L Brevis for Traumatic Oral Lesions in Orthodontic Patients
Primary Purpose
Orthodontic Appliance Complication, Oral Mucositis, Bacterium; Agent
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
L brevis
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Orthodontic Appliance Complication focused on measuring Fixed orthodontic appliance, Lactobacillus brevis CD2, Oral pain, Traumatic oral lesions
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- need for orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Oral lesions
- Uncompensated systemic diseases
- Regular use of corticoids, antibiotics, immuno regulators and antidepressive agents
Sites / Locations
- Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
L brevis
Placebo
Arm Description
Lactobacillus brevis CD2 in lozenges containing 4 billion CFU. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance.
Placebo in lozenges, identical to those of L brevis. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of days without traumatic oral lesions
Oral lesions (ulcers) due to fixed orthodontic appliance
Oral pain scale
Oral pain score measured by Likert scale between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum pain)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04398511
First Posted
May 16, 2020
Last Updated
May 20, 2020
Sponsor
Universidade de Passo Fundo
Collaborators
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04398511
Brief Title
L Brevis for Traumatic Oral Lesions in Orthodontic Patients
Official Title
The Effect of Lactobacillus Brevis CD2 on Traumatic Oral Lesions Induced by Fixed Orthodontic Appliance: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 7, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 29, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 13, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidade de Passo Fundo
Collaborators
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Introduction: Traumatic oral lesions are common in the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, and pathogenic oral bacteria might be involved. We tested whether the probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 (L brevis) is benefic in this condition. Methods: In a double-blind clinical trial, 20 patients were randomized to 21 days course of lozenges containing L brevis CD2 (4 billion colony-forming units after breakfast, lunch and dinner) or placebo, starting on the day of installation of the fixed orthodontic appliance. Main outcomes were days without oral lesions and oral pain score [ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum)]. Oral health related quality of life was measured by OHIP-14 before and after treatments.
Detailed Description
Study protocol After signing the informed consent form, the patients underwent an oral examination and answered about clinical information, oral pain scale, and the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The pain scale was graded between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum), Likert standard. There was also a drawing for the distribution of coded treatments, through a number taken by the patient from a manila envelope. After the orthodontic appliance installation session, each patient was instructed to use the coded treatment for the next 21 days, two gums after breakfast, after lunch and after dinner, totalizing 12 billion UFC of L brevis or placebo per day. The patient was provided with a diary to note the daily appearance of lesions and their evolution during the 21-day period, as well as the occurrence of any new symptoms (potential adverse effect), in addition to proof of the commitment assumed by the use of the tablets. After 21 days, each patient was reexamined by the author of the study, who collected the diaries and obtained information regarding the oral examination, oral pain scale, data on adherence to treatment and self-completion of the OHIP-14.
Statistical analysis Quantitative data are described with mean and standard deviation (or standard error of the mean) or median and range, while qualitative data are displayed with absolute and relative frequencies. Student's t-test was used for comparison of quantitative data between groups, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test being employed when the assumptions for that test were not met. Exact chi-square and Fisher´s exact test (FET) were used for categorical data. Treatment effect on OHIP-14 was analyzed using a Generalize Estimating Equations (GEE) model with Poisson distribution and log link, the predictors being treatment, time (beginning and end of treatment) and interaction treatment*time. The analyses were performed with softwares GraphPrism version 4.0 and SPSS® (IBM SPSS statistics v18). Sample size was estimated using WinPEPI v11.65. The P value indicative of significance was < 0.05. Because the final outcome was prevention or mitigation (not maintenance or augmentation) of undesirable symptoms, one-tailed tests were used for comparisons between groups respect to days without oral lesions, oral pain and OHIP-14 scores.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Orthodontic Appliance Complication, Oral Mucositis, Bacterium; Agent
Keywords
Fixed orthodontic appliance, Lactobacillus brevis CD2, Oral pain, Traumatic oral lesions
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Patients were treated with identical lozenges containing probiotic or placebo. The treatments were revealed only after statistical analysis.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
L brevis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Lactobacillus brevis CD2 in lozenges containing 4 billion CFU. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo in lozenges, identical to those of L brevis. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
L brevis
Other Intervention Name(s)
Oral probiotic
Intervention Description
Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges (4 billion CFU) after breakfast, lunch and dinner for 21 days.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo lozenges after breakfast, lunch and dinner for 21 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of days without traumatic oral lesions
Description
Oral lesions (ulcers) due to fixed orthodontic appliance
Time Frame
First 21 days after appliance installation
Title
Oral pain scale
Description
Oral pain score measured by Likert scale between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum pain)
Time Frame
First 21 days after appliance installation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
need for orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance
Exclusion Criteria:
Oral lesions
Uncompensated systemic diseases
Regular use of corticoids, antibiotics, immuno regulators and antidepressive agents
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fernando Fornari, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Passo Fundo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry
City
Passo Fundo
ZIP/Postal Code
99052-900
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26401826
Citation
Rennick LA, Campbell PM, Naidu A, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Effectiveness of a novel topical powder on the treatment of traumatic oral ulcers in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):351-7. doi: 10.2319/050415-303.1. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12411880
Citation
Kluemper GT, Hiser DG, Rayens MK, Jay MJ. Efficacy of a wax containing benzocaine in the relief of oral mucosal pain caused by orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Oct;122(4):359-65. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126405.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27935660
Citation
Bagatin CR, Andrucioli MCD, Ferreira JTL, Matsumoto MAN, da Silva RAB, da Silva LAB, Romano FL, Nelson-Filho P. Biofilm formation in Haas palatal expanders with and without use of an antimicrobial agent: an in situ study. Microsc Res Tech. 2017 May;80(5):471-477. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22817. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25840585
Citation
Gizani S, Petsi G, Twetman S, Caroni C, Makou M, Papagianoulis L. Effect of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri on white spot lesion development in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):85-89. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv015. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25878972
Citation
Anusha RL, Umar D, Basheer B, Baroudi K. The magic of magic bugs in oral cavity: Probiotics. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):43-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.154526.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20613927
Citation
Haukioja A. Probiotics and oral health. Eur J Dent. 2010 Jul;4(3):348-55.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22442601
Citation
Rastogi P, Saini H, Dixit J, Singhal R. Probiotics and oral health. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;2(1):6-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.85845.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17577323
Citation
Riccia DN, Bizzini F, Perilli MG, Polimeni A, Trinchieri V, Amicosante G, Cifone MG. Anti-inflammatory effects of Lactobacillus brevis (CD2) on periodontal disease. Oral Dis. 2007 Jul;13(4):376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01291.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21741230
Citation
Sharma A, Rath GK, Chaudhary SP, Thakar A, Mohanti BK, Bahadur S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges reduce radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Apr;48(6):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28848667
Citation
Sharma A, Tilak T, Bakhshi S, Raina V, Kumar L, Chaudhary S, Sahoo R, Gupta R, Thulkar S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy followed by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ESMO Open. 2017 Feb 13;1(6):e000138. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000138. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25720615
Citation
Lee JK, Kim SJ, Ko SH, Ouwehand AC, Ma DS. Modulation of the host response by probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 in experimental gingivitis. Oral Dis. 2015 Sep;21(6):705-12. doi: 10.1111/odi.12332. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
L Brevis for Traumatic Oral Lesions in Orthodontic Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs