Manual Therapy and Strengthening for the Hip in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain (MASH)
Primary Purpose
Chronic Low-back Pain, Hip Impairments, Hip-spine Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hip-focused rehabilitation intervention
Spine-focused rehabilitation intervention
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Low-back Pain focused on measuring older adult, geriatrics, chronic low back pain, low back pain, hip-spine, rehabilitation, physical therapy, spine, hip pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- LBP duration ≥ 3 months
- LBP an ongoing problem for at least half days in past 6 months
- LBP intensity > 3 on scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
- Classified into the "weak+painful" hip-spine subgroup based on two criterion. Participants must have: 1) hip internal rotation strength (normalized to body weight) in at least one hip that is < 0.26; and, 2) from the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Pain items P4-P8, a raw score sum of >5 (0-20 range, where higher scores indicate more pain interference with daily activities).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous hip fracture with surgical repair
- Previous hip fracture without surgical repair within the past 15 years
- Total hip replacement
- Known spinal pathology other than osteoarthritis (e.g. recent back surgery, vertebral fractures in the past year, rheumatoid arthritis, metastases)
- Non-ambulatory or severely impairment mobility (i.e. requires wheelchair)
- Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score of < 24, indicating cognitive impairment
- Severe visual or hearing impairment
- Unable to read or speak English
- Red flags indicative of serious disorder underlying LBP (e.g. fever associated with LBP, significant unintentional weight loss > 10 pounds, pain that awakes or keeps one awake at night)
- Significant pain the legs greater than the back
- Acute illness (e.g. hospitalization within the past 3 months or current infection)
- Inability to participate in study for the full six months for any known reason
- Received physical therapy for low back or hip within the last 3 months
Sites / Locations
- University of Delaware
- Duke University
- University of Pittsburgh
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Hip-focused
Spine-focused
Arm Description
Hip-focused rehabilitation intervention
Spine-focused rehabilitation intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses limitations in daily activities due to back pain. Scores can range from 0-100% with higher scores indicating greater back pain-related disability.
10-Meter Walk Test at Self-Selected Speed (10MWT)
A performance test where participants walk along a linear pathway at their 'usual pace' for three trials. Average self-selected gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses limitations in daily activities due to back pain. Scores can range from 0-100% with higher scores indicating greater back pain-related disability.
10-Meter Walk Test at Fast Speed (10MWT)
A performance test where participants walk along a linear pathway 'as quickly as possible', for three trials. Average fast gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
A 9-item questionnaire that assesses the presence/absence of depressive symptoms
Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LOBACS)
A 15-item questionnaire that measures a person's confidence in their ability to perform different activities, including carrying, pushing, sitting, walking, and exercising, which may be directly affected by low back pain.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
A 13-item questionnaire that that assesses how a person perceives pain. Items can be scored as three subscales to evaluate constructs of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing.
Quantitative Sensory Testing
A test where the assessor uses an algometer to measure pressure pain sensitivity at 4 sites: upper trapezius, posterior superior iliac spine, greater trochanter, and tibialis anterior; higher values indicate higher pain thresholds
Timed Up-and-Go (TUG)
A performance test where participants rise from a chair, walk 3 meters at their regular pace, and return to a seated position in the same chair. One practice trial is performed followed by three timed trials; performance times are averaged. Greater times indicate worse physical function.
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
A performance test where participants are asked to walk as far as they can in six minutes around a continuous track. Greater distances (in meters) indicate better mobility and exercise tolerance.
Movement-evoked Pain from the 6MWT
Participant self-reports pain intensity using the Numeric Rating of Pain Scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable) before, during (1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 4, minutes, and 5 minutes into the test), and after (at 6 minutes) the 6MWT. The change in pain intensity (0-10 points) from beginning to end of the performance test is calculated.
30 Second Chair Stand Test
A performance test where participants perform as many sit-to-stands as possible in 30 seconds while their arms are folded across their chest. The number of stands are counted.
Movement-evoked Pain from the 30 Second Chair Stand Test
Participant self-reports pain intensity using the Numeric Rating of Pain Scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable) before, during (10 seconds and 20 seconds into the test), and after (at 30 seconds) the 30 Second Chair Stand Test. The change in pain intensity (0-10) from beginning to end of the performance test is calculated.
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
A 40-item questionnaire that contains five domains (pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, sport and recreation function, and hip-related quality of life). Higher scores indicate lower hip-related disability.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29
A 29-item short form questionnaire developed by the National Institutes of Health that assesses the following domains of health-related quality of life: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, and pain intensity. Higher scores indicate better greater presence of each outcome.
Hip Strength
A series of strength testing measurements will be conducted using a hand-held dynamometer. All participant and examiner body positions are standardized using study protocols, and measurement locations are standardized using anatomical landmarks. Strength measurements are taken for the following hip motions: abduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation, and flexion.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04009837
First Posted
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 15, 2023
Sponsor
University of Delaware
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh, Duke University, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04009837
Brief Title
Manual Therapy and Strengthening for the Hip in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
Acronym
MASH
Official Title
Manual Therapy and Strengthening for the Hip in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain (MASH): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 3, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 3, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Delaware
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh, Duke University, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Older adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) are at a greater risk for disability, loss of independence, and lower quality of life. Experts agree that LBP is not a homogeneous condition, and treatments should differ based upon clinical presentation. One particular subgroup of older adults with chronic LBP are those that also have hip pain and muscle weakness; in addition, many of these individuals have limited and painful movement of the lumbar spine. Our past work indicates that all of these hip and lumbar spine impairments may contribute to worse physical function and greater disability, but the relative importance of each impairment is unclear. Thus, clinicians have limited evidence to draw on for treatment decisions, for this patient population. This randomized clinical trial is designed to explore two different interventions: one that addresses these hip issues (hip-focused) and one that focuses more directly on the lumbar spine (spine-focused). We aim to recruit a sample of 180 older adults who have chronic LBP, as well as hip impairments (i.e. pain and muscle weakness). To ensure our findings are generalizable, the study will be conducted across three sites in different geographical regions: University of Delaware, University of Pittsburgh, and Duke University.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Low-back Pain, Hip Impairments, Hip-spine Syndrome, Osteoarthritis
Keywords
older adult, geriatrics, chronic low back pain, low back pain, hip-spine, rehabilitation, physical therapy, spine, hip pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
184 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Hip-focused
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Hip-focused rehabilitation intervention
Arm Title
Spine-focused
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Spine-focused rehabilitation intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Hip-focused rehabilitation intervention
Intervention Description
The hip-focused intervention includes a blend of hip-focused rehabilitative techniques and some basic lumbar spine-directed techniques. The hip-focused arm includes tailored manual therapy, progressive strengthening exercises, and flexibility exercises for the hip, as well as spinal flexibility and trunk muscle training exercises. The intervention will be delivered by licensed physical therapists in one-hour sessions, twice per week, for 8 weeks.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Spine-focused rehabilitation intervention
Intervention Description
The spine-focused rehabilitation intervention is a direct and comprehensive lumbar spine rehabilitative program, but it does not include hip treatment. The spine-focused arm includes spinal manual therapy, spinal flexibility exercises, and trunk muscle training exercises. The intervention will be delivered by licensed physical therapists in one-hour sessions, twice per week, for 8 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
Description
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses limitations in daily activities due to back pain. Scores can range from 0-100% with higher scores indicating greater back pain-related disability.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention)
Title
10-Meter Walk Test at Self-Selected Speed (10MWT)
Description
A performance test where participants walk along a linear pathway at their 'usual pace' for three trials. Average self-selected gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
Description
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses limitations in daily activities due to back pain. Scores can range from 0-100% with higher scores indicating greater back pain-related disability.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6-months
Title
10-Meter Walk Test at Fast Speed (10MWT)
Description
A performance test where participants walk along a linear pathway 'as quickly as possible', for three trials. Average fast gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6-months
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Description
A 9-item questionnaire that assesses the presence/absence of depressive symptoms
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LOBACS)
Description
A 15-item questionnaire that measures a person's confidence in their ability to perform different activities, including carrying, pushing, sitting, walking, and exercising, which may be directly affected by low back pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Description
A 13-item questionnaire that that assesses how a person perceives pain. Items can be scored as three subscales to evaluate constructs of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Quantitative Sensory Testing
Description
A test where the assessor uses an algometer to measure pressure pain sensitivity at 4 sites: upper trapezius, posterior superior iliac spine, greater trochanter, and tibialis anterior; higher values indicate higher pain thresholds
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Timed Up-and-Go (TUG)
Description
A performance test where participants rise from a chair, walk 3 meters at their regular pace, and return to a seated position in the same chair. One practice trial is performed followed by three timed trials; performance times are averaged. Greater times indicate worse physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Description
A performance test where participants are asked to walk as far as they can in six minutes around a continuous track. Greater distances (in meters) indicate better mobility and exercise tolerance.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Movement-evoked Pain from the 6MWT
Description
Participant self-reports pain intensity using the Numeric Rating of Pain Scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable) before, during (1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 4, minutes, and 5 minutes into the test), and after (at 6 minutes) the 6MWT. The change in pain intensity (0-10 points) from beginning to end of the performance test is calculated.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
30 Second Chair Stand Test
Description
A performance test where participants perform as many sit-to-stands as possible in 30 seconds while their arms are folded across their chest. The number of stands are counted.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Movement-evoked Pain from the 30 Second Chair Stand Test
Description
Participant self-reports pain intensity using the Numeric Rating of Pain Scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable) before, during (10 seconds and 20 seconds into the test), and after (at 30 seconds) the 30 Second Chair Stand Test. The change in pain intensity (0-10) from beginning to end of the performance test is calculated.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Description
A 40-item questionnaire that contains five domains (pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, sport and recreation function, and hip-related quality of life). Higher scores indicate lower hip-related disability.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29
Description
A 29-item short form questionnaire developed by the National Institutes of Health that assesses the following domains of health-related quality of life: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, and pain intensity. Higher scores indicate better greater presence of each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Title
Hip Strength
Description
A series of strength testing measurements will be conducted using a hand-held dynamometer. All participant and examiner body positions are standardized using study protocols, and measurement locations are standardized using anatomical landmarks. Strength measurements are taken for the following hip motions: abduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation, and flexion.
Time Frame
Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
LBP duration ≥ 3 months
LBP an ongoing problem for at least half days in past 6 months
LBP intensity > 3 on scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Classified into the "weak+painful" hip-spine subgroup based on two criterion. Participants must have: 1) hip internal rotation strength (normalized to body weight) in at least one hip that is < 0.26; and, 2) from the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Pain items P4-P8, a raw score sum of >5 (0-20 range, where higher scores indicate more pain interference with daily activities).
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous hip fracture with surgical repair
Previous hip fracture without surgical repair within the past 15 years
Total hip replacement
Known spinal pathology other than osteoarthritis (e.g. recent back surgery, vertebral fractures in the past year, rheumatoid arthritis, metastases)
Non-ambulatory or severely impairment mobility (i.e. requires wheelchair)
Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score of < 24, indicating cognitive impairment
Severe visual or hearing impairment
Unable to read or speak English
Red flags indicative of serious disorder underlying LBP (e.g. fever associated with LBP, significant unintentional weight loss > 10 pounds, pain that awakes or keeps one awake at night)
Significant pain the legs greater than the back
Acute illness (e.g. hospitalization within the past 3 months or current infection)
Inability to participate in study for the full six months for any known reason
Received physical therapy for low back or hip within the last 3 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gregory E Hicks, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Delaware
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Delaware
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27708
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15219
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34751784
Citation
Pugliese JM, Coyle PC, Knox PJ, Sions JM, Patterson CG, Pohlig RT, Simon CB, Weiner DK, George SZ, Piva S, Hicks GE. The Manual Therapy and Strengthening for the Hip (MASH) Trial: Protocol for a Multisite Randomized Trial of a Subgroup of Older Adults With Chronic Back and Hip Pain. Phys Ther. 2022 Jan 1;102(1):pzab255. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab255.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Manual Therapy and Strengthening for the Hip in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs