search
Back to results

Low or High Ligation of the IMA With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery

Primary Purpose

Rectal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection
High ligation
Sponsored by
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring Rectal Cancer, Inferior Mesenteric Artery, Ligation, Apical Lymph Nodes, Laparoscopy, IMA Types

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathology shows rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma
  • The bottom edge of tumor to anuas is less than 15cm
  • The clinical staging of tumor by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) within T2-4 or N1-2
  • Receive or not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil before surgery
  • Racial resection in available after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • No metastasis evidence was found
  • Annual preservation surgery is available
  • Tolerate to general anesthesia
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status score between 0 and 1
  • Patients and general anesthesia can understand the clinical trail well and are willing to take part in

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suffer with other carcinoma synchronous or metachronous in 5 years
  • Multiple primary colon carcinoma
  • Radiation therapy was performed before surgery
  • History of colorectal surgery
  • Combine with acute intestinal obstruction, intestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation and emergency surgery is needed
  • Multiple organs resection surgery is needed
  • Abdominal perineal resection is performed
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists score stage IV to V
  • Pregnant, suckling period or reject to contraception
  • Severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infection or other severe complication
  • Severe mental illness
  • Unable to go through the treatment because of family, society or regional condition
  • Refuse to take part in the trail

Sites / Locations

  • The sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection

High ligation

Arm Description

Left colic artery (LCA) is identified according to the CT 3D-reconstruction, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, preserved LCA while low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed. Lymphadenectomy to the apical lymph nodes (No.253)is performed around the IMA until 2 cm from the aorta. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.

Open the peritoneum proceeds cephalad towards the duodenojejunal angle of Treitz, and the mesenteric root is incised 1 cm below the inferior margin of the pancreas. The aortomesenteric window is opened wide and the inferior mesenteric vessels are exposed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

5-years overall survival rate
5-years overall survival rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

5-years disease free survival rate
5-years disease free survival rate
1-year overall survival rate
1-year overall survival rate
1-year disease free survival rate
1-year disease free survival rate
Anastomosis leakage rate
anastomosis leakage rate after surgery, acute or chronic
Apical Lymph Nodes (LN) Positive Rate
Apical Lymph Nodes Positive Rate, No.253 LN
Operation Time
Blood loss during operation
Complication incident rate of surgery
conversion rate to laparotomy
Identification of IMA perfusion type before surgery
Identification of lymph node metastasis by CT
Mortality rate in 30 days after surgery
Recovery time after surgery
White cell level
C-reaction protein level
Albumin level
Anastomosis bleeding rate after surgery
Anastomosis stenosis rate after surgery
Intestinal dysfunction after stoma closure
Anus function after surgery
Life quality scoring
Bladder residual urine volume
Sexual function scoring

Full Information

First Posted
December 31, 2016
Last Updated
January 11, 2017
Sponsor
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03013153
Brief Title
Low or High Ligation of the IMA With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery
Official Title
Low or High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial (LAND)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Laparoscopy colon surgery is accepted worldwide in the recent years. But there is still argument on the effect of laparoscopy rectal surgery. Laparoscopy has advantages on showing the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), protection of autonomic nerve, low rectal anastomosis, and total mesorectum excision. However, debate on the level of IMA ligation and debonding of splenic flexure never ends. This study is going to give a clear and definite answer to how and why surgeons should deal with the IMA in laparoscopy rectal surgery,base on the 3D reconstruction of IMA and identification of IMA perfusion types.
Detailed Description
According to the report of World Health Organization 2015, the morbility and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) are rising all over the world. Although the technique gets great approval in CRC surgical treatment in the recent years, such as TME protocol, neoadjuvant and laparoscopy technique, the complication of anastomosis leakage and nerve damage are still to be solved. Laparoscopy colon surgery is accepted worldwide in the recent years. But there is still argument on the effect of laparoscopy rectal surgery. Laparoscopy has advantages on showing the inferior mesenteric artery, protection of autonomic nerve, low rectal anastomosis, and total mesorectum excision. However, debate on where is the best level of IMA ligation and whether splenic flexure be debonded never ends. This study is going to give a clear and definite answer to how and why surgeons should deal with the IMA in laparoscopy rectal surgery. The ligation level of IMA affects on hypogastric and pelvic nerve, leads to disorder of sexual and urination functions. What's more, it also have affection on the apical lymph node (No.253) harvesting and the blood supplement of proximal colon. Former studies have proved that the blood supplement and tension of anastomosis leads to leakage after surgery. Meanwhile, the ligation level of IMA is the key point on it. The former study comes from the sixth affiliated hospital found that the mistake of ligation level of IMA happened because of the poor touching and explosion with laparoscopy. The distance from the root of IMA to left colic artery (DRL) vary between 19mm and 64mm. When surgeon made mistake during ligation, it led to the insufficient resection of apical lymph node. Further more, affect the long-term survival. Besides, there are 4 different types of IMA according to the relationship between the left colic artery, sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery. These branches will confuse surgeon on how to deal with them. 3D reconstruction of abdominal pelvic CT is able to show the length of DRL, IMA types and apical lymph nodes clearly. With these technique, the investigators can preserve the left colic artery and resect apical lymph nodes precisely. In the past studies, high or low ligation takes advantage on both side. But none of them comes from retrospective clinical trail. Some author believe that high ligation do better in resection of apical lymph nodes, release the tension of anastomosis, providing precise tumor staging. On the other side, some authors consider that high ligation may cut down blood supplement, rise the incident of anastomosis leakage (AL). so they prefer low ligation to the high. Some studies show that there are no long term survival difference between high and low ligation on IMA in laparoscopy rectal resection. So whether high ligation is necessary, still to be proved. For local advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can lesson tumor size, reduce recurrence, preserve annual better and rise long-term survival. National Comprehensive Cancer Network command chemotherapy before surgery (Total Mesorectal Excision TME) as the standard for rectal cancer since 2005. Another randomized controlled trial (RCT) named Neoadjuvant FOLFOX6 Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation in Rectal Cancer (FOWARC) NCT01211210 has proved the recent positive result. In those cases, the positive metastasis apical lymph node appeared in less than 5% (5/116) cases. On the other side, the incident of AL was up to 7% (8/116) . This phenomenon discover that maybe low ligation with apical lymph nodes dissection can get the same treatment effect and decrease AL from happening.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
Keywords
Rectal Cancer, Inferior Mesenteric Artery, Ligation, Apical Lymph Nodes, Laparoscopy, IMA Types

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
748 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Left colic artery (LCA) is identified according to the CT 3D-reconstruction, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, preserved LCA while low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed. Lymphadenectomy to the apical lymph nodes (No.253)is performed around the IMA until 2 cm from the aorta. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.
Arm Title
High ligation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Open the peritoneum proceeds cephalad towards the duodenojejunal angle of Treitz, and the mesenteric root is incised 1 cm below the inferior margin of the pancreas. The aortomesenteric window is opened wide and the inferior mesenteric vessels are exposed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection
Other Intervention Name(s)
LAND
Intervention Description
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection (LAND). Left colic artery (LCA) is identified according to the CT 3D-reconstruction, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, preserved LCA while low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed. Lymphadenectomy to the apical lymph nodes (No.253)is performed around the IMA until 2 cm from the aorta.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
High ligation
Other Intervention Name(s)
HL
Intervention Description
High ligation (HL) Open the peritoneum proceeds cephalad towards the duodenojejunal angle of Treitz, and the mesenteric root is incised 1 cm below the inferior margin of the pancreas. The aortomesenteric window is opened wide and the inferior mesenteric vessels are exposed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
5-years overall survival rate
Description
5-years overall survival rate
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
5-years disease free survival rate
Description
5-years disease free survival rate
Time Frame
5 years
Title
1-year overall survival rate
Description
1-year overall survival rate
Time Frame
1 year
Title
1-year disease free survival rate
Description
1-year disease free survival rate
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Anastomosis leakage rate
Description
anastomosis leakage rate after surgery, acute or chronic
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Apical Lymph Nodes (LN) Positive Rate
Description
Apical Lymph Nodes Positive Rate, No.253 LN
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Operation Time
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Blood loss during operation
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Complication incident rate of surgery
Time Frame
1 day
Title
conversion rate to laparotomy
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Identification of IMA perfusion type before surgery
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Identification of lymph node metastasis by CT
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Mortality rate in 30 days after surgery
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Recovery time after surgery
Time Frame
60 days
Title
White cell level
Time Frame
7 days
Title
C-reaction protein level
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Albumin level
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Anastomosis bleeding rate after surgery
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Anastomosis stenosis rate after surgery
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Intestinal dysfunction after stoma closure
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Anus function after surgery
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Life quality scoring
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Bladder residual urine volume
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Sexual function scoring
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Pathology shows rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma The bottom edge of tumor to anuas is less than 15cm The clinical staging of tumor by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) within T2-4 or N1-2 Receive or not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil before surgery Racial resection in available after neoadjuvant chemotherapy No metastasis evidence was found Annual preservation surgery is available Tolerate to general anesthesia Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status score between 0 and 1 Patients and general anesthesia can understand the clinical trail well and are willing to take part in Exclusion Criteria: Suffer with other carcinoma synchronous or metachronous in 5 years Multiple primary colon carcinoma Radiation therapy was performed before surgery History of colorectal surgery Combine with acute intestinal obstruction, intestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation and emergency surgery is needed Multiple organs resection surgery is needed Abdominal perineal resection is performed American Society of Anesthesiologists score stage IV to V Pregnant, suckling period or reject to contraception Severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infection or other severe complication Severe mental illness Unable to go through the treatment because of family, society or regional condition Refuse to take part in the trail
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jiaming Zhou, MD
Phone
+8613560031075
Email
cysums03@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Meijin Huang, MD
Phone
+8613924073322
Email
13924073322@139.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meijin Huang, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The sixth affiliated hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
510655
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meijin Huang, MD
Phone
+8613924073322
Email
13924073322@139.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiaming Zhou, MD
Phone
+8613560031075
Email
cysums03@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiaping Wang, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meijin Huang, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiaming Zhou, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25623323
Citation
Mari G, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Miranda A, Rigamonti L, Crippa J, Magistro C, Di Lernia S, Forgione A, Carnevali P, Nichelatti M, Carzaniga P, Valenti F, Rovagnati M, Berselli M, Cocozza E, Livraghi L, Origi M, Scandroglio I, Roscio F, De Luca A, Ferrari G, Pugliese R. "High or low Inferior Mesenteric Artery ligation in Laparoscopic low Anterior Resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial" (HIGHLOW trial). Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0537-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25851151
Citation
Bostrom P, Haapamaki MM, Matthiessen P, Ljung R, Rutegard J, Rutegard M. High arterial ligation and risk of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):1018-27. doi: 10.1111/codi.12971.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26042185
Citation
Tanaka J, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Kiyomatsu T, Hata K, Kawai K, Kazama S, Nozawa H, Yamaguchi H, Ishihara S, Sunami E, Kitayama J, Watanabe T. Analysis of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: A case-control study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 May 11;4(2):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.05.002. eCollection 2015 Jun.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25132419
Citation
Dauser B, Herbst F. Diagnosis, management and outcome of early anastomotic leakage following colorectal anastomosis using a compression device: is it different? Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;16(12):O435-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12742.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
13363265
Citation
GRIFFITHS JD. Surgical anatomy of the blood supply of the distal colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1956 Oct;19(4):241-56. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22733197
Citation
Masoni L, Mari FS, Nigri G, Favi F, Gasparrini M, Dall'Oglio A, Pindozzi F, Pancaldi A, Brescia A. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2420-3. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23052748
Citation
Hida J, Okuno K. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2013 Jan;43(1):8-19. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0359-6. Epub 2012 Oct 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25585080
Citation
Murono K, Kawai K, Kazama S, Ishihara S, Yamaguchi H, Sunami E, Kitayama J, Watanabe T. Anatomy of the inferior mesenteric artery evaluated using 3-dimensional CT angiography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):214-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000285.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17082922
Citation
Seike K, Koda K, Saito N, Oda K, Kosugi C, Shimizu K, Miyazaki M. Laser Doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jun;22(6):689-97. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0221-7. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24135762
Citation
Battal B, Hamcan S, Akgun V, Bozkurt Y. Congenital superior-inferior mesenteric arterial variation or arc of Riolan due to occlusion of proximal superior mesenteric artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Apr;36(3):309-10. doi: 10.1007/s00276-013-1212-3. Epub 2013 Oct 18. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16365247
Citation
van Gulik TM, Schoots I. Anastomosis of Riolan revisited: the meandering mesenteric artery. Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1225-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1225.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24633578
Citation
Bertrand MM, Delmond L, Mazars R, Ripoche J, Macri F, Prudhomme M. Is low tie ligation truly reproducible in colorectal cancer surgery? Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric artery division branches. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):1057-62. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1281-y. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22968068
Citation
Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milsom JW. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):108-13. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23992097
Citation
Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA, Jayne DG. Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;16(2):95-109. doi: 10.1111/codi.12411.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25601556
Citation
Silberhumer GR, Paty PB, Temple LK, Araujo RL, Denton B, Gonen M, Nash GM, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Guillem J, Weiser MR, D'Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Wong DW, Fong Y. Simultaneous resection for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis is a safe procedure. Am J Surg. 2015 Jun;209(6):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16544225
Citation
Hadidi AT. A technique to improve vascularity in colon replacement of the esophagus. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Feb;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-923925.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18629764
Citation
Raboei EH, Luoma R. Colon patch esophagoplasty: an alternative to total esophagus replacement? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;18(4):230-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038396. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22770982
Citation
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Desiderio J, Vettoretto N, Parisi A, Boselli C, Noya G. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;21(3):e111-23. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23710555
Citation
Gervaz P, Platon A, Buchs NC, Rocher T, Perneger T, Poletti PA. CT scan-based modelling of anastomotic leak risk after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):1295-300. doi: 10.1111/codi.12305.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18560844
Citation
Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Wust AF, Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJ, van Tets WF. Radiological evaluation of colorectal anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Sep;23(9):863-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0487-z. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26131798
Citation
Hu X, Cheng Y. A Clinical Parameters-Based Model Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After a Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Large Study With Data From China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(26):e1003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25743996
Citation
Qu H, Liu Y, Bi DS. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3608-17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4117-x. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25775290
Citation
Majbar MA, Elmalki Hadj O, Souadka A, El Alaoui M, Sabbah F, Raiss M, Hrora A, Ahallat M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Tunis Med. 2014 Jul;92(7):493-6.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Low or High Ligation of the IMA With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs