LaseMD System for the Treatment of Melasma
Primary Purpose
Melasma
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LaseMD System
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Melasma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female, age 18 years and older.
- Subject in good health.
- Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to IV.
- Moderate to severe melasma (Melasma Severity Scale, score 2 or 3).
- Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated through the follow-up period.
- Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study.
- Post-menopausal or surgically sterilized, or using a medically acceptable form of birth control at least 3 months prior to enrollment and during the entire course of the study.
- Absence of physical or psychological conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
- Willingness and ability to provide written consent for study-required photography and adherence to photography procedures (i.e., removal of jewelry and makeup).
- Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to performance of any study-related procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to understand the protocol or to give informed consent.
- Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing.
- History of keloids or poor wound healing.
- Significant scarring in the area(s) to be treated that would interfere with assessing results.
- Open wounds or lesions in the area(s) to be treated.
- Excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, or thick sebaceous skin in the area(s) to be treated.
- History of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
- History of collagen vascular disease.
- History of autoimmune disease.
- Subjects with sensitivity or allergy to pre-treatment medication, EMLA Cream (Lidocaine/Prilocaine).
- Subjects with sensitivity or allergy to post-treatment cosmeceuticals, Tranexamic Acid and/or coconut.
- Subjects with photosensitive skin.
- Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study device.
- Subjects who are pregnant or lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant during the study.
- Subjects who anticipate the need for inpatient surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study.
- Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, noncompliance with medical treatment, or unreliability.
- Concurrent enrollment in any study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.
- Current smoker or history of smoking in the last five years.
- Current user of any nicotine-containing products, e.g., e-cigarettes, Nicorette gum, nicotine patches, etc.
- Excessively tanned in areas to be treated or unable/unlikely to refrain from tanning during the study.
- History of surgical or cosmetic treatments in the area(s) to be treated within the past 6 months.
- Microdermabrasion, or prescription level glycolic acid treatment to the treatment area(s) within 4 weeks prior to study participation or during the study.
- History of hormone treatment, such as estrogen, progesterone and/or oral contraceptives, initiated within 3 months of study participation, or planning to discontinue hormone therapy during the study, as applicable.
- Use of any prescription skin-lightening agent (such as tranexamic acid or hydroquinone), isotretinoin (or other retinoid), photo-sensitizing medication, or corticosteroid within 6 months of and during study participation.
History or current use of the following prescription medications:
- Accutane or other systemic retinoids within the past twelve months;
- Topical Retinoids within the past two weeks; and/or
- Antiplatelet agents/Anticoagulants (Coumadin, Heparin, Plavix) within the past two weeks.
- Psychiatric drugs that in the investigators opinion would impair the subject from understanding the protocol requirements or understanding and signing the informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- Laser and Skin Surgery Center of New York
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
LaseMD System
Arm Description
Subjects will receive LaseMD System treatment(s) for treatment of melasma.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Improvement in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) from Baseline
A change in MASI score from baseline to post-treatment. The MASI quantifies the pigmentation area, darkness, and homogeneity, assessing four areas of the face for hyperpigmentation: forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin, corresponding to 30%, 30%, 30% and 10% of the total face. The melasma area in each region is given a numeric value from 1 (<10%) to 6 (90-100%) in each of the four regions. Darkness of pigment is compared to normal skin in each area on a scale of 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). Homogeneity is based on a scale of 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). The MASI score is then calculated as the sum of severity rating of darkness and homogeneity, multiplied by the value of area involved. The maximum score is 48; the minimum score is 0.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Improvement in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) from Baseline
A change in MASI score from baseline to post-treatment. The MASI quantifies the pigmentation area, darkness, and homogeneity, assessing four areas of the face for hyperpigmentation: forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin, corresponding to 30%, 30%, 30% and 10% of the total face. The melasma area in each region is given a numeric value from 1 (<10%) to 6 (90-100%) in each of the four regions. Darkness of pigment is compared to normal skin in each area on a scale of 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). Homogeneity is based on a scale of 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). The MASI score is then calculated as the sum of severity rating of darkness and homogeneity, multiplied by the value of area involved. The maximum score is 48; the minimum score is 0.
Clinician assessment of overall aesthetic improvement.
Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of a 5-point Clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, based on a live assessment of the subject while comparing to the subject's pre-treatment photographs, and based on a comparison of the subject's pre-treatment photographs to the current post-treatment photograph. Aesthetic improvement will be based on the following definitions:
= Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result.
= Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal.
= Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition
= No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition.
= Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition.
Subject assessment of overall aesthetic improvement.
Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of a 5-point Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Subjects will complete the scale based on a live assessment referring to a hand mirror and their pre-treatment photographs, and based on a comparison of their pre-treatment photographs to the current post-treatment photograph. Aesthetic improvement will be based on the following definitions:
= Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result.
= Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal.
= Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition
= No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition.
= Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition.
Improvement in the Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MELASQOL) from baseline
The Melasma Quality of Life Scale assesses the effect melasma has on the quality of life of sufferers on a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all of the time), rating the following questions:
The appearance of your skin condition
Frustration about your skin condition.
Embarrassment about your skin condition.
Feeling depressed about your skin condition.
The effects of your skin condition on your interactions with other people.
The effects of your skin condition on your desire to be with people.
Your skin condition making it hard to show affection.
Skin discoloration making you feel unattractive to others.
Skin discoloration making you feel less vital or productive.
Skin discoloration affecting your sense of freedom.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated based on subjects' completion of a patient satisfaction questionnaire while referring to a hand mirror and their pre-treatment photographs and their Day 30 follow-up photographs. Subjects will be asked to document Yes/No as to whether they notice any improvement in how the melasma on their face looks; beyond changes to the melasma pigment specify any changes they see in the treated areas, e.g., skin texture improvement, skin tone improvement, fine lines and wrinkles improvement, etc.; characterize their level of satisfaction with study treatment based on 5 levels of satisfaction: Very satisfied, Satisfied, Slightly Satisfied, Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied; document Yes/No if they would recommend the treatment to friends and family members.
Treatment-related pain
During study treatments, subjects' pain levels will be monitored using a validated Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 being 'No Pain' and 10 being the 'Worst Possible Pain'.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03456674
Brief Title
LaseMD System for the Treatment of Melasma
Official Title
Evaluation of the Lutronic LaseMD System for the Treatment of Melasma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 7, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2019 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
LUTRONIC Corporation
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with use of the LaseMD Laser System for the treatment of melasma.
Detailed Description
This clinical trial is a designed as a prospective, multi-site, non-randomized study of 20 subjects. Subjects will receive up to 5 study treatments completed 21 days apart. Phone follow-up will occur at Day 3 following each treatment for the assessment of adverse events and expected treatment effects. Post-treatment follow-up will be completed prior to the next subsequent treatment and at Days 30, 90 and 180 following the last treatment to assess adverse events and expected treatment effects, capture digital images, and assess efficacy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Melasma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
A single cohort of study subjects will receive study treatment.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
LaseMD System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will receive LaseMD System treatment(s) for treatment of melasma.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LaseMD System
Intervention Description
A non-invasive fractional thulium laser delivering a wavelength of light energy as a fractionated array of microbeams to be absorbed by and damage the target molecule, a chromophore.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) from Baseline
Description
A change in MASI score from baseline to post-treatment. The MASI quantifies the pigmentation area, darkness, and homogeneity, assessing four areas of the face for hyperpigmentation: forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin, corresponding to 30%, 30%, 30% and 10% of the total face. The melasma area in each region is given a numeric value from 1 (<10%) to 6 (90-100%) in each of the four regions. Darkness of pigment is compared to normal skin in each area on a scale of 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). Homogeneity is based on a scale of 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). The MASI score is then calculated as the sum of severity rating of darkness and homogeneity, multiplied by the value of area involved. The maximum score is 48; the minimum score is 0.
Time Frame
From baseline to 30 Days following the last study treatment.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) from Baseline
Description
A change in MASI score from baseline to post-treatment. The MASI quantifies the pigmentation area, darkness, and homogeneity, assessing four areas of the face for hyperpigmentation: forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin, corresponding to 30%, 30%, 30% and 10% of the total face. The melasma area in each region is given a numeric value from 1 (<10%) to 6 (90-100%) in each of the four regions. Darkness of pigment is compared to normal skin in each area on a scale of 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). Homogeneity is based on a scale of 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). The MASI score is then calculated as the sum of severity rating of darkness and homogeneity, multiplied by the value of area involved. The maximum score is 48; the minimum score is 0.
Time Frame
From baseline to Days 90 and 180 following the last study treatment.
Title
Clinician assessment of overall aesthetic improvement.
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of a 5-point Clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, based on a live assessment of the subject while comparing to the subject's pre-treatment photographs, and based on a comparison of the subject's pre-treatment photographs to the current post-treatment photograph. Aesthetic improvement will be based on the following definitions:
= Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result.
= Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal.
= Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition
= No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition.
= Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition.
Time Frame
From baseline to Days 30, 90 and 180 following last treatment.
Title
Subject assessment of overall aesthetic improvement.
Description
Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of a 5-point Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Subjects will complete the scale based on a live assessment referring to a hand mirror and their pre-treatment photographs, and based on a comparison of their pre-treatment photographs to the current post-treatment photograph. Aesthetic improvement will be based on the following definitions:
= Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result.
= Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal.
= Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition
= No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition.
= Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition.
Time Frame
From baseline to Days 30, 90 and 180 following last treatment.
Title
Improvement in the Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MELASQOL) from baseline
Description
The Melasma Quality of Life Scale assesses the effect melasma has on the quality of life of sufferers on a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all of the time), rating the following questions:
The appearance of your skin condition
Frustration about your skin condition.
Embarrassment about your skin condition.
Feeling depressed about your skin condition.
The effects of your skin condition on your interactions with other people.
The effects of your skin condition on your desire to be with people.
Your skin condition making it hard to show affection.
Skin discoloration making you feel unattractive to others.
Skin discoloration making you feel less vital or productive.
Skin discoloration affecting your sense of freedom.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 30 following last treatment.
Title
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated based on subjects' completion of a patient satisfaction questionnaire while referring to a hand mirror and their pre-treatment photographs and their Day 30 follow-up photographs. Subjects will be asked to document Yes/No as to whether they notice any improvement in how the melasma on their face looks; beyond changes to the melasma pigment specify any changes they see in the treated areas, e.g., skin texture improvement, skin tone improvement, fine lines and wrinkles improvement, etc.; characterize their level of satisfaction with study treatment based on 5 levels of satisfaction: Very satisfied, Satisfied, Slightly Satisfied, Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied; document Yes/No if they would recommend the treatment to friends and family members.
Time Frame
Day 30 following last treatment.
Title
Treatment-related pain
Description
During study treatments, subjects' pain levels will be monitored using a validated Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 being 'No Pain' and 10 being the 'Worst Possible Pain'.
Time Frame
For the duration of each study treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Female, age 18 years and older.
Subject in good health.
Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to IV.
Moderate to severe melasma (Melasma Severity Scale, score 2 or 3).
Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated through the follow-up period.
Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study.
Post-menopausal or surgically sterilized, or using a medically acceptable form of birth control at least 3 months prior to enrollment and during the entire course of the study.
Absence of physical or psychological conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
Willingness and ability to provide written consent for study-required photography and adherence to photography procedures (i.e., removal of jewelry and makeup).
Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to performance of any study-related procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
Inability to understand the protocol or to give informed consent.
Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing.
History of keloids or poor wound healing.
Significant scarring in the area(s) to be treated that would interfere with assessing results.
Open wounds or lesions in the area(s) to be treated.
Excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, or thick sebaceous skin in the area(s) to be treated.
History of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
History of collagen vascular disease.
History of autoimmune disease.
Subjects with sensitivity or allergy to pre-treatment medication, EMLA Cream (Lidocaine/Prilocaine).
Subjects with sensitivity or allergy to post-treatment cosmeceuticals, Tranexamic Acid and/or coconut.
Subjects with photosensitive skin.
Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study device.
Subjects who are pregnant or lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant during the study.
Subjects who anticipate the need for inpatient surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study.
Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, noncompliance with medical treatment, or unreliability.
Concurrent enrollment in any study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.
Current smoker or history of smoking in the last five years.
Current user of any nicotine-containing products, e.g., e-cigarettes, Nicorette gum, nicotine patches, etc.
Excessively tanned in areas to be treated or unable/unlikely to refrain from tanning during the study.
History of surgical or cosmetic treatments in the area(s) to be treated within the past 6 months.
Microdermabrasion, or prescription level glycolic acid treatment to the treatment area(s) within 4 weeks prior to study participation or during the study.
History of hormone treatment, such as estrogen, progesterone and/or oral contraceptives, initiated within 3 months of study participation, or planning to discontinue hormone therapy during the study, as applicable.
Use of any prescription skin-lightening agent (such as tranexamic acid or hydroquinone), isotretinoin (or other retinoid), photo-sensitizing medication, or corticosteroid within 6 months of and during study participation.
History or current use of the following prescription medications:
Accutane or other systemic retinoids within the past twelve months;
Topical Retinoids within the past two weeks; and/or
Antiplatelet agents/Anticoagulants (Coumadin, Heparin, Plavix) within the past two weeks.
Psychiatric drugs that in the investigators opinion would impair the subject from understanding the protocol requirements or understanding and signing the informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kari Larson, MBA
Organizational Affiliation
Sponsor GmbH
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Laser and Skin Surgery Center of New York
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
LaseMD System for the Treatment of Melasma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs