Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia (LDHLA)
Primary Purpose
Hemorrhoids
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under espinal anesthesia
diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
Ligasure haemorrhoidetomy under spinal anestesia
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hemorrhoids focused on measuring diathermy hemorrhoids, Ligasure, randomized controlled trial, Postoperative pain, Surgical Procedure, Ambulatory, Local Anesthesia, Safety procedure long term, Day Surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with a long-standing history of symptomatic grade III or IV haemorrhoids
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous anal surgery, concomitant anal disease (fissure, fistula, incontinence and inflammatory bowel disease), use of anticoagulants or analgesics, known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics and the inability to give written informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital de Viladecans (Departement of surgery: coloproctology)
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
I
II
III
IV
Arm Description
conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under spinal anaesthesia
conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy with local anaesthesia combined with intravenous sedation (group II)
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
all cause morbility within the first 7 days after surgery (consequence of surgery and anesthesia) and results sintomatology since 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
intraoperative time, postoperative complications, pain (VAS), bleeding, pruritus and tenemus, continence ( score system of Jorge and Wexner), anal stenosis, presence of skin tags, degree of satisfaction and days of sick leave.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00617448
First Posted
February 5, 2008
Last Updated
February 15, 2008
Sponsor
Hospital de Viladecans
Collaborators
Fundacio per la recerca e investigació del Hospital de Viladecans
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00617448
Brief Title
Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
Acronym
LDHLA
Official Title
Ligasure™ Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Spinal or Local Anaesthesia With Ropivacaine. A Randomized Study With One Year Follow-up
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2008
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital de Viladecans
Collaborators
Fundacio per la recerca e investigació del Hospital de Viladecans
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this prospective randomised trial was to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy versus Ligasure™ diathermy, and to assess the short-term outcome of each procedure performed either under spinal anaesthesia or local anaesthesia with pudendal block with ropivacaine combined with intravenous sedation.
We think, Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia can be performed as day-case procedure and with equal results at long-term than conventional diathermy (considered goal standar of haemorrhoidectomy).
Detailed Description
Seventy-four consecutive patients with a long-standing history of symptomatic grade III or IV haemorrhoids were assigned randomly by means of a computer-generated list to conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under spinal anaesthesia (group I); conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy with local anaesthesia combined with intravenous sedation (group II); Ligasure™ under spinal anaesthesia (group III) and Ligasure™ with local anaesthesia combined with intravenous sedation (group IV). Allocations were sealed in opaque numbered envelopes. All patients were operated on electively and by the same surgical team (two colorectal surgeons) and variables were collected after operation by an independent observer who was unaware of the operation performed.
The intraoperative time was measured. Intraoperative and early (within the first 48 h) postoperative complications associated with the surgical procedure and complications related to the anaesthetic technique (headache, vomiting, nausea, acute urinary retention, bleeding and hypotension) were recorded. A 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the intensity of pain, which was measured at 2, 6 and 24 hours postoperatively and during the first bowel movement. Seven days after surgery, patients were contacted by phone and the following data were recorded: VAS score at rest and during bowel movements, bleeding (categorised as 0 = none, 1 = occasional with defecation, 2 = with each defecation, 3 = with and without defecation) and pruritus (categorised as 0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent) and tenesmus (categorised as 0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent). These variables were collected at 4 and 12 months after operation by an independent observer who was unaware of the operation performed. Clinical evaluation at 1 year included relapse, continence according to the incontinence score system of Jorge and Wexner19, anal stenosis, presence of skin tags, patient's degree of satisfaction (where 0 corresponded to a unsatisfactory result and 10 an excellent result) and days of sick leave.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hemorrhoids
Keywords
diathermy hemorrhoids, Ligasure, randomized controlled trial, Postoperative pain, Surgical Procedure, Ambulatory, Local Anesthesia, Safety procedure long term, Day Surgery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
81 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
I
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under spinal anaesthesia
Arm Title
II
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy with local anaesthesia combined with intravenous sedation (group II)
Arm Title
III
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia
Arm Title
IV
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under espinal anesthesia
Other Intervention Name(s)
diathermy excision haemorrhoids regional, open haemorrhoidectomy, regional anesthesia
Intervention Description
For surgery: conventional haemorrhoidectomy with diathermy (Milligan-Morgan).For anesthesia: lidocaine 2% at doses of 50-70 mg was used for spinal anaesthesia.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
Other Intervention Name(s)
diathermy excision haemorrhoids regional, open haemorrhoidectomy, perianal anesthetics infiltration, pudendal block
Intervention Description
For surgery: conventional haemorrhoidectomy with diathermy (Milligan-Morgan). For anesthesia: pudendal nerve block, infiltration of the right and left pararectal spaces, anterior and presacral regions with ropivacaine (150 mg of ropivacaine [20 mL, 7.5 mg/mL] diluted in 50 mL of 0.9% physiological saline). Ten minutes before local anaesthesia, patients were sedated with i.v. remifentanil 0.05-0.15 μg·kg-1
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ligasure haemorrhoidetomy under spinal anestesia
Other Intervention Name(s)
regional anesthesia, Ligasure for prolapsed piles
Intervention Description
For surgery: ligasure haemorrhoidectomy For anesthesia: lidocaine 2% at doses of 50-70 mg was used for spinal anaesthesia.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ligasure for prolapsed piles, Pudendal block
Intervention Description
For surgery: haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure For anesthesia: pudendal nerve block, infiltration of the right and left pararectal spaces, anterior and presacral regions with ropivacaine (150 mg of ropivacaine [20 mL, 7.5 mg/mL] diluted in 50 mL of 0.9% physiological saline). Ten minutes before local anaesthesia, patients were sedated with i.v. remifentanil 0.05-0.15 μg·kg-1
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
all cause morbility within the first 7 days after surgery (consequence of surgery and anesthesia) and results sintomatology since 12 months
Time Frame
at 2, 6, 24 horus, 7 days, 4 and 12 monts after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
intraoperative time, postoperative complications, pain (VAS), bleeding, pruritus and tenemus, continence ( score system of Jorge and Wexner), anal stenosis, presence of skin tags, degree of satisfaction and days of sick leave.
Time Frame
Intraoperative, at 2,6,24 hours and 7 days after surgery and 4 and 12 monts after surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patients with a long-standing history of symptomatic grade III or IV haemorrhoids
Exclusion Criteria:
previous anal surgery, concomitant anal disease (fissure, fistula, incontinence and inflammatory bowel disease), use of anticoagulants or analgesics, known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics and the inability to give written informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pi F Siques, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Barcelona university of Medicine (Departement Ciencies Cliniques)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital de Viladecans (Departement of surgery: coloproctology)
City
Viladecans
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08840
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11952582
Citation
Jayne DG, Botterill I, Ambrose NS, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ, O'Riordain DS. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2002 Apr;89(4):428-32. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2002.02056.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11856126
Citation
Palazzo FF, Francis DL, Clifton MA. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2002 Feb;89(2):154-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01993.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15932557
Citation
Peters CJ, Botterill I, Ambrose NS, Hick D, Casey J, Jayne DG. Ligasure trademark vs conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised clinical trial. Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jul;7(4):350-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00817.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15573239
Citation
Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N. Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):235-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9098-0. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10953578
Citation
Masoni L, La Torre F, Otti M, Pascarella G, Gasparrini M, Riso V, Cottini F, Montori A. [Hemorrhoidectomy with ropivacaine (Naropin) local anesthesia. Preliminary experience]. Minerva Chir. 2000 May;55(5):383-7. Italian.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16518980
Citation
Lohsiriwat D, Lohsiriwat V. Outpatient hemorrhoidectomy under perianal anesthetics infiltration. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Dec;88(12):1821-4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11786772
Citation
Vinson-Bonnet B, Coltat JC, Fingerhut A, Bonnet F. Local infiltration with ropivacaine improves immediate postoperative pain control after hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Jan;45(1):104-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6121-4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15875295
Citation
Kim J, Lee DS, Jang SM, Shim MC, Jee DL. The effect of pudendal block on voiding after hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):518-23. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0798-2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17119982
Citation
Haveran LA, Sturrock PR, Sun MY, McDade J, Singla S, Paterson CA, Counihan TC. Simple harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy utilizing local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation: a safe and rapid alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;22(7):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0242-2. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs