Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery Versus Endoscopic Full-thickness Gastroplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Primary Purpose
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
anti-reflux surgery
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- long history of GERD symptoms
- persistent or recurrent symptoms despite optimal medical treatment
- persistent or recurrent complications of GERD
- reduced quality of life owing to increasing esophageal exposure to gastric juice
- pathological values in the preoperative evaluated functional parameters.
Exclusion Criteria:
- any distinct hiatal hernia detectable by gastroscopy or barium radiography
- dysphagia
- esophageal strictures
- poor physical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores III and IV) and pregnancy.
Sites / Locations
- GPH Zell am See
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
laparoscopic antireflux surgery
endoscopic full-thickness-gastroplication
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01324791
First Posted
March 26, 2011
Last Updated
March 28, 2011
Sponsor
General Public Hospital Zell am See
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01324791
Brief Title
Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery Versus Endoscopic Full-thickness Gastroplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
undefined (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
General Public Hospital Zell am See
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Endoscopic full thickness gastroplication (Plicator-Procedure) has the potential to be a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS)to improve symptoms of GERD. This prospective randomized study compares objective and subjective outcome parameters of Plicator with that of LARS.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
7. Study Design
Study Phase
Not Applicable
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
laparoscopic antireflux surgery
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
endoscopic full-thickness-gastroplication
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
anti-reflux surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
long history of GERD symptoms
persistent or recurrent symptoms despite optimal medical treatment
persistent or recurrent complications of GERD
reduced quality of life owing to increasing esophageal exposure to gastric juice
pathological values in the preoperative evaluated functional parameters.
Exclusion Criteria:
any distinct hiatal hernia detectable by gastroscopy or barium radiography
dysphagia
esophageal strictures
poor physical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores III and IV) and pregnancy.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GPH Zell am See
City
Zell am See
State/Province
Salzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
5700
Country
Austria
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery Versus Endoscopic Full-thickness Gastroplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs