search
Back to results

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Transobturatory Tape for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence

Primary Purpose

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension
Transobturator tape procedure
Sponsored by
University Magna Graecia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stress Urinary Incontinence focused on measuring Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, Stress incontinence, Surgery, TOT, Treatment, Predominant or genuine stress urinary incontinence

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Predominant or genuine stress urinary incontinence by self report,examination and test
  • Urethral hypermobility
  • Eligible for both surgical procedures
  • Ambulatory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • <12 months post-partum
  • Systemic disease and/or drugs known to affect bladder function
  • Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy
  • Urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter
  • Recent pelvic surgery
  • Severe genuine stress incontinence (loss of urine with minimal physical activity) with associated prolapse equal to or more than second degree
  • Previous pelvic or anti-incontinence surgery
  • History of severe abdominopelvic infections
  • Known extensive abdominopelvic adhesions
  • Detrusor instability and/or intrinsic sphincter dysfunction
  • Other gynaecologic pathologies (eg, fibroids, ovarian cysts)
  • BMI >30

Sites / Locations

  • "Pugliese" Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Group A

Group B

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Objective/subjective symptoms improvements

Secondary Outcome Measures

Intra-operative complication rate
Postoperative complications rate
Failure rate
Recurrence rate
Quality of life
Sexual function

Full Information

First Posted
December 12, 2007
Last Updated
April 5, 2013
Sponsor
University Magna Graecia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00573703
Brief Title
Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Transobturatory Tape for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence
Official Title
A Comparison Between Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension and Transobturatory Tape (TOT) for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Study Start Date
September 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Magna Graecia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Transobturatory tape (TOT) procedure is a minimally invasive approach to urinary stress incontinence owing to the category of the sling-adopting procedures. Its efficacy and safety, also in comparison with similar procedures have been demonstrated. The benefits of the sling- adopting procedures in comparison to laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, which has been considered as the gold standard treatment, have been showed. But these comparisons did not included the TOT procedure in the experimental arms. Based on this considerations the aim of this trial will be to compare TOT and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in women with urinary stress incontinence.
Detailed Description
Women with predominant and genuine stress urinary incontinence will be enrolled and randomized in two groups (groups A and B). Patients of group A will be treated with laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, whereas patients of group B will be treated with TOT procedure. All patients eligible will undergo baseline assessment consisting of anthropometric, clinical, hormonal, urodynamic, and ultrasonographic evaluations. During the study, the surgical outcomes, the clinical subjective and objective efficacy data, and the adverse experiences will be evaluated in each patient. Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Keywords
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, Stress incontinence, Surgery, TOT, Treatment, Predominant or genuine stress urinary incontinence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension
Intervention Description
Lapaparoscopic approach. One or two nonadsorbable sutures are placed at the level of the midurethra without penetrating the vaginal mucosa and fixed to Cooper's ligament with a tension free knotting technique.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Transobturator tape procedure
Intervention Description
Small incision sites in the vagina and in the femoral/pelvic fold. Bilateral transobturator insertion of mesh by means of needle. Application of resorbable tensioning suture that maintains the mesh and enables fine adjustments in mesh tension during the procedure and in the immediate postoperative period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective/subjective symptoms improvements
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intra-operative complication rate
Time Frame
one day
Title
Postoperative complications rate
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Failure rate
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Recurrence rate
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Quality of life
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Sexual function
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Predominant or genuine stress urinary incontinence by self report,examination and test Urethral hypermobility Eligible for both surgical procedures Ambulatory Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy <12 months post-partum Systemic disease and/or drugs known to affect bladder function Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy Urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter Recent pelvic surgery Severe genuine stress incontinence (loss of urine with minimal physical activity) with associated prolapse equal to or more than second degree Previous pelvic or anti-incontinence surgery History of severe abdominopelvic infections Known extensive abdominopelvic adhesions Detrusor instability and/or intrinsic sphincter dysfunction Other gynaecologic pathologies (eg, fibroids, ovarian cysts) BMI >30
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefano Palomba, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fulvio Zullo, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
"Pugliese" Hospital
City
Catanzaro
ZIP/Postal Code
88100
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Transobturatory Tape for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs