search
Back to results

Lumbar Plexus and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks For Total Hip Replacement

Primary Purpose

Hip Osteoarthritis, Pain, Acute, Pain, Postoperative

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Chile
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
lumbar plexus block
suprainguinal fascia iliaca block
Sponsored by
University of Chile
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hip Osteoarthritis focused on measuring nerve block, fascia iliaca, hip replacement, lumbar plexus

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 80 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
  • Body mass index between 20 and 35 (kg/m2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are unable to give their own consent
  • Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
  • Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
  • Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) or morphine
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior surgery in the corresponding side of the lumbar o suprainguinal area
  • Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Lumbar plexus block

Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block

Arm Description

Patients randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block

Patients randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Morphine consumption over 24 hours
Total morphine consumption over 24 hours post block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Performance time
Interval between the start of skin disinfection and the end of local anesthetic injection
Number of needle passes
The initial needle insertion counted as the first pass. Any subsequent needle advancement that is preceded by a retraction of at least 10 mm counts as an additional pass
Postoperative static pain at 3 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative static pain at 6 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative static pain at 12 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative static pain at 24 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative dynamic pain at 3 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative dynamic pain at 6 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative dynamic pain at 12 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative dynamic pain at 24 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative static pain at 48 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Postoperative dynamic pain at 48 hours after block
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time until first morphine demand
Time until first patient-controlled analgesia morphine demand
Block assessment at 3 hours
Sensorimotor block assessed using a 10-point composite score evaluating sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves, and motor block of femoral and obturator nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice on then lateral, anterior and medial thigh using a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
Block assessment at 6 hours
Sensorimotor block assessed using a 10-point composite score evaluating sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves, and motor block of femoral and obturator nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice on then lateral, anterior and medial thigh using a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
Block assessment at 24 hours
Sensorimotor block assessed using a 10-point composite score evaluating sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves, and motor block of femoral and obturator nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice on then lateral, anterior and medial thigh using a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
Incidence of block related adverse events
Incidence of adverse events related to nerve block (vascular puncture, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, epidural spread)
Incidence of opioid related adverse events
Incidence of adverse events related to opioid use (nausea/vomiting, pruritus, somnolence, respiratory depression)
Incidence of Inability to perform physiotherapy
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to pain (score more than 4 in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points) or motor blockade.
Surgical duration
Time between skin incision and closure
Readiness to discharge
Days to be ready for discharge following physiotherapist criteria
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay after surgery

Full Information

First Posted
November 13, 2018
Last Updated
June 2, 2020
Sponsor
University of Chile
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03744065
Brief Title
Lumbar Plexus and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks For Total Hip Replacement
Official Title
A Randomized Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Plexus and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks For Total Hip Replacement Analgesia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 19, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 22, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 23, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Chile

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The nerves from lumbar plexus (LP) are the current target to achieve analgesia after a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Lumbar plexus block (LPB) is an alternative that provides optimal postoperative analgesia. However, many adverse effects and complications have been reported due to its proximity to vital structures. Because of these shortcomings, an alternative to block the LP nerves is required. In a recent trial suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SFIB) was reported to provide reliable analgesia in THA. SFIB may carry a lower risk profile, however, no study has compared the efficacy of LPB and SFIB in this setting. Thus, this randomized trial is set out to compare US guided LPB and SFIB for analgesia after THA. The hypothesis is that both blocks would result in similar postoperative opioid (morphine) consumption at 24 hours and, therefore, designed the study as an equivalence trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Pain, Acute, Pain, Postoperative, Opioid Use
Keywords
nerve block, fascia iliaca, hip replacement, lumbar plexus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lumbar plexus block
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block
Arm Title
Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
lumbar plexus block
Intervention Description
Injection with ultrasound guidance of 40 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with 5 micrograms of epinephrine per mL and dexamethasone 4 milligrams, in the posteromedial quadrant of psoas muscle
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
suprainguinal fascia iliaca block
Intervention Description
Injection with ultrasound guidance of 40 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with 5 micrograms of epinephrine per mL and dexamethasone 4 milligrams, underneath the fascia iliaca at the suprainguinal level
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Morphine consumption over 24 hours
Description
Total morphine consumption over 24 hours post block
Time Frame
24 hours post block
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance time
Description
Interval between the start of skin disinfection and the end of local anesthetic injection
Time Frame
2 hours after surgery
Title
Number of needle passes
Description
The initial needle insertion counted as the first pass. Any subsequent needle advancement that is preceded by a retraction of at least 10 mm counts as an additional pass
Time Frame
2 hours after surgery
Title
Postoperative static pain at 3 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
3 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative static pain at 6 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
6 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative static pain at 12 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
12 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative static pain at 24 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
24 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative dynamic pain at 3 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
3 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative dynamic pain at 6 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
6 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative dynamic pain at 12 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
12 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative dynamic pain at 24 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
24 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative static pain at 48 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
48 hours after the block
Title
Postoperative dynamic pain at 48 hours after block
Description
Pain evaluated in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points
Time Frame
48 hours after the block
Title
Time until first morphine demand
Description
Time until first patient-controlled analgesia morphine demand
Time Frame
48 hours after the block
Title
Block assessment at 3 hours
Description
Sensorimotor block assessed using a 10-point composite score evaluating sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves, and motor block of femoral and obturator nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice on then lateral, anterior and medial thigh using a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
Time Frame
3 hours after the block
Title
Block assessment at 6 hours
Description
Sensorimotor block assessed using a 10-point composite score evaluating sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves, and motor block of femoral and obturator nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice on then lateral, anterior and medial thigh using a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
Time Frame
6 hours after the block
Title
Block assessment at 24 hours
Description
Sensorimotor block assessed using a 10-point composite score evaluating sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves, and motor block of femoral and obturator nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice on then lateral, anterior and medial thigh using a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis.
Time Frame
24 hours after the block
Title
Incidence of block related adverse events
Description
Incidence of adverse events related to nerve block (vascular puncture, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, epidural spread)
Time Frame
3 hours after block
Title
Incidence of opioid related adverse events
Description
Incidence of adverse events related to opioid use (nausea/vomiting, pruritus, somnolence, respiratory depression)
Time Frame
48 hours after block
Title
Incidence of Inability to perform physiotherapy
Description
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to pain (score more than 4 in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points) or motor blockade.
Time Frame
24 hours after the block
Title
Surgical duration
Description
Time between skin incision and closure
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Readiness to discharge
Description
Days to be ready for discharge following physiotherapist criteria
Time Frame
4 days after surgery
Title
Length of hospital stay
Description
Length of hospital stay after surgery
Time Frame
7 days after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age between 18 and 80 years American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3 Body mass index between 20 and 35 (kg/m2) Exclusion Criteria: Adults who are unable to give their own consent Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination) Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50) Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100) Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100) Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) or morphine Pregnancy Prior surgery in the corresponding side of the lumbar o suprainguinal area Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniela Bravo, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Chile
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
City
Santiago
State/Province
Metropolitana
ZIP/Postal Code
8380456
Country
Chile

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17961837
Citation
Siddiqui ZI, Cepeda MS, Denman W, Schumann R, Carr DB. Continuous lumbar plexus block provides improved analgesia with fewer side effects compared with systemic opioids after hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9416746
Citation
Klein SM, D'Ercole F, Greengrass RA, Warner DS. Enoxaparin associated with psoas hematoma and lumbar plexopathy after lumbar plexus block. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1576-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00040. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8602680
Citation
Aida S, Takahashi H, Shimoji K. Renal subcapsular hematoma after lumbar plexus block. Anesthesiology. 1996 Feb;84(2):452-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199602000-00027. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15321930
Citation
Aveline C, Bonnet F. Delayed retroperitoneal haematoma after failed lumbar plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Oct;93(4):589-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh242. Epub 2004 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12552223
Citation
Weller RS, Gerancher JC, Crews JC, Wade KL. Extensive retroperitoneal hematoma without neurologic deficit in two patients who underwent lumbar plexus block and were later anticoagulated. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):581-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00044. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9750813
Citation
Gentili M, Aveline C, Bonnet F. [Total spinal anesthesia after posterior lumbar plexus block]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17(7):740-2. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(98)80112-3. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12717153
Citation
Pousman RM, Mansoor Z, Sciard D. Total spinal anesthetic after continuous posterior lumbar plexus block. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1281-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00034. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19468598
Citation
Duarte LT, Saraiva RA. [Total spinal block after posterior lumbar plexus blockade: case report.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2006 Oct;56(5):518-23. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942006000500010. Portuguese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24794455
Citation
Dogan Z, Bakan M, Idin K, Esen A, Uslu FB, Ozturk E. Total spinal block after lumbar plexus block: a case report. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):121-3. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18813048
Citation
Gadsden JC, Lindenmuth DM, Hadzic A, Xu D, Somasundarum L, Flisinski KA. Lumbar plexus block using high-pressure injection leads to contralateral and epidural spread. Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):683-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818631a7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12411815
Citation
Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, Ecoffey C, Falissard B, Mercier FJ, Bouaziz H, Samii K. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service. Anesthesiology. 2002 Nov;97(5):1274-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00034. Erratum In: Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):595. Mercier Frederic [corrected to Mercier Frederic J].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2589650
Citation
Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg. 1989 Dec;69(6):705-13. Erratum In: Anesth Analg 1990 Apr;70(4):474.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19258967
Citation
Dolan J, Williams A, Murney E, Smith M, Kenny GN. Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block: a comparison with the loss of resistance technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;33(6):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.03.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26767235
Citation
Kumar K, Pandey RK, Bhalla AP, Kashyap L, Garg R, Darlong V, Malhotra R, Yadav CS. Comparison of conventional infrainguinal versus modified proximal suprainguinal approach of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for postoperative analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2015;66(3):95-100.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21401544
Citation
Hebbard P, Ivanusic J, Sha S. Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block: a cadaveric evaluation of a novel approach. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06628.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28059869
Citation
Desmet M, Vermeylen K, Van Herreweghe I, Carlier L, Soetens F, Lambrecht S, Croes K, Pottel H, Van de Velde M. A Longitudinal Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Reduces Morphine Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):327-333. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000543.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26426575
Citation
Sauter AR, Ullensvang K, Niemi G, Lorentzen HT, Bendtsen TF, Borglum J, Pripp AH, Romundstad L. The Shamrock lumbar plexus block: A dose-finding study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):764-70. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000265.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29135692
Citation
Arnuntasupakul V, Chalachewa T, Leurcharusmee P, Tiyaprasertkul W, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Mar;35(3):224-230. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000736.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Lumbar Plexus and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks For Total Hip Replacement

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs