search
Back to results

Low Energy Shockwave Therapy for Improving Erectile Dysfunction (Shock-ED)

Primary Purpose

Erectile Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pre-inclusion questionnaires
1 month of PDE5i treatment
PDE5i follow-up questionnaires
Inclusion questionnaires
4 weekly LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device
4 weekly sham LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device
Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 1
Follow-up questionnaires 3 months after Wave 1
8 bi-weekly LIESWT (Wave 2) with the RENOVA device
Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 2
Questionnaires via postal mail
Final follow-up questionnaires 12 months after Wave 2
Sponsored by
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Erectile Dysfunction

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 79 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has been correctly informed about the study.
  • The patient must have given his informed and signed consent.
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.
  • The patient is a man between 18 and 80 years of age. (≥18 years and < 80 years)
  • The patient has been in a stable sexual relationship for over 3 months
  • The patient is consulting for erectile dysfunction lasting for over 6 months
  • IIEF-EF6 score between 6 and 25
  • Patients have at least a natural tumescence during sexual stimulation (EHS score ≥ 1)
  • Pre-inclusion: Patient is willing to have 4 weeks of PDE5i treatment at the beginning of the trial, and then stop all treatment for an additional month.
  • Pre-inclusion: The patient agrees to try to engage at least 3 sexual intercourses per month during this period
  • Inclusion: Patient has completed 4 weeks of PDE5i treatment, and then stopped all treatment for an additional month.
  • Patient is available for a follow up of 19 months (at time of pre-inclusion and then 17 months at time of inclusion)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another interventional study
  • Within the past three months, the patient has participated in another interventional study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection
  • The patient is an adult under guardianship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • Complete anerection
  • History of pelvic cancer surgery (radical prostatectomy, cystectomy, abdominoperineal resection of the rectum)
  • Untreated testosterone deficiency
  • Neurological disease affecting the central nervous system
  • Untreated psychiatric disease, or psychiatric disease that may compromise study participation
  • Anatomical malformation of the penis considered by the investigator as being able to prevent vaginal penetration
  • Chronic haematological pathology associated with risk of haemorrhage
  • Oral or injectable antiandrogen treatment
  • The patient is taking blood thinners AND/OR has an International Normalized Ratio >3
  • Known allergy to treatments used in the study (e.g. Cialis, gel)

Exclusion criteria: The patient has contraindications for Cialis as mentioned in the SPC, re-given here :

  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1 of the SPC.
  • In clinical studies, tadalafil was shown to augment the hypotensive effects of nitrates. This is thought to result from the combined effects of nitrates and tadalafil on the nitric oxide/cGMP pathway. Therefore, administration of CIALIS to patients who are using any form of organic nitrate is contraindicated. (see section 4.5 of the SPC).
  • CIALIS, must not be used in men with cardiac disease for whom sexual activity is inadvisable. Physicians should consider the potential cardiac risk of sexual activity in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease.
  • The following groups of patients with cardiovascular disease were not included in clinical trials and the use of tadalafil is therefore contraindicated:
  • patients with myocardial infarction within the last 90 days,
  • patients with unstable angina or angina occurring during sexual intercourse,
  • patients with New York Heart Association Class 2 or greater heart failure in the last 6 months,
  • patients with uncontrolled arrhythmias, hypotension (< 90/50 mm Hg), or uncontrolled
  • uncontrolled hypertension,
  • patients with a stroke within the last 6 months.
  • CIALIS is contraindicated in patients who have loss of vision in one eye because of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), regardless of whether this episode was in connection or not with previous PDE5 inhibitor exposure (see section 4.4 of the SPC).

Sites / Locations

  • CHU de Bordeax - Hôpital Pellegrin
  • APHP - Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré
  • Clinique Beau Soleil
  • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
  • CHU de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

LIESWT arm

Sham arm

Arm Description

Patients randomized to this arm will have two sequences of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (LIESWT). Interventions: Pre-inclusion questionnaires; 1 month of PDE5i treatment; PDE5i follow-up questionnaires; Inclusion questionnaires; 4 weekly LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 1; Follow-up questionnaires 3 months after Wave 1; 8 bi-weekly LIESWT (Wave 2) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 2; Questionnaires via postal mail; Final follow-up questionnaires 12 months after Wave 2.

Patients randomized to this arm will have one sequence of sham Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and then three months later one sequence of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy. Interventions: Pre-inclusion questionnaires; 1 month of PDE5i treatment; PDE5i follow-up questionnaires; Inclusion questionnaires; 4 weekly sham LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 1; Follow-up questionnaires 3 months after Wave 1; 8 bi-weekly LIESWT (Wave 2) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 2; Questionnaires via postal mail; Final follow-up questionnaires 12 months after Wave 2.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in IIEF-EF score

Secondary Outcome Measures

% patients with improvement
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
% patients with improvement
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
% patients with improvement
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
% patients with improvement
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
% patients with improvement
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
Change in IIEF-EF score
Change in IIEF-EF score from baseline
Change in IIEF-EF score from baseline
Change in IIEF-EF score from baseline
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in EHS
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Immediately after treatment session.
The number of patients with other complications
Any other complications that might occur throughout the study (very few are listed in the literature).

Full Information

First Posted
November 20, 2014
Last Updated
August 3, 2020
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02304679
Brief Title
Low Energy Shockwave Therapy for Improving Erectile Dysfunction
Acronym
Shock-ED
Official Title
The Effectiveness of Low Energy Shockwave Therapy for Improving Erectile Dysfunction in Men: a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 21, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 22, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the change from baseline in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) scores in patients receiving 4 weekly treatments of shockwave therapy versus those receiving a sham treatment. The change will be evaluated at 3 months after the end of a sequence of 4 weekly treatments.
Detailed Description
The secondary objectives of this study are: A. To evaluate erectile function (EF) categorical improvement in patients receiving 4 weekly treatments of shockwave therapy versus those receiving a sham treatment, at 3 months after a first sequence of treatment. B. To compare improvements in erectile function between 4 weeks of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) use and 4 weekly treatments of shockwave therapy ("within patient" effect). C. To compare improvements in erectile function between 4 weeks of PDE5 inhibitor use and 4 weekly treatments of sham shock wave therapy ("within patient" effect). D. To evaluate the effect of a 2nd sequence of 4-8 weekly shock wave treatments 3 months after this second sequence. E. To evaluate treatment effects (the same comparisons as in objectives A, B, C, D) on other validated measure of EF (question 2 of the sexual encounter profile (SEP2), question 3 of the sexual encounter profile (SEP3), Global Assessment Question (GAQ), Erection Hardness Scale (EHS)), and the remaining domains of the IIEF score (orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, overall satisfaction), as well as the total IIEF score. F. To evaluate treatment tolerance and potential adverse events. G. To compare changes in EF measures over time for a follow-up period of 12 months following the second sequence of 4 weekly shock wave treatments. H. To compare the effect of a sequence of 4 weekly shock wave treatments versus 8 biweekly shock wave treatments 3 months after the treatment ("within patient" effect).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Erectile Dysfunction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
154 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
LIESWT arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to this arm will have two sequences of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (LIESWT). Interventions: Pre-inclusion questionnaires; 1 month of PDE5i treatment; PDE5i follow-up questionnaires; Inclusion questionnaires; 4 weekly LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 1; Follow-up questionnaires 3 months after Wave 1; 8 bi-weekly LIESWT (Wave 2) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 2; Questionnaires via postal mail; Final follow-up questionnaires 12 months after Wave 2.
Arm Title
Sham arm
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to this arm will have one sequence of sham Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and then three months later one sequence of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy. Interventions: Pre-inclusion questionnaires; 1 month of PDE5i treatment; PDE5i follow-up questionnaires; Inclusion questionnaires; 4 weekly sham LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 1; Follow-up questionnaires 3 months after Wave 1; 8 bi-weekly LIESWT (Wave 2) with the RENOVA device; Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 2; Questionnaires via postal mail; Final follow-up questionnaires 12 months after Wave 2.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Pre-inclusion questionnaires
Intervention Description
(Month -2) During this visit, the investigator will: Validate the patient's inclusion and exclusion criteria; Obtain informed consent from the patient; Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope in order to respect patient confidentiality. Prescribe 1 month of PDE5i treatment. The next visit will be scheduled
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
1 month of PDE5i treatment
Intervention Description
5 mg Tadalafil per day for 1 month
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
PDE5i follow-up questionnaires
Intervention Description
(Month -1) During this visit the investigator will: Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope in order to respect patient confidentiality. Perform a clinical exam; particular attention is given to the recording of complications / adverse events. Remind the patient that over the next 4 weeks he is not to take any treatments for his condition (wash-out period). The next visit will be scheduled
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Inclusion questionnaires
Intervention Description
(Day 0) During this visit the investigator will: Verify inclusion and exclusion criteria, and proceed with final inclusion Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope in order to respect patient confidentiality. Perform a clinical exam; particular attention is given to the recording of complications / adverse events. Randomize the patient at the end of the visit The patient will go home with a calendar specifying the time and place of the various visits. The patient should have four weekly LIESWT or sham sessions within the next month. The first session may take place the same day and immediately after the present visit.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
4 weekly LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device
Intervention Description
Following final inclusion, patients will have weekly LIESWT sessions (one session per week for four weeks). Particular attention is given to the recording of complications/adverse events. At the end of each session, the patient is asked to evaluate the level of pain that occurred during the session using a visual analog scale.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
4 weekly sham LIESWT (Wave 1) with the RENOVA device
Intervention Description
Following final inclusion, patients will have weekly sham LIESWT sessions (one session per week for four weeks). Particular attention is given to the recording of complications/adverse events. At the end of each session, the patient is asked to evaluate the level of pain that occurred during the session using a visual analog scale.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 1
Intervention Description
(Month 2) During this visit the investigator will: Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope. Perform a clinical exam; particular attention is given to the recording of complications / adverse events.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Follow-up questionnaires 3 months after Wave 1
Intervention Description
(Month 4) During this visit the investigator will: Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope. Perform a clinical exam; particular attention is given to the recording of complications / adverse events. The patient should have four weekly LIESWT sessions within the next month. The first session may take place the same day and immediately after the present visit.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
8 bi-weekly LIESWT (Wave 2) with the RENOVA device
Intervention Description
During the 5th month following final inclusion, all patients will have bi-weekly LIESWT sessions. These will occur twice per week for four consecutive weeks. Particular attention is given to the recording of complications/adverse events. At the end of each session, the patient is asked to evaluate the level of pain that occurred during the session using a visual analog scale.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Follow-up questionnaires 1 month after Wave 2
Intervention Description
(Month 6) During this visit the investigator will: Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope. Perform a clinical exam; particular attention is given to the recording of complications / adverse events.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaires via postal mail
Intervention Description
Eight, 11, and 14 months after final inclusion, corresponding to 3, 6 and 9 months following Wave 2, the IIEF, SEP2, SEP3, GAQ and EHS questionnaires will be sent to patients via postal mail.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Final follow-up questionnaires 12 months after Wave 2
Intervention Description
(Month 17) During this visit the investigator will: Have the patient fill out the IIEF, SEP-2, SEP-3, EHS and GAQ questionnaires. Responses are place and sealed in a specifically provided envelope. Perform a clinical exam; particular attention is given to the recording of complications / adverse events.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in IIEF-EF score
Time Frame
Month 0 versus Month 4
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
% patients with improvement
Description
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus Month 4
Title
% patients with improvement
Description
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
Time Frame
Month -2 versus Month -1
Title
% patients with improvement
Description
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus Month 2
Title
% patients with improvement
Description
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus Month 8
Title
% patients with improvement
Description
The presence/absence of improvement in erectile function as compared to baseline. Improvement in erectile function is defined as a >2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction, >5 points for moderate erectile dysfunction and >7 points for severe erectile dysfunction(Rosen et al. 2011)
Time Frame
Month 4 versus Month 8
Title
Change in IIEF-EF score
Time Frame
Change between month -2 and month -1
Title
Change in IIEF-EF score from baseline
Time Frame
Change between month 0 and month 2
Title
Change in IIEF-EF score from baseline
Time Frame
Change between month 0 and month 8
Title
Change in IIEF-EF score from baseline
Time Frame
Change between month 4 and month 8
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 4
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month -2 versus month -1
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 2
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 8
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 6
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 11
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 14
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP2
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 17
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 4
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month -2 versus month -1
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 2
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 8
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 6
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 11
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 14
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the SEP3
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 17
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 4
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month -2 versus month -1
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 2
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 8
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 6
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 11
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 14
Title
% patients answering "yes" to the GAQ
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 17
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 4
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month -2 versus month -1
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 2
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 8
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 6
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 11
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 14
Title
Change in EHS
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 17
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 4
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month -2 versus month -1
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 2
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 8
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 6
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 11
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 14
Title
Change in IIEF score (including subscores)
Time Frame
Month 0 versus month 17
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Week 1
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Week 2
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Week 3
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Month 5, week 1
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Month 5, week 2
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Month 5, week 3
Title
Visual analog scale for pain during treatment
Description
Immediately after treatment session.
Time Frame
Month 5, week 4
Title
The number of patients with other complications
Description
Any other complications that might occur throughout the study (very few are listed in the literature).
Time Frame
Month 17

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
79 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient has been correctly informed about the study. The patient must have given his informed and signed consent. The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan. The patient is a man between 18 and 80 years of age. (≥18 years and < 80 years) The patient has been in a stable sexual relationship for over 3 months The patient is consulting for erectile dysfunction lasting for over 6 months IIEF-EF6 score between 6 and 25 Patients have at least a natural tumescence during sexual stimulation (EHS score ≥ 1) Pre-inclusion: Patient is willing to have 4 weeks of PDE5i treatment at the beginning of the trial, and then stop all treatment for an additional month. Pre-inclusion: The patient agrees to try to engage at least 3 sexual intercourses per month during this period Inclusion: Patient has completed 4 weeks of PDE5i treatment, and then stopped all treatment for an additional month. Patient is available for a follow up of 19 months (at time of pre-inclusion and then 17 months at time of inclusion) Exclusion Criteria: The patient is participating in another interventional study Within the past three months, the patient has participated in another interventional study The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study The patient is under judicial protection The patient is an adult under guardianship The patient refuses to sign the consent It is impossible to correctly inform the patient Complete anerection History of pelvic cancer surgery (radical prostatectomy, cystectomy, abdominoperineal resection of the rectum) Untreated testosterone deficiency Neurological disease affecting the central nervous system Untreated psychiatric disease, or psychiatric disease that may compromise study participation Anatomical malformation of the penis considered by the investigator as being able to prevent vaginal penetration Chronic haematological pathology associated with risk of haemorrhage Oral or injectable antiandrogen treatment The patient is taking blood thinners AND/OR has an International Normalized Ratio >3 Known allergy to treatments used in the study (e.g. Cialis, gel) Exclusion criteria: The patient has contraindications for Cialis as mentioned in the SPC, re-given here : Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1 of the SPC. In clinical studies, tadalafil was shown to augment the hypotensive effects of nitrates. This is thought to result from the combined effects of nitrates and tadalafil on the nitric oxide/cGMP pathway. Therefore, administration of CIALIS to patients who are using any form of organic nitrate is contraindicated. (see section 4.5 of the SPC). CIALIS, must not be used in men with cardiac disease for whom sexual activity is inadvisable. Physicians should consider the potential cardiac risk of sexual activity in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. The following groups of patients with cardiovascular disease were not included in clinical trials and the use of tadalafil is therefore contraindicated: patients with myocardial infarction within the last 90 days, patients with unstable angina or angina occurring during sexual intercourse, patients with New York Heart Association Class 2 or greater heart failure in the last 6 months, patients with uncontrolled arrhythmias, hypotension (< 90/50 mm Hg), or uncontrolled uncontrolled hypertension, patients with a stroke within the last 6 months. CIALIS is contraindicated in patients who have loss of vision in one eye because of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), regardless of whether this episode was in connection or not with previous PDE5 inhibitor exposure (see section 4.4 of the SPC).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stéphane Droupy, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU de Bordeax - Hôpital Pellegrin
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33000
Country
France
Facility Name
APHP - Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré
City
Garches
ZIP/Postal Code
92380
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Beau Soleil
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34070
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
City
Nîmes Cedex 09
ZIP/Postal Code
30029
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
City
Pierre Benite
ZIP/Postal Code
69310
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Low Energy Shockwave Therapy for Improving Erectile Dysfunction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs