search
Back to results

Locomotor Muscle Oxygenation and Activation During Acute Interval Compared to Constant-load Bed-cycling Exercise

Primary Purpose

Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness, Critical Illness

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Constant-load bed-cycling exercise
Interval bed-cycling exercise
Sponsored by
KU Leuven
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness focused on measuring ICU acquired muscle weakness, Quadriceps muscle, Near-infrared spectroscopy, Oxygenation, EMG, Early-mobilization, Bed-cycling, Interval exercise, Continuous exercise

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full cooperatively adult patients indicated by the Adequacy Score of standardized 5 questions (SQ5) = 5/5
  • Patients mechanically ventilated for longer than 48 hours during the same ICU admission
  • Patients are expected to remain in the ICU for more than an additional 48 hours starting from study enrollment
  • Patients able to perform active cycling for > 10 consecutive minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing functional limitations
  • Low limb injuries or conditions that would preclude in-bed cycling such as a body habitus unable to fit the bike
  • Extreme obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2)
  • Neurologically unstable
  • Acute surgery
  • Palliative goals of care
  • Temperature > 40 °C
  • An anticipated fatal outcome
  • Evidence of coronary ischaemia, for example, chest pain or electrocardiogram changes
  • Resting heart rate <40 or >120 beats per minute
  • Mean arterial pressure <60 or >120 mmHg
  • Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 90%
  • Wounds, trauma or surgery of leg precluding cycle ergometry
  • Wounds, trauma or surgery of pelvis precluding cycle ergometry
  • Wounds, trauma or surgery of lumbar spine precluding cycle ergometry
  • Coagulation disorder (international normalised ratio > 1.8, or platelets < 50,000 mcL)
  • Intracranial pressure >20 mm Hg
  • Femoral access other than femoral central line
  • Acute deep vein thrombosis
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • >20 mcg/min of noradrenaline
  • inotropic or vasopressor support comparable to a dose of noradrenaline >20mcg/min
  • Fraction of inspired oxygen > 55%
  • Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) <65 torr (<8.66 kPa)
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure > 10 cmH2O
  • Respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minutes with adequate ventilatory support
  • Minute ventilation >150 mL/kg body weight

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital LeuvenRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm 1 (First constant-load then interval bed-cycling protocol)

Arm 2 (First interval then constant-load bed-cycling protocol)

Arm Description

During Day 1, patients will be familiarized with the constant-load and interval bed-cycling exercise against no resistance. Patients will be also randomized in the two arms of the study before the determination of the appropriate exercise intensities to be subsequently use during the constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols on Day 2 and Day 3. Exercise intensities will be determined so that the volume of training during the two protocols will be equal. During Day 2, patients randomized to arm 1 will perform the constant-load bed-cycling protocol. During Day 3, patients who executed the constant-load bed-cycling protocol on Day 1 (arm 1) will perform the interval bed-cycling protocol.

During Day 1, patients will be familiarized with the constant-load and interval bed-cycling exercise against no resistance. Patients will be also randomized in the two arms of the study before the determination of the appropriate exercise intensities to be subsequently use during the constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols on Day 2 and Day 3. Exercise intensities will be determined so that the volume of training during the two protocols will be equal. During Day 2, patients randomized to arm 2 will perform the interval bed-cycling protocol. On Day 3 they will perform the constant-load bed-cycling protocol.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Differences between bed-cycling protocols in fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) for each measured region of the m. quadriceps femoris
Assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in activation (sEMG amplitude) for each measured region of the muscle quadriceps femoris
Assessed by surface electromyography
Adverse event rate during constant-load bed-cycling
Constant-load bed-cycling protocol will be considered as a safe intervention in case the adverse event rate will be less than 2.6%; adverse events: catheter/tube removal, increase in vasoactive medications >5mcg/min, increase in systolic blood pressure > 200 mmHg for > 2min, decrease in mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg for > 2 min, decrease in heart rate < 50 bpm for > 2 min, increase in heart rate > 140 beats per minute for > 2 min, increase in respiratory rate and sustained > 5 min after session, decrease in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 88% for > 1 min requiring an increase in fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.1 sustained > 5 min)
Adverse event rate during interval bed-cycling
Interval bed-cycling protocol will be considered as a safe intervention in case the adverse event rate will be less than 2.6%; adverse events: catheter/tube removal, increase in vasoactive medications >5mcg/min, increase in systolic blood pressure > 200 mmHg for > 2min, decrease in mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg for > 2 min, decrease in heart rate < 50 bpm for > 2 min, increase in heart rate > 140 beats per minute for > 2 min, increase in respiratory rate and sustained > 5 min after session, decrease in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 88% for > 1 min requiring an increase in fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.1 sustained > 5 min)
Percentage of completed constant-load bed-cycling sessions
The constant-load bed-cycling is deemed to be feasible if at least 80% of planned constant-load sessions were able to be commenced and 80% of commenced sessions can be completed
Percentage of completed interval bed-cycling sessions
The interval bed-cycling is deemed to be feasible if at least 80% of planned interval sessions were able to be commenced and 80% of commenced sessions can be completed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Differences in Relative dispersion (RD) of fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of fractional oxygen extraction among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Differences between exercise protocols in Relative dispersion (RD) of fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) among the different regions of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part) as indicator of heterogeneity of fractional oxygen extraction among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Differences between exercise protocols in oxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (OxyHb/Mb), deoxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (DeoxyHb/Mb) and total hemoglobin/myoglobin concentration (TotHb/Mb) for each measured region of quadriceps femoris
Differences between exercise protocols in oxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (OxyHb/Mb), deoxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (DeoxyHb/Mb) and total hemoglobin/myoglobin concentration (TotHb/Mb) for each measured region of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part)
Differences in Median frequency of sEMG of different regions of quadriceps femoris
Differences in Median frequency of sEMG of different regions of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part) between exercise protocols
Differences in relative dispersion (RD) of sEMG values among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of activation among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Differences between exercise protocols in relative dispersion (RD) of sEMG values among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of activation among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in heart rate
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in mean arterial blood pressure
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in respiratory frequency
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in minute ventilation
In case of mechanically ventilated patients
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in tidal volume
In case of mechanically ventilated patients
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation
Assessed by monitoring vital signs

Full Information

First Posted
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
February 7, 2023
Sponsor
KU Leuven
Collaborators
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05279547
Brief Title
Locomotor Muscle Oxygenation and Activation During Acute Interval Compared to Constant-load Bed-cycling Exercise
Official Title
Locomotor Muscle Oxygenation and Activation During Acute Interval Compared to Constant-load Bed-cycling Exercise: A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
KU Leuven
Collaborators
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Up to 60% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with a prolonged stay in the ICU develop complications such as intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) characterized by limb and respiratory muscle weakness. ICUAW is associated with worse prognosis, longer ICU stay and increased morbidity and mortality. Physical therapy (PT) interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU), can improve patients' outcomes. However, improvements in muscle function achieved with standard physical activity interventions aiming at early mobilization are highly variable due to lack of consistency in definition of the interventions, lack of consideration for the complexity of exercise dose and/or insufficient stimulation of muscles during interventions. It has been suggested that modifying early mobilization and exercise protocols towards shorter intervals consisting of higher intensity exercises might result in more optimal stimulation of muscles. In the present study the researchers therefore aim to simultaneously assess (by non-invasive technologies) locomotor muscle oxygenation and activation along with the measurements of the load imposed on respiration and circulation during two different training modalities i.e., moderate intensity continuous bed-cycling (endurance training) vs high-intensity alternated by lower intensity periods of bed-cycling (interval training).
Detailed Description
Critical illness is related to high morbidity and mortality rates, and health-care costs. Up to 60% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with a prolonged stay in the ICU develop complications such as intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) characterized by limb and respiratory muscle weakness. These abnormalities develop already within the first days to weeks after intensive care unit (ICU) admission and are related to immobility, sepsis, inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), prolonged mechanical ventilation, multiple organ failure, and the use of corticosteroids. ICUAW is associated with worse prognosis, longer ICU stay and increased morbidity and mortality. Survivors of critical illness frequently report long-term physical impairments persisting up to 5 years after discharge. Physical therapy (PT) interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU), can improve patients' outcomes. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of strategies to improve physical functioning of ICU survivors identified the importance of PT interventions in the ICU. Early rehabilitation during ICU admission has the potential to result in important clinical benefits for patients. These findings highlight the importance of aiming to apply mobilization strategies early during ICU stay to maintain and improve physical functioning as good as possible. With a projected increase in the number of critically ill patients, requiring rehabilitation in the ICU effective and efficient rehabilitation interventions are warranted. However, improvements in muscle function achieved with standard physical activity interventions aiming at early mobilization are highly variable. Therefore, there is a need for implementing more evidence-based PT interventions, as part of routine clinical practice. Variable results of current interventions may be due to lack of consistency in definition of the interventions, lack of consideration for the complexity of exercise dose and/or insufficient stimulation of muscles during interventions. It has been suggested that modifying early mobilization and exercise protocols towards shorter intervals consisting of higher intensity exercises might result in more optimal stimulation of muscles. A recent study evaluating a cohort of 181 consecutive patients receiving 541 in-bed cycling sessions as part of routine PT interventions in ICU showed that constant-load bed-cycling appears to be both feasible and safe. In addition, recent evidence in patients with chronic lung disease shows that acute alteration of intense and less intense periods of exercise induced partial restoration of local muscle oxygen stores during the less intense periods of exercise facilitating the muscles to achieve higher exercise intensities during the intense periods, compared to constant-load submaximal exercise. Hence, in patients with chronic lung diseases, alternating intense with less intense loads during interval exercise may be physiologically more effective than constant submaximal workloads maintained during endurance type training for achieving a higher stimulation of locomotor muscles. This has not been investigated so far in intensive care unit patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness, Critical Illness
Keywords
ICU acquired muscle weakness, Quadriceps muscle, Near-infrared spectroscopy, Oxygenation, EMG, Early-mobilization, Bed-cycling, Interval exercise, Continuous exercise

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
two arms randomized cross-over trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1 (First constant-load then interval bed-cycling protocol)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
During Day 1, patients will be familiarized with the constant-load and interval bed-cycling exercise against no resistance. Patients will be also randomized in the two arms of the study before the determination of the appropriate exercise intensities to be subsequently use during the constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols on Day 2 and Day 3. Exercise intensities will be determined so that the volume of training during the two protocols will be equal. During Day 2, patients randomized to arm 1 will perform the constant-load bed-cycling protocol. During Day 3, patients who executed the constant-load bed-cycling protocol on Day 1 (arm 1) will perform the interval bed-cycling protocol.
Arm Title
Arm 2 (First interval then constant-load bed-cycling protocol)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
During Day 1, patients will be familiarized with the constant-load and interval bed-cycling exercise against no resistance. Patients will be also randomized in the two arms of the study before the determination of the appropriate exercise intensities to be subsequently use during the constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols on Day 2 and Day 3. Exercise intensities will be determined so that the volume of training during the two protocols will be equal. During Day 2, patients randomized to arm 2 will perform the interval bed-cycling protocol. On Day 3 they will perform the constant-load bed-cycling protocol.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Constant-load bed-cycling exercise
Intervention Description
Patients will actively cycle for a minimum duration of 10 minutes and a maximum duration of 20 minutes without breaks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Interval bed-cycling exercise
Intervention Description
Patients will cycle for the same duration as during constant-load exercise. Interval bed-cycling session will consist of 30 seconds of high intensity exercise alternated by 30 seconds of passive cycling designed so that volume of training will be equal.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) for each measured region of the m. quadriceps femoris
Description
Assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in activation (sEMG amplitude) for each measured region of the muscle quadriceps femoris
Description
Assessed by surface electromyography
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Adverse event rate during constant-load bed-cycling
Description
Constant-load bed-cycling protocol will be considered as a safe intervention in case the adverse event rate will be less than 2.6%; adverse events: catheter/tube removal, increase in vasoactive medications >5mcg/min, increase in systolic blood pressure > 200 mmHg for > 2min, decrease in mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg for > 2 min, decrease in heart rate < 50 bpm for > 2 min, increase in heart rate > 140 beats per minute for > 2 min, increase in respiratory rate and sustained > 5 min after session, decrease in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 88% for > 1 min requiring an increase in fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.1 sustained > 5 min)
Time Frame
1 session of maximal 20 minutes of constant-load bed-cycling per patient
Title
Adverse event rate during interval bed-cycling
Description
Interval bed-cycling protocol will be considered as a safe intervention in case the adverse event rate will be less than 2.6%; adverse events: catheter/tube removal, increase in vasoactive medications >5mcg/min, increase in systolic blood pressure > 200 mmHg for > 2min, decrease in mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg for > 2 min, decrease in heart rate < 50 bpm for > 2 min, increase in heart rate > 140 beats per minute for > 2 min, increase in respiratory rate and sustained > 5 min after session, decrease in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 88% for > 1 min requiring an increase in fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.1 sustained > 5 min)
Time Frame
1 session of maximal 20 minutes of interval bed-cycling per patient
Title
Percentage of completed constant-load bed-cycling sessions
Description
The constant-load bed-cycling is deemed to be feasible if at least 80% of planned constant-load sessions were able to be commenced and 80% of commenced sessions can be completed
Time Frame
1 session of maximal 20 minutes of constant-load bed-cycling per patient
Title
Percentage of completed interval bed-cycling sessions
Description
The interval bed-cycling is deemed to be feasible if at least 80% of planned interval sessions were able to be commenced and 80% of commenced sessions can be completed
Time Frame
1 session of maximal 20 minutes of interval bed-cycling per patient
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Differences in Relative dispersion (RD) of fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of fractional oxygen extraction among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Description
Differences between exercise protocols in Relative dispersion (RD) of fractional oxygen saturation (StiO2,%) among the different regions of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part) as indicator of heterogeneity of fractional oxygen extraction among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Time Frame
1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Title
Differences between exercise protocols in oxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (OxyHb/Mb), deoxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (DeoxyHb/Mb) and total hemoglobin/myoglobin concentration (TotHb/Mb) for each measured region of quadriceps femoris
Description
Differences between exercise protocols in oxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (OxyHb/Mb), deoxygenated hemoglobin/myoglobin (DeoxyHb/Mb) and total hemoglobin/myoglobin concentration (TotHb/Mb) for each measured region of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part)
Time Frame
1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Title
Differences in Median frequency of sEMG of different regions of quadriceps femoris
Description
Differences in Median frequency of sEMG of different regions of quadriceps femoris (i.e., vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris upper part and rectus femoris lower part) between exercise protocols
Time Frame
1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Title
Differences in relative dispersion (RD) of sEMG values among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of activation among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Description
Differences between exercise protocols in relative dispersion (RD) of sEMG values among the different regions of quadriceps femoris as indicator of heterogeneity of activation among different regions of quadriceps femoris muscle.
Time Frame
1 session constant-load bed-cycling + 1 interval bed-cycling session administered in 2 different days within 1 week.
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in heart rate
Description
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in mean arterial blood pressure
Description
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in respiratory frequency
Description
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in minute ventilation
Description
In case of mechanically ventilated patients
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in tidal volume
Description
In case of mechanically ventilated patients
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week
Title
Differences between bed-cycling protocols in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation
Description
Assessed by monitoring vital signs
Time Frame
constant-load and interval bed-cycling protocols administered in 2 different days within 1 week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Full cooperatively adult patients indicated by the Adequacy Score of standardized 5 questions (SQ5) = 5/5 Patients mechanically ventilated for longer than 48 hours during the same ICU admission Patients are expected to remain in the ICU for more than an additional 48 hours starting from study enrollment Patients able to perform active cycling for > 10 consecutive minutes Exclusion Criteria: Pre-existing functional limitations Low limb injuries or conditions that would preclude in-bed cycling such as a body habitus unable to fit the bike Extreme obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2) Neurologically unstable Acute surgery Palliative goals of care Temperature > 40 °C An anticipated fatal outcome Evidence of coronary ischaemia, for example, chest pain or electrocardiogram changes Resting heart rate <40 or >120 beats per minute Mean arterial pressure <60 or >120 mmHg Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation < 90% Wounds, trauma or surgery of leg precluding cycle ergometry Wounds, trauma or surgery of pelvis precluding cycle ergometry Wounds, trauma or surgery of lumbar spine precluding cycle ergometry Coagulation disorder (international normalised ratio > 1.8, or platelets < 50,000 mcL) Intracranial pressure >20 mm Hg Femoral access other than femoral central line Acute deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism >20 mcg/min of noradrenaline inotropic or vasopressor support comparable to a dose of noradrenaline >20mcg/min Fraction of inspired oxygen > 55% Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) <65 torr (<8.66 kPa) Positive end-expiratory pressure > 10 cmH2O Respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minutes with adequate ventilatory support Minute ventilation >150 mL/kg body weight
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Daniel Langer, Prof. Dr.
Phone
003216376497
Email
daniel.langer@kuleuven.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Diego Poddighe
Email
diego.poddighe@kuleuven.be
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Langer, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
KU Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Langer
Email
daniel.langer@kuleuven.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Langer, PT, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32135387
Citation
Anekwe DE, Biswas S, Bussieres A, Spahija J. Early rehabilitation reduces the likelihood of developing intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.004. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30680218
Citation
Clarissa C, Salisbury L, Rodgers S, Kean S. Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities. J Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 17;7:3. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0355-z. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32826429
Citation
Supinski GS, Valentine EN, Netzel PF, Schroder EA, Wang L, Callahan LA. Does Standard Physical Therapy Increase Quadriceps Strength in Chronically Ventilated Patients? A Pilot Study. Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1595-1603. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004544.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31506074
Citation
Grunow JJ, Goll M, Carbon NM, Liebl ME, Weber-Carstens S, Wollersheim T. Differential contractile response of critically ill patients to neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Crit Care. 2019 Sep 10;23(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2540-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30669936
Citation
Reid JC, Clarke F, Cook DJ, Molloy A, Rudkowski JC, Stratford P, Kho ME. Feasibility, Reliability, Responsiveness, and Validity of the Patient-Reported Functional Scale for the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1396-1404. doi: 10.1177/0885066618824534. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32866055
Citation
Hoffman M, Clerckx B, Janssen K, Segers J, Demeyere I, Frickx B, Merckx E, Hermans G, Van der Meulen I, Van Lancker T, Ceulemans N, Van Hollebeke M, Langer D, Gosselink R. Early mobilization in clinical practice: the reliability and feasibility of the 'Start To Move' Protocol. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Jul;38(7):908-918. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1805833. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32317212
Citation
Nickels MR, Aitken LM, Barnett AG, Walsham J, McPhail SM. Acceptability, safety, and feasibility of in-bed cycling with critically ill patients. Aust Crit Care. 2020 May;33(3):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Locomotor Muscle Oxygenation and Activation During Acute Interval Compared to Constant-load Bed-cycling Exercise

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs