Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 1 Month
Improvement in SI joint pain VAS score of greater than or equal to 20 points, at post-operative & NSM visit after 1 month. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain. Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Si Joint Pain VAS Score at 3 Months
Improvement in SI joint pain VAS score of greater than or equal to 20 points, at post-operative & NSM visits after 3 months. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain. Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 6 Months
Improvement in SI joint pain VAS score of greater than or equal to 20 points, at post-operative & NSM visits after 6 months. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain. Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 12 Months
Improvement in SI joint pain VAS score of greater than or equal to 20 points compared to baseline. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain. Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. Subjects in the NSM group who crossed over are considered failures for this endpoint by definition.
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 24 Months
Improvement in SI joint pain VAS score of greater than or equal to 20 points compared to baseline. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 100 mm line on which the subject indicates their level of pain. 0 = no pain. 100 = worst imaginable pain. Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. Subjects in the NSM group who crossed over are considered failures for this endpoint by definition.
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
Improvement in ODI score of greater than or equal to 15 points, at month 1.
Oswestry Disability Index is a validated measure of disability related to low back pain. There are 10 sections, each with a score between 0-5. Scores are expressed on a percent basis without using the percent term. Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (completely disabled).
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
Improvement in ODI score of greater than or equal to 15 points, at month 3.
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
Improvement in ODI score of greater than or equal to 15 points, at post-operative visits. 6 month visit.
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
Improvement in ODI score of greater than or equal to 15 points compared to baseline. Oswestry Disability Index is a validated measure of disability related to low back pain. Subjects in the NSM group who crossed over are considered failures for this endpoint by definition.
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
Improvement in ODI score of greater than or equal to 15 points compared to baseline. Oswestry Disability Index is a validated measure of disability related to low back pain. Subjects in the NSM group who crossed over are considered failures for this endpoint by definition.
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at Post-operative Visits
Improvement in quality of life (QOL) as measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at post-operative / NSM visits. The Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) is a 36-item patient reported health questionnaire to measure quality of life across 8 domains. The PCS is the Physical Component Summary score. PCS is normed, so that "normal" scores are 50 +- 10. Higher scores indicate higher quality of life; lower scores indicate lower quality of life. SF-36 PCS (NBS, 2009 norms) ranges from 5 (minimum value, poor physical function) to 80 (maximum, excellent clinical function).
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at Post-operative Visits
Improvement in quality of life (QOL) as measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at post-operative / NSM visits. The Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) is a 36-item patient reported health questionnaire to measure quality of life across 8 domains. The PCS is the Physical Component Summary score. PCS is normed, so that "normal" scores are 50 +- 10. Higher scores indicate higher quality of life; lower scores indicate lower quality of life. SF-36 PCS (NBS, 2009 norms) ranges from 5 (minimum value, poor physical function) to 80 (maximum, excellent clinical function).
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at Post-operative Visits
Improvement in quality of life (QOL) as measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at post-operative / NSM visits. The Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) is a 36-item patient reported health questionnaire to measure quality of life across 8 domains. The PCS is the Physical Component Summary score. PCS is normed, so that "normal" scores are 50 +- 10. Higher scores indicate higher quality of life; lower scores indicate lower quality of life. SF-36 PCS (NBS, 2009 norms) ranges from 5 (minimum value, poor physical function) to 80 (maximum, excellent clinical function).
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at Post-operative Visits
Improvement in quality of life (QOL) as measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at post-operative visits. EQ-5D is a five-question broad quality of life measure that can be combined into a single index and represents the time trade-off (TTO) utility of current health. A score of 0 would = worst imaginable health, while a score of 1.0 would be best imaginable health.
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at Post-operative Visits
Improvement in quality of life (QOL) as measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at post-operative visits. EQ-5D is a five-question broad quality of life measure that can be combined into a single index and represents the time trade-off (TTO) utility of current health. A score of 0 would = worst imaginable health, while a score of 1.0 would be best imaginable health.
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at Post-operative Visits
Improvement in quality of life (QOL) as measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at post-operative visits. EQ-5D is a five-question broad quality of life measure that can be combined into a single index and represents the time trade-off (TTO) utility of current health. A score of 0 would = worst imaginable health, while a score of 1.0 would be best imaginable health.
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Ambulatory Status
Time to full ambulation among those without full ambulation at baseline.
60 days was the median of time to full ambulation for the iFuse implant System arm.
Work Status
Proportion of non-working (due to back pain or other reasons) subjects who return to work
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Work Status
Non-working subjects (due to back pain or other reasons) who return to work
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Work Status
Non-working subjects who return to work
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Work Status
Non-working subjects who return to work
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Work Status
Non-working subjects who return to work
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Work Status
Non-working subjects who return to work
Note that secondary endpoint analysis is based on available data only. No imputation of missing scores was prespecified in the protocol.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any event meeting ISO 14155 definition for serious adverse event at following time points: during procedure (if randomized to iFuse), hospital discharge (if iFuse, typically 1-2 days), and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after randomization.