search
Back to results

Magnetic Nanoparticle Thermoablation-Retention and Maintenance in the Prostate:A Phase 0 Study in Men (MAGNABLATE I)

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Magnetic Nanoparticle Injection
Sponsored by
University College London Hospitals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Prostate Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer
  2. Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
  3. Patients giving informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have taken any form of hormones (except 5-alpha reductase inhibitors) within the last 6 months
  2. Unable to have MRI scan or CT scan, or in whom artefact would reduce scan quality
  3. Unable to have general or regional anaesthesia
  4. Patients on immunosuppression or predefined immunosuppressed state
  5. Patients with a coagulopathy predisposing to bleeding to clot formation
  6. Patients with an inherited or acquired condition limiting metabolism of iron
  7. Unable to give informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • University College London Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Magnetic Nanoparticle Injection

Arm Description

Patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy or prostatectomy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
1.1 dose escalation safety trial of magnetic nanoparticles injected into the prostates of patients prior to cystoprostatectomy. 1.2 a dose escalation safety trial of magnetic nanoparticles injected into the prostates of patients prior to prostatectomy. 1.3 ex-vivo prostates with a special marker to determine the retention and distribution of the magnetic nanoparticles in relation to the intended target area at time of injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

The anatomical distribution of magnetic nanoparticles
2.1 anatomical distribution of magnetic nanoparticles compared with injection site in prostate assessed by both Perls' staining and postoperative imaging (MRIand CT) of the ex vivo tissue

Full Information

First Posted
January 6, 2014
Last Updated
May 8, 2017
Sponsor
University College London Hospitals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02033447
Brief Title
Magnetic Nanoparticle Thermoablation-Retention and Maintenance in the Prostate:A Phase 0 Study in Men
Acronym
MAGNABLATE I
Official Title
Magnetic Nanoparticle Thermoablation-Retention and Maintenance in the Prostate:A Phase 0 Study in Men
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University College London Hospitals

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Men with early prostate cancer face a number of options which lie at the extremes of care. On one hand, active surveillance involves monitoring the disease and on the other, immediate treatment involves surgery or radiotherapy. The difference between these two strategies in terms of reducing the chance of a man dying from his disease is small. Not only is the benefit small, surgery or radiotherapy carry significant side-effects. These occur because of damage to surrounding tissue resulting in incontinence of urine (1 in 5), erectile dysfunction (1 in 2) and back-passage bleeding, diarrhoea or discomfort (1 in 10). The investigators have been working on new forms of treatment that use heat, light or cold to destroy tissue and minimise treatment-related harms. The investigators have not yet found one that delivers the ideal treatment. The ideal treatment is one that can be done under local anaesthetic, can effectively destroy areas of cancer, limit damage to surrounding tissues, is repeatable, and adaptable to future discoveries such as molecular targeting of cancer cells. The investigators think magnetic thermoablation may be able to deliver on these ideal attributes. Magnetic thermoablation involves injecting magnetic iron nanoparticles directly into the cancer. When a magnetic field is applied close to them, these nanoparticles heat up to very high temperatures that kill cells. Magnetic thermoablation does not use x-rays or surgical incisions. The investigators have done a lot of the preclinical work already to develop this type of treatment. The investigators now need to develop a system that can be used to treat prostate cancer. However, before the investigators can do this, they need to test whether the magnetic nanoparticles actually stay where they are injected. The consequences of them moving to areas that they should not can be serious. First, the nanoparticles could move away from the cancer which means the cancer will not be heated effectively. Second, the nanoparticles could move to sensitive structures around the prostate (back-passage, bladder, sphincter muscle controlling urine flow, nerves controlling erections). If this happens, damage of those sensitive structures could occur leading to side-effects. The investigators propose a study to try and find out what happens to those nanoparticles. The study will involve approaching men who are having their prostates removed by radical surgery. If these patients agree to participate, the investigators will inject their prostate with varying amounts of nanoparticles. The investigators will NOT heat them up. The investigators will use special scans and, once they have had their surgery, to look at the pathology specimens to see where the nanoparticles have gone. The actual nanoparticles are not harmful but the process of injection can carry a small amount of harm. If the nanoparticles stay where they are injected, the investigators will then be able to run another study in which we treat men who have prostate cancer with magnetic thermoablation.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY 1.1 To conduct a dose escalation safety trial of magnetic nanoparticles injected into the prostates of men prior to cystoprostatectomy. 1.2 To conduct a dose escalation safety trial of magnetic nanoparticles injected into the prostates of men prior to prostatectomy. 1.3 To evaluate ex-vivo prostates with a special marker to determine the retention and distribution of the magnetic nanoparticles in relation to the intended target area at time of injection SECONDARY 2.1 To evaluate the anatomical distribution of magnetic nanoparticles compared with injection site in prostate assessed by both Perls' staining and postoperative imaging (MRI and CT) of the ex vivo tissue

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
Prostate Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
12 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Magnetic Nanoparticle Injection
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy or prostatectomy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic Nanoparticle Injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Description
1.1 dose escalation safety trial of magnetic nanoparticles injected into the prostates of patients prior to cystoprostatectomy. 1.2 a dose escalation safety trial of magnetic nanoparticles injected into the prostates of patients prior to prostatectomy. 1.3 ex-vivo prostates with a special marker to determine the retention and distribution of the magnetic nanoparticles in relation to the intended target area at time of injection
Time Frame
outcome measures assessed every month and presented at 12 months for the primary end points
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The anatomical distribution of magnetic nanoparticles
Description
2.1 anatomical distribution of magnetic nanoparticles compared with injection site in prostate assessed by both Perls' staining and postoperative imaging (MRIand CT) of the ex vivo tissue
Time Frame
every month will be assessed and presented at 12 months for the secondary end points

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Patients giving informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Have taken any form of hormones (except 5-alpha reductase inhibitors) within the last 6 months Unable to have MRI scan or CT scan, or in whom artefact would reduce scan quality Unable to have general or regional anaesthesia Patients on immunosuppression or predefined immunosuppressed state Patients with a coagulopathy predisposing to bleeding to clot formation Patients with an inherited or acquired condition limiting metabolism of iron Unable to give informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hashim Ahmed, MbChB, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
MRC Clinical Scientist
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University College London Hospital
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
NW1 2BU
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Magnetic Nanoparticle Thermoablation-Retention and Maintenance in the Prostate:A Phase 0 Study in Men

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs