search
Back to results

Iontophoresis of Treprostinil to Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Skin Ulcers (InTREPiD)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Treprostinil iontophoresis
Remodulin® placebo iontophoresis
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Grenoble
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Foot Ulcer focused on measuring Iontophoresis, Treprostinil, Diabetic, Foot Ulcer, Wound Healing

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), with one or more foot ulcer of microvascular or mixed etiology:

    • The ulcer size must be ≥1 cm² and <20 cm²
    • Grade 1A, 1C, 2A or 2C (University of Texas Classification of Diabetic Foot)
  • Patient affiliated to social security insurance or beneficiary of social security insurance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of hypersensitivity reaction to treprostinil
  • Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD)
  • Systemic treatment with any PGI2 analogue in the past two months.
  • Critical ischemia of the lower limb, defined as leg pain at rest associated with ankle pressure <50 mmHg.
  • Infected wound, treated with antibiotics in the past 15 days.
  • Active or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease as follows:
  • Myocardial infarction, or angina within 6 months of study participation
  • Arrhythmia (uncontrolled, highly symptomatic, requires treatment or life-threatening).
  • Congestive heart failure.
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 3 months of study participation
  • Uncontrolled hypertension: systolic blood pressure> 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure> 105 mmHg (2 abnormal readings during visit)
  • Valvular heart disease
  • Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh C) at the time of enrollment
  • Active gastroduodenal ulcer
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Trauma or any clinical event susceptible to be responsible for hemorrhage within 6 months of study participation
  • Renal disease (creatinine > 2 mg/dL and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 mL/min, history of dialysis)
  • Unstable diabetes that has resulted in hyperosmolar coma or ketoacidosis, and/or documented increase or decrease in HbA1c of more than 2.0% within the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy or Lactation
  • Females of childbearing potential not using an effective form of birth control as determined by the investigators.
  • Participant involved in another interventional clinical study
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial order
  • Person under guardianship or curatorship

Sites / Locations

  • CHU Grenoble AlpesRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Treprostinil iontophoresis

Remodulin® Placebo iontophoresis

Standard care

Arm Description

Gel of treprostinil 1 mg/mL (target concentration) Part 1: 1 administration/day, on separate days, with 72h between two doses. Ascending doses are 0.025 mg/mL, 0.05mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 0.7 mg/mL, and 1 mg/mL. The intensity will be set at 120 µA during 60 minutes, i.e. a total current of 17.3 mC/cm². Part 2: 1 administration/day at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for 10 days; dressing will be changed by a trained nurse every 2 days. The intensity will be set at 120 µA during 60 minutes, i.e. a total current of 17.3 mC/cm².

Placebo will be made from the placebo of Remodulin® incorporated into hydrogel (Suprasorb® G). The route and frequency of administration will be the same as for the investigational drug (topical administration by iontophoresis).

subjects randomized to the standard of care group (no iontophoresis) will only undergo standard blood test at visit 0 or 1, unless tests <1 month before inclusion are available This group is not double blind Standard care consists on debridement and dressings

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of wound closure between the 3 groups: iontophoresis of treprostinil, iontophoresis of placebo, and standard of care, over12 weeks.
Wound closure is expressed as the percentage change non-reepithelialized skin area over time (12-week follow-up), assessed with a digital camera and image analysis software.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The percentage of patients with complete healing at the last follow-up visit
Wound area will be assessed with a digital camera and image analysis software.
Comparison of time to complete healing between groups
Time to complete reepithelialization will be sought in the medical record on a monthly basis.
The effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on skin perfusion assessed with laser speckle contrast imaging at the site of the ulcer and around the wound
Cutaneous perfusion will be assessed as cutaneous vascular conductance, and compared between groups
Comparison of skin oxygenation around the lesion and on healed skin (when possible)
Comparison using transcutaneous pressure of oxygen
8-hour PK profile. AUC0-8
8-hour PK profile. AUC0-8 will be calculated from seven time points: immediately after the end of iontophoresis ( T0), 15 min, 30 min, 1h, 2h, 4h, and 8h
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, among which hypotension, any cutaneous reaction at the site of iontophoresis, local pain, liver enzymes.
All adverse events will be rated according to the NIH Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Evaluation of safety via blood pressure
Blood pressure will be continuously recorded with digital photoplethysmography.
Evaluation of safety via the appearance of the wound
Photographs of the wound will be taken and sent to investigators, blinded to the group

Full Information

First Posted
August 20, 2018
Last Updated
May 17, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03654989
Brief Title
Iontophoresis of Treprostinil to Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Skin Ulcers
Acronym
InTREPiD
Official Title
Iontophoresis of Treprostinil to Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Skin Ulcers
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 28, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Assess the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on wound closure over 12 weeks, in patients with DFU. In the present study the investigators aim at establishing the proof-of-concept of iontophoresis of treprostinil as a potential treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in humans. The main hypothesis is that in patients with DFUs, the pharmacodynamic effect of a PGI2 analogue potentiates the effect of low-intensity current on microvascular function, tissue oxygenation and healing.
Detailed Description
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) represent a serious public health problem associated with significant morbidity and health costs. Despite optimal etiologic treatment and local care, amputation is frequent, stressing the need for new treatments. Tissue ischemia is the primary cause for nonhealing DFUs. The cutaneous microcirculation, by providing tissue perfusion, fluid hemostasis, and delivery of oxygen and nutrients, plays a critical role in the pathophysiology and impaired healing of DFUs. The investigators therefore hypothesize that the skin microcirculation, and more specifically the prostacyclin (PGI2) pathway, is an interesting target for the local treatment of DFUs. Indeed, besides its potent vasodilator effect, PGI2 plays a role in the promotion of fibroblast migration and angiogenesis in wound models. However, the benefit of systemic (i.e. IV or SC) treatments is counterbalanced by potentially serious vasodilatation-induced side effects (e.g. severe headaches, flushing, tachycardia and hypotension). These properties are dose-limiting and are associated with safety issues and increased costs. The paradox is that impaired microvasculature prevents the drug, when administered intravenously, from diffusing properly to the wound. Elevated doses are therefore needed, leading to adverse drug reactions. The originality of this approach is to locally deliver negatively charged PGI2 analogues into and around the wound under the influence of a low-intensity current, through a method called iontophoresis. Iontophoresis enables a controlled delivery of ionized drugs into/through the skin under the influence of low-intensity current. In addition, endogenous electrical signals in the wound are known to play a role in healing, by increasing the directed migration of keratinocytes, fibroblasts and neutrophils. Exogenous electric stimulation would mimic this phenomenon with a positive impact on wound healing. In summary, both the drug and its vehicle could therefore work synergistically, while delivering the drug locally therefore limiting side effects due to systemic diffusion. This is a prospective, monocentric, controlled, randomized, double-blinded phase I/II study The main objective is to assess the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on wound closure over 12 weeks, in patients with DFU. The investigators will compare wound closure, expressed as the percentage change of the wound area over time (12-week follow-up), between 3 groups: iontophoresis of treprostinil, iontophoresis of placebo, and standard of care. Wound area will be assessed with a digital camera and image analysis software. Secondary objectives are: To assess the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on complete healing over 3 months To assess the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on the time to complete healing To assess the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on skin perfusion at the site of the ulcer and around the wound To evaluate the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on skin oxygenation around the lesion and on healed skin To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of topical administration of treprostinil over damaged (wounded) To evaluate the safety of the procedure The study will be divided into two consecutive parts: Part 1: 8 to 24 patients with DFU (depending on the total number of doses tested, and the number of doses per patient) will be included in a single ascending dose (SAD) safety study of treprostinil iontophoresis. Part 2: 36 patients with DFU associated with microvascular dysfunction (+/- neuropathy) will be randomized into three groups to receive either: 1. Treprostinil iontophoresis; 2. Placebo iontophoresis; 3. Standard care. Drug administration (placebo or treprostinil), but not standard care, will be double-blind. After a 10-day treatment, follow-up includes 6 visits over 10 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Keywords
Iontophoresis, Treprostinil, Diabetic, Foot Ulcer, Wound Healing

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
2 sub-studies: Preliminary safety study, Phase I: single ascending dose study that aims at establishing the safety, tolerability, and PK of the procedure in patients with active ulcers; we propose an accelerated titration design with 7 doses of gel. The accelerated phase (first four doses) uses single-patient cohorts per dose. After these doses, a standard 3+3 design will be performed. Any occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the accelerated phase halts the accelerated titration and the cohort is expended to the standard 3+3 design. Two instances of DLT at a dose level halt escalation, and D-1 is the maximum tolerated dose. Proof-of-concept study, Phase II: Thirty-six patients with DFU associated with microvascular dysfunction will be randomized into three groups: Treprostinil iontophoresis; Placebo iontophoresis; Standard care. Drug administration, but not standard care, will be double-blind. After a 10-day treatment, follow-up includes 6 visits over 10 weeks.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Double blind (for the two groups treated with iontophoresis of treprostinil or placebo); open for the standard of care group. The preparation of syringes of gel containing treprostinil or placebo will be centralized. Both gels will be physically identical, and investigators will not have access to the randomization list or to preparation records. This ensures proper blinding at treatment initiation. Treatment kits will subsequently be given to research nurses to continue the treatment at home. Nurses will not have access to the randomization list or preparation records either, which guarantees proper blinding throughout the 10-day treatment. Unblinding will be done in case of any suspicion of an unexpected serious adverse reaction, prior to the declaration of the event to the competent authorities. Unblinding may be done 24/24h by the Pharmacy department.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treprostinil iontophoresis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Gel of treprostinil 1 mg/mL (target concentration) Part 1: 1 administration/day, on separate days, with 72h between two doses. Ascending doses are 0.025 mg/mL, 0.05mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 0.7 mg/mL, and 1 mg/mL. The intensity will be set at 120 µA during 60 minutes, i.e. a total current of 17.3 mC/cm². Part 2: 1 administration/day at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for 10 days; dressing will be changed by a trained nurse every 2 days. The intensity will be set at 120 µA during 60 minutes, i.e. a total current of 17.3 mC/cm².
Arm Title
Remodulin® Placebo iontophoresis
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo will be made from the placebo of Remodulin® incorporated into hydrogel (Suprasorb® G). The route and frequency of administration will be the same as for the investigational drug (topical administration by iontophoresis).
Arm Title
Standard care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
subjects randomized to the standard of care group (no iontophoresis) will only undergo standard blood test at visit 0 or 1, unless tests <1 month before inclusion are available This group is not double blind Standard care consists on debridement and dressings
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Treprostinil iontophoresis
Intervention Description
We will administer treprostinil at increasing doses by a iontophoresis.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Remodulin® placebo iontophoresis
Intervention Description
Placebo iontophoresis will be performed using Remodulin® placebo (United Therapeutics) delivered with Axion GmbH electrodes connected to a PeriIont generator (Perimed). Part 1: 1 administration/day, on separate days, with 72h between two doses. The intensity will be set at 120 µA during 60 minutes, i.e. a total current of 17.3 mC/cm². Part 2: 1 administration/day for 10 days. The intensity will be set at 120 µA during 60 minutes, i.e. a total current of 17.3 mC/cm².
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of wound closure between the 3 groups: iontophoresis of treprostinil, iontophoresis of placebo, and standard of care, over12 weeks.
Description
Wound closure is expressed as the percentage change non-reepithelialized skin area over time (12-week follow-up), assessed with a digital camera and image analysis software.
Time Frame
Up to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The percentage of patients with complete healing at the last follow-up visit
Description
Wound area will be assessed with a digital camera and image analysis software.
Time Frame
week 12
Title
Comparison of time to complete healing between groups
Description
Time to complete reepithelialization will be sought in the medical record on a monthly basis.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the date of documented healing, assessed up to 12 months.
Title
The effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on skin perfusion assessed with laser speckle contrast imaging at the site of the ulcer and around the wound
Description
Cutaneous perfusion will be assessed as cutaneous vascular conductance, and compared between groups
Time Frame
day 9
Title
Comparison of skin oxygenation around the lesion and on healed skin (when possible)
Description
Comparison using transcutaneous pressure of oxygen
Time Frame
Day 0 and Day 9 and week 12
Title
8-hour PK profile. AUC0-8
Description
8-hour PK profile. AUC0-8 will be calculated from seven time points: immediately after the end of iontophoresis ( T0), 15 min, 30 min, 1h, 2h, 4h, and 8h
Time Frame
part 1 : V1 (day0) V2 (day3 or more after V1) V3 (day3 or more after V2) V4 (day3 or more after V3), Part 2 : at days 0 and 9
Title
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, among which hypotension, any cutaneous reaction at the site of iontophoresis, local pain, liver enzymes.
Description
All adverse events will be rated according to the NIH Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Time Frame
During all the study, 3 months of follow-up for every subject
Title
Evaluation of safety via blood pressure
Description
Blood pressure will be continuously recorded with digital photoplethysmography.
Time Frame
During all the study, 3 months of following for every subject
Title
Evaluation of safety via the appearance of the wound
Description
Photographs of the wound will be taken and sent to investigators, blinded to the group
Time Frame
During all the study, 3 months of following for every subject

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with type 2 diabetes according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), with one or more foot ulcer of microvascular or mixed etiology: The ulcer size must be ≥1 cm² and <20 cm² Grade 1A, 1C, 2A or 2C (University of Texas Classification of Diabetic Foot) Patient affiliated to social security insurance or beneficiary of social security insurance. Exclusion Criteria: History of hypersensitivity reaction to treprostinil Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) Systemic treatment with any PGI2 analogue in the past two months. Critical ischemia of the lower limb, defined as leg pain at rest associated with ankle pressure <50 mmHg. Infected wound, treated with antibiotics in the past 15 days. Active or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease as follows: Myocardial infarction, or angina within 6 months of study participation Arrhythmia (uncontrolled, highly symptomatic, requires treatment or life-threatening). Congestive heart failure. Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 3 months of study participation Uncontrolled hypertension: systolic blood pressure> 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure> 105 mmHg (2 abnormal readings during visit) Valvular heart disease Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh C) at the time of enrollment Active gastroduodenal ulcer Intracerebral hemorrhage Trauma or any clinical event susceptible to be responsible for hemorrhage within 6 months of study participation Renal disease (creatinine > 2 mg/dL and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 mL/min, history of dialysis) Unstable diabetes that has resulted in hyperosmolar coma or ketoacidosis, and/or documented increase or decrease in HbA1c of more than 2.0% within the previous 3 months. Pregnancy or Lactation Females of childbearing potential not using an effective form of birth control as determined by the investigators. Participant involved in another interventional clinical study Person deprived of liberty by judicial order Person under guardianship or curatorship
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Matthieu Roustit, PharmD, PhD
Phone
+33-476-769-260
Email
MRoustit@chu-grenoble.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Adeline Paris, pharmacist
Phone
+33-476-767-383
Email
Aparis@chu-grenoble.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cracowski Jean-luc, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical pharmacology unit, grenoble alpes university hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU Grenoble Alpes
City
Grenoble
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Luc CRACOWSKI, Pr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Iontophoresis of Treprostinil to Enhance Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Skin Ulcers

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs