search
Back to results

Long-term tDCS Tinnitus Treatment

Primary Purpose

Tinnitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Czechia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sponsored by
Charles University, Czech Republic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tinnitus focused on measuring tDCS, tinnitus, anxiety, depression, neurostimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nonpulsatile tinnitus for at least 6 months
  • 18 and more years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable cardiovascular condition
  • History of seizures
  • Intracranial masses
  • Intracranial metalic objects
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Unwillingness to sign the informed consent
  • Inability to pass the follow-up
  • Unstable medication for at least 6 months prior to the enrollment
  • Other stimulation method for at least 6 months prior to the enrollmment

Sites / Locations

  • Psychiatric Department, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Active group

Sham group

Arm Description

The investigators aimed for six sessions of anodal stimulation over the right DLPFC (F4 in 10-20 EEG system) with cathode above the left DLPFC (F3) using HDCstim by Newronika S.r.l., Italy. The therapy was administered over two weeks (Mon, Wed, Fri) to ensure a washout period of 48 to 72 hours between applications. The current of 1.5 mA was delivered via silicone electrodes inserted into saline (0.9%) filled cellulose sponges, both 5x5cm (Current Density of 0.6 A/m2), for 20 minutes with 20 seconds of both ramp-up and ramp-down. An International 10-20 EEG system was used to determine the stimulation location, and dedicated EEG caps were used to ensure consistency between applications.

The sham (placebo) was administered using the same devices with a preprogrammed sham protocol (using HDCprog by Newronika S.r.l., Italy) of 20 minutes to be virtually indistinguishable from the active stimulation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T1 (baseline)
A questionaire evaluating 8 subdomains of tinnitus. A total minimal score=0, maximum score=250. Higher score means generally more severe form of tinnitus.
Changes in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T2
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T3
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T4
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T1 (baseline)
A questionnaire evaluating 3 subdomains of tinnitus and its handicap. A total minimal score=0 %, maximum score=100%. Higher score means generally more severe form of tinnitus.
Changes in Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T2
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T3
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T4
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T1 (baseline)
A standardized questionaire to evaluate the symptoms of anxiety. Minimum=0 points, maximum=63 points. A higher score means generally more severe anxiety.
Changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T2
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T3
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T4
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T1 (baseline)
A standardized questionaire focusing on symptoms of depression. The scale calculates SDS index from the raw data - minimal SDS index=25 points; maximal SDS index=100 points. Higher SDS index means generally more severe depression.
Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T2
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T3
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T4
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at T1 (baseline)
An abbreviated version of WHO questionaire evaluating 4 domains of quality of life during the therapy. The outcomes are calculatefd are on a scale ranging between 0-100%. Higher scores mean generally higher perceived quality of life.
Changes in The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at 2
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at 3
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Changes in The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at 4
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 20, 2022
Last Updated
June 27, 2022
Sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05437185
Brief Title
Long-term tDCS Tinnitus Treatment
Official Title
The Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment of Tinnitus and Its Psychiatric Comorbidities
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study was designed to evaluate a therapeutic effect of tDCS in the treatment of tinnitus and its comorbidities (anxiety, depresion) and to evaluate the associated quality of life. In the randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, 39 participants (active n=19, sham n=20) underwent bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) tDCS (anode over right DLPFC, cathode left DLPFC, current of 1.5 mA, 20 minutes, 6 sessions in 2 weeks). Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (ITHQ), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and WHO-Quality of Life-BREF were employed in 4 evaluation points, including the follow-ups of 6 weeks and six months.
Detailed Description
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-arm trial was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, General University Hospital in Prague, Czechia. The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of General University Hospital in Prague, Czechia, in 2019 under the reference number 531/19 S-IV. Participants were recruited through the recruitment campaign of the Department of Psychiatry, which was supported by outpatient services of several neurological, psychiatric, internal, and otorhinolaryngological departments in several university hospitals around Prague. All participants were required to sign written consent with the trial, anonymized data, the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and were fully informed about the trial's goals, risks, and requirements. Participation was not associated with any financial reward. The participation was offered to persons at least 18 years of age (on the day of signing the consent) with a history of tinnitus lasting at least six months. The investigators excluded persons contraindicated to tDCS - such as those with epilepsy, intracranial masses or metallic objects, pregnancy, and heart conditions. The investigators also excluded persons with a history of alcohol and drug abuse, persons unwilling to sign the informed consent or persons who underwent any other tinnitus therapy in the last six months. The investigators intended to discontinue the treatment in any participant developing any severe adverse effect (significant exacerbation of tinnitus, epileptic seizure, severe headache, or any adverse effect deemed severe enough by the participants) and in participants noncompliant or unwilling to participate further with the trial and its follow-ups. The investigators required the participants not to alter their medication at least six months before the trial if any was used.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tinnitus
Keywords
tDCS, tinnitus, anxiety, depression, neurostimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants were randomly allocated either to the active or sham (placebo) group.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The participants were distributed between 2 arms using an aperiodic, nondeterministic, atmospheric random noise randomization algorithm. The stimulation type was unblinded upon completing all the follow-ups or dropping out. The blinding was ensured by a dedicated team member with no direct access to the participants or their data.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
44 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The investigators aimed for six sessions of anodal stimulation over the right DLPFC (F4 in 10-20 EEG system) with cathode above the left DLPFC (F3) using HDCstim by Newronika S.r.l., Italy. The therapy was administered over two weeks (Mon, Wed, Fri) to ensure a washout period of 48 to 72 hours between applications. The current of 1.5 mA was delivered via silicone electrodes inserted into saline (0.9%) filled cellulose sponges, both 5x5cm (Current Density of 0.6 A/m2), for 20 minutes with 20 seconds of both ramp-up and ramp-down. An International 10-20 EEG system was used to determine the stimulation location, and dedicated EEG caps were used to ensure consistency between applications.
Arm Title
Sham group
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
The sham (placebo) was administered using the same devices with a preprogrammed sham protocol (using HDCprog by Newronika S.r.l., Italy) of 20 minutes to be virtually indistinguishable from the active stimulation.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Intervention Description
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory method utilizing weak electrical currents to elicit short and long-term central nervous system changes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Intervention Description
The sham was administered using the same tDCS devices as in the active group with a preprogrammed sham protocol of 20 minutes to be virtually indistinguishable from the active stimulation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T1 (baseline)
Description
A questionaire evaluating 8 subdomains of tinnitus. A total minimal score=0, maximum score=250. Higher score means generally more severe form of tinnitus.
Time Frame
The measurement was established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)
Title
Changes in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T2
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T3
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) at T4
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T4 (6 months since T1)
Title
Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T1 (baseline)
Description
A questionnaire evaluating 3 subdomains of tinnitus and its handicap. A total minimal score=0 %, maximum score=100%. Higher score means generally more severe form of tinnitus.
Time Frame
The measurement was established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)
Title
Changes in Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T2
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T3
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire version 1 (ITHQ) at T4
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T4 (6 months since T1)
Title
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T1 (baseline)
Description
A standardized questionaire to evaluate the symptoms of anxiety. Minimum=0 points, maximum=63 points. A higher score means generally more severe anxiety.
Time Frame
The measurement was established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)
Title
Changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T2
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T3
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at T4
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T4 (6 months since T1)
Title
Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T1 (baseline)
Description
A standardized questionaire focusing on symptoms of depression. The scale calculates SDS index from the raw data - minimal SDS index=25 points; maximal SDS index=100 points. Higher SDS index means generally more severe depression.
Time Frame
The measurement was established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)
Title
Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T2
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T3
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) at T4
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T4 (6 months since T1)
Title
The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at T1 (baseline)
Description
An abbreviated version of WHO questionaire evaluating 4 domains of quality of life during the therapy. The outcomes are calculatefd are on a scale ranging between 0-100%. Higher scores mean generally higher perceived quality of life.
Time Frame
The measurement was established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)
Title
Changes in The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at 2
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T2-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at 3
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T3-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)
Title
Changes in The World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF at 4
Description
Changes compared to the baseline (T4-T1) were calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement.
Time Frame
Measured at T4 (6 months since T1)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Nonpulsatile tinnitus for at least 6 months 18 and more years of age Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Unstable cardiovascular condition History of seizures Intracranial masses Intracranial metalic objects History of alcohol or drug abuse Unwillingness to sign the informed consent Inability to pass the follow-up Unstable medication for at least 6 months prior to the enrollment Other stimulation method for at least 6 months prior to the enrollmment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tadeas Mares, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Psychiatric Department, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Anders, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Psychiatric Department, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jozef Buday, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Psychiatric Department, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Psychiatric Department, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague
City
Prague
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
12000
Country
Czechia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD can be shared upon request from a verified researcher.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available after the final publication, indefinitely
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Upon individual request by a verified researcher.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36311525
Citation
Mares T, Albrecht J, Buday J, Podgorna G, Le TH, Magyarova E, Poshor K, Halik J, Buna J, Capek V, Kostylkova L, Klasova J, Fabian V, Anders M. Long-term effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of chronic tinnitus: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 13;13:969800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.969800. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Long-term tDCS Tinnitus Treatment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs