search
Back to results

MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

Primary Purpose

Palatal Expansion Technique, Cleft Lip and Palate, Class III Malocclusion

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rapid maxillary expansion
Maxillary Protraction
Sponsored by
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Palatal Expansion Technique focused on measuring palatal expansion technique, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Maxillary retroposition

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 13 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cleft lip and palate;
  • 6 to 13 years before orthodontic treatment, with sagittal deficiency of the facial middle third;
  • Angle Class III malocclusion, or mesial step of the deciduous second molars, and anterior crossbite;
  • ANB less than 0˚, Wits less than -2 mm and the distance from point A to the perpendicular nasion less than 0 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous orthodontic treatment;
  • Other craniofacial anomalies;
  • Inadequate maxillary denture for placement of a expander.

Sites / Locations

  • Pontifical Catholic University of Minas GeraisRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

MARPE

Hyrax

Arm Description

Maxillary expander anchored in mini-implants (MARPE)

Tooth-born anchored maxillary expanders, without mini-implants

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment).
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time.
Cone beam computed tomography will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).

Full Information

First Posted
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 15, 2020
Sponsor
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04354116
Brief Title
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
Official Title
Microimplant-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Appliance to Orthopedically Correct Midface Deficiency in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 10, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 10, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 10, 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this randomized controlled study will be to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask, associated with MARPE and Class III elastics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) with maxillary retrusion, compared to HYRAX type maxillary expanders. The investigators will examine differences in treatment times, along with skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes.
Detailed Description
The CONSORT statement will be used as a guide for this study. This work will be a parallel group study, randomized, with active control, with an allocation ratio of 1: 1. This study was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais. Participants will be recruited in the Master's Degree in Orthodontics at PUC Minas, based on inclusion criteria. Interventions: Palatal expanders of the HYRAX type, with bands on the first permanent molars or second deciduous molars will be used for patients in both groups. The hooks for the use of Class III elastics will be welded on the vestibular of the upper molar bands. In the experimental group, the expander will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants, in a technique known as rapid maxillary expansion assisted by mini-implants (MARPE). The control group will be active, with conventional dento-mucus-supported HYRAX expanders. All expanders will be manufactured by the same orthodontic technician. Both groups will be treated with maxillary protraction with a Petit-type face mask at night (12 hours a day). The direction of the elastics for the maxillary traction force will be between 15˚ to 30˚ below the occlusal plane, providing a force between 400 and 500 g per side. During the day (12 hours a day), patients will use a lower expansion plate with an occlusal stop, which will be activated once a week (0.25 mm), with hooks in the region of the lower canines for the use of Class III elastics. size 3/16 "(150g). The time-frame of the experiment will be 6 months. Results (primary and secondary) The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment). Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time. Conical beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Teleradiographies will be extracted from the CFFCs and cephalometric measurements will be obtained by the investigator (V.E.) using the Dolphin Image software (Austin, USA). Traditional cephalometric measurements will be used to describe the changes before and after treatment. Calculation of the sample size As no study in the orthodontic literature used the same protocol used in this study, the sample size will be estimated by G * Power (version 3.0.8), with 95% power; significance level of 5%; two-tailed. For point A, sagittal movements of 2.6 +/- 1.5 mm in the RME group and 5.8 +/- 2.3 mm in the RME group with constriction, a minimum sample size of 11 in each group will be necessary to detect a significant difference between groups. For ANS, sagittal movements of 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm in the RME group and 4.8 +/- 2.5 mm in the RME group with constriction, a minimum sample size of 16 in each group will be necessary to detect a significant difference between groups. Therefore, 16 will be the minimum sample size for each group. The sample size will be increased by 40%, resulting in 22 patients for each group, in case there is a withdrawal or the need to use a different protocol. Randomization (random number generation, allocation hiding, implementation) Patients will be recruited and allocated to the control group (RME) or the intervention group (MARPE) according to the sequence of participation. Simple randomization will be applied. Blinding The blinding of investigators or participants will not be possible because the expanders in the two groups will be different. Operators and patients will easily know which group they are in. However, blinding will be used during cephalometric analysis. All image exams will be hidden by opaque tape and replaced with research numbers and then mixed together before analysis. The investigator will not know the clustering of the CT scans, which will look similar. Statistical analysis (primary and secondary results, subgroup analyzes) All statistical analyzes will be performed using the software (version 18.0; PASW Statistics, Chicago, Illinois). Descriptive statistics will include the means and standard deviations of age, total treatment time, maxillary prostration time, cephalometric values and changes in values in each group. The 1-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to test the normality of distributions for all times and differences in cephalometric values. Independent t-tests will be used to compare the two groups, including total treatment time, protraction time and changes in cephalometric values; the t-tests will be used for the values that show "equality of variances not assumed" between the groups (SNA and Nasio perpendicular). The level of significance will be 0.05, with two-tailed test. Error of the Method All locations and measurements of the points will be checked twice carefully at the end of the initial plots and measurements. Not all images will be traced twice. However, to evaluate the tracing errors, 20 scans will be chosen at random. Plots, locations and measurements will be made twice, two weeks apart and then subjected to the Dahlberg formula. The error of the method will be determined by the Dahlberg formula, where n = 20 and d will be the difference between the measurements in 2 moments.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Palatal Expansion Technique, Cleft Lip and Palate, Class III Malocclusion, Skeletal Malocclusion
Keywords
palatal expansion technique, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Maxillary retroposition

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
44 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MARPE
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Maxillary expander anchored in mini-implants (MARPE)
Arm Title
Hyrax
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Tooth-born anchored maxillary expanders, without mini-implants
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Rapid maxillary expansion
Intervention Description
Palatal expanders of the HYRAX type, with bands on the first permanent molars will be used for patients in both groups. In the experimental group, the expander will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants, in a technique known as rapid maxillary expansion assisted by mini-implants (MARPE). The control active group will be with conventional HYRAX expanders. The maxillary expansion protocol will be once a day for 2 weeks.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Maxillary Protraction
Intervention Description
Protraction hooks will be projected around the upper canine area. In the experimental group (MARPE), the appliance will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants. The control active group will be anchored with conventional HYRAX expanders. Both groups will be treated with maxillary protraction with a Petit-type face mask at night (12 hours a day).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment).
Description
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time.
Description
Cone beam computed tomography will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with cleft lip and palate; 6 to 13 years before orthodontic treatment, with sagittal deficiency of the facial middle third; Angle Class III malocclusion, or mesial step of the deciduous second molars, and anterior crossbite; ANB less than 0˚, Wits less than -2 mm and the distance from point A to the perpendicular nasion less than 0 mm. Exclusion Criteria: Previous orthodontic treatment; Other craniofacial anomalies; Inadequate maxillary denture for placement of a expander.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Vitor Eto, DDS
Phone
55(31)99822-5804
Email
ildeu_andrade@yahoo.com.br
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ildeu Andrade Jr., PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais
City
Belo Horizonte
State/Province
MG
ZIP/Postal Code
30535-901
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ildeu Andrade Jr., PhD
Phone
3319-4416
Email
ildeu_andrade@yahoo.com.br

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs