search
Back to results

Lymphadenectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Ureteral Neoplasms

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy
Nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy
Sponsored by
Zealand University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ureteral Neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age above 18 years
  2. Locally advanced high grade urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter (Clinical stage > T1)
  3. Patient with ECOG performance score of 2 and less.
  4. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical suspicion of non-muscle invasive UUTUC
  2. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma for the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter
  3. Inability to understand written consent forms or give consent

Sites / Locations

  • Roskilde HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Nephroureterektomy

Nephroureterektomy + Lymphadenectomy

Arm Description

scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy

scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recurrence free survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of metastasis

Full Information

First Posted
November 15, 2015
Last Updated
September 16, 2021
Sponsor
Zealand University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02607709
Brief Title
Lymphadenectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma
Official Title
Lymphadenectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma in the Renal Pelvis and Ureter
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2032 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Zealand University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Two out of three tumours in the upper urinary tract are located in the renal pelvis. Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is probably more common among tumours in the upper urinary tract compared to tumours in the urinary bladder. Thus, muscle-invasive tumours represent approximately 45 % of renal pelvic tumours compared to 25 % of tumours within the urinary bladder. As in the bladder, lymph node metastases are rare in non-muscle invasive disease. Information regarding indications, extent and possible curative potential is currently lacking for lymphadenectomy in conjunction with nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract (UUTUC). There are, however, retrospective series with survival data for patients with lymph node metastasis that report long term survival after surgery as monotherapy [4] with similar survival proportions as in bladder cancer with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy. A retrospective study from Tokyo was expanded to the only available prospective study, where 68 patients with UUTUC were submitted to template-based lymphadenectomy. Another retrospective study by the same Japanese group, showed that 5-year cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the complete lymphadenectomy group than in the incomplete lymphadenectomy or without lymphadenectomy groups. Tanaka N et al. reported recurrence rate after nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy at 1 and 3 years were 18.9 and 29.8 %, respectively.
Detailed Description
Background: Two out of three tumours in the upper urinary tract are located in the renal pelvis. Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is probably more common among tumours in the upper urinary tract compared to tumours in the urinary bladder. Thus, muscle-invasive tumours represent approximately 45 % of renal pelvic tumours compared to 25 % of tumours within the urinary bladder. As in the bladder, lymph node metastases are rare in non-muscle invasive disease. Information regarding indications, extent and possible curative potential is currently lacking for lymphadenectomy in conjunction with nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract (UUTUC). There are, however, retrospective series with survival data for patients with lymph node metastasis that report long term survival after surgery as monotherapy with similar survival proportions as in bladder cancer with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy. A retrospective study from Tokyo was expanded to the only available prospective study, where 68 patients with UUTUC were submitted to template-based lymphadenectomy. Another retrospective study by the same Japanese group, showed that 5-year cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the complete lymphadenectomy group than in the incomplete lymphadenectomy or without lymphadenectomy groups. Tanaka N et al. reported recurrence rate after nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy at 1 and 3 years were 18.9 and 29.8 %, respectively. Hypothesis: Complete lymphadenectomy during nephroureterectomy because of invasive urothelial carcinoma may reduce the incidence of lymph nodes metastasis, local recurrence, distant metastasis and improve the cancer survival rate. Purpose: To evaluate the influence of complete lymphadenectomy on recurrence and cancer specific survival rate compared to limited or no lymphadenectomy. Primary endpoint/analysis: Recurrence free survival at five-year postoperative. Secondary endpoints: Incidence of lymph node metastases, local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, cancer specific and overall survival at one, three and five-year postoperative. Complications rate according to Clavien classification within the first thirty days postoperatively. Another endpoint/analysis: Multivariate analysis of possible preoperative risk factors for lymph node metastases (tumour size, preoperative urinary cytology, lymph node enlargement on CT, PET-CT positivity) and postoperative risk factors for lymph node metastases (stage, grade, tumour diameter, presence of necrosis in the tumour (none; <10%; >10% of total tumour area), number of lymph nodes excised). Design: Prospectively randomized to template based lymphadenectomy or not, in patients with clinically muscle-invasive UUTUC in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter. One to one, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, 183 patients in each group. Group A will be scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy except for clinically enlarged. Group B will be scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ureteral Neoplasms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
366 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Nephroureterektomy
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
scheduled to receive routine standard open or robot assisted nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy
Arm Title
Nephroureterektomy + Lymphadenectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
scheduled to received mapped lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Lymphadenectomy in conjugation with nephroureterectomy
Intervention Description
Lymphadenectomy (intervention group only): Lymphadenectomy performs in four fractions on the right side and two fractions on the left side according to Dissection template (Appendix 1). Renal hilar nodes are included in fraction 1 and 3, respectively.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy
Intervention Description
Removing the kidney, ureter and bladder cuff
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence free survival
Time Frame
Five years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of metastasis
Time Frame
Five years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Complications
Time Frame
Within 30 days after operations

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age above 18 years Locally advanced high grade urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter (Clinical stage > T1) Patient with ECOG performance score of 2 and less. Able to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Clinical suspicion of non-muscle invasive UUTUC Metastatic urothelial carcinoma for the renal pelvis or upper 2/3 of the ureter Inability to understand written consent forms or give consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Nessn H Azawi, MB.Ch.B.
Phone
004526393034
Email
nesa@regionsjaelland.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jørgen B Jensen, MD, DMSc.
Email
jb@skejby.net
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nessn H Azawi, MB.Ch.B.
Organizational Affiliation
Roskilde University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Roskilde Hospital
City
Roskilde
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nessn H. Azawi, M.D.
Phone
004526393034
Email
nesa@regionsjaelland.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nessn Azawi, M.D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16406872
Citation
Holmang S, Johansson SL. Bilateral metachronous ureteral and renal pelvic carcinomas: incidence, clinical presentation, histopathology, treatment and outcome. J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):69-72; discussion 72-3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00057-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9763077
Citation
Hall MC, Womack S, Sagalowsky AI, Carmody T, Erickstad MD, Roehrborn CG. Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-year experience in 252 patients. Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00295-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15577672
Citation
Olgac S, Mazumdar M, Dalbagni G, Reuter VE. Urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a clinicopathologic study of 130 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Dec;28(12):1545-52. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200412000-00001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19864000
Citation
Lughezzani G, Jeldres C, Isbarn H, Shariat SF, Sun M, Pharand D, Widmer H, Arjane P, Graefen M, Montorsi F, Perrotte P, Karakiewicz PI. A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1296. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17320661
Citation
Kondo T, Nakazawa H, Ito F, Hashimoto Y, Toma H, Tanabe K. Primary site and incidence of lymph node metastases in urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract. Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25271269
Citation
Kondo T, Hara I, Takagi T, Kodama Y, Hashimoto Y, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Omae K, Ikezawa E, Yoshida K, Tanabe K. Possible role of template-based lymphadenectomy in reducing the risk of regional node recurrence after nephroureterectomy in patients with renal pelvic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;44(12):1233-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu151. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24217788
Citation
Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Kobayashi H, Ide H, Miyazaki Y, Obata J, Hoshino K, Shirotake S, Akita H, Kosaka T, Miyajima A, Momma T, Nakagawa K, Hasegawa S, Nakajima Y, Jinzaki M, Oya M. Metastatic behavior of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: association with primary tumor location. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):1038-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3349-z. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15273542
Citation
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Lymphadenectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs