search
Back to results

Lung Impedance Monitoring In Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure (LIMIT-CHF)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Preset increase in frusemide dose
No intervention
Sponsored by
Barts & The London NHS Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previously fitted with an ICD or a CRT-D device for primary or secondary prevention (for at least 34 days) with a Medtronic Optivol capable Device
  • Previous hospital admission for decompensated heart failure
  • Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF <50%)
  • Currently compensated heart failure with a functional class of III or better
  • All patients will be on optimal medical treatment including a beta blocker, an ACEI (or ARB) and spironolactone unless contraindicated or not tolerated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decompensated patients who have NYHA class IV or clinical signs of lung congestion at time of evaluation (these patients may be included later if/when their NYHA class improves)
  • Patients with a high Optivol fluid index at time of evaluation (these patients may be included later when the Optivol fluid index comes down)
  • Patients with advanced renal failure ± dialysis (Chronic Kidney Disease class 4 or 5 with an estimated GFR of <30 ml/min)

Sites / Locations

  • St Bartholomew's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group 1: Optivol Group

Group 2: Optivol alarm muted

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The number of unplanned hospitalisations or acute unscheduled care in the emergency department or heart failure clinic
The primary study end-point will be a comparison between groups 1 and 2 regarding the ratio of the number of readmissions for heart failure to the total number of patients in each group of the two main groups over the course of the study (i.e. number of readmissions per patient)

Secondary Outcome Measures

NYHA functional Class improvement of at least 1 grade
The proportion of patients achieving at least 1 grade improvement in New York Heart Association functional class in each group
Minnesota Quality of Life Score improvement in each group
A comparison between the 2 study groups regarding the magnitude of improvement in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (questionnaire) score at 1 year compared to baseline
Change in the 6 minute walk test(6MWT)distance in metres
A comparison between the change in the 6MWT distance covered (at 1 year compared to baseline) in each of the 2 study groups
Change in the level of BNP in serum (pg/ml)
A comparison between between the 2 study groups regarding the change in level of BNP at 1 year compared to baseline

Full Information

First Posted
February 21, 2011
Last Updated
July 8, 2015
Sponsor
Barts & The London NHS Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01320007
Brief Title
Lung Impedance Monitoring In Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure
Acronym
LIMIT-CHF
Official Title
Lung Impedance Monitoring In Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Barts & The London NHS Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Heart failure is a major clinical problem that is increasing in magnitude and the cost of management of heart failure is escalating. A significant part of this cost is related to unplanned acute presentation to emergency departments and hospitalisation with worsening shortness of breath due to increased fluid content in the lungs. Many heart failure patients are already fitted with defibrillators to protect them from the risk of fast heart rhythms and sudden death and are followed up in both the heart failure clinics and defibrillator clinics. Recently some of the defibrillators fitted have been equipped with an extra function that can detect and warn of changes in the fluid content of the lungs very early even before the patient starts to complain of any shortness of breath and before any signs of fluid overload are seen clinically. However, it is not known how to deal with these warnings if they occur very early and it is not known whether a medical intervention at his stage is beneficial to prevent progression and eventual hospital admission. In the majority of cases, early warnings of this kind are ignored or this function is disabled at implantation of the device. The current study will involve patients who have already been fitted with a device with the above capability. The investigators will use the new function to guide management of these patients and compare their outcome with similar patients who are fitted with devices without it. The investigators will attempt to manage early warnings by a predetermined increase in medications in a group of patients and compare their clinical course to a similar group in whom no action is taken.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1: Optivol Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Group 2: Optivol alarm muted
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Preset increase in frusemide dose
Intervention Description
All patients in Group 1 will have the Optivol function and alerts switched on. Optivol levels will be downloaded monthly via the Medtronic Carelink Network (for those patients who have it) or during pacemaker follow up appointments. If the Optivol alarm goes off, all patients will be requested to contact a member of the research team by phone and those with rising Optivol (irrespective of the presence or absence of heart failure symptoms) will be requested to increase the dose of diuretic that they are on by 50% for 1 week then revert to their usual dose after 7 days. A routine renal function check will be performed at the end of the week.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
No intervention
Intervention Description
The Optivol data for these patients will be downloaded periodically (at each scheduled device check) and recorded but will not be available at follow up in the heart failure clinic.. These patients will act as controls for group 1 patients. They will undergo baseline investigations and then will undergo routine heart failure treatment and follow-up in the heart failure clinic. These will include a routine clinical evaluation, body weight and blood analysis as per the heart failure clinic protocol. Medications will be reviewed and changed according to clinical needs.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of unplanned hospitalisations or acute unscheduled care in the emergency department or heart failure clinic
Description
The primary study end-point will be a comparison between groups 1 and 2 regarding the ratio of the number of readmissions for heart failure to the total number of patients in each group of the two main groups over the course of the study (i.e. number of readmissions per patient)
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
NYHA functional Class improvement of at least 1 grade
Description
The proportion of patients achieving at least 1 grade improvement in New York Heart Association functional class in each group
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Minnesota Quality of Life Score improvement in each group
Description
A comparison between the 2 study groups regarding the magnitude of improvement in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (questionnaire) score at 1 year compared to baseline
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Change in the 6 minute walk test(6MWT)distance in metres
Description
A comparison between the change in the 6MWT distance covered (at 1 year compared to baseline) in each of the 2 study groups
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Change in the level of BNP in serum (pg/ml)
Description
A comparison between between the 2 study groups regarding the change in level of BNP at 1 year compared to baseline
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Previously fitted with an ICD or a CRT-D device for primary or secondary prevention (for at least 34 days) with a Medtronic Optivol capable Device Previous hospital admission for decompensated heart failure Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF <50%) Currently compensated heart failure with a functional class of III or better All patients will be on optimal medical treatment including a beta blocker, an ACEI (or ARB) and spironolactone unless contraindicated or not tolerated Exclusion Criteria: Decompensated patients who have NYHA class IV or clinical signs of lung congestion at time of evaluation (these patients may be included later if/when their NYHA class improves) Patients with a high Optivol fluid index at time of evaluation (these patients may be included later when the Optivol fluid index comes down) Patients with advanced renal failure ± dialysis (Chronic Kidney Disease class 4 or 5 with an estimated GFR of <30 ml/min)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard J Schilling, Md FRCP
Organizational Affiliation
Barts and the London NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St Bartholomew's Hospital
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
EC1A 7BE
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26683599
Citation
Domenichini G, Rahneva T, Diab IG, Dhillon OS, Campbell NG, Finlay MC, Baker V, Hunter RJ, Earley MJ, Schilling RJ. The lung impedance monitoring in treatment of chronic heart failure (the LIMIT-CHF study). Europace. 2016 Mar;18(3):428-35. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv293. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Lung Impedance Monitoring In Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs