Irreversible Electroporation of Unresectable Liver Tumors
Primary Purpose
Liver Metastases, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Bile Duct Cancer
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Irreversible electroporation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Liver Metastases focused on measuring irreversible electroporation, primary liver cancer, secondary liver cancer, colorectal liver metastases, NanoKnife, ablation, IRE
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary or secondary cancer of the liver.
- Largest tumor diameter ≤5 cm in any plane.
- Tumor must be deemed as unresectable and unsuitable for other established curative liver directed therapies.
- Treatment must be given with curative intent.
- Patients must be able to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Radiological signs of synchronous intra- or extrahepatic disease, unless curative intended therapy is planned.
- Tumor is inaccessible e.g. due to venous dilation etc. (assessed with preoperative ultrasound)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2
- Child-Pugh class C
- International Normalized Ratio (INR)>1.5
- Pregnancy
- Persistent atrial fibrillation
- Implanted electronic devices e.g. cardiac pacemakers or other electrostimulators.
- Metal stents or other metallic objects near the ablation zone (unless the stent can be replaced with a plastic stent prior to IRE)
- Severe allergies to anesthetic agent, paralytic agent or any of the equipment used during treatment.
- Patient is referred from a hospital outside of Denmark
Sites / Locations
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Intervention
Arm Description
Selected patients who choose to participate will undergo ablation of the target lesion using irreversible electroporation.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
90-day complication rate and severity
Adverse events will be registered and scaled according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Technical success rate
The rate of patients were it is possible to place needles according to the treatment plan and deliver 90 electrical pulses per electrode pair
Technical efficacy rate (1 month) (according to SIR)
The rate of patients showing no residual tumor on contrast enhanced computed tomography (ceCT)
Median local progression free survival from IRE
The median time from the intervention to progressive disease of the treated lesion, according to RECIST 1.1 or modified RECIST (mRECIST) (only for HCC).
Median overall survival (OS) from IRE
The median time from the intervention to death.
Longitudinal changes in perceived quality of life
Quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 is used to assess the quality of life in the included patients. Raw scores will be calculated according to the manual. Items will be grouped in: Global health status (range 0 - 100, high is good), Functional scales (range 0 - 100, high is good) and symptom scales (range 0 - 100 low is good). Differences in each scales during the course of the trial will be calculated separately.
Longitudinal changes in pain perception
Long term pain will be assessed using the modified Danish version of the Brief Pain Inventory - short form. The outcomes assessed will be an average score of pain severity items and interference items in accordance with the manual. The scales range from 0 to 10 (lower is less pain).
Periprocedural pain perception
Perioperative pain will be scores using the visual analogue pain scale (range 0 - 10, low score is less pain).
Longitudinal changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
Physicians assessment of global functioning using the "Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group" performance status scale (range 0 - 5, low score is better)
Longitudinal changes in nutritional status assessment
Nutritional status assessment using the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (short form). The short form includes only patient reported measures and will be combined into a single score according to the manual (range 0 - 37, low score is better).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04404647
First Posted
May 15, 2020
Last Updated
March 24, 2021
Sponsor
Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, MD, DMSc, Professor of Surgery
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04404647
Brief Title
Irreversible Electroporation of Unresectable Liver Tumors
Official Title
Irreversible Electroporation of Unresectable Liver Tumors - a Phase I Study of Safety and Feasibility
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Low accrual rate
Study Start Date
June 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, MD, DMSc, Professor of Surgery
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of curative intended irreversible electroporation (IRE) in the treatment of liver tumors neighboring major vessels or bile ducts.
Detailed Description
Patients can be included in the study if they have one or more malignant liver tumors unsuitable for resection and thermal ablation (due to proximity of major vessels or bile duct) or other established liver directed therapies.
Prior to inclusion all potential participant will be evaluated by the local multidisciplinary team, to insure fulfillment of the above-mentioned criteria. In general, the included patient will have tumors with <1 cm of margin to major hepatic vessels or bile ducts, thereby not allowing for conventional treatments because of risk of i.e. hemorrhage, biliary tract damage, liver failure or ineffective ablation due to heat sink.
IRE will be done under general anesthesia as an in-patient procedure. Patients will be observed for at least 24 hours after IRE.
Patients will attend CT scans 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-IRE according to national guidelines (for follow-up after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)). Patients will attend the out-patient clinic after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. During the follow-up period, patients will be asked to fill out electronic forms monitoring pain, quality of life and nutritional status. After 24 months the patients will only be followed with CT scans in accordance with the mentioned schedule. Data collection for scientific purposes will stop when the last included patient has been followed for at least 24 months or when the study period concludes.
In case of multiple liver tumors, where a conventional treatment approach is not possible due to a single lesion being too close to major vessels or bile ducts, IRE may be used in conjunction to conventional therapy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Metastases, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Bile Duct Cancer
Keywords
irreversible electroporation, primary liver cancer, secondary liver cancer, colorectal liver metastases, NanoKnife, ablation, IRE
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Selected patients who choose to participate will undergo ablation of the target lesion using irreversible electroporation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Irreversible electroporation
Other Intervention Name(s)
NanoKnife(TM)
Intervention Description
The IRE procedure will be carried out as ultrasound guided technique either percutaneously or during laparotomy. Needle spacing and electrical pulse delivery will be performed in a standardized way.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
90-day complication rate and severity
Description
Adverse events will be registered and scaled according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Time Frame
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical success rate
Description
The rate of patients were it is possible to place needles according to the treatment plan and deliver 90 electrical pulses per electrode pair
Time Frame
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Title
Technical efficacy rate (1 month) (according to SIR)
Description
The rate of patients showing no residual tumor on contrast enhanced computed tomography (ceCT)
Time Frame
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Title
Median local progression free survival from IRE
Description
The median time from the intervention to progressive disease of the treated lesion, according to RECIST 1.1 or modified RECIST (mRECIST) (only for HCC).
Time Frame
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Title
Median overall survival (OS) from IRE
Description
The median time from the intervention to death.
Time Frame
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Title
Longitudinal changes in perceived quality of life
Description
Quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 is used to assess the quality of life in the included patients. Raw scores will be calculated according to the manual. Items will be grouped in: Global health status (range 0 - 100, high is good), Functional scales (range 0 - 100, high is good) and symptom scales (range 0 - 100 low is good). Differences in each scales during the course of the trial will be calculated separately.
Time Frame
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Title
Longitudinal changes in pain perception
Description
Long term pain will be assessed using the modified Danish version of the Brief Pain Inventory - short form. The outcomes assessed will be an average score of pain severity items and interference items in accordance with the manual. The scales range from 0 to 10 (lower is less pain).
Time Frame
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Title
Periprocedural pain perception
Description
Perioperative pain will be scores using the visual analogue pain scale (range 0 - 10, low score is less pain).
Time Frame
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Title
Longitudinal changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
Description
Physicians assessment of global functioning using the "Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group" performance status scale (range 0 - 5, low score is better)
Time Frame
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Title
Longitudinal changes in nutritional status assessment
Description
Nutritional status assessment using the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (short form). The short form includes only patient reported measures and will be combined into a single score according to the manual (range 0 - 37, low score is better).
Time Frame
2 years after intervention (last patient)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary or secondary cancer of the liver.
Largest tumor diameter ≤5 cm in any plane.
Tumor must be deemed as unresectable and unsuitable for other established curative liver directed therapies.
Treatment must be given with curative intent.
Patients must be able to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Radiological signs of synchronous intra- or extrahepatic disease, unless curative intended therapy is planned.
Tumor is inaccessible e.g. due to venous dilation etc. (assessed with preoperative ultrasound)
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2
Child-Pugh class C
International Normalized Ratio (INR)>1.5
Pregnancy
Persistent atrial fibrillation
Implanted electronic devices e.g. cardiac pacemakers or other electrostimulators.
Metal stents or other metallic objects near the ablation zone (unless the stent can be replaced with a plastic stent prior to IRE)
Severe allergies to anesthetic agent, paralytic agent or any of the equipment used during treatment.
Patient is referred from a hospital outside of Denmark
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Professor, DMSc
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital
City
Aalborg
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Irreversible Electroporation of Unresectable Liver Tumors
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs