search
Back to results

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair (LIFT vs PLUG)

Primary Purpose

Anal Fistula

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula track procedure
anal fistula plug
Sponsored by
Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anal Fistula focused on measuring transsphincteric anal fistula, cryptoglandular origin, anal fistula repair, Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Track (LIFT) procedure, anal fistula plug (Plug), surgical repair

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older.
  • Able to understand and provide informed consent or have a legally authorized representative capable of providing consent.
  • Has a documented diagnosis, confirmed by physical exam and/or endorectal ultrasound (if available), of a trans-sphincteric fistula tract determined to be of cryptoglandular origin (primary or recurrent).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or suspicion of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's or Ulcerative colitis).
  • History of connective tissue disease.
  • Rectovaginal fistula.
  • Presence of horseshoe fistula.
  • History of immunosuppression therapy/treatment within previous six months.
  • Presents of a proximal diversion and refractory fistula.
  • Any physical conditions, disease, or disorder that would exclude subject from being a candidate for elective surgery.
  • Known history of allergy to pork or pork products.

Sites / Locations

  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, LtdRecruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania Health SystemRecruiting
  • University of Ottawa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

LIFT

Plug

Arm Description

those subjects receiving the Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Track procedure

those subjects randomized to the receive the placement of the porcine anal fistula plug

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure of this study will be to compare the rate of fistula closure between the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula track (LIFT) procedure and the use of a porcine bioabsorbable anal fistula plug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary measures will include level of fecal incontinence, fecal incontinence quality of life, complication rates, and rate of closure after re-operation

Full Information

First Posted
January 27, 2009
Last Updated
May 28, 2009
Sponsor
Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd.
Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania, University of Ottawa, Massachusetts General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00830661
Brief Title
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
Acronym
LIFT vs PLUG
Official Title
A Randomized, Prospective, Multi-Centered Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of the Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT)Procedure Versus Use of Anal Fistula Plug (AFP)in the Surgical Repair of Trans-Sphincteric Anal Fistulae of Cryptoglandular Origin
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd.
Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania, University of Ottawa, Massachusetts General Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Anal fistulae are a difficult problem to treat. The optimal treatment for fistula involving the anal sphincter is unclear. Two standardly used methods of treatment are the ligation of intersphincteric fistula track (LIFT) procedure and the use of an anal fistula plug. The purpose of this study is to exam the rate of fistula closure between the LIFT procedure and the use of a fistula plug

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anal Fistula
Keywords
transsphincteric anal fistula, cryptoglandular origin, anal fistula repair, Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Track (LIFT) procedure, anal fistula plug (Plug), surgical repair

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
124 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
LIFT
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
those subjects receiving the Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Track procedure
Arm Title
Plug
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
those subjects randomized to the receive the placement of the porcine anal fistula plug
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula track procedure
Intervention Description
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula track (LIFT) procedure. This procedure will be performed as per standard operating procedure.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
anal fistula plug
Intervention Description
placement of the porcine anal fistula plug as per the instructions for use in product packaging
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary outcome measure of this study will be to compare the rate of fistula closure between the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula track (LIFT) procedure and the use of a porcine bioabsorbable anal fistula plug
Time Frame
1month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month postoperatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary measures will include level of fecal incontinence, fecal incontinence quality of life, complication rates, and rate of closure after re-operation
Time Frame
1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 months postoperatively

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older. Able to understand and provide informed consent or have a legally authorized representative capable of providing consent. Has a documented diagnosis, confirmed by physical exam and/or endorectal ultrasound (if available), of a trans-sphincteric fistula tract determined to be of cryptoglandular origin (primary or recurrent). Exclusion Criteria: History or suspicion of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's or Ulcerative colitis). History of connective tissue disease. Rectovaginal fistula. Presence of horseshoe fistula. History of immunosuppression therapy/treatment within previous six months. Presents of a proximal diversion and refractory fistula. Any physical conditions, disease, or disorder that would exclude subject from being a candidate for elective surgery. Known history of allergy to pork or pork products.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Deb J Jones, BS
Phone
651-225-7830
Email
djones@crsal.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rachael Peterson, BS
Phone
651-225-7817
Email
rpeterson@crsal.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather L Rossi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Minnesota/Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Husein Moloo, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Ottawa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joshua Bleier, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liliana Bordeianou, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liliana Bordeianou, MD
Phone
617-643-0541
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liliana Bordeianou, MD
Facility Name
Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deb Jones, BS
Phone
651-225-7830
Email
djones@crsal.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachael Peterson, BS
Phone
651-225-7817
Email
rpeterson@crsal.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather Rossi, MD
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Health System
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joshua Bleier, MD
Email
Joshua.Bleier@uphs.upenn.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joshua Bleier, MD
Facility Name
University of Ottawa
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1N6N5
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Husein Moloo, MD
Email
hmoloo@ottawahospital.on.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathon Cook, PhD
Email
jcook@ohri.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Husein Moloo, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathon Cook, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs