search
Back to results

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Primary Purpose

Humans, Urinary Incontinence, Male Urogenital Diseases

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intraoperative nerve monitoring,
standard of care robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Sponsored by
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Humans focused on measuring Urinary incontinence, Prostate cancer, Erectile dysfunction, Functional outcome, Robotic prostatectomy, Prostatectomy, Urethral sphincter

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are planned to undergo either non-nerve or unilateral nerve sparring surgery.
  • Patients that deemed able to understand the protocol and to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incontinence prior to surgery
  • Diabetes
  • Known neurological disease that can affect urinary/erectile function
  • Condition with Pacemaker
  • Previous pelvic trauma
  • Previous pelvic surgery including transurethral resection of the prostate
  • Previous pelvic radiation therapy

Sites / Locations

  • Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intraoperative nerve monitoring

Control Cohort

Arm Description

Patients that undergo robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the use intraoperative nerve monitoring, via electromyography, to identify the exact location of the somatic fibers in the pelvic nerves that seem crucial for urinary continence control and erectile function

Patients that undergo standard of care robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Return of continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Difference in total International consultation on incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ)-score between the 2 groups after a follow-up of 1 year. ICIQ is a self-reported survey and screening tool for incontinence. It consists of 3 questions regarding symptoms in the past 4 week, with an overall 0-21 score, where greater values indicate increased severity. Question 1 scores from 0-5, question 2 scores either 0,2,4 or 6 and question 3 scores from 0-10. Only the total score is evaluated. Furthermore there is 1 self-diagnostic question.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Difference in erection rates and sexual activity between the 2 groups after 12 months. Sexual activity defined as yes to the question "Within the last 3 months, have you been sexually active and attempted intercourse?" Erection is defined as a score of at least 17 on the IIEF-5 form and or a score of a least 3 on the EHS form with the use of either no assistance phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors
Nerve function prior to removal of the prostate correlated to patient's preoperative urinary function
Correlation between nerve signal prior to removal of the prostate and preoperative urinary function
Nerve function prior to removal of the prostate correlated to patient's preoperative erectile function
Correlation between nerve signal prior to removal of the prostate and preoperative erectile function
Nerve function after removal of the prostate correlated to patient's postoperative urinary function
Correlation between nerve signal after removal of the prostate and postoperative urinary function
Nerve function after removal of the prostate correlated to patient's postoperative erectile function
Correlation between nerve signal after removal of the prostate and postoperative erectile function
Difference in the degree of incontinence between the two groups for incontinent patients.
Measured in gram on the 24-hour pad test
Difference in Time to continence between the two groups
Difference in Time to continence between the two groups

Full Information

First Posted
October 25, 2018
Last Updated
March 1, 2023
Sponsor
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03721029
Brief Title
Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Official Title
Can Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Predict and Improve Functional Outcomes After Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 3, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 10, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) can predict and improve post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function.
Detailed Description
Study design: This is a single center, randomized, single blinded, prospective, clinical trial. The study population will comprise of 100 men that will undergo either a non-nerve sparring or unilateral-nerve sparring RARP. This means that the preoperative evaluation has suggested that it will not be possible to preserve the cavernous parasympathetic nerves lying in the fascia on either side of the prostate gland during surgery (called bilateral-nerve sparring). Despite the term, non-nerve sparring surgery, the surgeon will still attempt to preserve the somatic fibers of the pudendal nerve as best possible. However, due to the extent of cancer tissue the surgeon will generally need to operate closer to the pudendal nerve then when performing bilateral-nerve sparring surgery. So, the somatic fibers of the pudendal nerve are more likely to be severed. The same is the case on one side when performing unilateral surgery. The treatment group will consist of 50 subjects that will undergo nerve monitoring during RARP. Results will be compared to a control cohort consisting of 50 patients that will undergo contemporary RARP. Aside from the usage of nerve monitoring in the intervention-group, all procedures and care from admission to the hospital through discharge will be standard of care for subjects in both the control and Intervention-group. Baseline evaluation and collection of data: Patients will be screened for eligibility on the phone, and if eligible and they accept they will be scheduled to a visit at the hospital where the following data will be registered for all participants prior to surgery: Age at time of surgery Known co-morbidity Body Mass Index (BMI) Medicine status Smoking Partner status Level of education Employment Clinical status Clinical stage (cT-staging) Gleason score Prostate specific antigen (PSA) Prior to surgery participants will also have answered the questionnaires listed either prior to or during the first visit and have undergone an MRI and the bulbocavernosus-reflex test: ICIQ (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire) form about incontinence symptoms Danish Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score Erection Hardness Scale (EHS) score Presence or absence of bulbocavernosus-reflex. The physician test for this by shortly squeezing the penis while observing if the urethra retracts or the anal sphincter contracts. The test is not painful and only takes a few seconds. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan with measurements of the urethral length and width, and prostate volume along with other specific anatomical structures in relation to the urethra. Contrast agents will not be applied. Intraoperative data: Contraction of the sphincter musculature during stimulation via the nerve monitoring system before removal of the prostate gland Contraction of the sphincter musculature during stimulation via the nerve monitoring system after removal of the prostate gland. Blood loss Non- or unilateral nerve sparring Lymph node dissection Total surgical time Sphincter lesion The surgeon's subjective prediction whether the patient will return to continence postoperatively During the procedure, through discharge and before follow-up regime begins, the following data points will be collected: Time to removal of catheter Leakage of the anastomosis Stricture. Other adverse effects Pathologic cancer stage (pT-stage) Pathologic Gleason score Status of surgical margins Follow-up evaluation. Subjects will be evaluated 14 days after catheter removal and at standard clinical controls at 3, 6 and 12 months. The following questionnaires are answered at every visit: International consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) for incontinence, Danish Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Erection Hardness Scale (EHS). During the last 3 visits subjects also answers a fluid intake/output questionnaire and hand in the results of a 24-hour pad test. In addition to the questionnaires the patients will also undergo an MRI and a bulbocavernosus reflex test 12 months postoperative.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Humans, Urinary Incontinence, Male Urogenital Diseases, Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction
Keywords
Urinary incontinence, Prostate cancer, Erectile dysfunction, Functional outcome, Robotic prostatectomy, Prostatectomy, Urethral sphincter

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients that undergo robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the use intraoperative nerve monitoring, via electromyography, to identify the exact location of the somatic fibers in the pelvic nerves that seem crucial for urinary continence control and erectile function
Arm Title
Control Cohort
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients that undergo standard of care robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Intraoperative nerve monitoring,
Intervention Description
Intraoperative nerve monitoring, via electromyography, enables real-time identification of the location of the somatic fibers in the pelvic nerves that seem crucial for urinary continence control and erectile function.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
standard of care robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Intervention Description
With out the usage of intraoperative nerve monitoring
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Return of continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Description
Difference in total International consultation on incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ)-score between the 2 groups after a follow-up of 1 year. ICIQ is a self-reported survey and screening tool for incontinence. It consists of 3 questions regarding symptoms in the past 4 week, with an overall 0-21 score, where greater values indicate increased severity. Question 1 scores from 0-5, question 2 scores either 0,2,4 or 6 and question 3 scores from 0-10. Only the total score is evaluated. Furthermore there is 1 self-diagnostic question.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Description
Difference in erection rates and sexual activity between the 2 groups after 12 months. Sexual activity defined as yes to the question "Within the last 3 months, have you been sexually active and attempted intercourse?" Erection is defined as a score of at least 17 on the IIEF-5 form and or a score of a least 3 on the EHS form with the use of either no assistance phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Nerve function prior to removal of the prostate correlated to patient's preoperative urinary function
Description
Correlation between nerve signal prior to removal of the prostate and preoperative urinary function
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Nerve function prior to removal of the prostate correlated to patient's preoperative erectile function
Description
Correlation between nerve signal prior to removal of the prostate and preoperative erectile function
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Nerve function after removal of the prostate correlated to patient's postoperative urinary function
Description
Correlation between nerve signal after removal of the prostate and postoperative urinary function
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Nerve function after removal of the prostate correlated to patient's postoperative erectile function
Description
Correlation between nerve signal after removal of the prostate and postoperative erectile function
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Difference in the degree of incontinence between the two groups for incontinent patients.
Description
Measured in gram on the 24-hour pad test
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Difference in Time to continence between the two groups
Description
Difference in Time to continence between the two groups
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients that are planned to undergo either non-nerve or unilateral nerve sparring surgery. Patients that deemed able to understand the protocol and to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Incontinence prior to surgery Diabetes Known neurological disease that can affect urinary/erectile function Condition with Pacemaker Previous pelvic trauma Previous pelvic surgery including transurethral resection of the prostate Previous pelvic radiation therapy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jens Sønksen, Dr., Phd, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Professor
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
City
Herlev
State/Province
Central Region
ZIP/Postal Code
2730
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs