search
Back to results

LV Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (ENDO-CRT)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement
Sponsored by
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy, Transseptal left ventricular endocardial lead

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than 18 years
  • NYHA class II-IV
  • LVEF ≤35%
  • QRS ≥120 milliseconds
  • Optimal tolerated medical therapy
  • Either unable to position an LV lead via the standard coronary sinus on CRT implantation
  • OR Recipient of a CRT-P or CRT-D system for greater than 6 months for standard indications AND limited improvement or worsened clinical status despite device optimisation
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life-expectancy less than 1 year due to concomitant, non-cardiovascular disorders
  • Previous atrial septal defect device closure.
  • Chronic renal dialysis and End stage liver disease
  • History of stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, Coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary stenting within the last 3 months
  • Presence of correctable valvular disease (aortic/mitral)
  • Mitral valve prosthesis.
  • Contra indication to vitamin K antagonist
  • Unresolved intra-cardiac thrombus
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Active Bi-ventricular Pacing

No Biventricular pacing

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test
Improvement in peak oxygen consumption

Secondary Outcome Measures

New NYHA Class
Change in New York Heart Association functional Class
6 minute walk
Change in 6 minute hall walk test distance
Quality of life
Minnesota Living with heart failure questionnaire score
Echocardiography
Change in size and function of the heart
Digital photoplethysmography
Cardiac output
Biochemical response
Change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) and NT pro BNP (N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) levels.
Composite cardiac assessment score
Change in composite assessment score made up of symptom, exercise tolerance, echocardiographic and biochemical parameters.

Full Information

First Posted
June 24, 2014
Last Updated
June 26, 2014
Sponsor
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02174289
Brief Title
LV Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
Acronym
ENDO-CRT
Official Title
A Randomised Double-blinded Cross Over Study to Evaluate the Improvement of Left Ventricular Systolic Failure Using Targeted Left Ventricular Endocardial Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for severe systolic heart failure with well documented benefits in symptom improvement and reduction of morbidity and mortality. However, upto 30% of patients do not respond to treatment despite fulfilling the recommended indications. Lack of clinical response may be the result of imperfect left ventricular lead placement in the veins around the heart with conventional techniques. Optimum lead placement may constrained by coronary venous anatomy and may overlie scarred heart muscle or may not be at the site of latest electrical depolarisation. In a further 10% of patients, conventional left ventricular lead placement is not possible for other technical reasons. Left ventricular endocardial lead placement may overcome the limitations and allow placement to be guided by echocardiography, electrical mapping and the pattern of heart muscle scarring. We aim to investigate if targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement improves exercise capacity, heart failure symptoms, heart function and size, heart pumping efficiency and biochemical markers of heart strain. Each parameter will be assessed independently and as part of a composite cardiac performance score. Patients with heart failure will be enrolled who require an endocardial left ventricular lead on clinical grounds as either conventional left ventricular lead implantation has technically failed or they have clinically non-responded to CRT.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure
Keywords
Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy, Transseptal left ventricular endocardial lead

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active Bi-ventricular Pacing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
No Biventricular pacing
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement
Intervention Description
The left ventricular endocardial lead will be passed through the intra-atrial septum
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test
Description
Improvement in peak oxygen consumption
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
New NYHA Class
Description
Change in New York Heart Association functional Class
Time Frame
3 months
Title
6 minute walk
Description
Change in 6 minute hall walk test distance
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Quality of life
Description
Minnesota Living with heart failure questionnaire score
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Echocardiography
Description
Change in size and function of the heart
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Digital photoplethysmography
Description
Cardiac output
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Biochemical response
Description
Change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) and NT pro BNP (N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) levels.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Composite cardiac assessment score
Description
Change in composite assessment score made up of symptom, exercise tolerance, echocardiographic and biochemical parameters.
Time Frame
3 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Freedom from adverse events
Description
Acute: Tamponade, effusion, systemic thromboembolism; acute lead displacement and arrhythmia Chronic: systemic thromboembolism; lead displacement, disfunction or fracture; device related systemic infection; bleeding; arrhythmia
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Medium term clinical outcomes
Description
Assess medium term response to treatment with regards to symptoms, exercise tolerance, echocardiographic and biochemical parameters (as specified above), particularly systemic thrombosis.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Targeting success
Description
Success at targeting the site which produces the greatest haemodynamic response using echocardiogaphic speckle tracking, endocardial electrical mapping and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
Time Frame
Intra operative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age greater than 18 years NYHA class II-IV LVEF ≤35% QRS ≥120 milliseconds Optimal tolerated medical therapy Either unable to position an LV lead via the standard coronary sinus on CRT implantation OR Recipient of a CRT-P or CRT-D system for greater than 6 months for standard indications AND limited improvement or worsened clinical status despite device optimisation Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Life-expectancy less than 1 year due to concomitant, non-cardiovascular disorders Previous atrial septal defect device closure. Chronic renal dialysis and End stage liver disease History of stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, Coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary stenting within the last 3 months Presence of correctable valvular disease (aortic/mitral) Mitral valve prosthesis. Contra indication to vitamin K antagonist Unresolved intra-cardiac thrombus Pregnancy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Charles Butcher, MBBS MRCP
Email
c.butcher@rbht.nhs.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom Wong, MD FESC
Organizational Affiliation
Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charles Butcher, MBBS MRCP
Email
c.butcher@rbht.nhs.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom Wong

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15753115
Citation
Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. Epub 2005 Mar 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22611136
Citation
McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-847. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104. Epub 2012 May 19. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2013 Jan;34(2):158.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17540662
Citation
Gras D, Bocker D, Lunati M, Wellens HJ, Calvert M, Freemantle N, Gervais R, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L, Erdmann E, Cleland JG, Daubert JC; CARE-HF Study Steering Committee and Investigators. Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems in the CARE-HF trial: procedural success rate and safety. Europace. 2007 Jul;9(7):516-22. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum080. Epub 2007 May 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9826866
Citation
Jais P, Douard H, Shah DC, Barold S, Barat JL, Clementy J. Endocardial biventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 1):2128-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01133.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17399634
Citation
van Gelder BM, Scheffer MG, Meijer A, Bracke FA. Transseptal endocardial left ventricular pacing: an alternative technique for coronary sinus lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Apr;4(4):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.023. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17704095
Citation
Nuta B, Lines I, MacIntyre I, Haywood GA. Biventricular ICD implant using endocardial LV lead placement from the left subclavian vein approach and transseptal puncture via the transfemoral route. Europace. 2007 Nov;9(11):1038-40. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum176. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11139915
Citation
Jais P, Takahashi A, Garrigue S, Yamane T, Hocini M, Shah DC, Barold SS, Deisenhofer I, Haissaguerre M, Clementy J. Mid-term follow-up of endocardial biventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1744-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07010.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20797490
Citation
Spragg DD, Dong J, Fetics BJ, Helm R, Marine JE, Cheng A, Henrikson CA, Kass DA, Berger RD. Optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22405632
Citation
Khan FZ, Virdee MS, Palmer CR, Pugh PJ, O'Halloran D, Elsik M, Read PA, Begley D, Fynn SP, Dutka DP. Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 24;59(17):1509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.030. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23476053
Citation
Saba S, Marek J, Schwartzman D, Jain S, Adelstein E, White P, Oyenuga OA, Onishi T, Soman P, Gorcsan J 3rd. Echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):427-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000078. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

LV Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs