search
Back to results

Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery

Primary Purpose

Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Stage I Rectal Cancer, Stage II Rectal Cancer

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
conventional laparoscopic surgery
robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery
quality-of-life assessment
questionnaire administration
Sponsored by
City of Hope Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion

  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Diagnosis of rectal cancer amenable to curative surgery either by anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection (i.e. staged T1-3, N0-2, M0 by CT and MRI or transrectal ultrasound)
  • Rectal cancer suitable for resection by either standard or robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure
  • Fit for robotic-assisted or standard laparoscopic rectal resection
  • ASA =< 3
  • Capable of completing required questionnaires at time of consent

Exclusion

  • Benign lesions of the rectum
  • Cancers of the anal canal
  • Locally advanced cancers not amenable to curative surgery
  • Locally advanced cancers requiring en bloc multi-visceral resection
  • Synchronous colorectal tumours requiring multi-segment surgical resection
  • Co-existent inflammatory bowel disease
  • Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic spread
  • Concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years that could confuse diagnosis (non-melanomatous skin cancer or superficial bladder cancer treated with curative intent are acceptable; for other cases please discuss with Chief Investigator via CTRU)
  • History of psychiatric or addictive disorder or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the trial requirements
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in another rectal cancer clinical trial relating to surgical technique

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Arm I

    Arm II

    Arm Description

    Patients undergo standard conventional laparoscopic resection.

    Patients undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Rate of conversion to open surgery as an indicator of surgical technical difficulty

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Circumferential resection margin positivity rate
    Local recurrence rate
    Intra-operative and post-operative complications
    Operative mortality
    Self reported bladder and sexual function
    Health related quality of life
    Disease free and overall survival
    Intra-operative laparoscopic skills (randomly selected cases only) as assessed by the global assessment tool for evaluation of intra-operative laparoscopic skills (GOALS)
    Quality of the plane of surgery as assessed by central review of photographs
    Health economics

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 3, 2010
    Last Updated
    April 16, 2012
    Sponsor
    City of Hope Medical Center
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01196000
    Brief Title
    Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery
    Official Title
    Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2012
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    The study has never been opened to accrual at COH. Study to be closed at COH due to the lack of qualified robotic colorectal surgeons.
    Study Start Date
    December 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 2013 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    City of Hope Medical Center

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    RATIONALE: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery may be a less invasive type of surgery for rectal cancer and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. It is not yet known whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is more effective than laparoscopic surgery in treating patients with rectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial studies robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery to see how well it works compared to laparoscopic surgery in treating patients with rectal cancer that can be removed by surgery.
    Detailed Description
    OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery versus standard laparoscopic rectal cancer resection by means of a randomized, controlled trial. II. To assess technical ease of the operation, as determined by the clinical indicator of low conversion rate to open operation. III. To assess surgical accuracy and improved oncological outcome as determined by clear pathological resection margins. IV. To assess quality of life and analyze cost-effectiveness to aid evidence-based knowledge to inform NHS and other service providers and decision-makers. V. To analyze disease-free and overall survival and local recurrence rates at 3-year follow-up. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients undergo standard laparoscopic resection. ARM II: Patients undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and then annually thereafter for 3 years.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Stage I Rectal Cancer, Stage II Rectal Cancer, Stage III Rectal Cancer

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Arm I
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients undergo standard conventional laparoscopic resection.
    Arm Title
    Arm II
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    conventional laparoscopic surgery
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    laparoscopy-assisted surgery, surgery, laparoscopic
    Intervention Description
    operation using conventional laparoscopic techniques
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery
    Intervention Description
    operation that involves use of laparoscopic assistance with robotic assistance
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    quality-of-life assessment
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    quality of life assessment
    Intervention Description
    Ancillary studies
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    questionnaire administration
    Intervention Description
    Ancillary studies
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Rate of conversion to open surgery as an indicator of surgical technical difficulty
    Time Frame
    At completion of surgery
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Circumferential resection margin positivity rate
    Time Frame
    At completion of pathology review
    Title
    Local recurrence rate
    Time Frame
    At 3 years
    Title
    Intra-operative and post-operative complications
    Time Frame
    At day 30 and 6 months
    Title
    Operative mortality
    Time Frame
    At day 30
    Title
    Self reported bladder and sexual function
    Time Frame
    At day 30 and 6 months
    Title
    Health related quality of life
    Time Frame
    At day 30 and 6 months
    Title
    Disease free and overall survival
    Time Frame
    At 3 years
    Title
    Intra-operative laparoscopic skills (randomly selected cases only) as assessed by the global assessment tool for evaluation of intra-operative laparoscopic skills (GOALS)
    Time Frame
    Upon completion of GOALS assessment by an independent expert
    Title
    Quality of the plane of surgery as assessed by central review of photographs
    Time Frame
    At completion of the central review of photographs
    Title
    Health economics
    Time Frame
    At day 30 and 6 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Able to provide written informed consent Diagnosis of rectal cancer amenable to curative surgery either by anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection (i.e. staged T1-3, N0-2, M0 by CT and MRI or transrectal ultrasound) Rectal cancer suitable for resection by either standard or robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure Fit for robotic-assisted or standard laparoscopic rectal resection ASA =< 3 Capable of completing required questionnaires at time of consent Exclusion Benign lesions of the rectum Cancers of the anal canal Locally advanced cancers not amenable to curative surgery Locally advanced cancers requiring en bloc multi-visceral resection Synchronous colorectal tumours requiring multi-segment surgical resection Co-existent inflammatory bowel disease Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic spread Concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years that could confuse diagnosis (non-melanomatous skin cancer or superficial bladder cancer treated with curative intent are acceptable; for other cases please discuss with Chief Investigator via CTRU) History of psychiatric or addictive disorder or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the trial requirements Pregnancy Participation in another rectal cancer clinical trial relating to surgical technique
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alessio Pigazzi
    Organizational Affiliation
    City of Hope Medical Center
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs