search
Back to results

KIVEXA Vs TRUVADA, Both Administered With Efavirenz, In ART-Naive Subjects (ASSERT)

Primary Purpose

Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus I, HIV Infection

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Abacavir/lamivudine and efavirenz
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine and efavirenz
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus I focused on measuring tenofovir, HIV, efavirenz, naive, lamivudine, abacavir, emtricitabine, renal

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is at least 18 years of age.
  • Subject is antiretroviral-naïve (defined as having no previous therapy with any NNRTI and 14 days of prior therapy with any other antiretroviral).
  • Subject has plasma HIV-1 RNA 1,000 copies/mL at screening. This test may be repeated once within the 45-day screening window.
  • Subject is willing and able to understand and provide written informed consent prior to participation in this study.
  • A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of:

    1. Non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal); or,
    2. Child-bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screen and agrees to one of the following methods of contraception (any contraception method must be used consistently and correctly, i.e., in accordance with both the approved product label and the instructions of a physician):

Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the investigational products, throughout the study, and for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of all study medications Double barrier method (male condom/spermicide, male condom/diaphragm, diaphragm/spermicide). Hormonal contraception will not be considered adequate for inclusion into this study Any intrauterine device (IUD) with published data showing that the expected failure rate is <1% per year.

Sterilization (female subject or male partner of female subject).

  • Prior to randomization, subjects must have been screened and be negative for the HLA-B*5701 allele. Test may be performed by local laboratory and results must be available for source document verification according to local practices.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is in the initial acute phase of a CDC Clinical Category C infection at Baseline.
  • Subject is enrolled in one or more investigational drug protocols, which may impact HIV RNA suppression.
  • Subject is, in the opinion of the Investigator, unable to complete the study dosing period and protocol evaluations and assessments.
  • Subject is either pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Subject suffers from a serious medical condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the subject.
  • Subject has a history of inflammatory bowel disease or other gastrointestinal dysfunction.
  • Subject has any acute laboratory abnormality at screening.
  • Subject has an estimated creatinine clearance within the screening period <50mL/min via the Cockcroft-Gault method.
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Subjects with a history of thyroid disease, hyperparathyroid disease, chronic hyper or hypocalcemia, vitamin D deficiency, or receiving thyroid hormone or parathyroid hormone replacement within 28 days prior to screening.
  • Subjects with a history of systemic inflammatory arthritis.
  • Subjects who are hepatitis B positive at screening.
  • Subject requires treatment with radiation therapy or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Subject has received treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine or any agents with documented activity against HIV-1 in vitro within 28 days prior to Screening, or an anticipated need during the study.
  • Subjects who require treatment with any of the following medications within 28 days of commencement of investigational product, or an anticipated need during the study:
  • Medications with significant drug-drug interactions with efavirenz:voriconazole, terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, ergot alkaloids (dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine), midazolam, triazolam, St. John's wort, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampin, pimozide, bepridil
  • Medications which may impact on bone mineral density: oral or systemic corticosteroids, anticonvulsants, heparin, warfarin, cyclosporine, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, Vitamin D supplements and analogues, Calcium supplements, oestrogen or progesterone replacement (oral hormonal contraception permitted), raloxifene, tamoxifen, testosterone or anabolic steroid replacement/supplements.
  • Systemic interleukins or interferons
  • Subject has a history of allergy to any of the protocol-specified medications or any excipients therein.
  • Subject has evidence of genotypic resistance at screening (according to central lab interpretation) or prior documented evidence of genotypic and/or phenotypic (above threshold for reduced susceptibility) resistance to any of the following drugs: efavirenz, abacavir, lamivudine, tenofovir, emtricitabine.
  • Subjects who are unsuitable for DEXA scanning should be excluded, including 1) Less than three vertebra in the range of L1 to L4 that are suitable for BMD measurement by DEXA, or 2) Bilateral hip replacement.
  • The subject has previously participated in an experimental drug and/or vaccine trial(s) within 60 days or 5 half-lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the experimental drug or vaccine - whichever is longer, prior to screening for the study.
  • The subject will participate simultaneously in another clinical study.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

ABC/3TC + EFV

TDF/FTC + EFV

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 48
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine; BMI, body mass index.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 24
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine.
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 96
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 96 value minus the baseline value. GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^s, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine.
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 24
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. Cockcroft-Gault is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine, weight, and gender. GFR = (140 - age) * (mass in kg) * (0.85 if female) divided by 72 * serum creatinine in mg/dL. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter; kg, kilogram; CG, Cockcroft-Gault.
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 48
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. Cockcroft-Gault is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine, weight, and gender. GFR = (140 - age) * (mass in kg) * (0.85 if female) divided by 72 * serum creatinine in mg/dL. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter; kg, kilogram.
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 96
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 96 value minus the baseline value. Cockcroft-Gault is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine, weight, and gender. GFR = (140 - age) * (mass in kg) * (0.85 if female) divided by 72 * serum creatinine in mg/dL. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter; kg, kilogram.
Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72 m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 24
mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared
Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 48
mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared
Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 96
mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared
Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 24
Normal: GFR >=60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio <=200 mg/g GFR; Stage 1: GFR >=90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 2: GFR >=60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 3: GFR >=30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 4: GFR >=15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 5: GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2. mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; mg, milligram; g, gram.
Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 48
Normal: GFR >=60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio <=200 mg/g GFR; Stage 1: GFR >=90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 2: GFR >=60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 3: GFR >=30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 4: GFR >=15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 5: GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2. mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; mg, milligram; g, gram.
Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 96
Normal: GFR >=60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio <=200 mg/g GFR; Stage 1: GFR >=90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 2: GFR >=60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 3: GFR >=30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 4: GFR >=15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 5: GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2. mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; mg, milligram; g, gram.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 24
BMD is a measure (grams [g] per centimeters cubed [cm^3]) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 24
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 48
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 48
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 96
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 96
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 24
BMD is a measure of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones.
Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 48
BMD is a measure of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones.
Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 96
BMD is a measure of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones.
Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 24
The T-score is a radiographic diagnosis that compares bone mineral density (BMD) to that of a "normal, healthy, 30-year-old female". The lower the T-score, the lower the BMD. A T-score of +1 to -1 is normal. A T-score decrease of -1 indicates a 10%-15% decrease in BMD.
Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 48
The T-score is a radiographic diagnosis that compares bone mineral density (BMD) to that of a "normal, healthy, 30-year-old female". The lower the T-score, the lower the BMD. A T-score of +1 to -1 is normal. A T-score decrease of -1 indicates a 10%-15% decrease in BMD.
Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 96
The T-score is a radiographic diagnosis that compares bone mineral density (BMD) to that of a "normal, healthy, 30-year-old female". The lower the T-score, the lower the BMD. A T-score of +1 to -1 is normal. A T-score decrease of -1 indicates a 10%-15% decrease in BMD.
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 24
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events occurring in two or more participants are presented.
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 48
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events occurring in two or more participants are presented.
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 96
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events occurring in two or more participants are presented.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 24
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <200 mg/dL, desirable; 200-<240 mg/dL, borderline high; >=240 mg/dL, high. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 48
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <200 mg/dL, desirable; 200-<240 mg/dL, borderline high; >=240 mg/dL, high. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 96
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <200 mg/dL, desirable; 200-<240 mg/dL, borderline high; >=240 mg/dL, high. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 24
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <100 mg/dL, optimal; 100-<130 mg/dL, near/above optimal; 130-<160 mg/dL, borderline high; 160-<190 mg/dL, high; >=190 mg/dL, very high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 48
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <100 mg/dL, optimal; 100-<130 mg/dL, near/above optimal; 130-<160 mg/dL, borderline high; 160-<190 mg/dL, high; >=190 mg/dL, very high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 96
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <100 mg/dL, optimal; 100-<130 mg/dL, near/above optimal; 130-<160 mg/dL, borderline high; 160-<190 mg/dL, high; >=190 mg/dL, very high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 24
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <40 mg/dL, low; 40-<60 mg/dL, normal; >=60 mg/dL, high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 48
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <40 mg/dL, low; 40-<60 mg/dL, normal; >=60 mg/dL, high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 96
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <40 mg/dL, low; 40-<60 mg/dL, normal; >=60 mg/dL, high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <150 mg/dL, normal; 150-<200 mg/dL, borderline high; 200-<500 mg/dL, high; >=500 mg/dL, very high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <150 mg/dL, normal; 150-<200 mg/dL, borderline high; 200-<500 mg/dL, high; >=500 mg/dL, very high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 96
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <150 mg/dL, normal; 150->200 mg/dL, borderline high; 200-<500 mg/dL, high;>= 500 mg/dL, very high.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 24
The DAIDS toxicity table provides descriptive terminology for grading the severity of adult adverse events. Laboratory grades also provide ranges for each parameter. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. LDL, low-density lipid; HDL, high-density lipid. Treatment emergent refers to any toxicity that was not present prior to the start of study drug treatment.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 48
The DAIDS toxicity table provides descriptive terminology for grading the severity of adult adverse events. Laboratory grades also provide ranges for each parameter. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. LDL, low-density lipid; HDL, high-density lipid. Treatment emergent refers to any toxicity that was not present prior to the start of study drug treatment.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 96
The DAIDS toxicity table provides descriptive terminology for grading the severity of adult adverse events. Laboratory grades also provide ranges for each parameter. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. LDL, low-density lipid; HDL, high-density lipid. Treatment emergent refers to any toxicity that was not present prior to the start of study drug therapy.
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 24
HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) is a strong predictor of the rate of HIV disease progression. It was measured from plasma (participant blood samples) taken at all visits throughout the study. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid. Viral load is a measure of the severity of the HIV infection.
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 48
HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) is a strong predictor of the rate of HIV disease progression. It was measured from plasma (participant blood samples) taken at all visits throughout the study. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid. Viral load is a measure of the severity of the HIV infection.
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 96
HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) is a strong predictor of the rate of HIV disease progression. It was measured from plasma (participant blood samples) taken at all visits throughout the study. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid. Viral load is a measure of the severity of the HIV infection.
Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 24
CD4+ counts are used to monitor the progression of HIV disease and the strength of the immune system. The number of CD4+ cells decreases as HIV disease progresses. Cell counts were measured from participant blood samples taken throughout the study.
Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 48
CD4+ counts are used to monitor the progression of HIV disease and the strength of the immune system. The number of CD4+ cells decreases as HIV disease progresses. Cell counts were measured from participant blood samples taken throughout the study.
Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 96
CD4+ counts are used to monitor the progression of HIV disease and the strength of the immune system. The number of CD4+ cells decreases as HIV disease progresses. Cell counts were measured from participant blood samples taken throughout the study.
Number of Participants Classified as Protocol-defined Failures With Treatment-emergent Resistance to Study Drug in the Indicated Viruses at Week 96
Viral resistance was measured using blood samples collected from participants throughout the study. NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Virological failure was defined as any one of: participant does not achieve a 1 log10 copies (cop)/mL decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA by Week (Wk) 4, or has two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA measures >=400 cop/mL separated by at least 2-4 wk after being previously <=400 cop/mL on/after Wk 4, or has two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA measures >400 cop/mL separated by at least 2-4 wk on/after Wk 24.
Number of Participants Who Indicated "Yes" or "No" to the Question of Whether Unplanned Healthcare Resources Were Utilized
Participants were asked at each visit whether or not they utilized unplanned healthcare resources.

Full Information

First Posted
October 24, 2007
Last Updated
April 7, 2011
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00549198
Brief Title
KIVEXA Vs TRUVADA, Both Administered With Efavirenz, In ART-Naive Subjects
Acronym
ASSERT
Official Title
Study of Once-Daily Abacavir/Lamivudine Versus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine, Administered With Efavirenz in Antiretroviral-Naive, HIV-1 Infected Adult Subjects
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Recently, the fixed-dose combinations (FDC) KIVEXA™ (abacavir/lamivudine) and TRUVADA (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine) have facilitated the usage of once-daily regimens. However data from head-to-head randomized trials comparing these two FDCs as part of an initial regimen are not available at present. The long-term toxicity profiles of these regimens are of particular importance, as treatment of HIV is currently life-long and therefore, minimizing long-term toxicity and maximizing adherence and duration of regimen maintenance are critical therapy objectives. The primary endpoint is estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as measured by the modified diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation, a validated estimate of renal function.
Detailed Description
ViiV Healthcare is the new sponsor of this study, and GlaxoSmithKline is in the process of updating systems to reflect the change in sponsorship.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus I, HIV Infection
Keywords
tenofovir, HIV, efavirenz, naive, lamivudine, abacavir, emtricitabine, renal

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
392 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ABC/3TC + EFV
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
TDF/FTC + EFV
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Abacavir/lamivudine and efavirenz
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine and efavirenz
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine; BMI, body mass index.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 24
Description
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Calculated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation, at Week 96
Description
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 96 value minus the baseline value. GFR is a measure of the rate at which blood is filtered by the kidney. MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^s, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 24
Description
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. Cockcroft-Gault is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine, weight, and gender. GFR = (140 - age) * (mass in kg) * (0.85 if female) divided by 72 * serum creatinine in mg/dL. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter; kg, kilogram; CG, Cockcroft-Gault.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 48 value minus the baseline value. Cockcroft-Gault is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine, weight, and gender. GFR = (140 - age) * (mass in kg) * (0.85 if female) divided by 72 * serum creatinine in mg/dL. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter; kg, kilogram.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by Cockcroft-Gault Equation, at Week 96
Description
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 96 value minus the baseline value. Cockcroft-Gault is an equation (calculation) used to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine, weight, and gender. GFR = (140 - age) * (mass in kg) * (0.85 if female) divided by 72 * serum creatinine in mg/dL. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter; kg, kilogram.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72 m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 24
Description
mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 48
Description
mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Decline From Baseline in Estimated GFR, Calculated by MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault Equations, of >=10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 (mL/Min for Cockcroft-Gault), >=20 mL/Min/1.72m^2, >=10%, and >=20% at Week 96
Description
mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 24
Description
Normal: GFR >=60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio <=200 mg/g GFR; Stage 1: GFR >=90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 2: GFR >=60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 3: GFR >=30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 4: GFR >=15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 5: GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2. mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; mg, milligram; g, gram.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 48
Description
Normal: GFR >=60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio <=200 mg/g GFR; Stage 1: GFR >=90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 2: GFR >=60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 3: GFR >=30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 4: GFR >=15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 5: GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2. mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; mg, milligram; g, gram.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With National Kidney Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Categories of Renal Function at Week 96
Description
Normal: GFR >=60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio <=200 mg/g GFR; Stage 1: GFR >=90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 2: GFR >=60-<90 mL/min/1.73 m^2 and creatinine ratio >200 mg/g; Stage 3: GFR >=30-<60 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 4: GFR >=15-<30 mL/min/1.73 m^2; Stage 5: GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2. mL, milliliter; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; mg, milligram; g, gram.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 24
Description
BMD is a measure (grams [g] per centimeters cubed [cm^3]) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 24
Description
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 48
Description
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 48
Description
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 96
Description
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), at Week 96
Description
BMD is a measure (grams per cm^3) of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones. The standard error (SE) of both treatment groups was based on the model on the log scale.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 24
Description
BMD is a measure of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 48
Description
BMD is a measure of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With a Decline From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) >=2.0% and >=6.0% at Week 96
Description
BMD is a measure of the mineral content of bone in a particular skeletal area. DXA scans use low energy x-rays to measure the density of bones.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 24
Description
The T-score is a radiographic diagnosis that compares bone mineral density (BMD) to that of a "normal, healthy, 30-year-old female". The lower the T-score, the lower the BMD. A T-score of +1 to -1 is normal. A T-score decrease of -1 indicates a 10%-15% decrease in BMD.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 48
Description
The T-score is a radiographic diagnosis that compares bone mineral density (BMD) to that of a "normal, healthy, 30-year-old female". The lower the T-score, the lower the BMD. A T-score of +1 to -1 is normal. A T-score decrease of -1 indicates a 10%-15% decrease in BMD.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants Meeting World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria for Osteopenia (T-score of -2.5 to -1.0) and Osteoporosis (T-score of <-2.5) at Week 96
Description
The T-score is a radiographic diagnosis that compares bone mineral density (BMD) to that of a "normal, healthy, 30-year-old female". The lower the T-score, the lower the BMD. A T-score of +1 to -1 is normal. A T-score decrease of -1 indicates a 10%-15% decrease in BMD.
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 24
Description
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events occurring in two or more participants are presented.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 48
Description
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events occurring in two or more participants are presented.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation by Week 96
Description
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse events occurring in two or more participants are presented.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 24
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <200 mg/dL, desirable; 200-<240 mg/dL, borderline high; >=240 mg/dL, high. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 48
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <200 mg/dL, desirable; 200-<240 mg/dL, borderline high; >=240 mg/dL, high. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 96
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <200 mg/dL, desirable; 200-<240 mg/dL, borderline high; >=240 mg/dL, high. mg, milligram; dL, deciliter.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 24
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <100 mg/dL, optimal; 100-<130 mg/dL, near/above optimal; 130-<160 mg/dL, borderline high; 160-<190 mg/dL, high; >=190 mg/dL, very high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 48
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <100 mg/dL, optimal; 100-<130 mg/dL, near/above optimal; 130-<160 mg/dL, borderline high; 160-<190 mg/dL, high; >=190 mg/dL, very high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 96
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <100 mg/dL, optimal; 100-<130 mg/dL, near/above optimal; 130-<160 mg/dL, borderline high; 160-<190 mg/dL, high; >=190 mg/dL, very high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 24
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <40 mg/dL, low; 40-<60 mg/dL, normal; >=60 mg/dL, high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 48
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <40 mg/dL, low; 40-<60 mg/dL, normal; >=60 mg/dL, high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) at Week 96
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <40 mg/dL, low; 40-<60 mg/dL, normal; >=60 mg/dL, high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <150 mg/dL, normal; 150-<200 mg/dL, borderline high; 200-<500 mg/dL, high; >=500 mg/dL, very high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <150 mg/dL, normal; 150-<200 mg/dL, borderline high; 200-<500 mg/dL, high; >=500 mg/dL, very high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Thresholds for Fasting Triglycerides at Week 96
Description
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of their lipid profile. Data are categorized by the maximum post-baseline threshold reached. <150 mg/dL, normal; 150->200 mg/dL, borderline high; 200-<500 mg/dL, high;>= 500 mg/dL, very high.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 24
Description
The DAIDS toxicity table provides descriptive terminology for grading the severity of adult adverse events. Laboratory grades also provide ranges for each parameter. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. LDL, low-density lipid; HDL, high-density lipid. Treatment emergent refers to any toxicity that was not present prior to the start of study drug treatment.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 48
Description
The DAIDS toxicity table provides descriptive terminology for grading the severity of adult adverse events. Laboratory grades also provide ranges for each parameter. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. LDL, low-density lipid; HDL, high-density lipid. Treatment emergent refers to any toxicity that was not present prior to the start of study drug treatment.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Toxicities at Week 96
Description
The DAIDS toxicity table provides descriptive terminology for grading the severity of adult adverse events. Laboratory grades also provide ranges for each parameter. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. LDL, low-density lipid; HDL, high-density lipid. Treatment emergent refers to any toxicity that was not present prior to the start of study drug therapy.
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 24
Description
HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) is a strong predictor of the rate of HIV disease progression. It was measured from plasma (participant blood samples) taken at all visits throughout the study. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid. Viral load is a measure of the severity of the HIV infection.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 48
Description
HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) is a strong predictor of the rate of HIV disease progression. It was measured from plasma (participant blood samples) taken at all visits throughout the study. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid. Viral load is a measure of the severity of the HIV infection.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/Milliliter (c/mL) and 400 c/mL at Week 96
Description
HIV-1 RNA level (viral load) is a strong predictor of the rate of HIV disease progression. It was measured from plasma (participant blood samples) taken at all visits throughout the study. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid. Viral load is a measure of the severity of the HIV infection.
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 24
Description
CD4+ counts are used to monitor the progression of HIV disease and the strength of the immune system. The number of CD4+ cells decreases as HIV disease progresses. Cell counts were measured from participant blood samples taken throughout the study.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 48
Description
CD4+ counts are used to monitor the progression of HIV disease and the strength of the immune system. The number of CD4+ cells decreases as HIV disease progresses. Cell counts were measured from participant blood samples taken throughout the study.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Cluster Difference 4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 96
Description
CD4+ counts are used to monitor the progression of HIV disease and the strength of the immune system. The number of CD4+ cells decreases as HIV disease progresses. Cell counts were measured from participant blood samples taken throughout the study.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Number of Participants Classified as Protocol-defined Failures With Treatment-emergent Resistance to Study Drug in the Indicated Viruses at Week 96
Description
Viral resistance was measured using blood samples collected from participants throughout the study. NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Virological failure was defined as any one of: participant does not achieve a 1 log10 copies (cop)/mL decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA by Week (Wk) 4, or has two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA measures >=400 cop/mL separated by at least 2-4 wk after being previously <=400 cop/mL on/after Wk 4, or has two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA measures >400 cop/mL separated by at least 2-4 wk on/after Wk 24.
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Number of Participants Who Indicated "Yes" or "No" to the Question of Whether Unplanned Healthcare Resources Were Utilized
Description
Participants were asked at each visit whether or not they utilized unplanned healthcare resources.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 96
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Albumin as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96
Description
Renal biomarkers were analyzed using urine samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Renal biomarkers may be an indicator of various aspects of kidney function. The ratio was calculated by dividing the change from baseline albumin value by the urine creatinine value. Albumin is measured in milligrams per millimole (mg/mmol).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Beta 2 Microglobulin (B2M) as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96
Description
Renal biomarkers were analyzed using urine samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Renal biomarkers may be an indicator of various aspects of kidney function. The ratio was calculated by dividing the change from baseline B2M value by the urine creatinine value. B2M, beta 2 microglobulin (measured in mg/mmol).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in N-acetyl-B-glucosaminidase (NAG) as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96
Description
Renal biomarkers were analyzed using urine samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Renal biomarkers may be an indicator of various aspects of kidney function. The ratio was calculated by dividing the change from baseline NAG value by the urine creatinine value. NAG, N-acetyl-B-glucosaminidase (measured in micromoles per hour per millimole [umol/h/mmol]).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) as a Ratio to Urine Creatinine at Week 96
Description
Renal biomarkers were analyzed using urine samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Renal biomarkers may be an indicator of various aspects of kidney function. The ratio was calculated by dividing the change from baseline RBP value by the urine creatinine value. RBP, retinol binding protein (measured in micrograms per millimole [ug/mmol]).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 Amino-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 96
Description
P1NP is a bone biomarker that was analyzed using blood samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Bone biomarkers may be an indicator of bone turnover.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen Cross-linked C-telopeptide at Week 96
Description
Bone biomarkers were analyzed using blood samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Bone biomarkers may be an indicator of bone turnover.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 96
Description
Bone biomarkers were analyzed using blood samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Bone biomarkers may be an indicator of bone turnover.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96
Title
Exploratory Analysis of Change From Baseline in Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at Week 96
Description
Bone biomarkers were analyzed using blood samples collected from participants at baseline and Week 96. Bone biomarkers may be an indicator of bone turnover.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 96

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is at least 18 years of age. Subject is antiretroviral-naïve (defined as having no previous therapy with any NNRTI and 14 days of prior therapy with any other antiretroviral). Subject has plasma HIV-1 RNA 1,000 copies/mL at screening. This test may be repeated once within the 45-day screening window. Subject is willing and able to understand and provide written informed consent prior to participation in this study. A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of: Non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal); or, Child-bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screen and agrees to one of the following methods of contraception (any contraception method must be used consistently and correctly, i.e., in accordance with both the approved product label and the instructions of a physician): Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the investigational products, throughout the study, and for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of all study medications Double barrier method (male condom/spermicide, male condom/diaphragm, diaphragm/spermicide). Hormonal contraception will not be considered adequate for inclusion into this study Any intrauterine device (IUD) with published data showing that the expected failure rate is <1% per year. Sterilization (female subject or male partner of female subject). Prior to randomization, subjects must have been screened and be negative for the HLA-B*5701 allele. Test may be performed by local laboratory and results must be available for source document verification according to local practices. Exclusion Criteria: Subject is in the initial acute phase of a CDC Clinical Category C infection at Baseline. Subject is enrolled in one or more investigational drug protocols, which may impact HIV RNA suppression. Subject is, in the opinion of the Investigator, unable to complete the study dosing period and protocol evaluations and assessments. Subject is either pregnant or breastfeeding. Subject suffers from a serious medical condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the subject. Subject has a history of inflammatory bowel disease or other gastrointestinal dysfunction. Subject has any acute laboratory abnormality at screening. Subject has an estimated creatinine clearance within the screening period <50mL/min via the Cockcroft-Gault method. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5 times the upper limit of normal. Subjects with a history of thyroid disease, hyperparathyroid disease, chronic hyper or hypocalcemia, vitamin D deficiency, or receiving thyroid hormone or parathyroid hormone replacement within 28 days prior to screening. Subjects with a history of systemic inflammatory arthritis. Subjects who are hepatitis B positive at screening. Subject requires treatment with radiation therapy or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Subject has received treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine or any agents with documented activity against HIV-1 in vitro within 28 days prior to Screening, or an anticipated need during the study. Subjects who require treatment with any of the following medications within 28 days of commencement of investigational product, or an anticipated need during the study: Medications with significant drug-drug interactions with efavirenz:voriconazole, terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, ergot alkaloids (dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine), midazolam, triazolam, St. John's wort, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampin, pimozide, bepridil Medications which may impact on bone mineral density: oral or systemic corticosteroids, anticonvulsants, heparin, warfarin, cyclosporine, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, Vitamin D supplements and analogues, Calcium supplements, oestrogen or progesterone replacement (oral hormonal contraception permitted), raloxifene, tamoxifen, testosterone or anabolic steroid replacement/supplements. Systemic interleukins or interferons Subject has a history of allergy to any of the protocol-specified medications or any excipients therein. Subject has evidence of genotypic resistance at screening (according to central lab interpretation) or prior documented evidence of genotypic and/or phenotypic (above threshold for reduced susceptibility) resistance to any of the following drugs: efavirenz, abacavir, lamivudine, tenofovir, emtricitabine. Subjects who are unsuitable for DEXA scanning should be excluded, including 1) Less than three vertebra in the range of L1 to L4 that are suitable for BMD measurement by DEXA, or 2) Bilateral hip replacement. The subject has previously participated in an experimental drug and/or vaccine trial(s) within 60 days or 5 half-lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the experimental drug or vaccine - whichever is longer, prior to screening for the study. The subject will participate simultaneously in another clinical study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Innsbruck
ZIP/Postal Code
A-6020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Salzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
A-5020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
A-1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
A-1140
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brugge
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Charleroi
ZIP/Postal Code
6000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aalborg
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-9000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aarhus N
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hvidovre
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2650
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Koebenhavn
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Odense C
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Garches
ZIP/Postal Code
92380
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Levallois-Perret
ZIP/Postal Code
92300
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Denis Cedex 01
ZIP/Postal Code
93205
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69115
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
80335
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30159
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Duesseldorf
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
40237
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45122
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04170
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20146
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dublin
ZIP/Postal Code
7
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dublin
ZIP/Postal Code
8
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ferrara
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
44100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Modena
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
41100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rimini
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
47900
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00149
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Legnano (MI
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20025
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20127
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20142
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Torino
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10149
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV 1006
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Alkmaar
ZIP/Postal Code
1815 JD
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2512 VA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713 GZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3078 HT
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Amadora
ZIP/Postal Code
2720-276
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46015
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Basel
ZIP/Postal Code
4031
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bern
ZIP/Postal Code
3010
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
St Gallen
ZIP/Postal Code
9007
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zuerich
ZIP/Postal Code
8091
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zurich
ZIP/Postal Code
8038
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Manchester
State/Province
Lancashire
ZIP/Postal Code
M8 5RB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Woolwich, London
State/Province
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE18 4QH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Edinburgh
State/Province
Midlothian
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brighton
State/Province
Sussex East
ZIP/Postal Code
BN2 1ES
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B4 6DH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
WS2 9PS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Farnworth, Bolton
ZIP/Postal Code
BL4 0JR
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gloucester
ZIP/Postal Code
GL1 3NN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leicester
ZIP/Postal Code
LE1 5WW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
E1 1BB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
N18 1QX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
NW3 2QG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW10 9TH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW17 0QT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Middlesborough
ZIP/Postal Code
TS4 3BW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sheffield
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2JF
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20431394
Citation
Post FA, Moyle GJ, Stellbrink HJ, Domingo P, Podzamczer D, Fisher M, Norden AG, Cavassini M, Rieger A, Khuong-Josses MA, Branco T, Pearce HC, Givens N, Vavro C, Lim ML. Randomized comparison of renal effects, efficacy, and safety with once-daily abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine, administered with efavirenz, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Sep;55(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181dd911e.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

KIVEXA Vs TRUVADA, Both Administered With Efavirenz, In ART-Naive Subjects

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs