search
Back to results

Low Dose Multi-Nut Oral Immunotherapy in Pre-schoolers With a Multi-Nut Allergy (LMNOP)

Primary Purpose

Allergy, Nut

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Multi-nut OIT
Sponsored by
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Allergy, Nut focused on measuring Oral immunotherapy, Randomised controlled trial, Skin prick test, Oral food challenge

Eligibility Criteria

18 Months - 36 Months (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is between the ages of 18 and 36 months at the time of Screening visit 1
  • Has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf
  • IgE-mediated allergy to 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut, confirmed by:

Nut 1 pre-screening:

For at least one of almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut (Nut 1)*:

  1. History of ingestion with IgE-mediated reaction (birth to present) AND
  2. History of SPT ≥3mm OR History of sIgE ≥0.35 number of kilounits per liter (KuL) AND

Nut 2 pre-screening:

For a second nut out of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut (Nut 2):

History of SPT ≥3mm OR History sIgE ≥0.35 KuL

In clinic screening: Participants meeting pre-screening criteria for Nuts 1 and 2 above will be invited for in-clinic screening

  1. SPT: wheal size ≥3mm at Visit 1 for 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut AND
  2. OFC: react to ≤3000 mg protein top dose (4449 mg cumulative) in open, single nut OFC for 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut

OFC not needed if:

History of failed OFC within past 3 months (confirmed by investigator review of discharge summary) OR History of anaphylaxis after ingestion within past 3 months based on investigator judgement +/- review of ER/Ambulance/medical notes

*Peanut is not included as Nut 1 to reduce the incidence of screening children with a peanut allergy only - children with peanut allergy may have been advised to avoid all other nuts. We require children to have eaten and reacted to at least one tree nut, and then the 2nd nut, which children may or may not have eaten, can be peanut or a tree nut.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe anaphylaxis (as defined by persistent hypotension, collapse, loss of consciousness, persistent hypoxia or ever needing more than 2 doses of intramuscular adrenaline or an intravenous adrenaline infusion for management of an allergic reaction)
  • Severe anaphylaxis at study screening OFC (defined as persistent hypotension, collapse, loss of consciousness, persistent hypoxia, or requiring more than 2 doses of intramuscular adrenaline or an intravenous adrenaline infusion for management of an allergic reaction)
  • Fails either screening OFC on dose 1 (0.5 mg).
  • Underlying medical conditions that increase the risks associated with anaphylaxis (e.g., cardiac disease or poorly controlled asthma (defined below))
  • Confirmed eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) or history indicating EoE
  • Current use of beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
  • Receiving systemic immunomodulatory treatment
  • Not commenced or unable to eat solid food
  • Weight <7.5kgs (recommended minimum weight for EpiPen Jr (adrenaline autoinjector))
  • Has a sibling in the study

Defining uncontrolled asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma. Asthma management and prevention for adults and children older than 5 years)

In the past 4 weeks, has the patient had:

Daytime symptoms more than twice/week? Any night waking due to asthma? Short Acting Beta Agonist (SABA) reliever needed more than twice/week? Any activity limitation due to asthma? Uncontrolled - answered yes to 3-4 of these

Sites / Locations

  • Murdoch Children's Research InstituteRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Multi-nut OIT

Standard Care

Arm Description

Participants will have a personalised combination of two nuts they are allergic to for their multi-nut OIT (a. peanut, b. almond, c. cashew, d. hazelnut, e. walnut). In the escalation visit, participants will receive 5 increasing doses of personalised multi-nut OIT in clinic at 20-minute intervals: 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, 12 mg, 24 mg total nut protein, 12 mg/nut. The build-up phase will consist of daily home doses of multi-nut OIT and clinic visits every 2 weeks for up-dosing, up to a maintenance dose of 600 mg total protein, 300 mg/nut, over 3-8 months. In the maintenance phase, participants will continue to take their multi-nut OIT dose of 600 mg total protein each day at home for the remainder of the 18 months, with visits to the clinic every 3 months.

Strict avoidance of the 2 study nuts the participants are allergic to over 18 months - a. peanut, b. almond, c. cashew, d. hazelnut, e. walnut, as per standard care instructions for children with allergies in Australia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Main Trial: Comparison of the number of participants who pass their OFC after the 18-month treatment phase for both study nuts between the Multi-Nut OIT Group and Standard Care Group
In both groups, passing requires participants tolerating all OFC doses for both of their study nuts. For the Multi-Nut OIT Group, participants must pass their OFC at the end of the 18-month treatment phase, and then pass another OFC after 4 weeks of no OIT. For the Standard Care Group, participants must pass their OFC after the 18-month period. Participants have a personalised combination of two nuts: a. peanut, b. almond, c. cashew, d. hazelnut, e. walnut, as nominated at study screening.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the proportion and severity of reported adverse events (AE) related to study nut ingestion during the 18-month treatment phase
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria, related to study peanut/tree nut ingestion from randomisation to end of the 18-month treatment phase collected via OFC and clinic visit observations and medical history taken, and parent questionnaire diaries.
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from screening to 18 months in quality of life scores for the children, measured by the Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parent Form (FAQL-PF)
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) are disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with food allergy. The FAQL-PF completed by parents of children aged 0-12 years, consists of 30 items over 3 domains: emotional impact, food anxiety, social and dietary restrictions. Total and domain scores are calculated by dividing the sum of completed items by the number of competed items.
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from screening to 18 months in quality of life scores for the parents using the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A)
The ICECAP-A questionnaire is a measure of capability well-being for adults. It has been developed in the United Kingdom (UK) using in-depth and semi-structured qualitative research with adults over the age of 18; values for the UK, obtained using best-worst scaling, are available. The instrument contains five attributes - stability, attachment, autonomy, achievement, and enjoyment, each with four levels. Research on the instrument's validity, reliability, feasibility of use and sensitivity to change are still ongoing.
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from screening to 18 months in State/Trait anxiety using the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
The STAI is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic. Higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the number of allergy-related healthcare visits from randomisation to 18 months
Captured per number of hospitalisations, Emergency Room (ER) visits, physician office visits, and medications/number of prescriptions using linked data to Medicare healthcare usage (Medical Benefits Scheme (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)) and Victorian Data Linkage for hospital presentations (Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED)).
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in SPT wheal size at screening and at 18 months
Measured by SPT wheal size for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at screening and at 18 months
Measured by levels of sIgE for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) at screening and at 18 months
Measured by levels of sIgG4 for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of component-resolved diagnostic (CRD) at screening and at 18 months
Measured by levels of CRD for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months. CRD is an approach utilised to characterize the molecular components of each allergen involved in a sIgE-mediated response.
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of basophil activation test (BAT) at screening and at 18 months
Measured by levels of BAT for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Main Trial: Total number of missed doses overall (all participants) in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the 18 month treatment phase
Compliance will be measured by daily parent diary records of doses consumed. Total number of missed daily doses overall (all participants).
Main Trial: Mean number of missed daily doses per participant in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the 18 month treatment phase
Compliance will be measured by daily parent diary records of doses consumed. Total number of missed daily doses averaged per participant.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Comparison of the number of participants who pass their OFC after the 12 month Ad Libitum phase for both study nuts between the Multi-Nut OIT Group and Standard Care Group
In both groups, passing requires tolerating all OFC doses for both of their study nuts.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the proportion and severity of reported AEs related to study nut ingestion during the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria, related to study peanut/tree nut ingestion from the start to the end of the 12-month Ad libitum phase collected via end of trial OFC observation and medical history, and parent 1-monthly questionnaires.
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from the start to the end of the Ad libitum phase in quality of life scores for the children, measured by the FAQL-PF
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) are disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with food allergy. The FAQL-PF completed by parents of children aged 0-12 years, consists of 30 items over 3 domains: emotional impact, food anxiety, social and dietary restrictions. Total and domain scores are calculated by dividing the sum of completed items by the number of competed items.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from the start to the end of the Ad libitum phase in quality of life scores for the parents using the ICECAP-A
The ICECAP-A questionnaire is a measure of capability well-being for adults. It has been developed in the UK using in-depth and semi-structured qualitative research with adults over the age of 18; values for the UK, obtained using best-worst scaling, are available. The instrument contains five attributes - stability, attachment, autonomy, achievement, and enjoyment, each with four levels. Research on the instrument's validity, reliability, feasibility of use and sensitivity to change are still ongoing.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from the start to the end of the Ad libitum phase in State/Trait anxiety using the STAI
The STAI is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic. Higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the number of allergy-related healthcare visits during the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Captured per number of hospitalisations, ER visits, physician office visits, and medications/number of prescriptions using linked data to Medicare healthcare usage (MBS/PBS) and Victorian Data Linkage for hospital presentations (VAED)
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change in SPT wheal size from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Measured by SPT wheal size for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of sIgE from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Measured by levels of sIgE each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of sIgG4 from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Measured by levels of sIgG4 for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change levels of CRD from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Measured by levels of CRD for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment. CRD is an approach utilised to characterize the molecular components of each allergen involved in a sIgE-mediated response.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change levels of BAT from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Measured by levels of BAT for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the amount of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase
Amount of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase based on parent 1-monthly questionnaires.
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the frequency of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase
Frequency of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase based on parent 1-monthly questionnaires.
Pilot Phase: Number of children at screening who refuse, are eligible, or are ineligible
Pilot Phase: At screening, number of children who: refuse to participate are eligible are ineligible (and reason)
Pilot Phase: Number of children at recruitment who agree or refuse to participate
At recruitment, number of eligible children who: agree to be in the study who refuse to be in the study
Pilot Phase: Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete escalation
Number of children in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete all escalation doses
Pilot Phase: Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete the build-up phase
Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete build-up
Pilot Phase: Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group and the Standard Care Group who withdraw, discontinue, and/or experience 1 or more protocol violations
Number of participants in either arm who: withdraw discontinue the treatment prior to 18 months experience 1 or more protocol violations
Pilot Phase: Number and severity of AEs during the screening OFC for all participants
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria during the screening OFC.
Pilot Phase: Number and severity of AEs for the Multi-Nut OIT Group during escalation
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria during escalation.
Pilot Phase: Number and severity of AEs for the Multi-Nut OIT Group during the build-up phase
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria during build-up.
Pilot Phase: Total number of missed doses overall (all participants) in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the build-up phase
Based on parent diary entries. Number of missed daily doses overall (all participants).
Pilot Phase: Mean number of missed daily doses per participant in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the build-up phase
Based on parent diary entries. Number of missed daily doses averaged per participant.

Full Information

First Posted
September 8, 2021
Last Updated
December 14, 2022
Sponsor
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05049512
Brief Title
Low Dose Multi-Nut Oral Immunotherapy in Pre-schoolers With a Multi-Nut Allergy
Acronym
LMNOP
Official Title
Low Dose Multi-Nut Oral Immunotherapy in Pre-schoolers (LMNOP): a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Low Dose Multi-Nut Oral Immunotherapy Versus Standard Care for the Treatment of Multi-Nut Allergies in Young Children
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 16, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The LMNOP trial will be a 2-armed, open-label, randomised controlled trial (RCT), 2:1. Over a period of 18 months, children in the Multi-Nut Oral Immunotherapy Treatment (OIT) Group (experimental arm) will undergo low dose OIT to two nuts they are allergic to. At this time, children in the Standard Care Group (control arm) will be instructed to strictly avoid consuming two nuts they are allergic to. Avoiding consuming nut allergens is the standard care advice for children with peanut/tree nut allergies in Australia. The trial will assess the difference in the proportion of participants undergoing Multi-Nut OIT who can achieve sustained unresponsiveness (SU) compared to the proportion of participants avoiding nuts who develop natural tolerance (NT), i.e. grow out of their allergy. SU is when a participant can pass an oral food challenge (OFC) after having paused OIT treatment for several weeks. Participants will be between the ages of 18 and 36 months at the time of screening. The first 12 participants enrolled will be part of the pilot phase, with a total of n = 45 for the main trial. It is hypothesised that there will be a higher proportion of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group versus the Standard Care Group who pass the OFC following the 18-month treatment phase. That is, a higher proportion of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group will achieve SU compared to participants in the Standard Care Group achieving NT.
Detailed Description
The LMNOP trial is a novel RCT assessing whether, over a period of 18 months, children undergoing low dose, multi-nut OIT can safely achieve SU at a higher rate than children under standard care who develop NT to peanut and tree nuts. Trial Time Line Study Entry - Children will undergo a screening skin prick test (SPT) to two of peanut, cashew, almond, hazelnut and/or walnut and OFC. Children who meet the study eligibility criteria will be randomisation to either the Multi-Nut OIT Group or Standard Care Group for 18 months. Multi-Nut OIT Group: The 18-month treatment phase involves an escalation visit, build-up phase and maintenance phase. In the escalation visit, participants will receive 5 increasing doses of personalised multi-nut OIT in clinic at 20-minute intervals: 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, 12 mg, 24 mg total nut protein, 12 mg/nut. The build-up phase will consist of daily home doses of multi-nut OIT and clinic visits every 2 weeks for up-dosing, up to a maintenance dose of 600 mg total protein, 300 mg/nut, over 3-8 months. In the maintenance phase, participants will continue to take their multi-nut OIT dose of 600 mg total protein each day at home for the remainder of the 18 months, with visits to the clinic every 3 months. 300 mg per allergen was chosen as the daily maintenance dose, as this is the lowest dose thus far demonstrated in any trial to successfully achieve SU. Each dose will be mixed into a carrier food of the participant's choice (e.g. apple puree, custard, chocolate pudding etc). At the end of the 18-month treatment phase, participants will have a SPT and OFC to their study nuts. Participants who pass the OFC will cease OIT for 4 weeks. They will then undergo another OFC, 19 months after commencing treatment. Participants who pass this OFC will then enter the Ad libitum phase for 12 months. The Ad libitum phase involves participants eating the study nuts as much or as often as they want. To ensure the participant is consuming some nuts, they will be given advice that at a minimum, participants should have approximately ½ -1 teaspoon of nut flour, twice per week, for each nut. At the end of the Ad libitum phase, participants will undergo another OFC. Standard Care Group: At the end of the 18-month period, participants will have a SPT and OFC to their study nuts. Participants who pass their OFC will enter Ad libitum Phase for 12 months. As described for the Multi-Nut OIT Group, this involves participants eating the study nuts as much or as often as they want, with advice given that participants should have approximately ½ -1 teaspoon of nut flour, twice per week for each nut at a minimum. At the end of the Ad libitum phase, participants will undergo another OFC. Any Multi-Nut OIT Group participants who fail their OFC to one or both of their study nuts after the 18-month treatment phase will be asked to cease OIT to that nut(s) and will be referred back to their regular allergist. Likewise, any Multi-Nut OIT Group participants who fail their OFC to one or both of their study nuts after the 4 weeks of ceasing OIT will be asked to avoid the nut/s and will be referred back to their regular allergist. Any Standard Care Group participants who fail their OFC at this time, will be asked to continue avoiding that nut(s) and will also be referred back to their regular allergist. Participants in both groups who fail their OFC to both study nuts will be invited back at the end of the trial for a clinical assessment, but no OFC. Primary Aim of the Pilot Phase: To determine the feasibility of this study design in terms of recruitment into the study and completion of the escalation and build-up phases for participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group. Primary Aim of the Main Trial: To compare the proportion of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group versus the Standard Care Group who pass the OFC after the 18-month treatment phase. That is, comparing the proportion of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who achieve SU by passing their OFC after 18 months of OIT, and then passing another OFC after 4 weeks of ceasing OIT, to participants in the Standard Care Group who achieve NT by passing their OFC after the 18-month period. Healthy children aged 18-36 months at the screening visit with confirmed/suspected Immunoglobulin E-mediated (IgE-mediated) allergies to 2 of: peanut, cashew, almond, hazelnut and/or walnut, and who meet the study criteria, will be recruited into the trial. Children will be randomised (2:1) for the pilot phase to either: multi-nut OIT (n ~ 8) or standard care (n ~ 4), and for the main trial - multi-nut OIT (n ~ 30) or standard care (n ~ 15). The 12 pilot participants will be included in the over all total of 45 participants. Data from the first 12 participants enrolled, denoted the Pilot Phase, will be used to assess the feasibility of our study design in terms of the screening, recruitment, randomisation and treatment of participants, and examine the acceptability of low dose, multi-nut OIT in young children. Once the first 12 participants have been enrolled, we will pause recruitment until all Pilot Phase participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group have completed the build-up phase (~ 8 months). At this point we will undertake an interim analysis of the feasibility data, and review whether any adjustments need to be made to the protocol. Following this, and assuming that there are no major issues with the study protocol and further funding has been secured, we will continue recruitment into the trial as per the protocol. Potential participants will be identified from these sources: public and private Allergy clinics, Centre for Food & Allergy Research (CFAR) and Allergy & Anaphylaxis Australia (A&AA) websites and social media. For the Pilot Phase, recruitment will begin with distribution of the 'LMNOP Study Invitation' flyer electronically via the CFAR website and email list (270+ families interested in participating in food allergy research), and on Facebook via the Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI) and Melbourne Allergy Centre and Children's Specialists (MACCS) private allergy clinic. Parents who have expressed interest in the study will be contacted, and those children deemed likely to be eligible for the study according to study criteria following a screening phone call, will be invited to attend a 2-day screening assessment at the Melbourne Children's Trials Centre (MCTC), MCRI. Screening day 1: Following informed parental consent, children will have a SPT and blood will be drawn. Children with a positive SPT (≥3mm) to 2 of peanut, cashew, almond, hazelnut or walnut will be offered 2 individual nut OFCs to confirm allergy and reaction thresholds prior to randomisation. The OFC will not be needed if the child's allergy history meets the study criteria for a confirmed allergy. The first OFC will take place on Screening day 1. Screening day 2: Children will have a 2nd individual nut OFC. This will be completed approximately one week after the first OFC. Once the child has completed screening and has confirmed IgE-mediated allergy to 2 peanut/tree nuts (positive SPT (≥3mm), and OFC), they will enter the treatment phase, and will be randomised to either: Multi-Nut OIT Group: Participants will undergo multi-nut OIT treatment using a personalised multi-nut flour - 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut, 1:1 ratio of allergen protein. Multi-Nut OIT Group participants will continue strict avoidance of confirmed allergens outside of their daily dose of multi-nut flour, and will have 24-hour access to an on-call study doctor in case of allergic reactions. Standard Care Group: As per standard clinical care in Australia, families will be instructed to strictly avoid all confirmed nut allergens over the 18-month period. The Multi-Nut OIT Group will undergo an 18-month treatment phase consisting of an escalation visit, build-up phase and maintenance phase as described above. Participants who pass their OFC after 18 months of OIT, and then another OFC after no OIT for 4 weeks for one or both of their study nuts, will enter the Ad libitum phase described above. After 12 months of this unrestricted consumption of the study nuts, with a minimum of approximately 300 mg protein per nut: ½ -1 teaspoon of nut flour, twice per week for both nuts, participants will be assessed for induced tolerance (IT) via another OFC. IT is when a child can eat standard serves of the food 12 months after stopping OIT, without having an allergic reaction. The Standard Care Group for the 18 months will be instructed to avoid any consumption of the peanut/tree nuts they are allergic to, as per standard care. Participants who pass the OFC for one or both of their study nuts at the end of the 18 months will undergo the 12-month Ad libitum phase. At the end of this 12-month period, participants will then be assessed for maintaining NT via an OFC. That is, whether they have still outgrown their allergy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Allergy, Nut
Keywords
Oral immunotherapy, Randomised controlled trial, Skin prick test, Oral food challenge

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Multi-nut OIT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will have a personalised combination of two nuts they are allergic to for their multi-nut OIT (a. peanut, b. almond, c. cashew, d. hazelnut, e. walnut). In the escalation visit, participants will receive 5 increasing doses of personalised multi-nut OIT in clinic at 20-minute intervals: 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, 12 mg, 24 mg total nut protein, 12 mg/nut. The build-up phase will consist of daily home doses of multi-nut OIT and clinic visits every 2 weeks for up-dosing, up to a maintenance dose of 600 mg total protein, 300 mg/nut, over 3-8 months. In the maintenance phase, participants will continue to take their multi-nut OIT dose of 600 mg total protein each day at home for the remainder of the 18 months, with visits to the clinic every 3 months.
Arm Title
Standard Care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Strict avoidance of the 2 study nuts the participants are allergic to over 18 months - a. peanut, b. almond, c. cashew, d. hazelnut, e. walnut, as per standard care instructions for children with allergies in Australia.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Multi-nut OIT
Intervention Description
Finely ground pure peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut, and walnut.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Main Trial: Comparison of the number of participants who pass their OFC after the 18-month treatment phase for both study nuts between the Multi-Nut OIT Group and Standard Care Group
Description
In both groups, passing requires participants tolerating all OFC doses for both of their study nuts. For the Multi-Nut OIT Group, participants must pass their OFC at the end of the 18-month treatment phase, and then pass another OFC after 4 weeks of no OIT. For the Standard Care Group, participants must pass their OFC after the 18-month period. Participants have a personalised combination of two nuts: a. peanut, b. almond, c. cashew, d. hazelnut, e. walnut, as nominated at study screening.
Time Frame
At 18 months post commencement of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the proportion and severity of reported adverse events (AE) related to study nut ingestion during the 18-month treatment phase
Description
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria, related to study peanut/tree nut ingestion from randomisation to end of the 18-month treatment phase collected via OFC and clinic visit observations and medical history taken, and parent questionnaire diaries.
Time Frame
During the 18-month treatment phase
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from screening to 18 months in quality of life scores for the children, measured by the Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parent Form (FAQL-PF)
Description
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) are disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with food allergy. The FAQL-PF completed by parents of children aged 0-12 years, consists of 30 items over 3 domains: emotional impact, food anxiety, social and dietary restrictions. Total and domain scores are calculated by dividing the sum of completed items by the number of competed items.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from screening to 18 months in quality of life scores for the parents using the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A)
Description
The ICECAP-A questionnaire is a measure of capability well-being for adults. It has been developed in the United Kingdom (UK) using in-depth and semi-structured qualitative research with adults over the age of 18; values for the UK, obtained using best-worst scaling, are available. The instrument contains five attributes - stability, attachment, autonomy, achievement, and enjoyment, each with four levels. Research on the instrument's validity, reliability, feasibility of use and sensitivity to change are still ongoing.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from screening to 18 months in State/Trait anxiety using the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Description
The STAI is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic. Higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the number of allergy-related healthcare visits from randomisation to 18 months
Description
Captured per number of hospitalisations, Emergency Room (ER) visits, physician office visits, and medications/number of prescriptions using linked data to Medicare healthcare usage (Medical Benefits Scheme (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)) and Victorian Data Linkage for hospital presentations (Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED)).
Time Frame
Randomisation to 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in SPT wheal size at screening and at 18 months
Description
Measured by SPT wheal size for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at screening and at 18 months
Description
Measured by levels of sIgE for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) at screening and at 18 months
Description
Measured by levels of sIgG4 for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of component-resolved diagnostic (CRD) at screening and at 18 months
Description
Measured by levels of CRD for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months. CRD is an approach utilised to characterize the molecular components of each allergen involved in a sIgE-mediated response.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of basophil activation test (BAT) at screening and at 18 months
Description
Measured by levels of BAT for each child's study nuts at screening and at 18 months.
Time Frame
Screening and at 18 months
Title
Main Trial: Total number of missed doses overall (all participants) in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the 18 month treatment phase
Description
Compliance will be measured by daily parent diary records of doses consumed. Total number of missed daily doses overall (all participants).
Time Frame
During the 18-month treatment phase
Title
Main Trial: Mean number of missed daily doses per participant in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the 18 month treatment phase
Description
Compliance will be measured by daily parent diary records of doses consumed. Total number of missed daily doses averaged per participant.
Time Frame
During the 18-month treatment phase
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Comparison of the number of participants who pass their OFC after the 12 month Ad Libitum phase for both study nuts between the Multi-Nut OIT Group and Standard Care Group
Description
In both groups, passing requires tolerating all OFC doses for both of their study nuts.
Time Frame
At 32 months
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the proportion and severity of reported AEs related to study nut ingestion during the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Description
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria, related to study peanut/tree nut ingestion from the start to the end of the 12-month Ad libitum phase collected via end of trial OFC observation and medical history, and parent 1-monthly questionnaires.
Time Frame
During the 12 month Ad libitum phase
Title
Main Trial: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from the start to the end of the Ad libitum phase in quality of life scores for the children, measured by the FAQL-PF
Description
The Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) are disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with food allergy. The FAQL-PF completed by parents of children aged 0-12 years, consists of 30 items over 3 domains: emotional impact, food anxiety, social and dietary restrictions. Total and domain scores are calculated by dividing the sum of completed items by the number of competed items.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12 month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from the start to the end of the Ad libitum phase in quality of life scores for the parents using the ICECAP-A
Description
The ICECAP-A questionnaire is a measure of capability well-being for adults. It has been developed in the UK using in-depth and semi-structured qualitative research with adults over the age of 18; values for the UK, obtained using best-worst scaling, are available. The instrument contains five attributes - stability, attachment, autonomy, achievement, and enjoyment, each with four levels. Research on the instrument's validity, reliability, feasibility of use and sensitivity to change are still ongoing.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12 month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in mean change from the start to the end of the Ad libitum phase in State/Trait anxiety using the STAI
Description
The STAI is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety, or anxiety about an event, and trait anxiety, or anxiety level as a personal characteristic. Higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12 month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the number of allergy-related healthcare visits during the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Description
Captured per number of hospitalisations, ER visits, physician office visits, and medications/number of prescriptions using linked data to Medicare healthcare usage (MBS/PBS) and Victorian Data Linkage for hospital presentations (VAED)
Time Frame
During the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change in SPT wheal size from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Description
Measured by SPT wheal size for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of sIgE from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Description
Measured by levels of sIgE each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change in levels of sIgG4 from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Description
Measured by levels of sIgG4 for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change levels of CRD from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Description
Measured by levels of CRD for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment. CRD is an approach utilised to characterize the molecular components of each allergen involved in a sIgE-mediated response.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the two groups in change levels of BAT from 18-months treatment phase assessment to the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Description
Measured by levels of BAT for each child's study nuts at the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment.
Time Frame
At the 18-month treatment phase assessment and at the 12-month Ad libitum phase assessment
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the amount of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase
Description
Amount of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase based on parent 1-monthly questionnaires.
Time Frame
During the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Title
Main Trial Ad Libitum Phase: Difference between the Multi-Nut OIT Group in comparison to the Standard Care Group in the frequency of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase
Description
Frequency of study nut consumption during the Ad libitum phase based on parent 1-monthly questionnaires.
Time Frame
During the 12-month Ad libitum phase
Title
Pilot Phase: Number of children at screening who refuse, are eligible, or are ineligible
Description
Pilot Phase: At screening, number of children who: refuse to participate are eligible are ineligible (and reason)
Time Frame
At study screening, up to 4 weeks before starting treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Number of children at recruitment who agree or refuse to participate
Description
At recruitment, number of eligible children who: agree to be in the study who refuse to be in the study
Time Frame
At study recruitment, up to 4 weeks before starting treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete escalation
Description
Number of children in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete all escalation doses
Time Frame
At completion of first day of treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete the build-up phase
Description
Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group who complete build-up
Time Frame
At completion of build-up, between 3-8 months after commencing treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Number of participants in the Multi-Nut OIT Group and the Standard Care Group who withdraw, discontinue, and/or experience 1 or more protocol violations
Description
Number of participants in either arm who: withdraw discontinue the treatment prior to 18 months experience 1 or more protocol violations
Time Frame
During the 18 month treatment phase
Title
Pilot Phase: Number and severity of AEs during the screening OFC for all participants
Description
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria during the screening OFC.
Time Frame
At study screening, up to 4 weeks before starting treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Number and severity of AEs for the Multi-Nut OIT Group during escalation
Description
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria during escalation.
Time Frame
At completion of first day of treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Number and severity of AEs for the Multi-Nut OIT Group during the build-up phase
Description
Number and severity of AEs as assessed by standardised predetermined criteria during build-up.
Time Frame
During the build-up phase, between 3-8 month period after commencing treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Total number of missed doses overall (all participants) in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the build-up phase
Description
Based on parent diary entries. Number of missed daily doses overall (all participants).
Time Frame
During the build-up phase, between 3-8 month period after commencing treatment
Title
Pilot Phase: Mean number of missed daily doses per participant in the Multi-Nut OIT Group over the build-up phase
Description
Based on parent diary entries. Number of missed daily doses averaged per participant.
Time Frame
During the build-up phase, between 3-8 month period after commencing treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
36 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Is between the ages of 18 and 36 months at the time of Screening visit 1 Has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf IgE-mediated allergy to 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut, confirmed by: Nut 1 pre-screening: For at least one of almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut (Nut 1)*: History of ingestion with IgE-mediated reaction (birth to present) AND History of SPT ≥3mm OR History of sIgE ≥0.35 number of kilounits per liter (KuL) AND Nut 2 pre-screening: For a second nut out of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut (Nut 2): History of SPT ≥3mm OR History sIgE ≥0.35 KuL In clinic screening: Participants meeting pre-screening criteria for Nuts 1 and 2 above will be invited for in-clinic screening SPT: wheal size ≥3mm at Visit 1 for 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut AND OFC: react to ≤3000 mg protein top dose (4449 mg cumulative) in open, single nut OFC for 2 of peanut, almond, cashew, hazelnut or walnut OFC not needed if: History of failed OFC within past 3 months (confirmed by investigator review of discharge summary) OR History of anaphylaxis after ingestion within past 3 months based on investigator judgement +/- review of ER/Ambulance/medical notes *Peanut is not included as Nut 1 to reduce the incidence of screening children with a peanut allergy only - children with peanut allergy may have been advised to avoid all other nuts. We require children to have eaten and reacted to at least one tree nut, and then the 2nd nut, which children may or may not have eaten, can be peanut or a tree nut. Exclusion Criteria: History of severe anaphylaxis (as defined by persistent hypotension, collapse, loss of consciousness, persistent hypoxia or ever needing more than 2 doses of intramuscular adrenaline or an intravenous adrenaline infusion for management of an allergic reaction) Severe anaphylaxis at study screening OFC (defined as persistent hypotension, collapse, loss of consciousness, persistent hypoxia, or requiring more than 2 doses of intramuscular adrenaline or an intravenous adrenaline infusion for management of an allergic reaction) Fails either screening OFC on dose 1 (0.5 mg). Underlying medical conditions that increase the risks associated with anaphylaxis (e.g., cardiac disease or poorly controlled asthma (defined below)) Confirmed eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) or history indicating EoE Current use of beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors Receiving systemic immunomodulatory treatment Not commenced or unable to eat solid food Weight <7.5kgs (recommended minimum weight for EpiPen Jr (adrenaline autoinjector)) Has a sibling in the study Defining uncontrolled asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma. Asthma management and prevention for adults and children older than 5 years) In the past 4 weeks, has the patient had: Daytime symptoms more than twice/week? Any night waking due to asthma? Short Acting Beta Agonist (SABA) reliever needed more than twice/week? Any activity limitation due to asthma? Uncontrolled - answered yes to 3-4 of these
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kirsten Perrett, MBBS FRACP
Phone
039936
Ext
6278
Email
kirsten.perrett@rch.org.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Megan Mathers, BAppSci(Hon)
Phone
039936
Ext
6029
Email
megan.mathers@mcri.edu.au
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirsten Perrett, MBBS FRACP
Organizational Affiliation
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
City
Parkville
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3052
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirsten Perrett, MBBS FRACP
Phone
039936
Ext
6278
Email
kirsten.perrett@rch.org.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirsten Perrett, MBBS FRACP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Catherine Hornung, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paxton Loke, MBBS FRACP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tim Brettig, MBBS FRACP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dean Tey, MBBS FRACP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vicki McWilliam, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Koplin, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Lee, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel Peters, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marnie Robinson, MBBS FRACP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Dalziel, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thanh Dang, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wendy Norton, MBBS FRACP

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The de-identified data set that will be collected for this analysis of the LMNOP trial will be available six months after publication of the primary outcome. The study protocol may be obtained from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Prior to releasing any data, the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties; the LMNOP trial investigators must see and approve the analysis plan describing how the data will be analysed; there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment; and any additional costs involved must be covered. Should the study investigators be unavailable, this role is delegated to the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Data will only be shared with a recognised research institute, which has approved the proposed analysis plan.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Six months after the publication of the primary outcome
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Prior to releasing any data, the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties; the LMNOP trial investigators must see and approve the analysis plan describing how the data will be analysed; there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment; and any additional costs involved must be covered.

Learn more about this trial

Low Dose Multi-Nut Oral Immunotherapy in Pre-schoolers With a Multi-Nut Allergy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs