search
Back to results

Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis

Primary Purpose

Perforated Appendicitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Irrigation
No Irrigation
Sponsored by
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Perforated Appendicitis focused on measuring Perforated appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy, children, irrigation

Eligibility Criteria

1 Month - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 yrs old
  • Perforation identified as hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No perforation
  • A significant comorbidity that would limit their ability to recover from appendectomy in a normal fashion

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Mercy Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Irrigation

No Irrigation

Arm Description

Irrigation of the area with at least 500ml normal saline using the power suction/irrigator

Only suction with the power suction/irrigator without saline attached

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Post-operative abscess

Secondary Outcome Measures

operating time
length of stay

Full Information

First Posted
March 2, 2009
Last Updated
July 31, 2012
Sponsor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00854815
Brief Title
Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis
Official Title
Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose is to quantify the effect of irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.
Detailed Description
This will be a prospective, randomized clinical trial involving patients who present to the hospital with perforated appendicitis. This will be a definitive study. Power calculation was based on abscess rate in the previous prospective study. An unacceptable abscess rate needed to be chosen. Our current rate is 20%, or one-fifth of the patients. If this were to increase by 15%, it would place just over one third of the patients at risk which would be unacceptable. This is comparable to the 36% rejection level we used for the previous IRB approved trial (#07 02-031). Using a delta of 0.15 with alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8, the sample size is 109 patients in each arm. Therefore we will anticipate enrolling 220. Subjects will be those children who are found to have severe inflammatory changes on imaging or a high clinical suspicion of perforation. Permission will be obtained from parents prior to the operation. All of these children will be under duress prior to randomization, therefore we request waiving assent as we have done with the previous perforated appendicitis studies. The final decision to include a child in the study will made after perforation has been visually confirmed during surgery. Perforation will be defined as an identifiable hole in the appendix or stool in the abdomen. The randomization assignment will be made known at the initiation of the operation, and confirmation of perforation will confirm the patient will utilize the next randomization slot. The irrigation group will have suction irrigator set up with a 1 liter bag of normal saline. The surgeon must use at least 500 ml of this bag but may use as much as they choose. The no irrigation group will have the suction irrigator set up without the saline attachment. This will leave them with the capacity for suction only. Since several suction devices exist, this will assure the same type of suction for both groups. After the operation, both groups will be managed in the same manner. When the patient is tolerating a regular diet, on oral pain medication and has been afebrile for over 12 hours, they will be discharged on oral antibiotics to complete a course of 7 days. If they stay until the 5th post-operative day, a white blood cell count will be checked, which if it is normal, they will be discharged to home without antibiotics. This is standard post-operative care as delineated by our previous prospective, randomized.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Perforated Appendicitis
Keywords
Perforated appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy, children, irrigation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Irrigation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Irrigation of the area with at least 500ml normal saline using the power suction/irrigator
Arm Title
No Irrigation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Only suction with the power suction/irrigator without saline attached
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Irrigation
Other Intervention Name(s)
washout
Intervention Description
Irrigation of the area with at least 500ml NS using the power suction/irrigator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
No Irrigation
Other Intervention Name(s)
suction
Intervention Description
Suction only using suction/irrigator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Post-operative abscess
Time Frame
1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
operating time
Time Frame
1 day
Title
length of stay
Time Frame
2 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Month
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Under 18 yrs old Perforation identified as hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen Exclusion Criteria: No perforation A significant comorbidity that would limit their ability to recover from appendectomy in a normal fashion
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shawn D St. Peter, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Mercy Hospital
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64108
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs