search
Back to results

Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

Primary Purpose

Multiple Myeloma, Diagnosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Autologous transplantation
Sponsored by
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Myeloma focused on measuring Myeloma, Melphalan, Autologous transplantation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria included:

  • diagnosis of untreated Durie & Salmon stage IIA-IIIB measurable multiple myeloma;
  • age < 65 years.

Exclusion criteria included:

  • prior treatment for myeloma;
  • abnormal cardiac function, defined as systolic ejection fraction <50%;
  • abnormal pulmonary spirometry test;
  • serum bilirubins > 2.5 times normal and ALAT and/or ASAT > 2 times normal;
  • seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV, active non-hematologic malignancies.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Mel100

    Mel200

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Primary endpoints of the study were Overall Survival defined as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause; Progression Free Survival defined as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause or date of first relapse or progression.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Secondary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to relapse or death from progression.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    July 31, 2009
    Last Updated
    July 31, 2009
    Sponsor
    Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00950768
    Brief Title
    Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients
    Official Title
    GISMM2001: Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients: a Prospective, Multi-center Phase III Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2009
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 2002 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 2009 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 2009 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista

    4. Oversight

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    In this study will be randomised before induction treatment either to receive two courses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) or two courses of melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100). Informed consent will be obtained upon enrolment. Inclusion criteria included: diagnosis of untreated Durie e Salmon stage IIA-IIIB measurable multiple myeloma; age < 65 years. Exclusion criteria included: prior treatment for myeloma; abnormal cardiac function, defined as systolic ejection fraction <50%; abnormal pulmonary spirometry test; serum bilirubins > 2.5 times normal and ALAT and/or ASAT > 2 times normal; seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV, active non-hematologic malignancies. Induction therapy, PBSC mobilization, and autografting Initial treatment plan included induction chemotherapy with 2 courses of vincristine, 1 mg/m2 on day 1, adriamycin, 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and dexamethasone, 40mg/day days 1-4, administered 28 days apart, followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilisation and harvest after 1 or 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide, 4 g/m2, and G-CSF, 10 ug/kg given i.v. or subcutaneously. After at least one month from PBSC collection, autografting consisted of melphalan, 200 mg/m2 or melphalan, 100 mg/m2, on day -2, and cryopreserved PBSC infusion on day 0. Patients received G-CSF, 5 ug/kg, from days +3 until neutrophil count > 1000/ul were achieved. Supportive care and toxicity grading Following autografting, all patients received standard prophylaxis against bacterial and fungal infections; herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus reactivation; and Pneumocystis carinii. Cytomegalovirus CMV reactivation was monitored through levels of CMV antigenemia and/or serum CMV DNA levels and treated with ganciclovir or foscarnet as clinically indicated. Standard criteria (Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0) were used for grading hematological and non-hematological toxicity.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Multiple Myeloma, Diagnosis
    Keywords
    Myeloma, Melphalan, Autologous transplantation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    298 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Mel100
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Title
    Mel200
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Autologous transplantation
    Intervention Description
    Tandem autologous transplantation Melphalan 100 mg/m2 versus Melphalan 200 mg/m2
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Primary endpoints of the study were Overall Survival defined as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause; Progression Free Survival defined as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause or date of first relapse or progression.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Secondary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to relapse or death from progression.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion criteria included: diagnosis of untreated Durie & Salmon stage IIA-IIIB measurable multiple myeloma; age < 65 years. Exclusion criteria included: prior treatment for myeloma; abnormal cardiac function, defined as systolic ejection fraction <50%; abnormal pulmonary spirometry test; serum bilirubins > 2.5 times normal and ALAT and/or ASAT > 2 times normal; seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV, active non-hematologic malignancies.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Mario Boccadoro, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Division of Hematology - University of Torino - A.O.U. San Giovanni Battista
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    19965659
    Citation
    Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Bruno B, Falcone AP, Liberati AM, Grasso M, Ria R, Pisani F, Cangialosi C, Caravita T, Levi A, Meloni G, Nozza A, Pregno P, Gabbas A, Callea V, Rizzo M, Annino L, De Stefano V, Musto P, Baldi I, Cavallo F, Petrucci MT, Massaia M, Boccadoro M. Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study. Blood. 2010 Mar 11;115(10):1873-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241737. Epub 2009 Dec 1. Erratum In: Blood. 2010 Sep 23;116(12):2195.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs