved nerve tissue at the end of the case. During the procedure and through hospital discharge the following data points will be collected: Type of nerve sparing - none, partial, and bilateral; Prostate size; Estimated blood loss and transfusion(s); Method of dissection (transperitoneal anterior, posterior, extraperitoneal, or lymph node dissection); Gleason score at radical prostatectomy; Pathological stage (nT); Positive surgical margin rate (PSM); Total robotic and surgical time; Total time for device deployment; Hospital admission / discharge dates; and Adverse events. Postoperative care will be according to the site-specific standard of care. Follow-up Evaluation and Data Collections: Subjects will be followed post-operatively at catheter removal (typically 1 week), 1 month (±2 weeks), 3 months (±3 weeks), 6 months (±1 month), and 12 months (±1 month) following the procedure. Data will be collected on the appropriate follow-up Case Report Forms (CRFs). The CRFs for each of the follow-up data collection points will be supplied to the subjects upon their discharge from the hospital following their procedure. Research assistant will call subjects the week prior to the due date to remind subjects to fill in and mail back (via pre-addressed, stamped envelopes supplied with CRFs) appropriate CRF. Site specific standard of care will be followed post-operatively. The following data and testing will be completed at each follow-up visit: Current symptoms; Modified EPIC-CP Questionnaire (question 3 and 4); SHIM Questionnaire; Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction; and Adverse events (AE). Contemporary Control Cohort: As the procedures for the prospective cohort are standard of care at the investigators institution, the investigator will have all of the same measures for the contemporary control cohort that he has for the for the prospective cohort. Each prospective subject will be matched to two selected subjects in the contemporary control cohort by biopsy Gleason score (6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10), nerve-sparing status (yes/no), type of nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) and age (within 5 years). The contemporary control cohort will draw from consecutive patients who have undergone RALP in the previous two years (2012-2014) that did not have IONM. The investigator will not record AEs for this contemporary control cohort as the investigator is only interested in collecting AEs data potentially related to the use of the IONM.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients for which intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
Intervention Description
Intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Description
The proportion of subjects who have urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at 6 months postoperatively.
Time Frame
6 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Description
The proportion of subjects who return to pre-operative baseline (RTB) category (i.e. normal, mild, moderate, or severe erectile dysfunction) of erectile function following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves. The change in SHIM score over time from baseline to 12 months.
Time Frame
catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Title
Time to urinary continence
Description
Assess time to continence defined as using 0 pads per day following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves for 12 month post-operatively.
Time Frame
catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male subjects 40-70 years of age diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate; Subjects scheduled for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for removal of localized prostate cancer; Subjects, who, in the opinion of the clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, cooperate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits Exclusion Criteria: Subjects with pre-operative urinary incontinence defined as use of pads or adult diapers; Subjects with previous pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy; Subjects with current or previous malignancy other than prostate or non-melanoma skin cancer; Subjects who have previously had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryotherapy; Subjects with a prostate volume of >80mL Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 34; Subjects with current or suspected urinary tract or bladder infection(s); Subjects with reported unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g., unstable angina, myocardial infarction within past 6 months, cardiac failure or life-threatening arrhythmia, congestive heart failure) or symptomatic postural hypotension within 6 months before screening; Subjects with a history of diabetes; Subjects with drug, alcohol, or substance abuse reported within the last three years (subject reported); Subjects with a life expectancy less than study duration; Subjects with systemic autoimmune disorder; Subjects with any significant psychological disturbance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could impair the consent process or ability to complete self-assessment questionnaires. Subjects with known sensitivity to any device or products required for the RALP surgery; and Subjects with any other condition that would contraindicate participation, as determined by the Investigator.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Indiana University School of Medicine
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs