search
Back to results

Iodine Mapping Using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism CT Versus Dual-Energy CT (InSPECT-DECT)

Primary Purpose

Pulmonary Embolism

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Iodine Mapping using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography versus Dual Energy Computed Tomography
Sponsored by
Radboud University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Pulmonary Embolism focused on measuring Pulmonary embolism (PE), Dual-Energy CT (DECT), Subtraction imaging

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 35 years or older and able to provide informed consent
  • Clinically requested CTPA because of suspected pulmonary embolism
  • Available history and physical examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Uncooperative patients.
  • Contra-indication to intravenous iodine administration.
  • Inability to position the arms above the shoulders

Sites / Locations

  • Radboudumc

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Patients

Arm Description

Each patient undergo the same CT protocol. Theobservers will observe the detection of the perfusion defects in two different techniques.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Presence of perfusion defects as reference standard
After 1.5 year, the radiologists scores the presence of perfusion defects caused by pulmonary embolism as a reference standard.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Radiation dose
Clinical diagnosis of Pulmonary embolism: after 6 months follow-up
30-day all cause mortality and PE-associated mortality
6 months all cause mortality and PE-associated mortality

Full Information

First Posted
July 12, 2016
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02890706
Brief Title
Iodine Mapping Using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism CT Versus Dual-Energy CT
Acronym
InSPECT-DECT
Official Title
Iodine Mapping Using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy Computed Tomography
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 7, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 30, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Comparing two techniques (Subtraction and Dual Energy CT) for functional Chest CT for patients with suspected with pulmonary embolism.
Detailed Description
Rationale: Iodine mapping of the lung using subtraction imaging in addition to standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) may improve the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the same manner as the addition of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) to CTPA. Objective: To evaluate image quality and accuracy of detection of perfusion defects associated with pulmonary pathology on iodine maps of the lung that are created by two different CT techniques: 1. A standard of care CTPA with DECT and 2. A new technique that subtracts a low radiation dose unenhanced CT from mono-energetic CTPA (subtraction) Study design: A maximum of 375 patients will undergo a standard CTPA with DECT according to local clinical guidelines, to have 30 patients with pulmonary embolism. For the purposes of this study, patients will undergo an additional unenhanced, low-radiation dose chest CT. Standard reconstructions of all scans and DECT iodine maps will be obtained for clinical reporting and subsequent treatment decisions, according to standard clinical routine. For research purposes, selected mono-energetic images will be post-processed using a novel subtraction algorithm to create iodine maps of the lungs. The iodine maps based on the subtraction algorithm will not be used for clinical management, only the additional unenhanced scan will be used in clinical management. Study population: Patients presenting with a clinical indication for pulmonary CT angiography because of suspected pulmonary embolism. Only adult patients (≥ 35 years) who are able to provide informed consent will be enrolled. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main endpoint of the study is presence of perfusion as established by an expert panel with access to all imaging information (including CTPA, subtraction and DECT) and clinical follow-up. Accuracy of DECT and subtraction is established by observers who are blinded to CTPA and clinical data. Presence of iodine density differences in perfusion defects is measured using region of interest (ROI) measurements. Images will be evaluated for objective and subjective image quality. Patient characteristics, radiation dose, clinical diagnosis, treatment decisions and patient outcome (all cause - and PE related mortality) will be recorded. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: CT imaging is associated with risks related to the use of radiation and iodinated contrast administration. No additional contrast will be used as compared to standard clinical practice as patients will only undergo one CTPA scan. The CT protocol of this study has been carefully designed to have a radiation dose identical or even lower than standard CT protocols for pulmonary embolism detection. The estimated dose-length product (DLP) of standard CTPA with DECT in Meander Medical Centre is 167 mGy-cm (effective dose is 2.4 mSv, using 0,0146 mSv/mGy-cm as a conversion factor). The researchers will expose patients who participate in the study to an estimated additional DLP of 72 mGy-cm due to the unenhanced scan, resulting in an additional estimated effective dose of 1,0 mSv. This implies that the total radiation dose is within the same range as radiation doses of other scans for PE detection in the Netherlands. The additional scan is not obligatory in pulmonary embolism diagnosis, but will be used for clinical evaluation of these patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pulmonary Embolism
Keywords
Pulmonary embolism (PE), Dual-Energy CT (DECT), Subtraction imaging

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
295 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patients
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Each patient undergo the same CT protocol. Theobservers will observe the detection of the perfusion defects in two different techniques.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Iodine Mapping using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography versus Dual Energy Computed Tomography
Intervention Description
Compare two techniques of the CT scanner
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Presence of perfusion defects as reference standard
Description
After 1.5 year, the radiologists scores the presence of perfusion defects caused by pulmonary embolism as a reference standard.
Time Frame
1.5 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiation dose
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 months
Title
Clinical diagnosis of Pulmonary embolism: after 6 months follow-up
Time Frame
Through study completion, after the first inclusion, the patients are followed for half a year.
Title
30-day all cause mortality and PE-associated mortality
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of three months
Title
6 months all cause mortality and PE-associated mortality
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of three months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients 35 years or older and able to provide informed consent Clinically requested CTPA because of suspected pulmonary embolism Available history and physical examination. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Hemodynamic instability Uncooperative patients. Contra-indication to intravenous iodine administration. Inability to position the arms above the shoulders
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Monique Brink, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Radboud University Medical Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Radboudumc
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6500
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20851940
Citation
Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):158-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100047.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23673455
Citation
van der Molen AJ, Schilham A, Stoop P, Prokop M, Geleijns J. A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 2013 Jun;4(3):383-90. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0253-9. Epub 2013 May 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17848685
Citation
Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, Gefter WB, Gottschalk A, Mayo JR, Sostman HD. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):315-29. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452070397. Epub 2007 Sep 11. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23097167
Citation
Lu GM, Zhao Y, Zhang LJ, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5 Suppl):S40-53. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9112.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15657816
Citation
Wildberger JE, Klotz E, Ditt H, Mahnken AH, Spuntrup E, Gunther RW. Multi-slice CT for visualization of acute pulmonary embolism: single breath-hold subtraction technique. Rofo. 2005 Jan;177(1):17-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813875.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23436840
Citation
Mayo J, Thakur Y. Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):522-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9928.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19000866
Citation
Pontana F, Faivre JB, Remy-Jardin M, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Tacelli N, Pansini V, Remy J. Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. Acad Radiol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1494-504. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31084482
Citation
Grob D, Smit E, Prince J, Kist J, Stoger L, Geurts B, Snoeren MM, van Dijk R, Oostveen LJ, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Sechopoulos I, Brink M. Iodine Maps from Subtraction CT or Dual-Energy CT to Detect Pulmonary Emboli with CT Angiography: A Multiple-Observer Study. Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):197-205. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182666. Epub 2019 May 14.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Iodine Mapping Using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism CT Versus Dual-Energy CT

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs